Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The efficacy and safety of oral sumatriptan as a 100-mg dispersible tablet was compared with oral Cafergot (2 mg ergotamine tartrate, 200 mg caffeine) in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial. In the trial, 580 patients were treated from 47 investigating centres in nine European countries. Sumatriptan was significantly more effective than Cafergot at reducing the intensity of headache from severe or moderate to mild or none; 66% (145/220) of those treated with sumatriptan improved in this way by 2 h, compared with 48% (118/246) of those treated with Cafergot (p less than 0.001). The onset of headache resolution was more rapid with sumatriptan, whereas recurrence of migraine headache within 48 h was lower with Cafergot. Sumatriptan was also significantly more effective at reducing the incidence of nausea (p less than 0.001), vomiting (p less than 0.01) and photophobia/phonophobia (p less than 0.001) 2 h after treatment, and fewer patients on sumatriptan (24%) than on Cafergot (44%, p less than 0.001) required other medication after 2 h. The overall incidence of patients reporting adverse events was 45% after sumatriptan and 39% after Cafergot; the difference was not significant. The most commonly reported events in the sumatriptan-treated patients were malaise or fatigue and bad taste; these were generally mild and transient. Nausea and/or vomiting, abdominal discomfort, and dizziness or vertigo were reported by a greater proportion of Cafergot-treated patients. It is concluded that oral sumatriptan was well tolerated and is a more effective acute treatment for migraine than Cafergot.
 ...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind comparison of sumatriptan and Cafergot in the acute treatment of migraine. The Multinational Oral Sumatriptan and Cafergot Comparative Study Group. 165 39

A double-blind, randomized, multicentre, parallel-group study was carried out to compare intranasal sumatriptan with placebo in the treatment of migraine. Seventy-four patients (37 in each treatment group) were recruited into the study. Patients received two insufflations of the same treatment (sumatriptan or placebo) 15 min apart. Sumatriptan (20 mg plus 20 mg) was more effective than placebo at relieving headache, defined as a reduction in severity from moderate (grade 2) or severe (grade 3) to mild (grade 1) or none (grade 0), at 60 and 120 min. At 120 min, 75% of patients in the sumatriptan group reported headache relief, compared with 32% of patients in the placebo group (p less than 0.001); 53% of patients in the sumatriptan group were completely pain-free, compared with 11% in the placebo group. A clinically significant reduction in the incidence of nausea, vomiting and photophobia was observed in the sumatriptan group compared with the placebo group, and sumatriptan was also more effective at reducing the functional disability of the patients. A similar number of patients reported migraine recurrence, within 24 h in both treatment groups. The observed reduction in headache severity, functional disability and nausea following intranasal administration of sumatriptan would appear to obviate the need for a concomitant anti-emetic during a migraine attack. The results support the further development and testing of intranasal sumatriptan.
 ...
PMID:A placebo-controlled study of intranasal sumatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine. The Finnish Sumatriptan Group and the Cardiovascular Clinical Research Group. 165 41

Safety information was pooled from 4,859 patients, mainly treated in controlled clinical trials with a dispersible tablet of sumatriptan or by a subcutaneous injection, and from 1,164 patients who received placebo by these routes. Safety monitoring involved collection of all adverse events, regardless of their relationship to treatment, and included routine laboratory screening tests and some special investigations. Individuals experienced several groups of symptoms that might be considered to be features of migraine itself or of the post-migraine period or due to treatment. The commonest complaints were an unpleasant taste or pain on injection. After oral sumatriptan (100-300 mg), some events (nausea, malaise) were characteristic of migraine and others (fatigue, sedation, weakness) were characteristic of the recovery period. With subcutaneous sumatriptan (4-8 mg) similar events were observed, but certain distinctive symptoms variously described as heaviness, pressure sensation, tingling, feelings of heat or warmth, were more common and affected various parts of the body. Their early onset and transient nature suggests some pharmacological mechanism, as yet not identified. Despite the mixed picture of symptoms recorded after treatment, they were not serious, they were transient and they were accepted by patients. Close patient monitoring allowed detailed evaluation of any possible cardiovascular side-effects as seen with other anti-migraine agents, particularly ergotamine. The evidence is reassuring but, since experience in patients with symptomatic ischaemic heart disease is limited, it is recommended that they should initially be treated with sumatriptan under medical supervision for their first two or three attacks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:The safety and tolerability of sumatriptan: an overview. 165 42

