Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A double-blind random study compared the effects of lorazepam and pantopon an intra-muscular premedication in healthy women for uterine curettage (D & C). Anxiety, as assessed by a self-rating test by the patient and by a trained observer, showed a significant reduction at one and one-half hours after lorazepam and a smaller reduction after pantopon, which was not significant. Sedation was satisfactory with no significant difference between the two drugs in the change before and after the premedication. Lorazepam showed much more amnesia than pantopon (p less than 0.001). The patients who had lorazepam required higher doses of thiopentone for the operation, and this, in part, led to longer intervals in recovery times after lorazepam. However, it is suggested that lorazepam itself was partly responsible for the longer recovery. Pantopon was followed by more nausea, vomiting and headaches, than lorazepam. The intra-muscular injection of lorazepam hurt more patients than did pantopon, but other local complications were negligible and comparable in both groups. The results of this study show that lorazepam produces better reduction of anxiety and much more amnesia than pantopon, with comparable sedation and much less nausea and vomiting. The only disadvantage of lorazepam is the lack of analgesia and, therefore, the need for more anaesthesia during the operation. The conclusion is that lorazepam is a very satisfactory premedication and warrants more use as such.
 ...
PMID:Lorazepam as a premedication. 0 77

Lorazepam, a new benzodiazepine, was compared with morphine for premedication. Ten patients received morphine 10 mg/70 kg i.m. and 10 received lorazepam 4 mg/70 kg i.m. Respiratory effects were assessed from the change in slope (S) and intercept (B) of the carbon dioxide response line, using a development of Read's rebreathing method. Morphine depressed S by 47% (P less than 0.01), but after lorazepam S increased by 27% (P less than 0.05), neither drug altering B significantly. In two volunteers lorazepam was assessed by both the rebreathing and the steady-state methods; after lorazepam S was smaller by the steady-state than by the rebreathing technique. The findings for lorazepam are consistent with the known effects of sleep on carbon dioxide sensitivity. Amnesia lasting 4-8 h occurred in all patients who received lorazepam so that pain and nausea during this period were not recalled, but no patient who received morphine experienced amnesia. We conclude that lorazepam merits further study, particularly where sedation without respiratory depression is needed, as in obstetrics, and where amnesia for uncomfortable procedures is required.
 ...
PMID:Respiratory effects and amnesia after premedication with morphine or lorazepam. 1 25

A double-blind random study compared lorazepam with diazepam as i.m. premedicants in 84 healthy women undergoing uterine curettage. Anxiety, assessed by a self-rating test by the patient and by a trained observer, was reduced 90 min after both lorazepam (P less than 0.001) and diazepam (P less than 0.01). There was more sedation and a longer recovery time after lorazepam than after diazepam. Amnesia at 24 h after operation (lack of recall rather than lack of recognition) was greater after lorazepam. There was transient local discomfort at the site of the injection in most patients in both groups, but no serious effects. Local erythema was present in 12 patients who received lorazepam and 10 who received diazepam 90 min after the injection, disappearing after 24 h in the former group but remaining in the latter. The incidence of nausea, vomiting and headache in both groups was small and similar, but there was more restlessness and dizziness after diazepam in the early recovery period.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of lorazepam and diazepam as premedicants. 2 39

Flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, reverses the residual central nervous system effects of benzodiazepines. In this US double-blind, multicenter study, the efficacy of flumazenil was compared with that of placebo in antagonizing the effects of midazolam, a benzodiazepine used to induce intravenous conscious sedation. The mean dose of flumazenil was 0.7 mg, administered intravenously. At 5 minutes posttreatment, 82% of 131 flumazenil-treated patients, compared with 15% of 65 placebo-treated patients, demonstrated complete reversal of sedation. In 85% of patients who responded to flumazenil, this reversal of sedation was maintained throughout the 180-minute observation period. Psychomotor performance returned to prestudy levels 5 minutes posttreatment in 87% of the flumazenil-treated patients, compared with 28% of the placebo-treated patients. At the doses administered, flumazenil was less effective in reversing midazolam-induced amnesia, with only 60% of patients demonstrating partial recovery of memory. It was, nevertheless, more effective than placebo. Flumazenil was well tolerated. Dizziness (10%) and nausea (9%) were the most frequently reported adverse effects. Results of this study demonstrate that flumazenil antagonizes the central nervous system effects of midazolam after intravenous conscious sedation.
 ...
PMID:Reversal of central nervous system effects by flumazenil after intravenous conscious sedation with midazolam: report of a multicenter clinical study. The Flumazenil in Intravenous Conscious Sedation with Midazolam Multicenter Study Group I. 128 95

The efficacy and safety of flumazenil in antagonizing the central effects of the benzodiazepine midazolam was demonstrated in patients in whom conscious sedation was induced with midazolam plus an opioid (fentanyl, meperidine, or morphine). In a double-blind, multicenter study, 240 patients were administered flumazenil postoperatively at an average intravenous dose of 0.7 mg (7 ml) and 114 patients were administered an average dose of 9 ml placebo. Complete reversal of sedation was observed in 80% of flumazenil-treated patients and 30% of placebo-treated patients 5 minutes posttreatment. In 87% of patients who responded to flumazenil, the level of alertness was maintained throughout the 180-minute observation period. Midazolam-impaired psychomotor performance returned to normal 5 minutes posttreatment in 80% of the flumazenil-treated patients and 28% of the placebo-treated patients. Flumazenil was less effective in reversing midazolam-induced amnesia, with only 70% of flumazenil-treated patients (and 15% of placebo-treated patients) able to recall the picture shown them at the 5-minute assessment, and fewer patients able to recall pictures shown at later times. Flumazenil was well tolerated, although adverse effects were reported slightly more often than in the placebo group. The most frequent adverse events in both groups were dizziness and nausea. Vital signs were not affected.
 ...
PMID:Reversal of central benzodiazepine effects by intravenous flumazenil after conscious sedation with midazolam and opioids: a multicenter clinical study. The Flumazenil in Intravenous Conscious Sedation with Midazolam Multicenter Study Group II. 128 96

In a US double-blind, multicenter study, flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, administered postoperatively in a mean intravenous dose of 0.67 mg (range, 0.2 to 1 mg), was superior to placebo in reversing sedation and other central nervous system effects of benzodiazepines in outpatients recovering from general anesthesia induced by midazolam, fentanyl or sufentanil, and nitrous oxide. Within 5 minutes after administration of flumazenil, sedation was reversed in 94% (87 of 93) of flumazenil-treated patients, compared with 13% (6 of 46) of placebo-treated patients. The criterion response (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale score of 4 or 5) that was achieved at 5 minutes was maintained in 79 (93%) of 85 patients throughout the 180-minute observation period. Psychomotor performance, measured by the Finger-to-Nose Test, was rated as normal at 5 minutes posttreatment for 77% (71 of 92) of flumazenil-treated patients, and 4% (2 of 46) of placebo-treated patients. The reversal of amnesia, as determined by the Picture Recall Test was less consistent. Patients given flumazenil did not experience more pain at the operative site or require more analgesic medication than did those given placebo. Nausea (flumazenil 24%; placebo 15%), dizziness (flumazenil 12%; placebo 2%), and vomiting (flumazenil 10%; placebo 9%) were the most frequent adverse effects in each group. In conclusion, flumazenil provided prompt arousal from benzodiazepine-induced sedation and was well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Reversal of the central effects of midazolam by intravenous flumazenil after general anesthesia in outpatients: a multicenter double-blind clinical study. The Flumazenil in General Anesthesia in Outpatients Study Group I. 128 2

