Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy of venlafaxine hydrochloride, a new antidepressant, are described. Venlafaxine inhibits the reuptake of serotonin, norepinephrine, and, to a lesser extent, dopamine. In animal models, it does not significantly inhibit muscarinic, histaminic, or adrenergic receptor activity and does not inhibit monoamine oxidase. Venlafaxine is rapidly absorbed and metabolized in the liver to its active metabolite, O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV). Time to peak concentration is one to two hours for the parent compound and four to five hours for ODV. The pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine might be dose-dependent, although pharmacokinetic studies have had conflicting results. The major route of elimination is renal; thus, patients with renal dysfunction may require lower doses. In double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of venlafaxine for maintenance therapy, venlafaxine has shown effective antidepressant activity in severely ill patients with major depression. Antidepressant effectiveness may be apparent within two weeks; this finding needs to be replicated. The dosage is 75-375 mg/day administered in two or three divided doses. The strength of the antidepressant response may be correlated with increasing dosage. Nausea is the most commonly reported adverse drug reaction (ADR). Others include somnolence, dizziness, dry mouth, and sweating. All ADRs have commonly occurred at the beginning of therapy and decreased with time. Overall, venlafaxine is well tolerated. Venlafaxine is as effective as other available antidepressants. It may cause fewer anticholinergic, antihistaminic, and antiadrenergic ADRs and may have a quicker onset of therapeutic action than existing antidepressants.
 ...
PMID:Venlafaxine: a heterocyclic antidepressant. 755 8

A total of 221 cases of deliberate acute overdose with fluvoxamine reported to the Paris Poison Centre, and 78 cases collected by the International Drug Safety Department of Duphar BV were analysed. Other agents, mainly benzodiazepines, neuroleptics, other antidepressants and alcohol, were also taken in 77% of the cases. The acute toxicity that could be attributed to fluvoxamine alone was rarely severe. The symptoms observed were always benign when the dose of fluvoxamine was below 1000 mg and included drowsiness, tremor, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, bradycardia and/or anticholinergic effects (dry mouth, mydriasis, sinus tachycardia, urinary retention). Seizures occurred in a few cases after high doses (generally > 1500 mg). Cardiotoxicity was not a serious problem; sinus bradycardia was noted with doses of less than 1000 mg, but was always moderate and required no treatment. Conduction abnormalities were rare.
 ...
PMID:Acute fluvoxamine poisoning. 790 58

Major depression is a common and disabling disorder with far-reaching social and economic implications. Nonetheless, major depression is treatable by one of the many currently available antidepressants with response rates of approximately 65-70%. Treatment of depression has improved in recent years because of the availability of effective and well-tolerated antidepressants, such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The currently available antidepressants are generally equally effective and are distinguished primarily by side-effect profiles. The side effects of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are attributed to their nonspecific interaction with cholinergic, histaminergic, serotonergic, and dopaminergic receptors in the central nervous system. The secondary amine TCAs, nortriptyline and desipramine, are preferred among the TCAs because of a more favorable side-effect profile. The TCAs are cardiotoxic, and overdoses are frequently fatal. Adverse effects, including potentially fatal drug and food interactions, limit the use of the monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs); however, these agents have a role in the treatment of depression with comorbid anxiety, refractory depression, atypical depression, and bulimia. The SSRIs possess a class side-effect profile of headache, nausea, and sexual dysfunction. Individual differences in side effects may distinguish fluoxetine (nervousness, restlessness), sertraline (diarrhea, loose stools), and paroxetine (dry mouth). The SSRIs all inhibit certain cytochrome P450 isoenzymes involved in the metabolism of drugs, such as the TCAs, and each SSRI has been reported to increase plasma concentrations of concomitantly administered TCAs. Bupropion therapy is associated with a risk of seizure development, which can be minimized by multiple daily doses. Trazodone is sedating and can rarely cause priapism. The related compound, nefazodone, does not cause sexual dysfunction or priapism, but is associated with sedation. Venlafaxine, a recently available antidepressant that appears to have efficacy in treatment-refractory depression, may cause nausea that requires gradual upward dosage titration. Higher doses of venlafaxine may also cause elevations in blood pressure, heart rate, and serum cholesterol. As more is learned about the pathophysiology of depression, even more specific and well-tolerated antidepressants will be developed.
 ...
PMID:Contemporary management of depression. 799 23

