Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In this adjuvant three-arm multicenter trial, we studied whether modulating the standard 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment with either folinic acid (FA) or interferon-alpha-2a (IFN-alpha) was superior to the recommended standard of adjuvant treatment in R0 resected colon cancer, 5-FU plus levamisole (LEV) for 12 months, in terms of toxicity and outcome. From July 1992 to October 1999, a total of 813 patients with resected colon cancer in stage II (T4N0M0; n = 63) or stage III (TxN1-3M0; n = 750) were randomized into three treatment groups and stratified according to N stage and participating centers (64 hospitals). The patients received a postoperative loading dose of 5-FU (450 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 [arms A and C]) or 5-FU (450 mg/m2) plus FA (Rescuvolin, Medac, Hamburg, Germany, 200 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 [arm B]). After completion of the first chemotherapy cycle, LEV was administered orally at a dosage of 150 mg per day on days 1 to 3, once every 2 weeks. After a 4-week chemotherapy-free interval, the treatment was continued weekly for 52 weeks. Treatment in one arm A ("standard") (n = 279) consisted of 5-FU intravenously (450 mg/m2 on day 1, once a week) plus LEV. 5-FU plus LEV was modulated in arm B (n = 283) with FA (200 mg/m2 on day 1, once a week) and in arm C (n = 251) with IFN-alpha at 6 million units three times a week repeated weekly. Treatment dosages were adjusted if toxic events above WHO grade 2 occurred. Patients were closely followed to determine recurrence and survival; the latter was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. Toxic events above WHO grade 2, mainly leukopenia, diarrhea, and nausea, occurred in 113 (14%) of 649 patients who had completed treatment in arms A (8.4%), B (13.5%), and C (31.7%). Discontinuance rates were as follows: 28% for all patients, 29% in arm A, 21% in arm B, and 34% in arm C. Overall relapse rates were 27% for all patients, 30% in arm A, 24% in arm B, and 28% in arm C. Relapses were local (8%), distant (78%), or combined (12%). Four-year overall survival rates in arms A, B, and C were 66.1%, 77.5%, and 66.2%, respectively. The 4-year survival rate in arm B was significantly higher compared to arm A (P <0.02, log-rank test) with arm A being equal to arm C. Adjuvant therapy with 5-FU plus FA plus LEV for 12 months is superior to the recommended standard (5-FU + LEV for 12 months). IFN-alpha modulation of 5-FU (plus LEV) adds to the toxicity with no therapeutic benefit.
 ...
PMID:Toxicity and effects of adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: results of the German prospective, controlled randomized multicenter trial FOGT-1. 1141 51

The patient was a 52-year-old woman who had sigmoid colon cancer with liver metastasis and multiple lung metastases. Resection of curability B was performed, and alternating adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of hepatic artery injection of 5-FU and systemic administration of CPT-11 was performed. Lung recurrence was found and no antitumor effect of chemotherapy was observed, so the CPT-11 which had been administered every other week was given every week in a dose of 60 mg/body, half of the original dose. Moreover, 5'-DFUR was administered in a dose of 800 mg/day every day. As a result, lung metastasis tumors were reduced markedly. Adverse events such as nausea, vomiting and depilation were mitigated, and no other toxicity was observed. The patient could thus be treated extremely safely in the outpatient clinic. This was considered to be a valuable case suggestive of the significance of combination chemotherapy of CPT-11 and 5'-DFUR and the importance of appropriate administration of CPT-11.
 ...
PMID:[A case of lung metastasis from colon cancer treated successfully with combined chemotherapy of CPT-11 and 5'-DFUR]. 1172 88

In order to inhibit the nausea and vomiting induced by oral anticancer drugs, granisetron was administered orally at a dose of 2 mg once a day, and its usefulness and safety were evaluated. The subjects were 26 outpatients with gastric or colon cancer receiving chemotherapy with oral anticancer drugs and complaining of gastrointestinal symptoms. A record sheet was handed to the patients. In comparison with the condition before treatment, the patients were instructed to indicate on the record sheet the severity of nausea (4 grades), presence or absence of vomiting, and degree of appetite (4 grades) after treatment, and thereby to evaluate the clinical efficacy or antiemetic effect every day in accordance with clinical efficacy evaluation criteria of 4 grades (very effective, effective, slightly effective, and ineffective). i) Nausea disappeared in 47.8% of the patients on the 1st day of treatment and in 65.2% on the 5th day of treatment. ii) Vomiting was observed in 2 and 3 patients on the 1st and 3rd day, respectively, but not on the 4th day of treatment or thereafter. iii) The efficacy rate, comprising both very effective and effective, was 69.5% on the 1st day of treatment, and increased gradually to reach 78.2% on the 5th day of treatment. iv) There was no adverse reaction or abnormality of laboratory test values attributable to granisetron. Granisetron was safe and effective against nausea and vomiting induced by oral anticancer drugs.
 ...
PMID:Clinical evaluation of granisetron as an inhibitor of nausea and vomiting induced by oral anticancer drugs. 1183 92

