Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (
nausea
)
23,468
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The efficacy and tolerability of oral sumatriptan (Imitrex tablets) were assessed in 187 migraineurs enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. In the clinic, patients received oral sumatriptan 25 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg, or placebo, for the treatment of a migraine attack. The results demonstrate that by 2 hours postdose, 52 to 57% of patients treated with sumatriptan 25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg compared with 17% of patients treated with placebo achieved relief of headache (p < 0.05 for each sumatriptan group vs placebo). By 4 hours postdose, 65 to 78% of sumatriptan-treated patients compared with 19% of placebo-treated patients achieved relief of headache (p < 0.05 for each sumatriptan group vs placebo). Oral sumatriptan also effectively relieved
nausea
and
photophobia
and improved clinical disability. No serious or unusual adverse events were reported, and the pattern and incidence of adverse events did not vary among the sumatriptan doses. Each dose--25 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg--of sumatriptan was effective and generally well tolerated.
...
PMID:Oral sumatriptan is effective and well tolerated for the acute treatment of migraine: results of a multicenter study. 764 79
This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of oral sumatriptan (Imitrex tablets) in 259 migraineurs. In the clinic, patients received oral sumatriptan 25 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg, or placebo for the treatment of a migraine attack. The results indicate that by 2 hours post-dose, 50 to 56% of patients treated with any of the three doses, compared with 26% of patients treated with placebo, achieved relief of headache (p < 0.05 for each sumatriptan group vs placebo). By 4 hours postdose, 68 to 71% of sumatriptan-treated patients, compared with 38% of placebo-treated patients, achieved relief of headache (p < 0.05 for each sumatriptan group vs placebo). Oral sumatriptan was similarly effective at relieving
nausea
and
photophobia
and at reducing clinical disability. The pattern and incidence of adverse events did not differ between treatment groups. All doses--25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg--of sumatriptan were effective and generally well tolerated. Dosing should be individualized according to the needs of the patient.
...
PMID:Oral sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: evaluation of three dosage strengths. 764 82
Two hundred and thirty migraineurs diagnosed by their general practitioners in accordance with their usual practice were included. The patients treated two migraine attacks at home by subcutaneous injection of sumatriptan or placebo and the alternative medication for the second attack (cross-over). When sumatriptan was compared to placebo, significantly more of the 209 evaluable patients reported headache relief at one hour (56% v 8%, p < 0.001) and two hours (62% v 15%, p < 0.001) after the first injection. Resolution of
nausea
,
photophobia
and phonophobia was significantly more common in patients on sumatriptan than on placebo (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The adverse events were usually transient and of mild or moderate severity, although, three patients withdrew due to adverse events. Ninety-five percent of patients evaluated by a neurological research fellow met the International Headache Society's criteria for migraine. In general practice, sumatriptan taken subcutaneously using an autoinjector at home was an effective and well tolerated acute treatment for migraine.
...
PMID:[Sumatriptan treatment of migraine in general practice. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study]. 765 70
Migraine is an episodic headache disorder associated with various combinations of neurologic, gastrointestinal, and autonomic symptoms. Gastrointestinal disturbances including
nausea
, vomiting, abdominal cramps, or diarrhea are almost universal. Sensory hyperexcitability manifested by
photophobia
, phonophobia, and osmophobia are frequently experienced. Other symptoms include blurry vision, nasal stuffiness, tenesmus, polyuria, pallor, and sweating. Our telephone interview survey of 500 self-reported migraine sufferers was performed in 1994. The most common reported symptoms associated with migraine were pain,
nausea
, problems with vision, and vomiting.
Nausea
occurred in more than 90% of all migraineurs; nearly one third of these experienced
nausea
during every attack. Vomiting occurred in almost 70% of all migraineurs; nearly one third of these vomited in the majority of attacks. In those who experienced
nausea
, 30.5% indicated that it interfered with their ability to take their oral migraine medication; in those with vomiting, 42.2% indicated that it interfered with their ability to take their oral migraine medication. The most important features of a migraine medication were rapid and effective relief of headache pain, decreasing the likelihood of headache recurrence, and not causing
nausea
. Many migraine patients suffer needlessly because their nausea and vomiting are both unreported to, and unrecognized by physicians. The presence of these symptoms is crucial to diagnose migraine not accompanied by aura.