In a double-blind multi-centre study of general practice patients with DSM-III-R major depressive disorder, sertraline (50 or 100 mg/day) was compared with dothiepin (75 or 150 mg/day) and with placebo. There were 83, 96 and 90 patients evaluated in the respective treatment groups; treatment lasted 6 weeks. Patients were assessed on the MADRS, CGI, and Leeds Self-rating Scales. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between sertraline and placebo were found on MADRS and CGI but not the Leeds Scales. In the mild subgroup analyses, there were no significant differences between sertraline and placebo. However, clear significant differences (p < 0.05) between sertraline and placebo were present in the severe subgroup. Dothiepin failed to achieve a statistically significant difference from placebo on any analyses. Seventy-six per cent of patients were treated with 50 mg sertraline and 81% of patients received 150 mg dothiepin. Both sertraline and dothiepin were generally well tolerated; the most frequent side effects with sertraline were nausea, dizziness and headache; with dothiepin the most frequent side effects were dry mouth, somnolence and headache.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of sertraline and dothiepin in the treatment of major depression in general practice. 805

Twenty-one healthy, caucasian, male volunteers completed this randomized single blind, multiple-dose, crossover bioavailability study during which either phentermine HCl capsules (Minobese Forte, reference product) or phentermine base capsules (Duromine, test product) were ingested once daily for 14 days. A washout period of 14 days was allowed between the two treatment phases. On profile days (day 14 of each treatment phase) subjects remained recumbent for 24 hours after drug administration. Serial venous blood samples were drawn over the 24 hour dosing interval for plasma phentermine assay by gas chromatography. The 90% confidence intervals for the "test/reference" mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic variables Cmax,norm, Cmin,norm, AUCnorm (normalized for difference in the dose of phentermine base), %PTF and T75% Cmax, all fell within the bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. With the aid of trough plasma phentermine concentrations, it was established that steady-state was reached after 14 days of once daily administration of either product. Adverse events experienced on both treatments included prolonged or recurrent episodes of insomnia, nausea, headache, dry mouth and dizziness. No clinically relevant changes in clinical chemistry or hematology variables occurred during the study.
 ...
PMID:Steady-state pharmacokinetics of phentermine extended-release capsules. 822 80

In this study, 312 depressed outpatients received either placebo or one of three venlafaxine doses twice daily (b.i.d.) for up to 6 weeks. The total daily doses of venlafaxine were 25, 50-75, and 150-200 mg/day. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores at Week 6 were significantly lower for the high-dose group than for the placebo group. A positive dose-response trend for the primary efficacy parameters was demonstrated as early as Week 1. Venlafaxine was well tolerated at all dose levels. The most common side effects of clinical interest were nausea and dry mouth. The frequency of nausea in the venlafaxine groups was essentially the same (25-29%), whereas the frequencies of dry mouth, somnolence, and sweating were dose related. The results indicate that b.i.d. doses of venlafaxine are safe and effective in treating depression.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of b.i.d. doses of venlafaxine in a dose-response study. 829 Jun 61

In a partially blinded randomised cross-over trial, 78 patients receiving cisplatinum based chemotherapy were assigned to receive two forms of antiemetic therapy: SAD, a regimen composed of serenace (haloperidol), ativan (lorazepam), and dexamethasone followed by low dose maxolon (metoclopramide) and STADMAX, a regimen composed of scopolamine (hyoscine), tavegyl (clemastine), ativan, dexamethasone and high dose maxolon. Each antiemetic regimen was given in random order, with the first and second cycles of cytotoxic chemotherapy. 66 (85%) patients completed both cycles of antiemetic therapy and were available for the cross-over comparison. Significantly less acute vomiting, as assessed by nurse observer (P < 0.0001), and less delayed vomiting, as assessed by patient diary (P = 0.03), were seen with STADMAX. In the first 18 h, complete control of vomiting (no episodes) was achieved in 30 (45%) patients with STADMAX compared with 10 (15%) receiving SAD. Overall, major control of emesis (< or = 2 episodes) was achieved in 56 (85%) patients with STADMAX compared with 35 (53%) receiving SAD. Vomiting was also better controlled on STADMAX in the week after this initial 18 hour period based on the 7 day patient diary with no vomiting episodes in 18/65 (28%) on STADMAX vs. 13/65 (20%) on SAD. However, no significant differences in appetite, nausea or vomiting were found when based on linear analogue self assessment (LASA) scales recorded by patients. Significant differences in side effects of the two antiemetic regimens were noted on LASA scales with more dry mouth (P = 0.01), blurred vision (P = 0.03) and diarrhoea (P = 0.04) associated with STADMAX and more restlessness (P = 0.002) associated with SAD. Significantly, no episodes of dystonic reactions were seen among patients on either regimen. In the 68 patients who completed both cycles and were in a position to express a preference, 46 (68%) preferred STADMAX compared with only 20 (29%) who preferred SAD (P = 0.001), while 2 patients expressed no preference. It is concluded that STADMAX is the preferred regimen to SAD for the control of cisplatinum-related emesis. It has a role, both where specific serotonin 3 antagonists are not available and as a model for building more effective combinations where these agents are available.
 ...
PMID:A randomised cross-over trial of antiemetic therapy for platinum-based chemotherapy. Improved control with an intensive multiagent regimen. 839 24

