Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In order to establish if anticholinergic drugs might influence postoperative nausea and vomiting, 100 ASA I-II adult patients scheduled for minor orthopaedic procedures, varicose vein stripping or inguinal herniorraphy were randomised to receive, in a double-blind fashion, either a premedicant and a reversal dose of 0.003 and 0.0075 mg/kg of glycopyrrolate or 0.006 and 0.015 mg/kg of atropine, respectively. Nitrous oxide, after thiopentone induction was used for anaesthesia with fentanyl and diazepam as supplements and pancuronium for relaxation. In the recovery room, up to 2 h after surgery, 28% of the patients in the glycopyrrolate group and 8% in the atropine group experienced nausea (P = 0.017). Thereafter, the patients complained of nausea at decreased and equal frequencies in both groups. The incidence of vomiting was not statistically significantly different. Droperidol was needed, to control persistent emesis, three times more often in the glycopyrrolate than in the atropine group. It is concluded that substitution of glycopyrrolate for atropine increases the likelihood of postoperative nausea, and continued use of atropine should be considered in patients at risk of postoperative emesis.
 ...
PMID:Do anticholinergic agents affect the occurrence of postanaesthetic nausea? 163 67

The effects of dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, on vigilance, thiopental anesthetic requirements, and the hemodynamic, catecholamine, and hormonal responses to surgery were investigated in healthy (ASA physical status 1) women scheduled for dilatation and curettage (D & C) of the uterus. Fifteen minutes before induction they received single iv doses of either dexmedetomidine (0.5 micrograms/kg; n = 19) or saline (n = 20) in a double-blind fashion. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with N2O/O2 (70/30%) and thiopental. Dexmedetomidine was well tolerated and no serious drug-related subjective side-effects or adverse events were observed. The most prominent subjective effects were fatigue and decreased salivation. The total amount of thiopental needed to perform D & C of the uterus was reduced approximately 30% (from 456 +/- 141 mg [mean +/- SD] after saline to 316 +/- 79 mg after dexmedetomidine). This was mostly due to a smaller induction dose in the group receiving dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine appeared to improve the recovery from anesthesia as measured by visual analogue scales (VAS) on fatigue and nausea. The plasma concentration of norepinephrine was decreased by 56% after dexmedetomidine implying decreased sympathetic nervous activity. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were moderately reduced after dexmedetomidine administration. The authors conclude that dexmedetomidine preanesthetic medication decreases thiopental anesthetic requirements and improves the recuperation from anesthesia with no serious hemodynamic or other adverse effects. Further studies in patients undergoing more stressful surgery are indicated.
 ...
PMID:Dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist, reduces anesthetic requirements for patients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery. 197 94

Twenty-two patients of ASA physical status 1 or 2 undergoing surgery of the perineal region received intrathecal pethidine as the sole agent. The anesthetic effect of 0.5 mg.kg-1 (group 1) or 0.7 mg.kg-1 (group 2) of pethidine was evaluated and compared. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (12 in group 1 and 10 in group 2). Subarachnoid puncture was performed with the patient in the sitting position, using a 25 gauge spinal needle at the lumbar vertebral level of L4/5 or L5/S. The patients remained sitting for 5 min before being placed in the supine position. Two patients in the group 1 had inadequate sensory blockade and they were excluded from further study. The average segmental level of analgesia was S1 in group 1 and L2 in group 2. Motor blockade of the anal sphincter was seen in all patients. During the operation, the patients were stable hemodynamically and no respiratory depression was noticed. Prolonged postoperative analgesia was obtained and some patients did not require additional analgesics during postoperative period. Four patients complained of itching, two patients of nausea and two developed arrhythmias.
 ...
PMID:[Spinal anesthesia with pethidine as the sole agent]. 207 94

