Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Dentistry uses a variety of different polymer materials. Dental polymer materials are based on methacrylate, its polymer, and polyelectrolytes. The setting of restorative materials and adhesives is initiated chemically by mixing two components or by light. In both cases, polymerisation is incomplete and monomers, not reacted, release. Studies have documented that monomers may cause a wide range of adverse health effects such as irritation to skin, eyes or mucous membranes, allergic dermatitis, asthma, parenthesise in the fingers, and disturbances from central nervous system such as; headache, pain in the extremities, nausea, loss of appetite, fatigue, sleep disturbances, irritability, loss of memory and changes in blood parameters. Dental personnel are occupationally exposed when handling the non reacted monomers. The use of gloves do not give enough protection as monomers, released from the material, easily penetrate all gloves used in dentistry. Face masks do not prevent inhalation of monomers. Ordinary glasses do not protect the eyes against vapor from monomers. The result from this study demonstrate the need for the development of ergonomic procedures and practices for safe handling of such materials in dental clinics.
 ...
PMID:Use of polymer materials in dental clinics, case study. 941 12

This study was conducted to compare the analgesic action of Lysine Clonixinate (LC) vs Paracetamol/Codeine association (PC) in the treatment of postepisiotomy pain in primiparae women: 131 primiparous patients with moderate-to-severe postepisiotomy pain were enrolled in a double blind dummy design study and randomly allocated to either treatment with fixed doses of LC 125 mg or Paracetamol 500 mg+Codeine 30 mg 6 qh during 24 hours. Intensity of spontaneous pain and pain on walking was assessed according to a visual analog scale (VAS) and patient's assessment before receiving treatment and after 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours. Intensity of spontaneous pain was reduced in 24 hours from 4.28 +/- 2.11 to 1.73 +/- 1.46 (P < 0.0001) in the LC group and from 4.78 +/- 2.08 to 1.90 +/- 1.72 in the PC-treated group (p < 0.0001); with no significant differences between treatments. 54% of the patients treated with LC and 55% of those receiving PC showed onset of analgesic action 30 minutes following dose administration. Patient's final global assessment revealed that 95% of LC-treated patients and 96% of the PC group showed total or partial pain relief during the first treatment day. No sleep disturbances were seen during the night in 75% of patients. Only one patient receiving LC showed nausea not requiring treatment discontinuation. It is concluded that both treatments are equally effective to relieve moderate-to-severe postepisiotomy pain.
 ...
PMID:Lysine clonixinate vs. paracetamol/codeine in postepisiotomy pain. 950 93

The objective of this study was to assess outcomes of pediatric day surgery tonsillectomy. A total of 129 children, aged 5-16 years, and their parents were recruited from three urban hospitals which provided pediatric day surgery. Children reported pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS) in day surgery and then daily at home for 7 days. Parents reported outcomes of surgery, including fluid intake, nausea, vomiting and sleep disturbances. They also recorded analgesic administration. Three main results related to extent and duration of pain, quality of management of pain, and effect of pain on utilization of health services. Tonsillectomy caused considerable pain which lasted more than 7 days. Pain followed a trajectory of intense or moderately intense pain for the first 3 days followed by a gradual decline over the next 4 days. In general, post-tonsillectomy pain was poorly managed by health professionals and parents. An unexpected observation was that children who had a bupivacaine infiltration of the tonsil fossa during surgery had significantly more pain in the evening of surgery than children who did not have an infiltration. The increase in postoperative pain experienced by those who had the infiltration was attributed to quality of pain management. Children with persistent pain (those who did not follow the typical trajectory) were likely to be taken to a medical practitioner. One-third of the sample made unscheduled visits to practitioners with most occurring from Day 4 to Day 7 of the follow-up.
 ...
PMID:Pain progression, intensity and outcomes following tonsillectomy. 953 72

