Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fifty-one patients with moderate (11/51) and severe (40/51) cancer pain were given a new non-narcotic analgesic -Tromadol HCL capsule (THC). In 42 of these patients, partial relief was obtained with an average relief time (ART) of 4.1 hours. The average starting time was 58 minutes. Pain relief rate (PRR) in moderate and severe pain was 82% (P = 0.945), and the ARTs were 7.4 hr. and 3.2 hr., respectively (P = 0.005). In 43 patients who were entered into a randomized study with control drugs of AT-237 (36 cases) or Anfendein (7 cases), the PRR was 60.4% (26/43), ART was 1.3 hours. The PRR and ART of THC and control drugs were statistically significant (P less than 0.001 and P = 0.023). Within adequate dose range, increase of THC dose could improve its analgesic effect (P = 0.011). The main side-effects were: somnolence (37.3%), nausea (35.3%), dizziness (33.3%), palpitation and anorexia (25.5%) and constipation (9.8%) which did not necessitate the suspension of THC administration.
 ...
PMID:[Pain-relief effect of tramadol HCL capsule for moderate and severe cancer pain]. 139 64

The application of acupuncture, moxibustion, acupressure, and shiatsu to antepartal and intrapartal care are discussed. Information on therapeutic interventions as described in textbooks is presented and compared with specific treatments evaluated in research studies. Specific clinical indications addressed include nausea during pregnancy, repositioning of the fetus in breech position, stimulation of contractions and true labor, and pain relief in labor. Qualifications for practitioners and recommendations for certified nurse-midwives caring for clients seeking referral for these services are discussed.
 ...
PMID:Acupuncture and related treatment modalities. Part II: Applications to antepartal and intrapartal care. 140 72

This article discusses the findings of a study of pre-adolescent children to determine if the mode of presentation of appendicitis had changed over the past 10 years, if the incidence of perforations decreased with age, and if diagnosis related groups (DRGs) impacted the length of hospital stay. The charts of 42 children under the age of 12 years who were discharged from two inner-city hospitals with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis from 1980 to 1989 were reviewed. There were 20 blacks and 22 whites, 26 males and 16 females with an average age of 7.31 years (range: 2 to 11 years). Over 95% of patients presented with right lower quadrant pain, 78% with guarding, 80% with a positive psoas sign, 93% with a positive Rovsing's sign, and 65% with rectal tenderness. Over 85% of patients had a history of nausea, vomiting, and anorexia. The mean duration of pain was 52.8 hours and the mean temperature was 99.6 degrees F. The mean white blood cell count was 18,176 +/- 4682 for whites versus 14,615 +/- 5459 for blacks. At surgery 15/42 (36%) of patients had a perforation, 11 of whom had positive wound cultures. Escherichia coli was recovered in all 11 of these patients. The average duration of pain in the perforated group was 50.9 hours, and the average age was 7 years. Eleven of these patients had normal bowel sounds on admission. Only 31% of the total cohort had a fecalith identified by pathology. The average postoperative length of stay was 6.5 +/- 2.5 days before the initiation of DRGs and 7.5 +/- 3 days afterward.
 ...
PMID:Appendicitis in children: a continuing clinical challenge. 140 59

This study compared the analgesic efficacy of intermittent injections of intrathecal fentanyl (10 micrograms), meperidine (10 mg), or sufentanil (5 micrograms) administered to 65 parturients during the first stage of labor. The groups did not differ in onset or duration of effective analgesia. The meperidine group, however, had significantly lower pain scores once cervical dilation progressed beyond 6 cm. Side effects included mild pruritus and nausea. After intrathecal drug injection, variable decelerations of the fetal heart rate increased in the fentanyl and meperidine groups. All neonates had a 5-min Apgar score of 7 or more. We conclude that intermittent intrathecal injections of fentanyl, meperidine, or sufentanil can provide adequate first-stage labor analgesia. Meperidine appears to provide more reliable analgesia as the first stage of labor progresses.
 ...
PMID:Comparison among intrathecal fentanyl, meperidine, and sufentanil for labor analgesia. 141 27

This study compared naloxone and nalbuphine when administered for treatment of side effects after epidural morphine, 5 mg, given for postcesarean analgesia. Patients requesting treatment for pruritus or nausea randomly received, in a double-blind fashion, up to three intravenous doses of either naloxone 0.2 mg (group 1; n = 20) or nalbuphine 5 mg (group 2; n = 20). The incidence of vomiting, the severity of nausea and pruritus, and the degree of sedation and pain were assessed before and 30 min after each dose. The first dose of nalbuphine decreased the incidence of vomiting (P < 0.005) and the severity of nausea and pruritus (P < 0.01), whereas naloxone caused no significant changes. Sedation scores increased after nalbuphine (P < 0.05) and remained unchanged after naloxone, whereas pain scores increased after naloxone (P < 0.01) and were unchanged after nalbuphine. Eighteen patients in group 1 and 12 in group 2 received a second dose, and 8 and 4 patients, respectively, a third dose. Other than decreased pruritus after the second dose with both drugs, no further changes occurred. We conclude that nalbuphine is superior to naloxone for the treatment of side effects after epidural morphine. However, persistent symptoms may require supplemental therapy, as repeated doses proved less effective than the initial dose.
 ...
PMID:Nalbuphine is better than naloxone for treatment of side effects after epidural morphine. 141 28

