Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In this study, the utility and safety of granisetron alone (Group G) and granisetron plus hydroxyzine hydrochloride (Group G/H) for nausea and vomiting were evaluated in patients with head and neck cancer treated by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the severity of nausea or frequency of vomiting, although all patients in the G/H group showed complete response (no nausea or vomiting) from the fifth day after cisplatin administration. The clinical utility rate was higher in Group G/H than in Group G. The only side effect observed was headache in one patient from Group G. No drug-related abnormality in laboratory tests was observed. These results demonstrate that the antiemetic efficacy of granisetron can be augmented by the addition of hydroxyzine hydrochloride, providing superior control of emesis induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:[Comparison of granisetron alone and granisetron plus hydroxyzine hydrochloride for the prophylactic treatment of emesis induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy]. 821 78

Twenty-seven patients with locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were offered three courses of cisplatinum and epirubicin. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this chemotherapy regimen. Subsequent therapy included surgery when feasible and/or radiation therapy. Eighteen patients completed three courses of chemotherapy. Three had a complete response and 14 a partial response. Nine patients refused chemotherapy before treatment was completed. Overall response rate was 63%. Among responding patients, the initial favorable response to chemotherapy was apparent after the first course of chemotherapy. A moderate degree of nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and alopecia were the most common toxicities. Leukopenia grade 3 according to ECOG criteria (WBC 1,000-2,000/mm3) was found in 8(44%) of the 18 patients completing treatment. There was no cardiac toxicity. This regimen appears to be an effective induction chemotherapy for advanced unresectable head and neck cancer with acceptable side effects. Subsequent therapy with surgery and/or radiation can give long-term local control of disease in some patients. In a selected group of patients with smaller tumors, this treatment should have a better response rate and a favorable effect on survival. Phase III studies using this regimen should be carried out.
 ...
PMID:Cisplatinum-epirubicin chemotherapy for advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. 844 Jun 11

Nine patients were entered on a Phase I-II study of cisplatin, cytosine arabinoside, and pentoxifylline in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer. The treatment regimen consisted of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 only, cytosine arabinoside 2,000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 2, and pentoxifylline 400 mg orally three times daily beginning 7 to 14 days before the chemotherapy. The pentoxifylline was continued between chemotherapy cycles. Chemotherapy courses were repeated at 3- to 4-week intervals. Partial remission were seen in two patients, two patients were stable, and five patients failed on treatment. Dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia. Pentoxifylline itself caused some nausea and anorexia. Although the patient numbers were small, there was no indication that pentoxifylline increased the efficacy of this chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. It is possible that another dose schedule might have been more effective.
 ...
PMID:Cisplatin, cytosine arabinoside, and pentoxifylline in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. 845 3

Induction chemotherapy followed by radiation has been extensively studied in an effort to improve local control and possibly overall survival of patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. From June 1989 until May 1991, 39 patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) were treated with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin (100 mg/m2 d 1) and fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 d 2-6) followed by radiation potentiated by weekly administration of carboplatin (60 mg/m2). Surgery was performed in selected patients with residual disease after the combined modality approach. Four cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin (325 mg/m2) and bleomycin (15 u) were administered in those patients who demonstrated a partial response after locoregional treatment. There were 36 men and 3 women with a median age of 56 (range 39-74) years and Karnofsky performance status of 70 (range 60-100). The primary site of the tumor was nasopharynx (8), oropharynx (8), hypopharynx (3), oral cavity (4), larynx (13), paranasal sinus (2), and salivary glands (1). Thirty-two (82%) patients presented with stage IV disease. After the completion of induction chemotherapy, 14 (36%, 95% CI 21-53%) patients achieved a complete response (CR). This CR rate was increased to 56% (95% CI, 42-74%) after locoregional treatment. Main toxicities included nausea/vomiting (56%), leukopenia (40%), anemia (30%), thrombocytopenia (10%), stomatitis (28%), diarrhea (17%), and alopecia (12%). Median relapse-free survival was 18 (1-50) months, median time to progression was 13 (0.3-58.5) months, and median survival 19 (0.3-59) months. Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and fluorouracil followed by radiation potentiated with carboplatin is feasible. However, this combined modality approach, as applied in the present study, does not appear to yield superior results than those reported with chemotherapy followed by radiation alone.
 ...
PMID:Cisplatin and continuous infusion of fluorouracil followed by radiation and weekly carboplatin in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study. 863 Jun 90