To estimate the frequency of adverse effects associated with the use of the transdermal nicotine patch, we abstracted and analysed data from 47 reports of 35 clinical trials. The meta-analysis presented here represents a synthesis of data from 41 groups of nicotine patch recipients totalling 5501 patients, and 33 groups of placebo recipients totalling 3752 patients. Smoking abstinence was the primary outcome in 32 of the trials, and relief of colitis symptoms was the primary outcome in 2 of the trials; 1 study of contact sensitisation was included in the skin irritation analysis. The patch was clearly effective as an aid to smoking abstinence. Despite the large number of patients in the analysis, few adverse cardiovascular outcomes (myocardial infarction, stroke, tachycardia, arrhythmia, angina) were reported, and no excess of these outcomes was detected among patients assigned to nicotine-patch use. The incidences of several minor adverse effects were clearly elevated among the nicotine-patch groups, especially sleep disturbances, nausea or vomiting, localised skin irritation and respiratory symptoms, but the background rates and risk ratios varied considerably across studies. The incidence of nausea or vomiting appeared to be lowest when the patch dose was tapered. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that very large studies would be needed to assess the effect of the patch, if any, on serious, rare outcomes. These results also suggest that the rate of minor adverse effects might be lowered by modifying patch-use protocols.
 ...
PMID:A meta-analysis to assess the incidence of adverse effects associated with the transdermal nicotine patch. 956 40

We aimed to compare the antidepressant and anxiolytic effects, tolerability and effects on quality of life of mirtazapine and citalopram in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre, 8-week study. Patients with a Major Depressive Episode (DSM-IV) and a baseline score of > or = 22 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) were randomized to 8 weeks treatment with either mirtazapine (n = 137, 15-60 mg/day) or citalopram (n = 133, 20-60 mg/day). Efficacy was evaluated by the MADRS, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), Clinical Global Impression scales (CGI), the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ). The efficacy analyses were performed on the Intent-To-Treat Group using the Last Observation Carried Forward method. Vital signs and laboratory variables are measured and adverse events recorded at each weekly visit. The magnitude of reduction from baseline in group mean MADRS scores was large in both groups, reaching after 8 weeks of treatment mean scores of 9.1 in the mirtazapine group and 8.9 in the citalopram group. Both treatments also resulted in a substantial improvement in anxiety symptoms, sleep disturbances and quality of life, and high percentage of responders. However, at day 14, statistically significantly larger magnitudes of change favouring mirtazapine were present in the group mean MADRS, HAM-A and CGI-Severity of illness and Quality of life scores. A difference of 2.3 points on MADRS favouring mirtazapine is considered indicative for a clinically relevant superiority between two proven antidepressants. Mirtazapine treatment was also related to faster improvement of sleep, quality of sleep and improved alertness following awakening, as shown by statistically significant differences on the self-rating LSEQ at various time points. There were no differences between two treatment groups on self-rating QLSEQ. Both drugs were well tolerated, with a low number of patients in either group prematurely terminating the study due to adverse events (mirtazapine: 3.6%, citalopram, 3.0%). Sweating and nausea were statistically significantly more frequent in the citalopram group and increased appetite and complaints of weight increase in the mirtazapine group. There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters and vital sign variables with either treatment, except for clinically relevant increase in body weight, occurring more frequently in mirtazapine patients. In this study, mirtazapine and citalopram were equally effective in reducing symptoms of depression and anxiety, and well tolerated. However, mirtazapine was significantly more effective than citalopram after 2 weeks of treatment on the MADRS, HAM-A and CGI Severity of illness and Quality of life scales. This finding, consistently present at all major efficacy variables, suggests potentially faster onset of efficacy of mirtazapine over citalopram.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine versus citalopram: a double-blind, randomized study in patients with major depressive disorder. Nordic Antidepressant Study Group. 1056 99

