Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities, and the response rate of irinotecan administered weekly with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In a phase I/II clinical trial, patients with histologically documented, surgically unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled. Irinotecan was administered as a 90 min intravenous infusion once weekly for 6 weeks. The starting dose was 30 mg m(-2) and dose escalation was done in 15 mg m(-2) increments. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 3 nonhaematologic toxicity (excluding nausea, vomiting and alopecia) or grade 4 haematologic toxicity according to the WHO criteria. Radiation was delivered to the primary tumour and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy), followed by a boost to the primary tumour (20 Gy). Twenty-seven patients were entered into this study at three irinotecan dose levels (30, 45 and 60 mg m(-2)). Twenty-six eligible patients were evaluated for toxic effects and clinical outcome. Severe oesophagitis, pneumonitis, and diarrhoea occurred at 45 and 60 mg m(-2). Three of the five patients given 60 mg m(-2) developed grade 3 or 4 oesophagitis and pneumonitis. In addition, one patient died of pneumonitis after completing therapy at 45 mg m(-2) in the phase II study. The objective response rate was 76.9% (95% CI, 53.0-88.9%). Oesophagitis, pneumonitis, and diarrhoea are the dose-limiting toxicities of weekly irinotecan combined with thoracic irradiation. The maximum tolerated dose and the dose for the phase II study were 60 and 45 mg m(-2) wk(-1), respectively. This combined therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is promising and shows acceptable toxicity.
 ...
PMID:Phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 1018 91

An effective locoregional therapy is needed for adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, stomach, and gastroesophageal junction. Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) may enhance the effect of radiation therapy (RT). Paclitaxel synchronizes cells at G2/M, a relatively radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle. We have shown that response to paclitaxel and concurrent RT (paclitaxel/RT) was not affected by p53 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. This finding suggested that paclitaxel/RT was a rational treatment approach for other malignancies that frequently harbor p53 mutations, such as upper gastrointestinal malignancies. We completed a phase I study of paclitaxel/RT for locally advanced pancreatic and gastric cancer. The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel was 50 mg/m2/wk for 6 weeks with abdominal RT. The dose-limiting toxicities were abdominal pain within the radiation field, nausea, and anorexia. Phase II studies are now under way. Twenty-five patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer have been entered at the phase II dose level of paclitaxel 50 mg/m2/wk with concurrent RT (total dose, 50 Gy). Thus far, the only grade 3/4 toxicities have been hypersensitivity reactions (n = 2), asymptomatic grade 4 neutropenia (n = 3), and nonneutropenic biliary sepsis (n = 1). Of the first 18 assessable patients with pancreatic cancer treated on the phase II study, six obtained a partial response, for a preliminary response rate of 33%. In the phase II study for locally advanced gastric cancer, 20 patients have been enrolled. Of the first 19 patients who have completed treatment, nine (47%) had grade 3/4 toxicities, including nausea, anorexia, esophagitis, and gastritis. Of the first 16 patients with gastric cancer, complete and partial responses have been observed in one and eight patients, respectively, for a preliminary response rate of 56%. We have also completed treatment on 24 patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction with neoadjuvant paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2, weekly for 4 weeks, with concurrent RT (total dose, 40 Gy) followed by surgical resection. Ten patients (41%) had grade 3/4 toxicities, including neutropenia, nausea, and dehydration. Of 24 patients, four complete responses (17%) and 14 partial responses (58%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 75%. Severe esophagitis was uncommon, making this a well-tolerated outpatient regimen for adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus. These findings demonstrate that paclitaxel-based chemoradiation for locally advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies is well-tolerated with substantial activity.
 ...
PMID:Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, stomach, and gastroesophageal junction. 1021 May 40

