Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

To establish the antiemetic activity of both dexamethasone (DXM) and metoclopramide (MCP) in patients receiving i.v. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF), 25 women with stage II breast cancer were entered into this study. A randomized, double-blind, crossover design was employed to evaluate DXM (24 mg in 5 doses) versus MCP (1 mg/kg as a single dose) versus a combination of both drugs (as above) or placebo (PLC). The patients were requested to complete a questionnaire evaluating the antiemetic effect. All but one patient completed the planned antiemetic program during the first four CMF courses. As compared to PLC, both the DXM-MCP combination and DXM alone provided a higher complete antiemetic protection rate (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006, respectively). The DXM regimens were more effective than both PLC (p = 0.004 and p = 0.01) and MCP (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006) in reducing the prevalence of severe vomiting. As compared to MCP, the DXM regimens provided a better control of the nausea (p less than 0.04 and p less than 0.01) and reduced both the episodes and the duration of vomiting (p less than 0.02 and p less than 0.05). The DXM regimens were also associated with a better patient opinion than the PLC (p less than 0.002 and p less than 0.0002). No significant differences were found between MCP and PLC, nor between the DXM regimens. Except for two dystonic reactions, MCP-related toxicity was mild, whereas that induced by DXM was negligible in patients with no contraindications to corticosteroids. As employed in this study, DXM provided safe and effective antiemetic protection for patients receiving adjuvant i.v. CMF. Data available do not support the use of a short-course MCP, either alone or in combination with DXM. The search for better antiemetic treatments is mandatory, especially for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. To date, we recommend the use of DXM as a standard regimen and as a control for further studies.
 ...
PMID:Effective control of CMF-related emesis with high-dose dexamethasone: results of a double-blind crossover trial with metoclopramide and placebo. 258 33

After total mastectomy and partial axillary dissection, 805 premenopausal women with stage II breast cancer were randomized to receive postoperative radiotherapy (RT) alone, RT + cyclophosphamide (C) for 12 monthly cycles, or RT + cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF) for 12 monthly cycles. At 3 years actuarial relapse-free survival for RT + C and RT + CMF was significantly better than for RT alone (p = 0.0009 and 0.0001, respectively). There was no significant difference in relapse-free survival between RT + C and RT + CMF. C resulted in more pronounced haematologic toxicity and a higher frequency of amenorrhoea and of alopecia than CMF, while CMF resulted in more pronounced nausea and stomatitis than C. In the preliminary results, C alone may be as effective as CMF in prolonging relapse-free survival in premenopausal women with stage II breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide or CMF in premenopausal women with stage II breast cancer. 634 78

The effectiveness of combining mitomycin C (MMC), tamoxifen (TAM), and 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (tegafur) was evident in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers. UFT, an oral preparation of tegafur and uracil at a molar ratio of 1:4, was reported to have higher antitumor effects than tegafur alone for patients with breast cancer. Therefore, the combined chemotherapy of MMC, TAM and UFT may possibly be effective for breast cancer. From 1988 to 1991. we studied the effects of postoperative adjuvant therapy for Japanese women with stage 11 breast cancer, all seen at 71 institutions in western areas of Japan. Five hundred and ninety four patients with stage II primary breast cancer who had undergone curative surgery, including total mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection, were enrolled. On the day of surgery, each patient was given 13 mg/m2 of MMC intravenously. Patients with ER+ tumors were then assigned to group A or group B. Group A received 30 mg/day of TAM given orally from postoperative 2 weeks, for 2 years. Group B was additionally given an oral dose of 300 mg/day of UFT for 2 years, given concomitantly with 30 mg/day of TAM. Patients with ER- tumors were assigned to group C or group D. Group C were prescribed 300 mg/day of UFT, orally, from postoperative 2 weeks for 2 years, and group D were additionally given an oral dose of 30 mg/day of TAM together with 300 mg/day of UFT. There were no differences among the groups regarding prognostic factors or doses of MMC and TAM in ER+ patients and MMC and UFT in ER- patients. Toxicity rates for leukopenia, anorexia, and nausea/vomiting were higher in group B than in group A patients. There were no statistical differences in the overall survival and disease-free survival times between groups A and B, or groups C and D, for all eligible cases. In a retrospective subgroup analysis using Bonferroni's adjustments, the additional effect of UFT on the combined treatment of MMC and TAM lengthened the disease-free survival time for patients with premenopausal ER+ cancers (corrected P value by Bonferroni's adjustments <0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that effects of the combined treatment of MMC, TAM, and UFT was significantly related to the menopausal status (P<0.01). Our findings show that postoperative ingestion of MMC, TAM, and UFT was effective for patients with premenopausal ER+ stage II breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative chemo-endocrine treatment with mitomycin C, tamoxifen, and UFT is effective for patients with premenopausal estrogen receptor-positive stage II breast cancer. Nishinihon Cooperative Study Group of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. 1057 4