Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The techniques of anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi and the associated complications in 600 treatments with the second generation lithotriptor Siemens Lithostar were studied. General anesthesia was used in 17 treatments (2.8%) and epidural anesthesia was applied in 73 (12%), primarily in children and patients in need of simultaneous surgical auxiliary procedures. A total of 510 treatments (85%) was performed with a combination of local infiltration anesthesia and supplementary intravenous opiates. In 65% of the cases only 2 injections of opiates were sufficient for pain relief. There were no complications in 394 treatments (77%) and minor complications, such as arrhythmia (9.2%) and nausea/vomiting (7.6%), were easily treated. Respiratory depression was observed in 10 cases (2%) and this potentially dangerous complication was associated with simultaneous administration of opiates and midazolam. Only 9 treatments (1.8%) had to be terminated due to complications. It is concluded that most treatments of urinary calculi with this second generation extracorporeal shock wave lithotriptor can be performed with local infiltration anesthesia combined with supplementary short-acting opiates intravenously for pain relief and sedation. When administering supplementary midazolam for sedation the risk of respiratory depression should be considered.
 ...
PMID:Anesthesia and complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi. 150 23

We analyzed the predictive value of a number of demographic and anesthesiological variables with respect to the three most common complications during spinal anesthesia: hypotension, bradycardia, and nausea. A stepwise logistic regression model was created, using data from a prospective study of 1752 patients to combine the predictive value of all entry variables. The highest risk factors for hypotension were: age greater than or equal to 50, a sensory level above Th6, receiving bupivacaine as a local anesthetic, body mass index greater than or equal to 30, and receiving opiate as a premedication. An anesthetic level above Th6 and age below 50 were primarily associated with bradycardia. Females and those with a high sensory level or receiving opiate as a premedication were at significant risk of nausea. The model was also reliably predictive for a separate group of 200 consecutive spinal anesthesia patients. Thus, the risk model may be clinically useful in identifying high-risk patients requiring additional attention.
 ...
PMID:A regression model for identifying patients at high risk of hypotension, bradycardia and nausea during spinal anesthesia. 151 41

Several studies comparing retrobulbar block (RB) and general anaesthesia (GA) for cataract surgery in the elderly have been published. Most of them were retrospective. Our prospective study was designed in order to determine the benefits or disadvantages using RB or GA. Arterial blood gases (ABG) and cardiovascular stability were explored in high-risk patients undergoing elective unilateral cataract extraction. METHODS. Forty patients over 65 years of age and with other co-existing diseases (ASA III-IV) were allocated randomly to receive either GA or RB. No premedication was given to either group of patients. On arrival in the anaesthetic room, a radial artery was cannulated for collection of blood samples and direct monitoring of the blood pressure. Pulse oximetry and ECG were continuously monitored in all patients, the end-expiratory CO2 (F(eexCO2)) only in the GA group. GA was induced with vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg and thiopentone 5 mg/kg; the lungs were ventilated with 100% oxygen. After intubation of the trachea controlled mechanical ventilation was continued with N2O/O2 (55:45) and enflurane 1%-2%. Only enflurane concentrations were varied to correct changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) if these exceeded +/- 20%. Respiratory frequency and tidal volume were kept constant until completion of surgery. The patients were extubated when they were able to ventilate more than 5 1/min (pressure support 10 cmH2O; PEEP 5 cmH2O). After extubation no O2 was given. In the RB group neural block was undertaken with prilocaine 2% (3 ml) as a retrobulbar injection and prilocaine 1% (5 ml) to block the facial innervation of the orbicularis muscle (Van Lint, O'Brien). Oxygen 3 1/min was administered by nasal tube during the operation. Nine arterial samples for blood gas analysis were collected: (1) control; (2) before operation; (3) 5 min after beginning the operation; (4) 15 min after beginning the operation and before i.v. administration of 500 mg acetazolamide over 5 min; (5) after acetazolamide; (6 and 7) 10 and 20 min after acetazolamide; and (8 and 9) 15 and 30 min after operation (RB) or extubation (GA). RESULTS. The patient demography, including duration of anaesthesia and operation, was similar in both groups (Table 1). Four patients in the GA group (2 needed O2 after extubation because of hypoxaemia) and 2 in the RB group were excluded. No significant differences were seen in base excess (BE) and standard bicarbonate (SHCO3). Arterial O2 tension, arterial O2 saturation, and pulse-oximetric O2 saturation were higher in the RB group intra- and postoperatively (Figs. 1, 3, 4). Arterial CO2 tension (PaCO2) was significantly higher in the GA group during the pre- and postoperative period (Fig. 2), but not during the operation. The PaCO2- F(eexCO2) gradient ranged between 5 and 9 mmHg. Administration of acetazolamide did not influence this gradient by regressive analysis. The postoperative outcome of the patients was comparable in both groups. Nausea or vomiting did not occur. MAP was significantly higher in the RB group during the operation. No significant differences were seen in the pre- and postoperative period. Heart rate in the GA group was higher only after extubation, but was within physiological limits. DISCUSSION. Despite the differing results between the two groups, our study showed no important advantage related to either RB or GA. Changes in ABG, MAP, and heart rate during the investigation period were within physiological limits in elderly patients. Intravenous acetazolamide did not influence ABG in a significant manner. With regard to the preference of each patient, we recommend both RB and GA for cataract surgery in high-risk patients on the assumption of sufficient preoperative treatment of co-existing diseases. In conclusion, cardiovascular and ABG stability were maintained during both anaesthetic techniques.
 ...
PMID:[General anesthesia vs. retrobulbar anesthesia in cataract surgery. A randomized comparison of patients at risk]. 152 60