Three hundred and ninety-seven patients who presented to the emergency department were screened for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of iv granisetron (40 micrograms/kg or 80 micrograms/kg) in acute migraine. Twenty-eight patients fulfilled the stringent eligibility criteria and completed the study. Rescue medication was required 2 h post-infusion in 8 of 10 patients receiving granisetron 40 micrograms/kg, 5 of 10 patients receiving granisetron 80 micrograms/kg, and 6 of 8 patients receiving placebo. Significant improvement (p less than 0.05) in headache pain (on a visual analogue scale and categorical scale) was observed in the 80-micrograms/kg group. Headache pain evaluated with the Hunter headache scale indicated improvement for the sensory and affective components of headache pain in both granisetron groups. Except for more nausea at 30 min in the placebo group, no significant differences were noted between treatments. All three treatments were well tolerated. Granisetron may be effective for acute migraine headache; however, further studies with increased patient numbers are required.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind comparison of granisetron and placebo for the treatment of acute migraine in the emergency department. 166 23

Headache in young children is frequently a cause of concern to parents and physicians. We have reviewed our experience with 104 children with onset of headaches prior to 7 years of age seen by age 9 years. Headaches could be classified in more than 90% of cases. The most common headache type in this population referred to a child neurologist was migraine that constituted 75% of the cases. Seventy-two of 78 cases were common migraine. Posttraumatic headaches accounted for an additional 12%. Associated symptoms such as autonomic signs, nausea, and vomiting were common, particularly in the migraine group. Neuroimaging studies when performed did not reveal any significant abnormalities. Other laboratory tests were also generally unhelpful. No child has gone on to develop new neurologic abnormalities or evidence of an intracranial tumor. We conclude that even in young children headaches are generally benign. Even in this population, neuroimaging studies have a very low yield in the absence of other symptoms and findings and are not always indicated.
 ...
PMID:Headaches in children younger than 7 years of age. 849 99

We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous lidocaine (1 mg/kg) in the treatment of acute migraine. Thirteen subjects were randomly allocated to receive intravenous lidocaine and 12 received intravenous normal saline. Subjects scored the intensity of headache and nausea on separate visual analogue scales before the injection and at 10 and 20 min after injection. At 20 min, the mean pain intensity score was 80% of initial intensity in the lidocaine group and 82% in the placebo group. The difference was not statistically significant; at 20 min, the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the two groups in mean percentage of initial pain score was 2 +/- 29%. At the dose studied, intravenous lidocaine has, at best, only a modest effect in acute migraine.
 ...
PMID:Is intravenous lidocaine clinically effective in acute migraine? 179 May 67

During 1989-90 there were a total of 3,475,862 prescriptions of oral contraceptives (OCs) made in Australia by general practitioners. A 2- sided insert to facilitate deciding on the proper dosage for patients with various conditions was developed containing the estrogen- progestogen doses of OC preparations, management of minor side effects (nausea, vomiting, weight gain, chloasma, breakthrough bleeding, breast tenderness, or acne), and the relative contraindications to OC use. The simple, user-friendly, and flexible flow chart contains relative contraindications: age over 35 in heavy smokers, migraine or severe vascular headache, age over 45, previous cholestasis during pregnancy, hypertension, smoking, diabetes mellitus, long term immobilization, abnormal vaginal bleeding, gallbladder disease, impaired liver function, acute infectious mononucleosis, and use of rifampin or anticonvulsants.
 ...
PMID:Prescribing oral contraceptives and the medical record. 179 98