...
PMID:Migraine symptoms: results of a survey of self-reported migraineurs. 767 55
Seven hundred nineteen young patients attending 21 Italian headache care settings were evaluated by a diagnostic headache interview and a neurological examination. Headache disorders were classified according to the current 1988 criteria of the International Headache Society (IHS); 54.9% of the patients suffered from migraine, 33.9% from tension-type headache, 1.9% from secondary headache, and 3.4% had non-classifiable headache. A further 5.9% of the patients were not classified due to incomplete questionnaires. Of the 395 patients with migraine, 44.5% were affected by migraine without aura, 29.9% by migraine with aura, 1.3% from other migraine forms, and 24.3% by migrainous disorders which do not fulfill the 1988 IHS diagnostic criteria for headache. Among the 244 patients with tension-type headache, 51.6% had episodic tension-type headache, 15.2% chronic tension-type headache, and 33.2% headache of the tension-type which does not fulfill the 1988 IHS criteria for episodic and chronic tension-type headache. In young migraine patients, pain was of a pulsating type in 55.7%, severe in 57.8%, unilateral in 42.6%, and aggravated by routine physical activity in 38.9%. Tension-type headache was described as pressing in 73.8%, mild or moderate in 75.7%, bilateral in 87.4%, and not aggravated by routine physical activity in 85.5%. The duration of pain was less than 2 hours in 35% of the cases in migraine sufferers and less than 30 minutes in 26.7% of tension-type headache sufferers.
Nausea
, phonophobia, and
photophobia
were present in at least half of the migraine patients and in one third of tension-type headache patients, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Applicability of the 1988 IHS criteria to headache patients under the age of 18 years attending 21 Italian headache clinics. Juvenile Headache Collaborative Study Group. 772 75
In replication of two recent studies, it was intended to show that headache symptoms obtained by means of questionnaires fit a categorial model, provided that appropriate methods of data analysis are used. In addition, the questions which are best posed to obtain a succinct classification should be determined. Configural frequency analysis (CFA) was applied to 7 answers for headache symptoms in 2 samples (n = 602 and 606). In both samples classification became more succinct when the symptoms taken into consideration were reduced to 5. Questions for the quality of pain (pulsating vs not pulsating) did not supply much information nor did the question about aggravation during physical activity in Sample I and for
photophobia
in Sample II enhance the succintness of the classification. Based on 5 symptoms, however, namely: (1) pain occurring in attacks; (2) unilaterality; (3) visual prodromi; (4)
nausea
/vomiting and (5)
photophobia
in Sample I, aggravation during physical activity in Sample II, CFA clearly revealed a few headache syndromes. They could easily be interpreted as migraine with aura, migraine without aura, and tension headaches. Combinations of both migraine and tension headache symptoms did not occur more often and sometimes less often than expected by chance.
...
PMID:Headache classification based on questionnaire data: which symptoms are especially suitable? 776 10
The efficacy of the 5-HT1 receptor agonist sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine has been investigated in an extensive programme of controlled clinical trials. Sumatriptan provided rapid relief from migraine headache with onset of relief occurring within 10 min of a 6 mg subcutaneous injection and within 30 min of a 100 mg oral dose. Maximum benefit was observed by 2 h after the injection and 4 h after the oral dose. Sumatriptan also significantly decreased the incidence of associated migraine symptoms (
nausea
,
photophobia
, phonophobia) and the need for rescue medication. Sumatriptan was an effective treatment for migraine with and without aura and when used at any time during the attack. Oral sumatriptan 100 mg provided significantly greater pain relief and had a more rapid onset of action than two commonly used acute treatments for migraine. Efficacy is maintained in long-term use, with no evidence of tachyphylaxis or dependence. Sumatriptan, whether given subcutaneously or orally, is an effective long-term acute treatment for migraine.
...
PMID:The clinical profile of sumatriptan: efficacy in migraine. 783 80
An open, prospective study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous sumatriptan in 17 children, ages 6 to 16 years, with severe, recurrent migraine. A 6-mg dose was used in 15 patients and relieved headache within 1 hour in six and by 2 hours in five others. Two smaller children received a 3-mg dose and both were headache-free within 2 hours. Most also reported marked improvement in associated symptoms such as
nausea
and
photophobia
. Four subjects had no clinical improvement after a 6-mg dose. Side effects, such as neck pressure, were brief and mild. These findings suggest that subcutaneous sumatriptan can be both effective and safe as an abortive agent in juvenile migraine, but the appropriate dose in smaller children will need further investigation.
