Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Vagal afferents are extensively distributed in the digestive tract from the oesophagus to the colon. They are involved in the reflex control of normal gastrointestinal (GI) tract function (e.g. secretion and motility) as well as reflexes more characteristic of diseases such as functional dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (e.g. vomiting, disordered lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and gastric accommodation). They are also implicated in signalling non-painful sensations (e.g. nausea and early satiety) associated with disease. A variety of receptors has been identified on vagal afferents, which can either enhance (e.g. 5-HT3, CCK1, VR1 and NK1 receptors) or reduce (e.g. ghrelin, leptin, k-opioid and GABAB receptors) activity, offering a range of potential therapeutic targets. Commonly used laboratory species (e.g. rat and mouse) lack an emetic reflex, and the implications of this for models of upper GI disorders have been explored in the light of expanding knowledge of the neuropharmacology of the emetic reflex implicating glutamate, prostanoids, cannabinoids and substance P. Additional pathophysiological roles for vagal afferents (e.g. in thermoregulation, arousal and fatigue) are being investigated, raising the intriguing possibility of the vagus as a target in non-GI disorders.
...
PMID:Abdominal vagal afferent neurones: an important target for the treatment of gastrointestinal dysfunction. 1248 26

DNA methyltransferase inhibitors sensitize leukemia cells to chemotherapeutics. We therefore conducted a phase 1/2 study of mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytarabine following 'priming' with 5-10 days of decitabine (dec/MEC) in 52 adults (median age 55 (range: 19-72) years) with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms. During dose escalation in cohorts of 6-12 patients, all dose levels were well tolerated. As response rates appeared similar with 7 and 10 days of decitabine, a 7-day course was defined as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Among 46 patients treated at/above the RP2D, 10 (22%) achieved a complete remission (CR), 8 without measurable residual disease; five additional patients achieved CR with incomplete platelet recovery, for an overall response rate of 33%. Seven patients (15%) died within 28 days of treatment initiation. Infection/neutropenic fever, nausea and mucositis were the most common adverse events. While the CR rate compared favorably to a matched historic control population (observed/expected CR ratio=1.77), CR rate and survival were similar to two contemporary salvage regimens used at our institution (G-CLAC (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF); clofarabine; cytarabine) and G-CLAM (G-CSF; cladribine; cytarabine; mitoxantrone)). Thus, while meeting the prespecified efficacy goal, we found no evidence that dec/MEC is substantially better than other cytarabine-based regimens currently used for relapsed/refractory AML.
...
PMID:Mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytarabine following epigenetic priming with decitabine in adults with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms: a phase 1/2 study. 2855 84

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a distressing treatment side-effect that could negatively affect children's quality of life (QoL). Different scoring systems for CINV were applied and different antiemetic drugs were used; however, few studies have been performed in children undergoing chemotherapy with Aprepitant. Herein, we report a pediatric experience on efficacy and safety of Aprepitant as part of triple antiemetic prophylaxis, in a cohort of thirty-two children and adolescents with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), treated with moderate/highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC/HEC) regimens in a single Hemato-Oncology Institution. The triple therapy was compared to standard antiemetic therapy in a cohort of twenty-three HL patients (control group). Aprepitant therapy was associated to a significant decrease of chemotherapy-induced vomiting (p = 0.0001), while no impact on the reduction of nausea was observed; these observations were also confirmed by multivariate analysis (p = 0.0040). Aprepitant was well tolerated and the most commonly reported adverse events were neutropenia and hypertransaminasemia. No significant differences on the toxicity were observed between the two compared groups. Our experience on Aprepitant efficacy and safety, associated with feasibility of orally administration, suggests a possible widespread use of the drug to prevent pediatric CINV.
...
PMID:Single center experience on efficacy and safety of Aprepitant for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma. 3097 65