Will to live has been shown to vary considerably during the final course of a terminal illness. The goal of this study was to identify illness-related and demographic variables predicting will to live among dying patients. Subjects were 168 patients with cancer who were admitted for palliative care. Will to live was measured twice daily for the duration of hospitalization by using a self-report 100-mm visual analogue scale. Will-to-live data for each patient were summarized into two statistics, intercept and slope, by using simple linear regression analyses. Intercept-slope pairs for all patients were classified into the following five clusters by using spatial and conceptual criteria: patients with sustained high will to live (58%), patients with sustained moderate will to live (11%), patients with sustained low will to live (3%), will-to-live relinquishers (18%), and will-to-live acquirers (10%). Discriminant analyses revealed seven variables that accounted for 69% of the variance in cluster membership: anxiety, shortness of breath, nausea, length of survival from time of admission, having a diagnosis of colon cancer, having no religion, and living with a spouse.
 ...
PMID:Predicting the trajectory of will to live in terminally ill patients. 1229 5

Physical exercise is probably both beneficial and harmful for the gastrointestinal tract, depending partly on the training intensity. On the one hand, gastrointestinal symptoms such as heartburn, chest pain, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, side ache and diarrhoea are common during heavy exercise. On the other hand, physical activity seems to protect from colon cancer, cholelithiasis and diverticular disease. Constipation has been shown to be related to inactivity. Despite this, no overwhelming evidence exists for a positive effect of physical exercise as a treatment option for chronic constipation. The reasons behind these somewhat discrepant effects are not understood fully. Altered gastrointestinal blood flow, effects on gastrointestinal motor function, neuroendocrine changes and mechanical effects are probably involved. Conflicting results exist regarding the effects of physical activity on gastrointestinal motility. Modern technologies now make motility studies in various parts of the gastrointestinal tract possible. More studies are needed to understand better the effects of physical exercise on the gastrointestinal tract. In particular, the relationship between the training intensity and duration and positive and negative alterations in gastrointestinal physiology needs to be addressed further.
 ...
PMID:Physical activity and the gastrointestinal tract. 1236 4

The purpose of this report is to summarize information on oxaliplatin, a drug recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information provided includes regulatory history, study design, efficacy and safety results, and pertinent literature references. A single, multicenter, randomized trial, enrolling 463 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma whose disease had recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of therapy with the combination of bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, was submitted. Study arms included infusional 5-FU/LV alone (arm A), oxaliplatin alone (arm B), and the combination of oxaliplatin and infusional 5-FU/LV(arm C). Oxaliplatin, at a dose of 85 mg/m2, was administered to patients in arms B and C intravenously over 2 hours in 250-500 ml of dextrose 5% in water (D5W) on day 1 only. A 200-mg/m2 dose of LV was administered simultaneously to arm C patients, in a separate bag using a Y-line, or alone to arm A patients, by i.v. infusion, over 2 hours. 5-FU was then administered to arms A and C patients, first as a bolus injection over 2-4 minutes at a dose of 400 mg/m2, then as a continuous infusion in 500 ml of D5W over 22 hours at a dose of 600 mg/m2. LV was repeated on day 2 of the cycle (arms A and C) followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus and a 600-mg/m2 22-hour infusion. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. Response rate was the prespecified end point for accelerated approval. Time to progression (TTP) was a secondary end point. The prespecified primary comparison was between the 5-FU/LV regimen and the 5-FU/LV/ oxaliplatin combination regimen. The three arms were well balanced for patient prognostic factors. There were no complete responders. The partial response rates were 0%, 1%, and 9% for the 5-FU/LV, oxaliplatin, and oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV treatments, respectively (p = 0.0002, arm C versus arm A). The median times to radiographic tumor progression, based on available radiographs, were 2.7 months, 1.6 months, and 4.6 months, respectively (p < 0.0001, arm C versus arm A). Common adverse events associated with the combination treatment included peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and abdominal pain. Neutropenia was the major hematologic toxicity. Adverse events were similar in men and women and in patients <65 and > or =65 years of age, but older patients may have been more susceptible to dehydration, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and fatigue. Oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU/LV was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum whose disease has recurred or progressed during or within 6 months of completion of first-line therapy with the combination of bolus 5-FU/LV and irinotecan. Approval was based on response rate and on an interim analysis of TTP. No results are available, at this time, that demonstrate a clinical benefit, such as improvement in disease-related symptoms or survival.
 ...
PMID:FDA drug approval summaries: oxaliplatin. 1475 10

