Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

150 cases of prostate cancer treated with estrogens at the Urology clinic of the Hotel-Dieu from 1963 to 1974 are presented. The men ranged in age from 50 to 91; the majority were 60-69 years. Their clinical stages were 29% Stage 1, no perceptible mass; 43% Stage 2, nodule felt on rectal exam; 13% Stage 3, tumor extended outside the prostate but not metastases, normal prostatic phosphatases; and 15% Stage 4, elevated prostatic phasphatases and metastases. Diagnosis was by urinary symptoms in Stage 2 or above, rectal palpation, and puncture biopsy under local anesthesia. Estrogen treatment consisted of diethylstilbestrol, stilbelstrol diphosphate or TACE (Chlorotraianisene), or estradiol. Estrogen side effects were loss of libido after 1 month, gynecomastia, and nausea. Other treatments included prostatectomy in Stages 1 and 2, cobalt in 5 cases, castration in 3 cases, 1 endo-uretral resection, and 1 hypophysectomy. 50% died in 1 year and 16% were lost to follow up and presumed dead in 1 year; the mean survival of the others was 3 years. Estrogen therapy improved symptoms and reversed tumor growth temporarily in hormone-dependent cancers, but these tumors all escape hormone control eventually.
 ...
PMID:[Course of prostate cancer under estrogen therapy]. 87 31

The palliation of bone pain is a common clinical problem once metastatic prostate cancer has escaped from hormonal control. This retrospective study compares the results of treatment using hemibody irradiation (HBI) at the Royal Marsden Hospital (27 cases) with isotope therapy using the bone-seeking isotope strontium-89 (89Sr) at Southampton General Hospital (51 cases). Prior to analysis patients were matched for potential prognostic factors (performance status, bone scan extent of disease, age, histology and duration of hormone response) to minimize the effect of treatment selection bias. Pain control assessed at 3 months was similar for HBI and matched 89Sr cases, with 63% and 52% respectively showing some benefit. Median survival was similar for these groups at 20 and 21 weeks respectively. The unmatched 89Sr group, which had more favourable prognostic factors, had a better outcome with 96% showing improvement in pain and with a median survival of 59 weeks. Subsequent univariate analysis demonstrated that performance status and extent of disease on bone scan were of overriding importance in determining outcome. Transfusion requirements were higher for the HBI group than for the matched 89Sr group (50% and 25% respectively) but other bone marrow toxicity was similar. Despite routine anti-emetic therapy 37% of patients treated with HBI had some nausea or vomiting. Although expensive, 89Sr appears as effective a treatment option as HBI. Response is most likely with either approach when patients have a good performance status and a limited extent of disease.
 ...
PMID:Palliation of bone metastases in prostate cancer. Hemibody irradiation or strontium-89? 137 17

Twenty-nine patients with metastatic prostate cancer that had progressed following orchiectomy were treated with intravenous epirubicin 90 mg/m2 every 28 days. Their median age was 71 years (range 49-78) and the median Zubrod scale (WHO score) was 1. Two patients had soft tissue lesions, 20 had bone metastases and 7 had both. Tumour response was assessed according to the National Prostatic Cancer Project criteria. Of 29 patients, 11 (38%) achieved a partial remission. The median duration of response was 6 months and the median survival time of all patients was 9 months (range 2-27). It seemed that treatment with epirubicin was not associated with an increase in survival. Toxicity was moderate and consisted of alopecia and mild nausea/vomiting. There was no significant haematological toxicity and no clinical cardiotoxicity. It was concluded that epirubicin was active in hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer in approximately 33% of the patients.
 ...
PMID:Phase II study of epirubicin in advanced hormone-resistant prostatic carcinoma. 148 91

Twenty-five patients with advanced prostatic cancer progressing after one course of endocrine treatment entered a phase II study of weekly administration of 30 mg Idarubicin orally. Twenty-two patients were evaluable for response and partial response (PR) was noted in 2 patients and stable disease (NC) in 10 patients. Median survival was 31 weeks and median time to progression was 14 weeks. Twenty-three patients were eligible in a score system combining analgetic consumption and pain reduction measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and 30% achieved a subjective response. Fifteen patients fulfilled treatment with the planned dose and 10 patients had dose reduction to a median of 23.8 mg Idarubicin. Haematological toxicity was greater than or equal to grade 3 (WHO) in 20% of the patients. Non-haematological toxicity was dominated by nausea/vomiting with 48% grade 3 (WHO). In conclusion, Idarubicin seems of limited value in the treatment of patients refractory to first line endocrine treatment.
 ...
PMID:Weekly oral idarubicin in advanced prostatic cancer. A phase II study. 162 55

Phase 2 study of 5'-DFUR in bladder and prostatic cancer was conducted at 15 collaborative institutions including Okayama University. 5'-DFUR was orally administered to patients at a daily dose of 800-1200 mg for more than 4 weeks. Forty-one patients with bladder cancer and 12 patients with prostatic cancer were evaluated. The response rate for bladder cancer was 31.7% (CR, 1 case: PR, 12 cases), against no response with prostatic cancer. Moreover, the concentration of 5-FU in bladder tumors was confirmed to be high. Adverse reactions such as diarrhea, anorexia, and nausea were observed. Thus, 5'-DFUR seems to be useful for the treatment of bladder cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Phase II study of 5'-DFUR treatment of the bladder and prostatic cancer]. 183 24