The intensity of complains, short survival and great number of patients makes many oncologists to apply chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer/NSCLC/. The achieved median duration of life after chemotherapy was 6 to 12 month. From the other hand non small cell lung cancer chemotherapy is a big burden even to healthy persons. It can worsen the quality of life. That was the reason we evaluated the quality of life after chemotherapy in advanced non small cell lung cancer patients. Taking into account, that the evaluation of quality of life, used in most diseases is useless in advanced NSCLC patients, for appreciation the quality of life in these cases the lung cancer symptoms scale/LCSS/was adopted. In 110 non small cell lung cancer patients in stage IIIB and IV, who received combined chemotherapy by Le Chevalier/Vindesine, Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide, Lomustin/or by Rosell/Mitomycin, Cyclophosphamide, Cisplatin/the quality of life was evaluated. In 20-persons control group all patients received the symptomatic treatment. In observed group of 110 patients, tumor regressions after 4 courses of chemotherapy allowed to resect cancer in 14 cases, to apply radiotherapy in 42 and to continue chemiotherapy in 23 persons. In every person from above mentioned group the quality of life was evaluated on the basis of intensity of cancer symptoms, accordingly to LCSS. The intensity of cancer symptoms was compared before and after treatment. There were compared; the innensity of complains, weakness, appetite, malnutrition, and hematological, neurological, performans state as well as respiratory sufficiency, infections, cardiac disorders and pain. Apart it, the side effects of applied therapy were assessed in 5 degree scale. The level of hemoglobin, the number of leucocytes, thrombocytes, bilirubine and transaminases in peripheral blood, hematurie, proteinurie, bleedings, appetite, nausea, vomitings, diarrhea, mucosal lesions, infections, skin lesions, cardiac lesions, neurological lesions, respiratory disorders, allergy, alopecia. It was established that, chemotherapy in the most patients improved the performance status and minimized cancer symptoms especially, after good response to treatment. After anticancer therapy more frequently severe infections and cardiac disorders, independently to results of treatment were seen. In non-responders, the cancer symptoms were intensified by side effects of antineoplastic-therapy. In this group of patients the severe side effects of therapy more frequently were seen.
 ...
PMID:[The quality of life after chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients]. 1034 48

In a prospective multi-centre collaborative study, 516 patients with advanced cancer were treated by epirubicin (pararubicin, EPI) containing regimens. After CEOP (cyclophosphamide CTX, EPI, vincristine VCR and prednisone PDN) was used in the treatment of 213 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, 87 patients had complete remission (CR) and 99 partial remission (PR). Their response rate was 87.3%. However, there were 2 CR and 71 PR in 161 patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by CEP regimen (CTX, EPI and cisplatin PDD), with a response rate of 45.3%. In 70 breast cancer patients treated by EMF regimen (EPI, Methotrexate MTX and 5-fluorouracil 5-FU), 8 had CR and 28 PR, with a response rate of 51.4%. The EPI containing regimens were also effective in dealing with gastro-intestinal tract and nasopharyngeal cancers. Adverse effects of epirubicin containing regimens were mainly nausea and vommiting, and the dose-qlimit toxicity was leucopenia. Hepatic, cardiac and renal toxicities were rather mild. The current phase III study revealed that the effect of epirubicin is similar to that of adriamycin, but the cardiac toxicity is relatively mild. So the effects can be improved by increasing the dose-intensity.
 ...
PMID:[Epirubicin containing regimens in advanced malignant tumors report of 516 cases. Epirubicin Collaborative Study Group]. 1037 13

This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of combining cisplatin/etoposide (VP-16) with the arotinoid Ro 40-8757 and to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Ro 40-8757 in this combination. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer were eligible. Treatment consisted of Ro 40-8757 p.o. day 1-21, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 2 and VP-16 100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 2-4, repeated every 3 weeks. Eighteen patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The doses of Ro 40-8757 ranged from 84 mg/m2 once daily to 42 mg/m2 thrice daily (tid). DLT consisting of delayed nausea/vomiting was reached at 42 mg/m2 tid. Consequently, the maximum tolerated dose was set at one dose level below the DLT, i.e. 28 mg/m2 tid. Skin toxicity occurred but was well manageable. Pharmacological analyses showed a small increase in the volume of distribution of cisplatin and VP-16 between the first and third course. However, no relationship with side effects was found. A response was achieved in 50% of patients. The combination of cisplatin/VP-16 with Ro 40-8757 appears to be feasible at a dose schedule of 28 mg/m2 tid. The response rate was at the upper rate of what can be expected with cisplatin and VP-16.
 ...
PMID:Phase I and pharmacologic study of the arotinoid Ro 40-8757 in combination with cisplatin and etoposide in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. 1037 70