A 55-year-old man was referred to us after transverse colostomy for intestinal obstruction caused by descending colon cancer with peritoneal dissemination. The colon lesion was palpated as a well-defined hard mass in the left lower abdomen and the disseminated lesion as a hard mass with an unclear border in the right lower abdomen. CEA level was 917 ng/ml at admission. Left hemicolectomy was performed for tumor reduction and TS-1 of 120 mg/day was started 6 days after surgery (4 weeks administration followed by a 2-week rest period). Administration discontinued due to nausea 4 weeks after commencement of the therapy, and restarted as a 2-week administration followed by a 2-week rest period. There has been no adverse reaction since then. Twenty-seven weeks after surgery, CEA level was reduced to 47 ng/ml and peritoneal dissemination was found to have disappeared upon physical examination and computed tomograph. TS-1 is expected to be an effective agent for the treatment of colon cancer with peritoneal dissemination.
 ...
PMID:[A case of advanced colon cancer with peritoneal dissemination completely responding to TS-1]. 1499 64

The objective of this study was to define the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and response rate of a combination of two topoisomerase I inhibitors, topotecan and irinotecan, in patients with metastatic colon cancer. Eleven patients, the majority with previously progressive disease on 5-fluorouracil-based regimens, were enrolled onto a phase I/II dose escalation trial utilizing continuous infusion topotecan for 2 weeks and weekly irinotecan x 3 with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dosages of topotecan utilized included 0.2 and 0.25mg/m2/day. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 62 mg/m2 by i.v. bolus. Patients were followed for toxicity and response. The MTD of the combination of agents was found to be 0.25mg/m2/day for topotecan and 62 mg/m2 for irinotecan. The most common serious toxicities were diarrhea and nausea/vomiting. Only one patient experienced grade III neutropenia. There were no complete or partial responses. However, four patients had prolonged disease stabilization (SD) of up to 324 days and this group remained on protocol therapy for an average of 227 days (p=0.0005 versus patients not achieving SD). We concluded that the MTD for this combination of topoisomerase I inhibitors, given on this particular schedule, has been defined. This combination cannot be recommended as a first- or second-line therapy for patients with metastatic colon cancer based on the responses observed. However, approximately one-third of patients achieved prolonged disease stabilization. Topotecan with irinotecan may be useful as a palliative regimen for a subgroup of colon cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:Combined topoisomerase I inhibition for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer. 1520 98

As capecitabine (Xeloda) is converted to 5-FU within tumours it can produce 5-FU-like side effects. However, diarrhoea, stomatitis, nausea, alopecia and neutropenia are significantly less frequent than with i.v. 5-FU. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is the only clinical adverse event occurring more often during capecitabine treatment. These findings in MCRC have also been confirmed in a large phase III trial in early stage colon cancer (X-Act adjuvant study) and phase II clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer. Because capecitabine is taken in the outpatient setting, the nurse and/or supervising clinician are responsible for educating patients how to use it correctly and on the nature/recognition/severity of adverse events. Patients need to be aware that temporary interruptions/dose modifications do not reduce the overall efficacy of capecitabine and will most likely lead to a resolution of side effects. Consequently, oncology nurses will be assuming a more significant and pivotal role in the efficient education and support of patients during home-based therapy with capecitabine.
 ...
PMID:Management of adverse events and other practical considerations in patients receiving capecitabine (Xeloda). 1534 79

A phase I study was conducted with oral irinotecan given daily for 14 days every 3 weeks in 45 patients with solid tumours to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, preliminary antitumour response and pharmacokinetics. Irinotecan was administered orally as a powder-filled capsule at doses ranging from 7.5 to 40 mg/m2 per day. Tumours were predominantly colorectal (30) together with 10 other gastrointestinal, 2 breast, 2 small cell lung and 1 ovarian. All but three patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median number of administered cycles was 3 (range 1-19). Gastrointestinal toxicities (grade 3 nausea, grade 3/4 vomiting and diarrhoea) and one incidence of grade 3 asthenia were dose limiting. There were no grade 3/4 haematological toxicities. The MTD was 30 mg/m2 per day. There were two documented partial responses, one in a patient with cancer of the small intestine and the other in a patient with colon cancer. Stable disease was seen in 16 patients (35.5%). Peak concentrations of irinotecan and metabolite SN-38 were reached within 2.0-2.4 h. The metabolic ratio of SN-38 AUC to irinotecan AUC was 0.17+/-0.10 (mean+/-SD). The dose recommended for phase II studies is 30 mg/m2 per day administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of an oral formulation of irinotecan administered daily for 14 days every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours. 1559 38


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>