Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, was investigated in a 6-week double-blind study among severely ill inpatients with DSM-III major depression. All but 1 patient also fulfilled criteria for melancholia. Following a 3-day placebo wash-out patients were randomly assigned to fluvoxamine, imipramine or placebo. Sixty of 81 patients completed at least 2 weeks following wash-out and were evaluated for efficacy. Analysis of covariance (controlling for baseline scores) showed significant (p less than 0.05) differences on CGI severity and BPRS total and a similar trend (p = 0.08) on the Hamilton Depression Scale. Fluvoxamine was superior (p less than or equal to 0.02) to both placebo and imipramine on these measures. Fluvoxamine's most common adverse effects were nausea and agitation. The number of fluvoxamine patients withdrawn for side-effects was less than imipramine and not significantly different than placebo. Fluvoxamine was not associated with significant changes in vital signs, ECG or laboratory tests. The results therefore indicate that fluvoxamine is a safe and highly effective treatment for hospitalized patients with major depression.
 ...
PMID:A placebo-controlled inpatient comparison of fluvoxamine maleate and imipramine in major depression. 250 30

Fluoxetine is a new, chemically unique antidepressant. In contrast with antidepressants already on the market, its only significant neurophysiologic effect is inhibition of serotonin reuptake. Double-blind comparisons show it is as effective in the treatment of major depression as tricyclic antidepressants. It is free of most of the troubling side effects of currently available antidepressants, including anticholinergic effects and weight gain. In fact, it is commonly associated with weight loss which is independent of nausea, the most commonly reported adverse effect. The recommended dose is 20 mg per day, given in the morning or early in the day. Fluoxetine deserves consideration for depressed patients for whom the clinician wishes to avoid anticholinergic effects, sedation, and weight gain. It may be especially effective in patients with pronounced obsessive-compulsive symptoms, weight gain with depression or from antidepressants, and in patients who have not responded to tricyclic therapy.
 ...
PMID:An overview of fluoxetine, a new serotonin-specific antidepressant. 266 82

Rolipram improves signal transmission in central noradrenergic neurones at a pre- and postsynaptic level, and is thus a novel approach in antidepressant therapy. In order to prove efficacy, tolerance, and safety, several controlled studies are underway. Results of a randomized double-blind comparative trial versus imipramine involving 64 in-patients with Major Depressive Disorder (DSM III) in six independent centers will be presented and discussed. The chosen biometric model provided evidence that towards the end of the study imipramine was superior to Rolipram. The particular clinical relevance of this difference is discussed. As regards tolerance, nausea emerged as the typical side-effect of Rolipram, whereas imipramine precipitated mainly anticholinergic side-effects.
 ...
PMID:Rolipram in major depressive disorder: results of a double-blind comparative study with imipramine. 266 80

Fluoxetine is a bicyclic antidepressant that is a specific and potent inhibitor of the presynaptic reuptake of serotonin. It has essentially no effect on the reuptake of norepinephrine or other neurotransmitters. Similarly, it has negligible binding affinity for neurotransmitter receptor sites. It is well absorbed after oral administration, with absolute bioavailability in dogs of approximately 72 +/- 27.6%. The mean Tmax is between 4 and 8 hours, and it is approximately 94% protein bound. After a single dose, the elimination half-life is 1-3 days. After long-term administration, the elimination half-life averages 4 days. Its pharmacokinetics appear nonlinear. It is metabolized to an active metabolite norfluoxetine, which is also specific for the inhibition of serotonin reuptake. Norfluoxetine's elimination half-life averaged 7 days after long-term administration. Little is known about potential drug interactions; however, fluoxetine appears to have minimal clinically relevant interactions. Fluoxetine is indicated in the treatment of major depression. Its efficacy is comparable to the tricyclics and it has a similar onset of action. Although doses as high as 80 mg/day have been used, the optimal dosage range appears to be 20-40 mg once daily. Fluoxetine has been used with success in obsessive-compulsive disorder and intention myoclonus, however, its use in these disorders remains investigational. The frequency of side effects is low and dose related; the most common effects are nausea, anxiety, insomnia, anorexia, diarrhea, nervousness, and headache. Eight reports of intentional overdose with fluoxetine alone resulted in no deaths and mild adverse effects. It will be marketed as 20-mg capsules under the brand name of Prozac. Although fluoxetine should be added to formularies, its use should be reserved for treatment of those who do not respond to or do not tolerate tricyclic agents.
 ...
PMID:Fluoxetine: a serotonin-specific, second-generation antidepressant. 355 56

Forty-two outpatients with major depressive disorder were treated with oral fezolamine in a 6-week, three-center open-label study. Therapy was initiated at 100 mg/day; thereafter dosage was increased based on the response of the patient. Maintenance dosage usually ranged between 100 and 450 mg/day. Clinically significant improvement relative to the patient's prestudy state was observed after 2 weeks in both patient and physician-rating scales. Fifty-five percent of patients improved their Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores by more than 50%. The median dose associated with a clinically significant response was 245 mg/day. Five of the 6 patients who dropped out did so because of gastrointestinal adverse effects. The most common adverse effects were nausea (36%), headache (29%), constipation (26%), and dry mouth (24%).
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of fezolamine in depressed patients. 368 2