Radiotherapy combined with daily administration of low-dose cisplatin (CDDP) was applied to 12 cases with head and neck cancer. They consisted of 12 carcinomas, occurring in the epipharynx (3 cases), mesopharynx (3), oral cavity (1), larynx (3) and parasinuses (2). The total response rate (CR + PR) was 83.3%. There was a remarkable effect in reducing tumor size, particularly on patients with laryngeal or epipharyngeal carcinoma. Severe mucositis with ulcers as a side effect was seen in eight cases after the irradiation of 20 to 30 Gy. Six of them tolerated a full dose of irradiation, but CDDP administration was stopped except in one case. To continue the CDDP administration in cases having irradiation of over 40 Gy, it is necessary to reduce the frequency of CDDP administration and/or to give post-irradiative hydration with 500 ml saline. When this combination therapy is used as a preoperative treatment, daily administration should be continued. Incidence of nausea or vomiting was not so frequent and they could be easily controlled by a serotonin-antagonist. Leukopenia was not severe.
 ...
PMID:[Radiotherapy combined with daily administration of low dose cisplatin for head and neck cancer]. 867 13

Combination chemotherapy with CDDP and 5-FU is one of the effective regimens for head and neck cancer. We studied the difference in the effects and adverse effects between two kinds of schedules of CDDP administration for CDDP-5-FU combination chemotherapy. For 13 patients, CDDP was administered on 5 consecutive days from day 1 to day 5 at a daily dose of 16 mg/m2 (Regimen A). For 14 patients CDDP was administered 80 mg on day 1 (Regimen B). 5-FU was administered 700 mg/m2/ day as a continuous drip infusion for 120 hours from day 1 to day 5. For regimen A, the response rate was 77%; for regimen B, it was 64%. The pattern of adverse effects showed a difference. Regimen B was more toxic for renal function than regimen A. But regimen A showed toxicity for bone marrow function. Acute phase nausea and vomit appeared more frequently in regimen B. The difference in the adverse effect pattern, which depends on the schedule of CDDP administration, seems important in order to apply this regimen for head and neck cancer patients safely. The schedule of CDDP administration should be changes depending on the renal and bone marrow function of patients. In order to evaluate the efficacy of UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy, UFT was administered p.o. to patients with maxillary sinus carcinoma for more than one year after definitive treatment with surgery or radiotherapy. Fifteen patients with UFT adjuvant chemotherapy showed significantly better survival rates than patients without adjuvant chemotherapy. We also studied adjuvant chemotherapy with CBDCA and FT for patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Administration with UFT (600 mg/day) from day 1 to day 14 with CBDCA 350 mg/m2 at day 7 was repeated more than twice. This regimen showed low toxicity and better survival for nasopharyngeal cancer patients. More clinical trials with this regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy are needed.
 ...
PMID:[Combination chemotherapy with 5-FU and CDDP or CDDP analog for head and neck cancer]. 893 83

Good clinical practice is dependent on continuous audit. Most audits of head and neck cancer treatment planning have been subjective, with only 5-year survival rates being considered objectively. Improvements in clinical care require not only measurable goals that relate to patients' perspectives, but also a means of assessing to what extent those goals have been met. In this context, 5-year survival rates are too crude to be useful, although they remain important for other reasons. Because a simple clinical objective measure of outcome applicable to head and neck cancer is not available, multiattribute assessment techniques were used to develop a clinically based scale for outcomes following treatment for head and neck cancer, with domains centred on social function, pain, physical appearance, eating and speech problems, nausea, donor site problems and shoulder function. Domains were weighted relative to each other; pain (mean weight 85) and social function (89) were considered most important followed by physical appearance (76), eating (76) and speech problems (74) A series of graded statements was constructed within each domain and scaled relative to each other. These components were also combined into an overall scale that will enable objective outcome assessment in this important area of medical care.
 ...
PMID:Multiattribute utility assessment of outcomes of treatment for head and neck cancer. 906 13