Chronic daily headache (CDH) represents a group of any headache disorder that occurs on a daily or near daily basis, for longer than 6 months. Even though it is a common problem, it is not a well defined disorder, resulting in controversies regarding its identification, description and approach. Three hundred patients, 232 women and 68 men, ages 16 to 86 (mean 38 years old for the women and 42 for the men), attending a headache center and fulfilling the proposed criteria for CDH (Silberstein et al.) and presenting headache 28 days per month were retrospectively studied. The clinical features allowed the primary headache diagnosis, before the transformation into daily presentation as: transformed migraine (TM ) in 271 patients (90,3%), chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) in 26 patients (8,7%) and new daily persistent headache (NDPH) in 3 patients (1%). Among the TM patients, the most observed presentation was pressure or tightening, bilateral fronto-temporal, moderate non-continuous headache, with a progressive onset. The association with nausea and phonophobia was demonstrated in 60% and 32% of the patients respectively. The association with photophobia and sleep disturbances, as well as the occurrence of intermittent headache attacks, was different among male and female patients. With regard to the CTTH patients, pressure or tightening, bilateral fronto-temporal, moderate non-continuous headache, with sleep disturbances and no associated symptoms, was the predominant presentation.
 ...
PMID:[Chronic daily headache: clinical presentation]. 1092 Apr 5

The restless legs syndrome (RLS) characteristically presents with an irresistible urge to move that is most often accompanied by creeping sensations deep in the limbs. Occasionally the upper limbs can also be affected. RLS symptoms occur at rest and are typically more intense at night and at bedtime. Some patients complain about involuntary leg movements, so-called periodic limb movements (PLM), while at rest or PLM have been observed by the bed partner. Often, patients have to get out of bed several times at night, to relieve themselves of their disagreeable sensations.The prevalence of RLS is estimated to be about 5%. Up to now only three classes of drugs have been systematically evaluated for treatment of RLS: benzodiazepines, opioids and dopaminergic agents.The most consistent results have been obtained with dopaminergic drugs. Several studies have shown that L-dopa given with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor at a 10:4 ratio is effective in treating RLS. Controlled studies using polysomnographic recordings in a double-blind design showed that L-dopa administered at night produces a significant reduction of RLS occurring at bedtime and of PLM, which are often associated with nocturnal arousals. In most cases, L-dopa 100mg, in conjunction with the decarboxylase inhibitor carbidopa or benserazide 25mg, suppresses RLS although a rebound of PLM may be observed in the last part of the night. The two major adverse effects frequently seen in patients treated with L-dopa are:Augmentation is one of the limiting factors of L-dopa therapy; thus, alternative treatment options are of major interest. In several open treatment trials performed with pergolide, patients reported a marked improvement of RLS symptoms including sleep problems. Mild symptoms of augmentation under pergolide treatment have been reported from single patients. In another 6-month open label trial, pergolide proved to be effective in patients who developed augmentation under L-dopa by relieving daytime symptoms after switching to pergolide.Most recently, the results of these open label trials have been replicated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicenter trial. Treatment with a single evening dose of 0.25-0.75mg pergolide resulted in a significant improvement of almost all subjective and objective parameters. Under pergolide, patients rated their RLS symptoms and sleep disturbances much less severe and polysomnographic recordings also revealed a significant improvement of all important sleep parameters. To prevent peripheral side-effects such as nausea or orthostatic hypotension, pergolide should be slowly up-titrated or domperidone should be added. Under these conditions, no major side-effects have been observed in treatment trials with pergolide in dosages up to 1.25mg.Pergolide with a half-life of 12-16h thus appears to be an appropriate drug in the therapy of RLS especially in those patients who developed augmentation under L-dopa therapy. Owing to the remarkable therapeutic effect of pergolide on RLS symptom control, other dopamine agonists are presently being tested for the treatment of RLS.
 ...
PMID:Restless legs syndrome and its treatment by dopamine agonists. 1100 92

Currently, two drugs are considered useful for those wishing to quit smoking in Germany--nicotine and bupropion. The mechanism of action appears to involve reuptake inhibition of the transmitters noradrenaline and/or dopamine by the brain. Treatment with a daily dose of 300 mg delayed release buproplon for 7 to 9 weeks resulted in smoking cessation in 30.3% (buproplon) and 35.5% (bupropion plus nicotine patch) of the smokers at 12 months (placebo: 15.6%, nicotine patch: 16.4%). A large number of the participants had had negative experience with nicotine preparations in previous attempts to stop smoking. Most side effects of bupropion involve the nervous system (disturbed sleep, trembling, loss of concentration, headache, dizziness, depression, restlessness, anxiety) and the gastrointestinal tract (dry mouth, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation) and elevated temperature (> 1% of the treated subjects). It is suggested that, at present, bupropion should be used for this indication only in those smokers in whom treatment with nicotine has failed.
 ...
PMID:[Antidepressive drug against nicotine. A method for smoking cessation]. 1119 75