Patients with a depressive illness with 4 major symptoms of depression and a score of at least 17 on the Hamilton Depression Scale (1-17) (HDS) were allocated to a randomized double-blind group comparative study in general practice. After retrospective analysis, all 81 patients except one were characterized as suffering from a 'Definite Major Depressive Disorder', as defined by Spitzer et al. (1978). After 6 weeks of treatment with a daily dosage of 600 mg femoxetine or 150 mg amitriptyline, no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups were observed, either when using the HDS or the clinical global assessment scale. Confidence limits of 95% for differences between therapeutic effect showed a non-significant tendency in favour of amitriptyline. During treatment, there were statistically significant differences in the reduction of HDS score between the 2 treatments in week 2. These differences were the result of amitriptyline's significantly greater effect on the 3 sleep items at week 2, as indicated by the results of single item analysis. Drop out rates due to side effects were between 14-15% in both treatment groups. Of the patients treated with femoxetine, 38% experienced no side effects, compared to 14% of patients treated with amitriptyline. Nausea was the side effect most commonly reported by patients treated with femoxetine, whereas a significantly greater frequency of anticholinergic side effects was recorded during treatment with amitriptyline (P less than 0.05). Unlike amitriptyline, femoxetine did not increase body weight. Treatment with the active drug was continued after the trial period in 14 and 18 patients in the femoxetine and amitriptyline groups respectively.
 ...
PMID:Femoxetine and amitriptyline in general practice: a randomized double-blind group comparison. 377 71

The efficacy and safety of fluoxetine, a new antidepressant agent, were assessed in a double-blind, parallel, randomized study of 44 outpatients with major depressive disorder. Following a 1-week placebo period, patients were randomly assigned to either fluoxetine or amitriptyline for a period of 5 weeks. The mean maintenance dosages were 55 mg/day for fluoxetine and 159 mg/day for amitriptyline. Both drugs were effective in relieving the symptoms of depression. The most frequently reported side effects were nausea and nervousness for fluoxetine, and dry mouth, dizziness, and drowsiness for amitriptyline.
 ...
PMID:A comparative trial of fluoxetine and amitriptyline in patients with major depressive disorder. 389 4

1 The effects of fluvoxamine to a maximum of 300 mg daily were compared with those of imipramine to a maximum of 200 mg daily, in 151 patients with primary major depression. 2 Four weeks of treatment with fluvoxamine resulted in 67.2% improvement (+/- s.d. 21.6) on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (26 items). Treatment with imipramine showed 62.1% improvement (+/- s.d. 29.5) on this scale. 3 Fluvoxamine had no untoward effects on the cardiovascular system, while imipramine produced systematic increases in the postural fall in blood pressure. Dry mouth, nausea, daytime somnolence and tremor were seen with fluvoxamine treatment, while imipramine was associated with dry mouth, daytime somnolence, dizziness and tremor. 4 We conclude that fluvoxamine seems to have the same general antidepressant efficacy as imipramine. It was not associated with any safety problems and was generally well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind controlled clinical trial comparing fluvoxamine with imipramine. 640 1

Seven hundred twelve patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depression and recommended for antidepressant treatment were treated with moclobemide as outpatients (88%) or inpatients in ordinary psychiatric practices. These differ from the highly selected patients usually studied in antidepressant research, without comorbidity, or coprescription and treated in special clinics. Sixty-five percent were women, with a mean age of 45 (+/- 13.6) years, and 88% were outpatients. Eighty-eight percent had preexisting depression. Eight percent had prior manic episodes. Previous antidepressant treatment for this episode had been received by 69%, with the most common reasons for change to moclobemide being inadequate response (66%) and poor tolerability (20%). The modal final dose was 450 mg. Regarding tolerability, 52% did not report adverse events. The most common adverse events were insomnia or stimulation (13%), nausea (11%), headache or migraine (11%), dizziness or disorientation (6%), sedation or drowsiness (5%), agitation or nervousness (3%), and diarrhea (3%). Only 10% of adverse events were severe, and 83% lasted less than 2 weeks. There was no difference when moclobemide followed fluoxetine use. Most adverse events did not significantly differ from the frequencies reported in double-blind placebo-controlled studies. Concomitant medications from all major drug groups were taken by 520 patients (73%), with no adverse interactions. Moclobemide overdose resulted in an uneventful recovery, whereas mixed overdoses caused no problems other than those attributable to coprescribed medication. On physician clinical global impression, 65% were moderately improved or better after 8 weeks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Moclobemide for depression: an Australian psychiatric practice study. 759 27

Venlafaxine has been shown in clinical trials to be safe and well tolerated in patients with major depression. Data were pooled from 19 studies in which 2181 patients were given venlafaxine, 451 were given placebo and 591 were given a reference antidepressant (imipramine, trazodone, clomipramine, maprotiline, dothiepin or amineptine). Long-term safety was evaluated in 422 patients who were given venlafaxine for at least 1 year; as well, a total of 229 elderly patients have been treated with venlafaxine, including 66 who were given it for at least 1 year. The adverse events that occurred during short-term treatment in > or = 10% of patients were nausea, headache, insomnia, somnolence, dry mouth, dizziness, constipation, asthenia, sweating and nervousness. In comparator-controlled trials, the frequency of anticholinergic events with the reference agents was approximately twice that with venlafaxine. The safety profile and patient acceptability of venlafaxine are comparable to those of third-generation antidepressants, and possibly better than those of first-generation agents.
 ...
PMID:Safety and tolerance profile of venlafaxine. 762 13


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>