Although epidural opioids frequently are used to provide postoperative analgesia, several articles have suggested that the analgesia after epidural fentanyl is similar to that after an equal dose of fentanyl given intravenously. To address this issue further, 29 postthoracotomy patients were studied in a randomized, double-blinded trial comparing a lumbar epidural fentanyl infusion with an intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia, plasma fentanyl pharmacokinetics, and respiratory effects for 20 h postoperatively. In all patients in both groups, good analgesia was achieved (pain score less than 3, maximum 10) over a similar time course, although the patients receiving epidural infusion required a significantly larger fentanyl infusion dose than did the patients receiving intravenous infusion (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.95 +/- 0.45 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.56 +/- 0.36 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.0002). The time course for the plasma fentanyl concentrations was similar in the two groups, and plasma fentanyl concentrations were not significantly different at any sampling period (T7-T20; group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.8 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.6 +/- 0.6 ng/ml; P = 0.06). Similarly, calculated clearance values for the two groups were not significantly different (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 0.95 +/- 0.26 l.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 0.87 +/- 0.25 l.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.3). Both groups demonstrated a similar degree of mild to moderate respiratory depression postoperatively, which was assessed with continuous respiratory inductance plethysmography and sequential arterial blood gas analysis. Side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were mild and did not differ between groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for postthoracotomy pain relief. Analgesic, pharmacokinetic, and respiratory effects. 848 73

Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism are often elderly with cardiovascular disease and in some an operation might be hazardous owing to anaesthetic complications. A technique for operation for primary hyperparathyroidism under local anaesthesia is described. The method uses a unilateral approach. Seventeen consecutive patients operated on under local anaesthesia were compared with a group of 15 patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. Normocalcaemia was achieved in 14 patients in each group. There was no difference in the extent of pain or the overall well-being between the two groups as determined by a visual analogue scale. Patients receiving local anaesthesia, however, experienced significantly less nausea after operation (P < 0.01). There was more fluctuation in blood pressure and heart rate in the general anaesthesia group compared with the other group. Surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism can be performed safely under local anaesthesia, and could be offered to patients if general anaesthesia were not suitable or involved an increased perioperative risk. It should not be recommended for routine use in patients who are fit for general anaesthesia.
 ...
PMID:Surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism performed under local anaesthesia. 142 61

The reported incidence of emetic symptoms in surgical patients varies from 8-92%. Intractable postoperative nausea and vomiting remains one of the most unpleasant side-effects experienced by patients postoperatively, both in ambulatory and non-ambulatory care, and has potential risks for severe postoperative complications. Multiple factors are associated with an increased risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting: age, gender, pre-existing disease, premedication, operative procedure, anaesthetic and analgesic drugs, anaesthetic procedure, and postoperative symptoms. Prophylactic use of anti-emetic premedication is not currently routine practice because not all patients are at serious risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and currently available anti-emetics carry undesirable side-effects. However, anti-emetic prophylaxis is very valuable for patients at increased risk. If symptoms do develop in the recovery room, several factors need to be considered in order for anti-emetic treatment to be successful. Adequate hydration and pain control should be ensured, tight-fitting oxygen masks avoided, and patients should be encouraged to take slow, deep breaths to decrease the sensation of nausea. To avoid side-effects, anti-emetics should be administered in minimally effective doses. If the administration of anti-emetics is initially unsuccessful, it may be useful to try a combination of anti-emetic drugs with different mechanisms of action.
 ...
PMID:Incidence and aetiology of postoperative nausea and vomiting. 142 22

Patients with breast carcinoma metastatic to the colon generally present with multiple symptoms, usually pain, vomiting, nausea, and ascites. We describe a patient who presented only with persistent diarrhea, underwent surgery for colon cancer, and, on pathological evaluation of the surgical specimen, was found to have metastatic breast cancer affecting the colon. Metastatic breast cancer should therefore be suspected in patients with a history of breast cancer and diarrhea of unknown cause that is not accompanied by other symptoms. Evaluating such patients by colonoscopy and biopsy would provide important information relevant to choosing between colon surgery and systemic therapy.
 ...
PMID:Metastatic breast carcinoma presenting as persistent diarrhea. 143 49

A single dose of epidural morphine (EM) usually produces 24 h of post-cesarean section (CS) analgesia and patients require supplemental analgesics beyond this period. This study assesses if a second dose of EM administered 24 h after the first one offers superior therapeutic efficacy compared to conventional analgesics. Patients (n = 100) were randomized to receive one or two doses of epidural morphine. In all patients, EM 5 mg was administered after delivery. After 24 h patients received epidurally either normal saline (n = 50, Group 1) or morphine 5 mg (n = 50, Group 2). An independent observer used a visual analogue scale to assess nausea, itching, and analgesia 24 h after each injection. Results were expressed as mean +/- 1 s.e. mean and analyzed using nonparametric methods. The second dose of EM produced a significantly lower incidence and severity of nausea and itching than did the first dose (P < 0.01) in Group 2 with no difference in analgesia. The second day postoperative pain score in Group 1 was significantly greater than the first day score in the same group, and significantly greater than the severity score in Group 2. Only 36% of patients receiving two doses of EM required supplemental analgesics beyond 48 h compared to 76% of those receiving one dose (P < 0.01). No serious complications were noted. In summary, the use of a second dose of EM for post-CS analgesia produces better analgesia and reduces the need for oral analgesics. The second dose produced fewer side-effects, probably due to acute tolerance to morphine.
 ...
PMID:A two-dose epidural morphine regimen for cesarean section patients: therapeutic efficacy. 144 73


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10