A comparison of the triphasic Triphasil and the combined oral contraceptive Diane 50 for treatment of acne for 6 cycles showed significant improvement in both groups. Triphasil (Wyeth-Ayerst) contains 50 mcg levonorgestrel and 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol, 75 mcg levonorgestrel and 40 mcg ethinyl estradiol for 5 days and 125 mcg levonorgestrel and 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol for 10 days. Diane 50 (Schering Ag) contains 2 mg cyproterone acetate and 50 mcg ethinyl estradiol for 21 days per cycle. 10 women in each group had physical, pelvic, ophthalmologic and neurologic exams, hematologic and biochemical screens, assays of free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone SO4 (DHEAS), progesterone, and computations of acne and hirsutism scores. Subjects had used tetracyclines, isotretinoin, erythromycin, topical clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide previously, but were withdrawn from medication in the cycle before the intervention. The mean acne scores, derived from grading and counting lesions and comedones, fell from 63.3 to 6 in the Diane 50 and from 64.2 to 4.5 in the Triphasil group. Subjective results were excellent for 6, good for 2 and unsatisfactory for 2 in the Diane 50 group, and excellent for 8 and good for 2 in the Triphasil group. In both groups mean free testosterone, androgen index, androstenedione and DHEAS, and an increase in SHBG were documented. 5 Triphasil and 5 Diane 50 subjects had increased cholesterol levels during the trial, the only abnormality detected. Side effects reported were recurrence of varicose veins and hemorrhoids in 1 women who withdrew, and complaints of mastalgia, nausea, dysmenorrhea, migraine, headache, backache and vaginal discharge.
 ...
PMID:An open study of Triphasil and Diane 50 in the treatment of acne. 183 45

Ondansetron was compared with metoclopramide for antiemetic efficacy in a randomised double-blind trial in 122 patients with advanced breast cancer. All patients were treated with epirubicin (greater than 50 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (greater than 500 mg/m2). 50 patients receiving ondansetron and 60 with metoclopramide were considered evaluable. Ondansetron was at least as effective as metoclopramide in the control of vomiting and nausea. The percentage of patients with complete plus major control was 72% (59-85%) vs. 61% (48-74%) on day 1 (P = 0.230) and 79% (67-91%) vs. 66% (53-78%) on days 2-3 after chemotherapy (P = 0.122). Over the 3-day study period, nausea was absent or mild in 60% of the patients treated with ondansetron, compared to 45% given metoclopramide (P = 0.064). No major drug-related side-effects were reported. 1 patient receiving ondansetron experienced gastrointestinal disturbance and headache. Episodes of diarrhoea, fever, hyperkinetic syndrome, fatigue, restlessness and migraine with vomiting were reported by 5 patients treated with metoclopramide. None of the changes in the biochemical or haematological parameters was attributed to the antiemetic treatments.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind randomised trial of the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ondansetron and metoclopramide in advanced breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. 183 24

Sumatriptan succinate, a 5-HT1D receptor agonist, constricts human cranial arteries. Two parallel-group trials for treatment of acute migraines were conducted in the United States. Adult patients were randomized and given either 6 mg of sumatriptan succinate subcutaneously (n = 734) or placebo (n = 370). At 1 hour, sumatriptan was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing moderate or severe headache pain to mild or no pain (70% vs 22%), in completely relieving headaches (49% vs 9%), and in improving clinical disability (76% vs 34%). Sumatriptan also reduced nausea and photophobia significantly better than placebo. Patients with residual migraines received another injection; those who had originally received sumatriptan received either a second active injection (n = 187) or placebo (n = 178), while those who had received placebo received a second placebo injection (n = 335). Statistical evidence for benefit of second sumatriptan injection is absent. Adverse events associated with sumatriptan were tingling, dizziness, warm-hot sensations, and injection-site reactions. Sumatriptan is effective and well tolerated in patients with acute migraine.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of acute migraine with subcutaneous sumatriptan. 165 6


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>