To determine the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer, three phase II studies of single agent gemcitabine have been conducted between 1990 and 1994. In an early phase II study, gemcitabine was administered of 800 mg/m2 on day 1, 8, 15 every four weeks (step I), and 1,000 mg/m2 (step II). Response was observed in 3 of 13 patients with previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer, although there was no responders in the previously treated patients. Late phase II studies were performed at 20 (group A) and 24 (group B) Japanese institutions to confirm the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine administered alone in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Seventy-three patients (group A) and 67 patients (group B) were entered into these studies. All patients had no previous chemotherapy and had measurable disease. Gemcitabine was administered at a starting dose of 1,000 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks followed by a week of rest. The dose was escalated to 1,250 mg/m2 if severe toxicity was not seen in the previous course. Nineteen of 73 patients (26%) had a partial response in group A. Of 67 patients, 14 (20.9%) showed a partial response in group B. Grade 3 or greater toxicities included anemia (20.5%) and leukopenia (9.6%) in group A, and in 13.4% and seven 10.4% in group B, respectively. And grade 3 thrombocytopenia was observed in 1.4%. Other toxicities including hepatic toxicity, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and fever were mild and transient. Pulmonary toxicity was observed in five patients, two of whom died of ARDS. The median durations of response were 19.6 weeks in group A and 20 weeks in group B, and median survival times were 44 and 39 weeks, respectively. In conclusion, gemcitabine is an active agent against non-small cell lung cancer with very mild toxicities. These results suggest that gemcitabine has potential utility in advanced non-small cell lung cancer on an outpatient basis. Further trials in combination with other active agents are warranted.
 ...
PMID:[Phase II studies of gemcitabine for non-small cell lung cancer in Japan]. 1039 14

The combination Phase I study of gemcitabine hydrochloride with cisplatin was conducted in the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at 5 investigation sites. Gemcitabine was administrated on day 1, 8 and 15 and cisplatin on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. The dosage of cisplatin was fixed to 80 mg/m2 and the dosage of Gemcitabine was gradually escalated in 3 dosing level from 600, 800 to 1,000 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose was determined with Continual Reassessment Method. For each dose level, 6 cases, 3 cases and 6 cases were registered respectively and all 15 cases were evaluable. In the dose level 3 with 1,000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin, grade 4 neutropenia was observed as DLT in 3 out of 6 cases, thus dose level 3 was considered as MTD and the recommended dose. Major adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting and anorexia. The incidence of such adverse events seemed to be dose-dependent and especially the grade of neutropenia seemed to be more serious as the dose increased. Also, the grade of liver function tests abnormal seemed to be more serious as the dose increased but the incidence as well as the grade did not have tendency of dose-dependent in another events including renal function tests abnormal. On the other hand, as to the efficacy PR was observed in 4 out of 15 cases. Based upon the results, it is necessary to discuss further the efficacy in the recommended dose in the combination therapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin.
 ...
PMID:[Phase I study of gemcitabine hydrochloride (LY 188011) combination therapy with cisplatin in the patients with non-small cell lung cancer]. 1039 16

Between September 1994 and July 1997, 78 patients with advanced/metastatic, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were selected for the NIP (vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin) protocol. The study group included 43 males; age range 34-74 years; median age 56 years; median follow-up for all patients was 14 months and for surviving patients, 30 months. Histological distribution included 55 adenocarcinomas (70.5%), 8 squamous cell carcinomas, and 9 large cell carcinomas. Stage distribution was 14 stage IIIB (malignant effusions) and 64 stage IV or recurrent metastatic; sites of metastasis were lungs, -26; liver-19; bones-27; brain-7; adrenals-3; distant nodes-2; skin-2. The NIP regimen was well tolerated by most of the patients but nausea/vomiting was noted in 55% of the cycles administered, most of them of grade 1-2 severity. Fifteen neutropenic episodes (5%) were encountered. Response to NIP was: 44 partial responses (56%); 1 complete response (1%); overall response, 58%. For stage IIIB, overall response was 36%, while for stage IV/metastatic, overall response was 63%. The median time to progression was 7 months for stage IIIB and 8 months for stage IV/metastatic disease and the overall median survival achieved was 14 months, with 60% of patients alive after one year. No significant difference in survival outcome was noted between patients with metastatic disease and those with stage IIIB (malignant effusion) disease. The NIP regimen has produced encouraging results in advanced NSCLC, as well as a favourable toxicity profile. The efficacy of NIP as a palliative tool should be assessed. A randomized trial to compare NIP with a two-drug combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin has been initiated.
 ...
PMID:Vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 1042 51