Recently, granisetron (KYT), one of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, has been developed and proved to have a strong effect for cisplatin (CDDP)-induced emesis. The combination chemotherapy with CDDP and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which has great efficacy for head and neck cancer, induces nausea and vomiting as side effects. We compared the effects of KYT for CDDP plus 5-FU-induced emesis between two administration schedules. Forty patients were randomized to two groups. KYT was administered either on day 1 for twenty patients (Group A), or for consecutive 5 days in another twenty patients (Group B). Additional antiemetics were administered in thirteen patients in Group A and seven patients in Group B for severe nausea and vomiting even after KYT administration. The times of additional antiemetics administration were more frequent in Group B. The nausea score was statistically lower in Group B and the duration of nausea or vomiting was statistically longer in Group A. The frequency of vomiting was the same in the two groups on day 1, but it was controlled faster in Group B. Appetite loss was lower on day 7 in Group B. It was concluded that vomit and nausea were controlled better in Group B after day 4. Additional antiemetics were not effective, and 5 consecutive administrations of KYT for chemotherapy with CDDP plus 5-FU was effective for late emesis.
 ...
PMID:[Comparison of effects between single vs five-day injection of granisetron for combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for head and neck cancer]. 923 62

We performed a phase II study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. From March 1994 until August 1996, 49 patients were treated with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion followed by carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 7 mg/mL x min; treatment was requested every 4 weeks. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered prophylactically on days 2 to 12 of each cycle. The study included 41 men and eight women, with a median age of 57 years (range, 23 to 73 years). Most of the patients were symptomatic and had locoregional disease. Primary sites included nasopharynx (14 patients), oropharynx (six), oral cavity (four), hypopharynx (three), larynx (20), paranasal sinuses (one), and unknown (one). After the completion of treatment, four patients (8%; 95% confidence interval, 0% to 16%) achieved a complete response and 12 (24%; 95% confidence interval, 12% to 37%) achieved a partial response. Grade 3/4 toxicities included anemia (2%) and leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and stomatitis (4% each). After a median follow-up of 15.3 months, median time to progression was 5.7 months (range, 0.5 to 29.8+ months) and median survival was 13.3 months (range, 0.5 to 30.2+ months). In our ongoing study in a similar patient population, gemcitabine was substituted for carboplatin.
 ...
PMID:Paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin or gemcitabine for the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer. 942 62

Some clinical parameters play a role in developing effective antiemetic therapy. In the present study, 310 patients entered and 301 were evaluable. They received cisplatin based combination chemotherapy (100 mg/m2), with antiemetic therapy based in metoclopramide, at a standard dose and schedule (2 mg/kg in 5 doses). Patient characteristics such as age, sex, performance status (Karnofsky), site of primary tumor, weight loss >15%, previous chemotherapy, previous radiotherapy, history of vomiting during pregnancy, additional drugs (dexamethasone, alprazolam), in the antiemetic regimen were included in the evaluation. We also studied the manifestation of anxiety and depression and the presence of psychosocial problems related to therapy, evaluated them with specific psychological indexes modified for our study. We evaluated incidence of vomiting, retches, and nausea, with several scales. We distinguished three groups of factors influencing nausea and vomiting. Factors that predicted for increased nausea and vomiting was gender (women), stress and age (younger patients experienced more prolonged duration and higher grades of nausea). The addition of alprazolam (a sedative drug) and dexamethasone, was associated with decreased incidence of nausea and vomiting. The weight loss (increased nausea and decreased vomiting control according to Gralla's scale). Previous chemotherapy decreased the number of patients without nausea and vomiting control according to Gralla's scale. Patients with previous radiotherapy presented an increased grade of nausea. Patients with head and neck cancer presented less nausea with shorter duration, less frequent episodes of vomiting. Patients with ovarian cancer presented increased mean number of retches. In conclusion, despite difficulties in assessing nausea and vomiting among clinical trials, several factors, especially stress, gender, weight loss, additional drugs (corticosteroids and sedatives) may play an important role in modulating the antiemetic response.
 ...
PMID:Factors that influence the antiemetic activity of metoclopramide to cisplatin based chemotherapy. 968 26


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>