We report the effects of flumazenil as reversion agent of the effects of diazepam at high doses as a part of short-duration general anesthesia. We have studied ten women in ASA I general condition who received anesthesia with fentanyl, 2.5 micrograms/kg-1, diazepam, 0.4 mg/kg-1 and O2/N2 at 60%. At the end of the operation, flumazenil, 0.2 mg, was administered. Hemodynamic, respiratory and adrenergic effects were evaluated. The degree of awareness and subjective feeling of the patient at awakening were also evaluated. After administration of flumazenil, awareness state was significantly higher (p less than 0.001) and it persisted during the duration of the study (120 minutes). Respiratory rate and pO2 increased significantly with administration of flumazenil (p less than 0.25 and p less than 0.01, respectively) and pCO2 decreased from 42.2 mmHg to 37.9 mmHg (p less than 0.05). Neither hemodynamic parameters nor plasma concentration of catecholamines changed significantly. As secondary effects attributable to flumazenil, four patients complained of nausea and one patient referred anxiety. We conclude that flumazenil allows to carry out anesthetic techniques with high doses of benzodiazepines even in short duration interventions with safety and without cardiocirculatory nor sympathetic-adrenal alterations.
 ...
PMID:[Diazepam reversion with flumazenil. Gasometric and sympathetic-adrenal study]. 209 74

The authors conducted a randomized double-blind controlled study comparing groups of patients receiving iv or epidural fentanyl infusions to determine whether, at comparable levels of analgesia, 1) the severity of side effects was different; and 2) plasma fentanyl concentrations differed between the two groups. Twenty-eight ASA physical status 2 women scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section were randomized into two groups to either receive fentanyl intravenously and saline epidurally or fentanyl epidurally and saline intravenously. After delivery of the infants under epidural anesthesia, each patient received a bolus of fentanyl 1.5 microgram/kg either intravenously or epidurally, and a fentanyl infusion was begun via the same route. Concurrently, a saline bolus and infusion were given via the alternate route. The rates of the fentanyl and saline infusions were adjusted until each patient was comfortable. Patients rated their pain, nausea, and pruritus on visual analogue scales. Sedation was evaluated by an observer. Respiratory depression was evaluated by end-tidal PCO2. Data were analyzed by unpaired two-tail t tests. Plasma fentanyl concentrations were measured at 12 and 24 h. Three patients in the iv group were dropped from the study because of inadequate pain relief. For the remaining 25 patients, similar infusion rates of fentanyl were required to produce similar levels of analgesia at 12 and 24 h. The severity of nausea, pruritus and sedation, and end-tidal PCO2 were similar for both groups. The plasma concentrations of fentanyl were significantly greater in those who received iv fentanyl at 12 h but not at 24 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized double-blind comparison of epidural versus intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia after cesarean section. 200 64

The purpose of this study was to determine if a small dose of intrathecal meperidine would achieve adequate spinal anaesthesia while minimizing complications and to compare its effectiveness with lidocaine. The spinal anaesthetic effects of five per cent lidocaine 0.5 mg.kg-1 in 7.5 percent glucose (n = 20) or five per cent meperidine 0.5 mg.kg-1 (n = 22) were evaluated in 42 ASA physical status II or III patients. Intrathecal injection of the anaesthetic agent was given with the patient in the sitting position in which he remained for ten minutes before being placed in the lithotomy position. The onset time for sensory blockade was seven minutes in the lidocaine group and ten minutes in the meperidine group. Final sensory levels were identical in both groups. Mean arterial blood pressure decreased significantly in the lidocaine group but not in the meperidine group. Motor block was absent in ten patients in the meperidine group but was present in all the patients in the lidocaine group. Duration of postoperative analgesia was 968 min in the meperidine group and 681 min in the lidocaine group (NS). Complications such as nausea, vomiting, itching, drowsiness and respiratory depression were similar in the two groups. It is concluded that low-dose meperidine, 0.5 mg.kg-1, is effective as a spinal anaesthetic agent and has few complications.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of intrathecal meperidine and lidocaine in endoscopic urological procedures. 219 5

The effects of ketamine administered per nasus (PN) or per rectum (PR) as pre-anesthetic medication for day surgery was studied in 70 ASA class I children with age ranging from 6 months to 6 years. Before study they were divided into 3 groups. Group A (n = 25) received no premedicant, while group B (n = 25) and group C (n = 20) received ketamine 6 mg/kg PR and 3 mg/kg PN as premedicant respectively. It was demonstrated that patients in group B and group C accepted the facemask during induction of anesthesia more willingly and peacefully than those in group A. In group B and group C there was accompaniment of analgesic effect seen postoperatively. The incidence of adverse reactions (nausea, vomiting, laryngospasm, salivation, respiratory depression) was low following the use of PR or PN ketamine although the children in these two groups emerged more belatedly from anesthesia and stayed in the post-anesthetic recovery room (PARR) for a longer time than in group A.
 ...
PMID:Rectal ketamine versus intranasal ketamine as premedicant in children. 221 4

