Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (
nausea
)
23,468
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
We tested the hypothesis that the administration of nitrous oxide (N2O) causes major (e.g., myocardial infarction, neuronal injury, hypoxemia, infection, death) or minor (e.g.,
nausea
, vomiting, headache, earache) untoward effects in patients requiring anesthesia for 1.5-4 h. Given the higher morbidity and mortality associated with aging, we also tested whether aging increased any untoward effect of N2O. Finally, we investigated whether the substitution of N2O for a fraction of the anesthesia supplied by isoflurane altered the latter's pharmacologic effects. We studied 270 patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty (n = 100), carotid endarterectomy (n = 70), or transsphenoidal hypophysectomy (n = 100) who were randomly assigned within each surgical group to receive isoflurane with or without 60% N2O. Regardless of patient age, we found no difference in major or minor untoward outcomes between anesthetic groups, nor a trend to suggest that a larger data cohort would reveal a significant adverse effect of N2O. The addition of N2O administration decreased the isoflurane requirement for clinical anesthesia but did not alter most of the clinical variables measured in practice, including blood pressure, heart rate, rate of recovery from anesthesia, development of postoperative pain, patient satisfaction with anesthesia, or duration of anesthesia or of hospitalization. Patients given N2O were no more likely to
dream
during anesthesia, remember events during anesthesia, or be frightened by those events. Our results support the continued use of N2O to anesthetize patients for elective surgery.
...
PMID:Clinical pharmacology of nitrous oxide: an argument for its continued use. 224 Jun 27
Sustained-release bupropion (bupropion SR) was first launched in the US in 1997 as an aid to smoking cessation and has since been launched in many other countries. Adverse events associated with the use of bupropion SR at the recommended dosage of 150mg twice daily in clinical trials most commonly included insomnia, headache, dry mouth,
nausea
and anxiety; insomnia and anxiety are also recognised as symptoms of nicotine withdrawal. Only insomnia and dry mouth occurred significantly more frequently with bupropion SR than with placebo. Relative to placebo, no significant changes in mean values for heart rate, blood pressure or routine laboratory parameters have been reported in smokers using bupropion SR alone in clinical trials. When bupropion SR was compared with a nicotine transdermal patch in a clinical trial, insomnia predominated in the bupropion SR group, while
dream
abnormalities were more common in smokers using the nicotine patch. Bupropion SR and the nicotine transdermal patch in combination can be used safely (with appropriate monitoring) as an aid to smoking cessation. Infrequent but clinically important adverse reactions to bupropion SR include seizures and hypersensitivity reactions: in controlled clinical trials of bupropion SR (300 mg/day), where smokers were carefully screened for risk factors for seizure, the incidence of both seizures and severe hypersensitivity reactions was approximately 0.1% for each event. In order to avoid a risk of seizure of greater than 0.1%, smokers should be screened for predisposing risk factors and adhere to the manufacturer's dosage recommendations (maximum daily dose of 300mg). Thus, bupropion SR is generally well tolerated, as seen by the low discontinuation rate due to an adverse event in clinical trials (6 to 12%). The most common adverse events (insomnia and dry mouth) are generally transient and often resolve quickly without therapeutic intervention; they can be managed if necessary by a reduction in bupropion dose.
...
PMID:Tolerability and safety of sustained-release bupropion in the management of smoking cessation. 1210 35
Hypnic headache (HH) is a rare sleep-associated primary headache disorder, usually affecting aged people, first described by Raskin in 1988. The headache attacks, single or multiple in one night, occur exclusively during sleep and tend to present at a consistent time each night, sometimes during a
dream
. Compared to the original description, newly reported cases have expanded the clinical spectrum of the disorder to include unilateral forms (about 40%, half of which are side-locked), forms with a longer duration (up to 3 h) and cases with onset in juvenile/adult age. The male predominance found in Raskin's series has not been confirmed by subsequent observations. To date the reported F/M ratio is 1.7/1. Pain is of severe intensity in less then one-third of cases and mild-moderate in about two-thirds. The location of pain is fronto-temporal in over 40% of cases; headache is throbbing in 38% of cases, dull in 57% and stabbing in less than 5%.
Nausea
is reported in 19% of cases; photophobia, phonophobia or both are present in 6.8%. Mild autonomic signs (lacrimation, nasal congestion, ptosis) may rarely be present. In 2004, HH was included in Group 4 of the International Classification of Headache Disorders-II (Other primary headaches). Sufficient evidence, mainly from polysomnographic studies, indicates that HH is a primary rapid eye movement (REM) sleep-related headache disorder of chronobiological origin. Lithium, melatonin, indomethacin and caffeine at bedtime are among the most effective therapeutic options. The pathophysiology of HH is still unclear. Available data allow speculation that, in predisposed subjects, an age-related impairment of suprachiasmatic nucleus could cyclically activate a disnociceptive mechanism leading to both a sudden awakening and headache. The mechanism may be precipitated by neurophysiologic events such as the strong reduction of firing occurring in the dorsal raphe nucleus during a REM sleep phase.
...
PMID:Hypnic headache: an update. 1668 19
(1) Drugs play a limited role in smoking cessation. Nicotine is the drug with the best risk-benefit balance and is available in several formulations and dose strengths. However, only about 16% of patients remain abstinent after one year, compared to about 10% of patients on placebo. Bupropion, an amphetamine derivative, is best avoided. (2) Varenicline, a partial acetylcholine receptor agonist, has been approved as an aid in smoking cessation. There are no published trials of varenicline versus nicotine. (3) Four placebo-controlled trials show that after 12 weeks of treatment with varenicline about 22% of patients remain abstinent at one year, compared to 8% on placebo. In the two trials also including a group treated with bupropion, the one-year abstinence rate was significantly higher with varenicline than bupropion in one trial and also in a combined analysis of the two trials. (4) The known adverse effects of varenicline seem to be limited in scope. In the short term they mainly consist of gastrointestinal problems (especially
nausea
and constipation) and neuropsychological disorders (insomnia,
dream
disturbances, and headache). Long-term cardiac toxicity cannot currently be ruled out. Simultaneous use of nicotine and varenicline aggravates the adverse effects of nicotine. (5) In practice, varenicline does not appear to have a better risk-benefit balance than nicotine. Nicotine therefore remains the first-choice drug when a patient needs pharmacological support to stop smoking.
...
PMID:Varenicline: new drug. Smoking cessation: no better than nicotine. 1716 37