...
PMID:Treatment of juvenile migraine with subcutaneous sumatriptan. 784 52
In order to study the frequency and characteristics of post-angiography headache, we interviewed 45 consecutive patients (mean age +/- SD = 57 +/- 15 years; M/F = 15/30) who underwent transfemoral cerebral angiography for: ischemic cerebrovascular disease (n = 33); suspected arteriovenous malformations (n = 4; one confirmed); suspected cerebral aneurysm (n = 5; two confirmed); and arterial dissection (n = 3; one confirmed and one was a follow-up study of a previously demonstrated dissection). Postangiography headache developed in 15 (33%) patients, 125 +/- 99 min after the completion of the study. It was unilateral in nine (60%) patients, homolateral to the usual side of migraine headache in two or three migraineurs, and pulsating in six (40%).
Nausea
, vomiting,
photophobia
, and phonophobia accompanied postangiography headache in 20%, 7%, 33%, and 20% respectively. Postangiography headache fulfilled the International Headache Society criteria for migraine without aura (except for the number of attacks) in 27% of patients. Patients with and those without postangiography headache were comparable in mean age, sex, and indication for angiography. Fifty-three percent (8/15) of patients with postangiography headache and 23% (7/30) of the non postangiography headache group reported prior recurrent headaches (P = 0.047, likelihood ratio chi-square). Postangiography headache has the characteristics of delayed arterial pain which may be related to a catheter-induced or contrast dye-induced release of vasoactive substances, notably nitric oxide and serotonin.
...
PMID:Postangiography headache. 786 30
The high rate of benzodiazepines (BZD) consumption has been repeatedly confirmed by epidemiological surveys in most major western world countries. In a recent french survey 7% of chronic users of BZD (use in 5/7 days for the last 12 months) were found the general population (17% in the population aged above 65). It has been suggested that the high BZD consumption rate could be related to dependence. The existence of BZD dependence was described in the early sixties with very high dose of chlordiazepoxide but it has become a real concern for the medical community since the late seventies with increasing number of reports of withdrawal symptoms. The extend of the actual rate of withdrawal symptoms at BZD tapering is still very controversial and according to the different studies it varies from 39 to 90%. The between studies difference in parameters such as: the patient populations (psychopathology, treatment duration), the type of tapering employed (duration, nature of the medical and psychological support) and the used operational criteria for withdrawal definition most likely explain this wide variation in the rate of occurrence of withdrawal manifestations. According to the American Psychiatric Association Task Force on Benzodiazepine Dependence, Toxicity and Abuse three type of pathological events can happen after treatment discontinuation: rebound, withdrawal syndrome and recurrence. The rebound consists in the early and transitory reappearance of the anxiety symptoms pre-existing to the treatment but in an exacerbated from; the withdrawal syndrome associates the resurgence of the pre-existing anxiety symptoms and new symptoms as sensory disturbances (metallic taste, hyperosmia, cutaneous exacerbated sensitivity,
photophobia
...)
nausea
, headache, motor disturbance in some rare cases depersonalization, paranoid reaction, confusion, convulsion. Rebound or withdrawal syndrome appearance delay varies from hours to few days according mostly to compounds elimination half-life. The relapse develops later with a progressive reapparance of pre-treatment symptoms. In practice recurrence and rebound are often difficult to isolate: recurrence can follow rebound. Different operational criteria of definition for this different entities have been proposed but there is a need for a consensual position. The treatment length, a high daily dose, an alcohol abuse history, a dependent personality and the severity of the psychopathology of the patients have been found to be predictive for the occurrence of withdrawal symptoms. Behavioural therapies (individual or in group) have been proposed with some success for the treatment of benzodiazepine dependence; drug treatment with carbamazepine or imipramine have demonstrated some efficacy. Other drug as buspirone clonidine having anxiolytic properties have not demonstrated efficacy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:[Dependence on benzodiazepines. Clinical and biological aspects]. 791 65
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>