Hypnosis has proven to be extremely valuable in the treatment of cancer patients. Specific applications include: establishing rapport between the patient and members of the medical health team; control of pain with self-regulation of pain perception through the use of glove anesthesia, time distortion, amnesia, transference of pain to a different body part, or dissociation of the painful part from the rest of the body; controlling symptoms, such as, nausea, anticipatory emesis, learned food aversions, etc.; psychotherapy for anxiety, depression, guilt, anger, hostility, frustration, isolation, and a diminished sense of self-esteem; visualization for health improvement; and, dealing with death anxiety and other related issues. Hypnosis has unique advantages for patients including improvement of self-esteem, involvement in self-care, return of locus of control, lack of unpleasant side effects, and continued efficacy despite continued use.
 ...
PMID:The use of hypnosis with cancer patients. 154 47

The authors prospectively examined the prevalence of somatization symptoms among community respondents after a natural disaster in Puerto Rico. Exposure to the disaster was related to a higher prevalence of medically unexplained physical symptoms, particularly gastrointestinal ones (abdominal pain, vomiting, nausea, excessive gas) and pseudoneurological ones (amnesia, paralysis, fainting, unusual spells/double vision).
 ...
PMID:Somatic symptoms after a natural disaster: a prospective study. 160 80

The degree of sedation and amnesia, subjective assessment of awakening and side effects after intravenous injection of 3-4 mg midazolam and 1 mg flumazenil or placebo were studied directly after colonoscopy, and on the first and the eight day. A total of 91 patients were studied; 45 patients were given flumazenil and 46 patients a placebo. Five minutes after injection of the test drugs all 45 patients given flumazenil but only 38 patients given the placebo were alert (p = 0.006). All three response criteria (for sedation, amnesia and subjective assessment of awakening) were fulfilled by 84.4% of the patients given flumazenil and 45.7% of the patients given the placebo (p = 0.0002). Thirty minutes after injection of the test drugs dizziness, nausea, and fatigue were found in 3 patients given flumazenil and in 10 patients given placebo. One day after colonoscopy 9 of 45 patients (20%) given midazolam and flumazenil complained of fatigue and 9 of 46 patients (19.5%) given midazolam and placebo. Eight days (+/- 1 day) later two patients in each group complained of headache, nausea and fatigue. No patient developed phlebitis at the injection site. Flumazenil seems to be a safe and efficient drug for reversing the sedative effect of midazolam, premedication after colonoscopy. However, resedation due to the effects of midazolam may occur. Flumazenil thus permits administration of a higher dose of midazolam without prolongation of the surveillance time. Improved exploitation of time, space and nursing resources is thus possible without jeopardizing patient safety, although caution is necessary since patients may not be fit to resume all normal activities.
 ...
PMID:A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effects of flumazenil after midazolam premedication in outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. 177 38

Fifty-three breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy entered a double-blind randomized trial of lorazepam 2.5 mg orally prior to chemotherapy and repeated after 12 hours (Arm A) versus placebo (Arm B) with methylprednisolone (MPN) 375 mg in 3 equal doses: 125 mg i.v. prior to chemotherapy and repeated i.m. 6 and 12 hours later. Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, 4'-epi-doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (FEC) day 1 was alternated every 21 days with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CMF) day 1 for a total of 12 courses. The majority of patients experienced greater than or equal to 5 emetic episodes with FEC therapy (Arm A = 52%; Arm B = 55%). Mild and moderate nausea were reported by 60% and 68% of patients in Arms A and B, respectively. With CMF therapy complete control of emesis was observed in 33% (Arm A) and 35% (Arm B) of patients. The addition of lorazepam did not improve results either with FEC or CMF. Sedation was experienced by 86 to 92% of patients treated with lorazepam and amnesia was observed in 48-50% of cases. FEC therapy must be considered a highly emetic regimen and antiemetic therapy planned accordingly.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind randomized trial of lorazepam versus placebo with methylprednisolone for control of emesis due to non-cisplatin containing chemotherapy. 209 Jul 73


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>