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral imidazotetrazinone that is spontaneously converted to 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) at physiological pH. MTIC methylates DNA at the O6 position of guanine, although this lesion may be repaired by the enzyme O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGAT). In this study, TMZ was combined with cisplatin (CDDP), because both agents have single-agent activity against melanoma and other tumor types. Additionally, CDDP has been shown to inactivate AGAT, and subtherapeutic concentrations of CDDP have been shown to increase the sensitivity of leukemic blasts to TMZ. This Phase I study sought to determine the toxicities, recommended dose, and pharmacological profile of the TMZ/CDDP combination. Patients were treated with oral TMZ daily for 5 consecutive days together with CDDP on day 1 (4 h after TMZ) every 4 weeks at the following TMZ (mg/m2/day)/CDDP (mg/m2) dose levels: 100/75, 150/75, 200/75, and 200/100. Plasma samples were obtained on days 1 and 2 to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of TMZ alone and in combination with CDDP. Fifteen patients received a total of 44 courses of TMZ/CDDP. The principal toxicities of the regimen consisted of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting, which were intolerable in two of six new patients treated at the 200/100 mg/m2 dose level. Of five patients receiving 17 courses at the next lower dose level (200/75 mg/m2), none experienced dose-limiting toxicity. Antitumor activity was observed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, and leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. Pharmacokinetic studies of TMZ revealed the following pertinent parameters (mean +/- SD): time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) = 1.1+/-0.6 h (day 1) and 1.7+/-0.9 h (day 2); elimination half-life (t1/2) = 1.74+/-0.22 h (day 1) and 2.35+/-0.70 h (day 2); and clearance (Cl(s)/F) = 115+/-27 ml/min/m2 (day 1) and 141+/-109 ml/min/m2 (day 2). TMZ drug exposure, described by the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCinfinity) and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), was similar on days 1 and 2. On the basis of these results, the recommended doses for Phase II clinical trials are TMZ 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days with 75 mg/m2 CDDP on day 1, every 4 weeks. The addition of CDDP did not affect the tolerable dose of single-agent TMZ (200 mg/m2/day x 5 days), nor did it substantially alter the pharmacokinetic behavior of TMZ.
 ...
PMID:A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies. 1043 61

The purpose of this work was to study the feasibility of concurrent chemoradiation in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 40 patients with inoperable NSCLC were treated with escalating doses of radiotherapy and cisplatin (cDDP). The radiation dose was increased step by step from 60.5 to 66 Gy in daily fractions of 2.75 Gy. Chemotherapy was also increased step by step from 20 to 24 daily doses of cDDP 6 mg/m(2) and given concurrently with radiotherapy. A dose of 40 Gy/2 Gy/20 fractions (fx) was given to the EPTV (elective planning target volume) which included the gross tumour volume with a margin of 2 cm and part of or the entire mediastinum. During each session a boost dose of 0.75 Gy was given simultaneously to the BPTV (boost planning target volume), which encompassed the GTV (gross tumour volume) with a margin of 1 cm, for the first 20 fx, so the total dose to the tumour was 55 Gy. Cisplatin 6 mg/m(2) was given 1 h prior to radiotherapy at each fraction. From then on the dose of radiation to the BPTV and the dose of cDDP were increased step by step. In group I the BPTV was irradiated with two extra fractions of 2.75 Gy to a total dose of 60. 5 Gy without cDDP. In group II the same total dose of 60.5 Gy was given but the last two fractions were combined with cDDP. In group III four extra fractions of 2.75 Gy were given to the BPTV to a total dose of 66 Gy, only two of these fractions combined with cDDP. Finally, in group IV a total dose of 66 Gy was given in 24 fractions, all fractions combined with cDDP. All patients were planned by means of a CT-based conformal treatment planning. The maximal length of the oesophagus receiving >/=60.5 Gy was 11 cm. 40 patients were evaluable for acute and late toxicity and for survival. Acute toxicity grade >/=3 (common toxicity criteria, CTC) was rarely observed; nausea/vomiting in 3 patients (8%), leucopenia in 2 patients (5%), thrombocytopenia in 2 patients (5%), whilst 2 patients (5%) suffered from severe weight loss. Late side-effects (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, EORTC/RTOG) were: oesophageal toxicity >/=grade 3 in 2 patients (5%) and radiation pneumonitis grades 1 (3%) and 2 (3%) in 1 patient each. Overall actuarial 1- and 2-year survival was 53% and 40%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year local disease-free interval was 65% and 58% respectively. Radiotherapy at a dose of 66 Gy/2.75 Gy/24 fx combined with daily cDDP 6 mg/m(2) given over 5 weeks is feasible and results in a good local disease-free interval and a good survival rate. This treatment schedule is at present being tested as one of the two treatment arms of EORTC phase III study protocol 08972/22973.
 ...
PMID:Toxicity of high-dose radiotherapy combined with daily cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer: results of the EORTC 08912 phase I/II study. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. 1073 23


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>