The hypothesis that the lipid emulsion of the emulsion formulation of propofol is responsible for the low frequency of nausea, retching, and vomiting after propofol anesthesia was tested. A randomized, prospective, and comparative study was performed to evaluate the antiemetic effect of 10% lipid solution in 60 women, ASA physical status I and II, scheduled for ambulatory laparoscopic procedures. Two groups of patients were studied. Induction of anesthesia (thiopental) and maintenance of anesthesia (enflurane, nitrous oxide) were similar in both groups. At induction the study group received 10% Intralipid (3 mL/min for 20 min). The control group received 5% dextrose in lactated Ringer's solution at the same rate. Other drugs administered during or after anesthesia were similar among the groups. The groups were similar with respect to duration of anesthesia, characteristics of early and intermediate recovery, as well as pain scores in the postanesthesia care unit. There were no differences in the amount of antiemetic medications administered or postoperative nausea, retching, or vomiting when the patients were evaluated objectively by a blinded observer or subjectively by patient self-evaluation. It is concluded that 10% Intralipid, the lipid in the emulsion formulation of propofol, does not possess significant antiemetic effects.
 ...
PMID:Is the antiemetic effect of the emulsion formulation of propofol due to the lipid emulsion? 222 15

Epidural narcotics has been shown to produce profound and long-lasting analgesia. It has been suggested that lipid-soluble narcotics such as fentanyl, because of their short transit time in the CSF, are less likely to be associated with delayed respiratory depression and side effects. We tried to combine low concentrations of fentanyl with bupivacaine to minimize side effects and to see if synergistic effect existed. Forty ASA physical status I or II patients who present for cholecystectomy were included in the trial. Before surgery a thoracic epidural catheter was inserted and pain control began when patients became fully awake and complained of pain in the recovery room after surgery. Patients were randomized in a double-blind fashion to one of four groups. Patients in group I were given epidural infusions of fentanyl 0.001%; patients in group 2 received fentanyl 0.001% mixed with bupivacaine 0.1%; patients in group 3 received fentanyl 0.0005%; patients in group 4 received fentanyl 0.0005% mixed with bupivacaine 0.1%. A continuous epidural infusion of these drugs began at a rate of 10 mL/h after a 5-mL bolus of the solution. Pain relief was assessed with visual analogue pain scale. Respiratory rates, vital signs, and mental status were assessed hourly. Except the group 3, the degree of analgesia achieved was similarly satisfactory in all other groups. There was no respiratory depression developed in either group. Motor block was minimal or absent in all groups. The incidence of nausea and pruritus was significant less in group 3 and group 4. In conclusion, the continuous infusion of dilute bupivacaine with fentanyl provides synergistic analgesia with minimal side effects.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of fentanyl and fentanyl-bupivacaine for post cholecystectomy pain control. 235 68

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and side-effects of sublingual buprenorphine, a synthetic opioid agonist antagonist, with those of subcutaneous morphine. Fifty ASA class 1 patients were included in the study after having given their informed consent. Caesarean section was carried out under epidural block with 0.5% bupivacaine; no opioids were used during the procedure. The first dose of opioid was given 2 h after the first dose of bupivacaine. Patients were randomly given either 10 mg morphine (n = 25) or 0.4 mg buprenorphine (n = 25), followed by the same dose every 6 h for 36 h. When analgesia was insufficient, tablets containing dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol were given. No attempt was made to blind the study to the patient, but the investigator assessing pain was unaware of the drug given to the patient. Pain intensity was assessed before, and 2 h after each dose of opioid with a 100 mm visual scale, as well as systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures, heart and breathing rates, and SpO2. Side-effects (pruritus, nausea, vomiting, drowsiness) were also noted. In 2 patients in each group, the protocol was stopped before the 36th h, but after the fourth dose, either because of side-effects, or at the patient's request. Results were similar in both groups of patients, whether for degree of pain relief, or physiological effects. There was no clinically detectable respiratory depression. Duration and intensity of episodes of arterial oxygen desaturation, and the incidence of nausea, were similar in the 2 groups; pruritus was more common in the morphine group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Postoperative analgesia after cesarean section: sublingual buprenorphine versus subcutaneous morphine]. 237 54


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>