Goserelin acetate implant is a newly approved depot formulation of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist indicated for palliation of advanced prostate cancer. LHRH superagonists suppress gonadotropin release from the pituitary gland by causing down-regulation of receptors. The sustained-release dosage form contains goserelin acetate dispersed in a biodegradable copolymer matrix and is designed to release active drug over 28 days. Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that, despite nonzero order release of goserelin from the matrix, goserelin acetate implant maintains serum concentrations of testosterone in the range normally found in castrated men (less than 2 nmol/L) throughout the recommended 28-day dosing interval. Response rates similar to those for orchiectomy and estrogen administration have been demonstrated. Combination therapy with either diethylstilbestrol or flutamide has produced favorable results, although the major advantage appears to be a reduction in the tumor flare seen during the first week of LHRH agonist therapy rather than an increase in response rate or survival. Adverse effects are similar to other LHRH agonists and include tumor flare during the first week of therapy, decreased libido, decreased erectile potency, hot flashes, and gynecomastia. In combination with flutamide, additional adverse effects include diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and elevated hepatic aminotransferases, all of which can be attributed to flutamide administration. Local reactions are minimal; however, some patients require a local anesthetic before goserelin acetate implant injection. The recommended dose is 3.6 mg administered subcutaneously into the upper abdominal wall every 28 days. The average wholesale cost is approximately +320 per month. Formulary addition is recommended.
 ...
PMID:Goserelin acetate implant: a depot luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog for advanced prostate cancer. 183 21

With estramustine phosphate the clinician has the possibility to ensure complete hormonal as well as cytotoxic control of advanced prostate cancer with a single drug. EMP is considered as a first choice for treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer. It is at least as effective as conventional chemotherapy, yet less aggressive with regard to its toxicity profile. EMP is particularly useful in patients with limited bone marrow reserve, e.g. in case of prior or associated radiotherapy. As to the use of EMP in primary treatment, more information is required before we can define with certainty subgroups of patients who would benefit more from an early course of EMP than from other hormonal therapy. The existing data point in the direction of poorly differentiated tumors, patients with bone pain and poor prognosis. EMP treatment is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity. This should be avoided as much as possible by proper selection of patients or by prophylaxis. Gastro-intestinal side effects, such as nausea, diarrhea and anorexia are dose-dependent. These adverse events tend to interfere with compliance at dosages over 560 mg/day. Dosage modifications or an anti-emetic may help. The intravenous administration of EMP offers the possibility for high loading doses at a substantially reduced risk for cardiovascular and gastrointestinal side effects.
 ...
PMID:The present role of estramustine phosphate in advanced prostate cancer. 192 66

The therapeutic efficacy and safety of various doses of leuprorelin acetate depot were determined in an open, multicentre study of patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostatic cancer (stages C, D1 or D2). Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3.75 mg (30 cases), 7.5 mg (eight cases), 15 mg (eight cases) and 30 mg (one patient) leuprorelin acetate depot administered subcutaneously once every 4 weeks. Of the 43 patients evaluable, two (5%) had complete remission, 23 (53%) partial remission and 13 (30%) patients stable disease. No significant differences were observed in response rates in relation to dose, disease stage or previous hormonal therapy. Disappearance or improvement in bone pain and urinary symptoms occurred in 63% and 79% of cases, respectively. Serum androgen concentrations decreased rapidly and persistently to castration levels, without significant differences for different doses. Treatment was well tolerated with a low incidence of mild side-effects - gynaecomastia (16%), nausea/vomiting (13%) and diarrhoea (2%). It is concluded that 3.75 mg leuprorelin acetate depot given subcutaneously once every 4 weeks is able to produce hormonal effects in all patients, an overall objective response comparable to that obtained using higher doses.
 ...
PMID:Leuprorelin acetate depot in advanced prostatic cancer: a phase II multicentre trial. 210 83

72 patients with hormone resistant, progressing prostatic cancer completed a self-administered questionnaire to assess subjective morbidity and quality of life before they were entered into a phase III trial of estramustine (34) vs. mitomycin (38). At least one post-treatment assessment was available in 43 patients. This considerable degree of non-compliance is explained by practical problems related to completion and collection of the questionnaires in these rapidly deteriorating patients. Doctors underestimated subjective morbidity (pain, decreased performance status, nausea) in 30-50% of the cases. Decreased functional status, fatigue and pain were identified as the most frequent major morbidities before study entry. In most patients, treatment did not reduce this morbidity. The routine application of self-administered quality of life questionnaires has considerable practical problems but yields clinically worthwhile information about subjective morbidity. Simple but relevant monitoring of subjective morbidity by the patient should be mandatory in cancer trials where palliation is a major endpoint.
 ...
PMID:Quality of life and treatment of hormone resistant metastatic prostatic cancer. The EORTC Genito-Urinary Group. 214 95

Frequency of nausea was investigated during the last six months of life of 342 patients who died from cancer in 1987. 44% received antiemetic treatment, but only 2% obtained complete relief. There was a close connection between opiate treatment, cytostatic treatment and nausea. The highest frequency of nausea was found among patients with gastrointestinal and ovarian cancer, whilst the lowest frequency was found in the prostate cancer group. We discuss antiemetic treatments in this connection.
 ...
PMID:[Nausea in cancer patients. An analysis of its frequency and an evaluation of the treatment of nausea]. 230 Sep 42


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>