Efficacy and safety of NK 622 (toremifene citrate) were compared with tamoxifen (TAM) by a double blind test in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. NK 622 and TAM were given orally for 12 weeks or more at daily doses of 40 and 20 mg/body, respectively. Eligible cases in NK622 and TAM groups were both 57 patients. No significant difference was observed in patient characteristics between either group. Response rates were 26.3% (8 CR and 7 PR, 15/57) in the NK 622 group and 28.1% (3 CR and 13 PR, 16/57) in the TAM group. Median values of duration to onset of CR were 91 days in the NK 622 group and 169 days in the TAM group. The duration was significantly shorter with the NK 622 group. Median duration of efficacy in CR and PR cases was 155 days in the NK 622 group and 154.5 days in the TAM group. Adverse effects were encountered in 7 patients (12.3%) of each of the 2 groups. The side effects were fatigue, hot flush, WBC decrease, abnormal values in liver function tests, etc. in the NK 622 group and anorexia, nausea, eruption, feeling of warmth, sweating, dry mouth, dizziness, abnormal values in liver function tests, etc. in the TAM group. Administration was discontinued in one patient with eruption and another patient with abnormal values of liver function tests in the TAM group, while there was no such case in the NK 622 group. Including the discontinued cases, the side effects were moderate and reversible in both groups. The patients in whom a drug was determined as useful or more numbered 24/57 (42.1%) in the NK 622 group and 23/57 (40.4%) in the TAM group. There was not significant difference between the 2 groups in the above results except the duration to onset of CR. From these results, NK 622 is expected to show comparable efficacy, safety, and usefulness in patients undergoing TAM treatment for advanced or recurrent breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation of NK 622 (toremifene citrate) in advanced or recurrent breast cancer--a comparative study by a double blind method with tamoxifen]. 843 63

Thirty-one selected patients with various haematological malignancies who received a 10 Gy-4 h total body irradiation (TBI) at the Institut Gustave Roussy 24 h before high dose cyclophosphamide for bone marrow transplantation, were prospectively evaluated for gastrointestinal symptoms, body temperature, consciousness, headache, xerostomia, parotiditis, ocular symptoms, blood pressure, and respiratory and cutaneous signs for 24 h. In spite of prophylactic administration of various anti-emetic agents, 90% of the patients experienced nausea and 80% experienced vomiting. An almost constant body temperature peak--up to 40.8 degrees C--was registered 6 h after the start of irradiation. No drowsiness was reported since the introduction of the new anti-emetic agent Ondansetron. Nearly half the patients (42%) complained of headache. The proportion of patients experiencing early (during TBI) xerostomia was 61%. 74% of patients complained of parotiditis in the first 24 h. Although this low dose rate whole body irradiation is not likely to be exactly replicated in many accidental human exposures, the incidence rate and the time-course of the observed prodromal phase symptoms may prove helpful for early triage in the case of accidental irradiation.
 ...
PMID:Prospective study of the clinical symptoms of therapeutic whole body irradiation. 844 18

Seventeen idiopathic parkinsonian patients ranging between 47 and 75 years of age were included in this study to investigate the effect and tolerance of lisuride on PD. The duration of this simple clinical study, which had no control group was 12 weeks. There was 50% relief in disability scores and ADL in 13 patients in the first group in the combined therapy for 12 weeks with lisuride added to L-DOPA plus benserazide (p < 0.01). Optimal lisuride doses added to L-DOPA plus benserazide varied between 0.1 and 0.8 mg (mean 0.5 +/- 0.2 mg). With the addition of lisuride to treatment, the L-DOPA plus benserazide dose was reduced in 6 of 13 by 38%. Monotherapy with lisuride resulted in 56% to 57% improvement in disability scores and 47% in relief in ADL. Dry mouth, nausea, weakness, postural hypotension, and headache were the most frequently encountered side effects of lisuride. These adverse effects disappeared in 3 or 4 days, depending on a slight decrease and following increase in the dose of lisuride and/or the development of tolerance. Not only will such a combined therapy contribute to the reduction of the end-of-dose inadequacies, on-off phenomena, wearing off, peak-dose dyskinesias, and similar motor fluctuations, it may also play a prophylactic role in their prevention or delay.
 ...
PMID:A study on the effect and tolerance of lisuride on Parkinson's disease. 861 74


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>