Ideally, treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD) should prevent or cure the disease. Unfortunately, these goals appear unobtainable in the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, symptomatic relief is a feasible treatment option for AD patients and is available currently in the form of cholinesterase inhibitors such as tacrine, donepezil, metrifonate and rivastigmine. Donepezil is a second-generation, piperidine-class, selective and reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Four double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of donepezil, involving over 1900 individuals with mild to moderate AD, have been published recently. In all trials, significant improvements in cognition were observed consistently for both therapeutic doses of donepezil (5 and 10 mg/d), relative to placebo. Similar donepezil-associated benefits were reported for global functioning. In addition, in one 24-wk, multinational clinical trial, patients receiving donepezil (10 mg/d) performed better than placebo-treated patients in their ability to perform complex daily functioning tasks. Donepezil was well tolerated in all trials, with approx. 79% of all donepezil-treated patients completing the studies compared with approx. 84% of placebo-treated patients. The most common adverse events associated with donepezil were generally cholinergic-induced and gastrointestinal in nature (e.g. nausea, diarrhoea, and vomiting) which were generally mild, transient and tended to occur after the dose was increased to 10 mg/d from 5 mg/d after 1 wk only. Sleep disturbances also occurred as the clinical trials utilized a bedtime dosing regimen. There was no evidence of organ toxicity or clinically significant treatment-emergent laboratory test abnormalities. Thus, donepezil appears to be a beneficial symptomatic treatment for patients with mild to moderate AD.
 ...
PMID:Management of cognition and function: new results from the clinical trials programme of Aricept(R) (donepezil HCl). 1134 20

Both antidepressants and neuroleptics are widely used in psychopharmacological treatment. In view of the often equal efficacy of substances belonging to the same class of drugs, potential side effects have become the most important criteria for the selection of a specific drug. The therapeutic effect of antidepressants is mediated by their inhibition of the reuptake of the neurotransmitters noradrenaline and of serotonin. Significant adverse effects may occur through the interaction of the antidepressants with other receptors believed not to be related to the therapeutic action, most importantly the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M), the histamine-1 (H1) receptor and the alpha-1 (alpha 1) adrenergic receptor. In contrast to the classical tricyclic antidepressants, the newly available selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors neither block the M1-, H1- nor the alpha 1 receptors. Although the rate of side effects is considerably lower compared to tricyclic antidepressants, adverse effects may, however, occur through the stimulation of different serotonin receptor subtypes (5-HT2A, 5-HT2B, and 5-HT3), leading to anxiety, sleep disturbances and nausea. Neuroleptics are often administered for years or even decades in the treatment of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The main adverse effects are extrapyramidal symptoms, including parkinsonism, akathisia, dystonic reactions, and tardive dyskinesias. With the introduction of the atypical neuroleptics (e.g. clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine) it became apparent that the antipsychotic effect and the extrapyramidal unwanted effect are not always and inextricably linked. The evidence for the hypotheses of the pathogenetic mechanisms leading to extrapyramidal side effects is reviewed. Both the dopamine receptor hypersensitivity hypothesis and the hypothesis of mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibition are as yet based on indirect evidence. However, if, as suggested by the analyses of mitochondrial energy metabolism, the antipsychotic effect and the adverse effects are unrelated properties of neuroleptics, new principles should be applied in the development of novel neuroleptics. Neuroleptics might then be developed that are effectively antipsychotic but are less likely to produce limiting extrapyramidal side effects.
 ...
PMID:Cell-mediated side effects of psychopharmacological treatment. 1171 30


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>