The low solubility of desflurane contributes to rapid emergence after outpatient anesthesia. Compared with isoflurane, recovery times to eye opening, response to verbal commands, and orientation to person, place, and time have been significantly shorter. Even when compared with the rapid, short-acting intravenous anesthetic propofol for induction and maintenance of outpatient anesthesia, desflurane displayed more favorable early recovery characteristics. Although patients receiving desflurane are less sedated in the early postoperative period than those receiving propofol, times to ambulation and discharge were similar. The direct "antiemetic" activity of propofol may have contributed to a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and emesis versus desflurane. Finally, the effects of desflurane, isoflurane, and propofol on postoperative psychomotor (e.g., Trieger test, choice reaction time) and cognitive (e.g., digit-symbol substitution test, critical flicker fusion test) function are remarkably similar. Given its favorable early recovery profile, desflurane would appear to be a useful alternative to both isoflurane and propofol for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia. As desflurane is pungent and possesses respiratory irritant properties, propofol will likely remain the induction agent of choice in the outpatient setting. In conclusion, desflurane appears to have few adverse effects on recovery after ambulatory surgery, but nausea and emesis were lower with propofol. Desflurane's relative ease of administration versus propofol may be an important determinant of its future role in outpatient anesthesia.
 ...
PMID:Studies of desflurane in outpatient anesthesia. 152 40

This study was undertaken to compare desflurane with propofol anesthesia in outpatients undergoing peripheral orthopedic surgery. Data were combined from two institutions participating in a multicenter study. Ninety-one patients, ASA physical status I or II, were each randomly assigned to one of four groups. After administration of fentanyl (2 micrograms/kg) and d-tubocurarine (3 mg), intravenous propofol was administered to induce anesthesia in groups I and II and desflurane in groups III and IV. Maintenance was provided by desflurane/N2O in groups I and III, propofol/N2O in group II, and desflurane/O2 in group IV. Emergence and recovery variables, psychometric test results, and side effects were recorded by observers unaware of the experimental treatment. Patients in group II experienced less nausea than other groups (P = 0.002) despite this group having required more intraoperative fentanyl supplementation than groups III and IV (P = 0.01). Time to emergence, discharge, and psychometric test results were similar in all groups. Desflurane appears to be comparable with propofol as an outpatient anesthetic, facilitating rapid recovery and discharge home.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of desflurane with propofol in outpatients undergoing peripheral orthopedic surgery. 153 Jan 70

The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and requirements for anti-emetic medication were assessed in 80 female patients undergoing day-case anaesthesia during assisted conception therapy. Anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 50 micrograms.kg-1 and propofol 1 mg.kg-1; atracurium 0.5 mg.kg-1 was given to facilitate tracheal intubation. The patients were allocated to receive either total intravenous maintenance of anaesthesia with an infusion of propofol and increments of alfentanil (Group P) or inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia with nitrous oxide and enflurane (Group E). Postoperative nausea, retching, vomiting, requirements for anti-emetic therapy, and unplanned admission for overnight stay in hospital were recorded. Overall incidence of nausea was 64% in group E and 39% in Group P (P less than 0.05). Incidence of vomiting was 67% in Group E and 34% in Group P (P less than 0.05). Metoclopramide was requested by 62% of patients in Group E, and 32% of those in Group P (P less than 0.05); 21% of the patients in Group E were admitted to hospital overnight, while only 5% of the patients in Group P required unscheduled admission to hospital (P less than 0.05). We conclude that total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil is superior to inhalational maintenance with nitrous oxide and enflurane in that it is associated with less nausea and vomiting, less requirement for anti-emetic medication, and a lower probability of unplanned admission to hospital after day-care gynaecological surgery.
 ...
PMID:Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil protects against postoperative nausea and vomiting. 153 Nov 18

We studied 114 female patients (ASA 1 or 2) who were within 20% of ideal body weight and who were scheduled to undergo gynaecological laparoscopy which required supplementation with an opioid (groups IA and PA), or dental procedures which did not require opioid supplementation (groups IO and PO). A computerised package of psychomotor tests was performed before surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 and all patients received atracurium 0.3 mg.kg-1 and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Patients in group IA received isoflurane 1% (inspired), and alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1 as a bolus and 10 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 as an infusion. Patients in group PA received propofol 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 as an infusion, decreasing to 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 after 15 min, together with alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1.h-1. Patients in groups IO and PO received isoflurane and propofol in the regimens described for groups IA and PA, but without alfentanil. Recovery was assessed by a blinded observer who recorded times to awakening (eye opening) and orientation (giving date of birth), and who repeated the psychomotor tests at 1, 3 and 5 h. Linear analogue scales of mood, nausea and pain were obtained and other side effects were noted in the succeeding 48 h. A matched control group of 25 females (who were not anaesthetised) underwent psychomotor testing on four occasions in order to assess the 'learning effect' of repeated recovery testing. The analysis of recovery tests did not assume a normal distribution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Anaesthesia 1992 Jun
PMID:Recovery characteristics using isoflurane or propofol for maintenance of anaesthesia: a double-blind controlled trial. 837 80

Hypnosis has proven to be extremely valuable in the treatment of cancer patients. Specific applications include: establishing rapport between the patient and members of the medical health team; control of pain with self-regulation of pain perception through the use of glove anesthesia, time distortion, amnesia, transference of pain to a different body part, or dissociation of the painful part from the rest of the body; controlling symptoms, such as, nausea, anticipatory emesis, learned food aversions, etc.; psychotherapy for anxiety, depression, guilt, anger, hostility, frustration, isolation, and a diminished sense of self-esteem; visualization for health improvement; and, dealing with death anxiety and other related issues. Hypnosis has unique advantages for patients including improvement of self-esteem, involvement in self-care, return of locus of control, lack of unpleasant side effects, and continued efficacy despite continued use.
 ...
PMID:The use of hypnosis with cancer patients. 154 47

Epidural fentanyl is often added to epidural local anaesthetic agents to improve the quality of anaesthesia obtained during Caesarean section. Fentanyl may be given either before or after delivery of the infant. When given before delivery, fentanyl has not been reported to cause neonatal depression, although this remains a concern. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was undertaken to determine if fentanyl was more effective if given before or after delivery of the baby in 64 women undergoing Caesarean section under lidocaine epidural anaesthesia. Maternal outcome was determined by time to achieve T4 neural blockade, the dose of lidocaine necessary to achieve this block and intraoperative scores for pain, nausea, vomiting, shivering, and sedation. Neonates were assessed by umbilical arterial blood pH and Apgar scores. No differences were detected in either group with respect to maternal or neonatal outcome. We recommend using only epidural local anaesthetic agents before delivery, and giving epidural fentanyl following delivery of the infant.
 ...
PMID:Epidural fentanyl and caesarean section: when should fentanyl be given? 840 64

Earlier studies have suggested that epidural fentanyl improves intraoperative analgesia during cesarean section, but others have suggested that it worsens postoperative analgesia from epidural morphine. The purpose of this study was to determine whether epidural fentanyl given before epidural morphine improves the quality of intraoperative epidural anesthesia without worsening postoperative analgesia provided by epidural morphine. Sixty patients having epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery were studied. Epidural anesthesia was established using 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 5 micrograms/mL. After delivery, either fentanyl 100 micrograms/10 mL or normal saline-control 10 mL was injected through the epidural catheter in a randomized, double-blind manner. All patients received 3.5 mg of morphine epidurally after uterine repair. After administration of the epidural study drug, there were no significant differences in the pain responses during surgery between the two groups. Patients in the fentanyl group experienced significantly less nausea and vomiting between delivery and the end of surgery than did patients in the normal saline-control group (P = 0.013). Postoperatively, visual analogue scale scores for pain, pruritus, nausea, and sedation were similar at 1, 2, 4, and 8 h in the two groups. We conclude that fentanyl 100 micrograms administered epidurally during cesarean delivery did not improve intraoperative analgesia, but significantly reduced intraoperative nausea and vomiting without diminishing the efficacy of postoperative analgesia provided by epidural morphine.
 ...
PMID:Does epidural fentanyl decrease the efficacy of epidural morphine after cesarean delivery? 156 32


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>