Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0027497 (nausea)
 23,468 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The development of effective antiemetic prophylaxis is one of the most significant steps forward in the area of supportive care. Fifteen years ago, patients receiving chemotherapy had to face the fact that nausea and vomiting were inevitable adverse effects, which could only be partially prevented by treatment with antiemetics such as dopamine (DA) D2 receptor antagonists and corticosteroids. The first group of drugs specifically developed as antiemetics was the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT](3)) receptor antagonists. These drugs have dramatically improved prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced emesis, particularly when used in combination with a corticosteroid. This combination has resulted in a significant decrease in the number of patients vomiting, whereas the improvement in the prophylaxis of nausea has been less successful. Another group of antiemetics, the neurokinin (NK) 1 receptor antagonists, has recently been developed, and the first drug in this class, aprepitant, has been approved by the FDA and the EU authorities. Studies have showed that patients benefit from the use of this drug in combination with standard antiemetic therapy (5-HT 3 receptor antagonist plus a corticosteroid), both in the acute and delayed phase of nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. This development has not only led to improved efficacy but also to a decreased risk associated with the use of antiemetics. One of the problems with traditional antiemetics, for example, the DA D2 receptor antagonists, is the risk of unpleasant adverse effects including restlessness and dystonic reactions. To avoid these adverse effects, combination with benzodiazepines or antihistamines was necessary, often resulting in sedation. Modern research also includes pharmacogenomic investigations. This has led to speculation about the importance of drug-drug interactions involving antiemetics through competition for metabolism by the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. The worst possible interaction would be a decrease in the effect of different cytotoxins but there is no evidence that such interactions are of importance in daily clinical practice. Guidelines are useful tools in the optimisation of antiemetic prophylaxis but, unfortunately, implementation of the evidence-based recommendations is far from successful. A prerequisite for further optimisation of antiemetic prophylaxis is updating of the guidelines, including recommendations for the use of NK 1 receptor antagonists (aprepitant), followed by implementation of these recommendations in the clinic. Future research must include 'the difficult trials' focusing on the remaining groups of patients with severe chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, including patients with refractory and breakthrough emesis.
 ...
PMID:Risk-benefit of antiemetics in prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. 1515 51

This article reviews the safety and tolerability profile of tegaserod, a novel selective partial agonist of the serotonin 5-HT(4) receptor. Tegaserod was recently approved for the treatment of women with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with constipation. Tegaserod exhibits rapid absorption from the small intestine, and is excreted unchanged in the faeces and as metabolites in the urine. Meal ingestion decreases its bioavailability. There is little effect of age or gender on pharmacokinetics, although plasma levels may be slightly higher in the elderly. Tegaserod has no effect on plasma levels of other drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzyme systems. Gastrointestinal symptoms are the most common adverse effects of tegaserod therapy. In data pooled from phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in IBS with constipation patients, diarrhoea was reported by 8.8% of patients treated with tegaserod 6mg twice daily versus 3.8% of patients receiving placebo. Similar rates have been observed in international post-US marketing RCTs. In most patients, tegaserod-induced diarrhoea was mild and transient. In RCTs, it did not elicit fluid or electrolyte disturbances, and fewer than 3% of IBS patients discontinued tegaserod due to diarrhoea. Since its release, rare cases of more severe diarrhoea and ischaemic colitis have been reported. The incidence of other gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g. abdominal pain, nausea, and flatulence) has been similar among tegaserod-treated patients and placebo-treated patients. Pooled analysis of phase III RCTs and post-US marketing RCTs have not demonstrated significant differences between tegaserod-treated patients and placebo-treated patients in the incidence of abdominal-pelvic surgery. There is no convincing evidence that rebound gastrointestinal symptoms occur upon termination of tegaserod therapy. Pooled analysis of phase III RCTs demonstrated an increase in the incidence of headaches among tegaserod-treated patients (6mg twice daily) compared with placebo-treated patients (15% vs 12.3%, respectively, p < 0.05), although post-US marketing RCTs have not observed this increase. Other extra-gastrointestinal adverse events occur with similar frequency among tegaserod-treated patients and placebo-treated patients. Tegaserod-treated patients in RCTs have not demonstrated significant prolongation of the QTc interval or cardiac arrhythmias compared with placebo-treated patients. Supra-therapeutic doses in healthy volunteers did not effect electrocardiographic parameters. Laboratory parameters are mostly unaffected by tegaserod, although several individuals have exhibited increased eosinophil counts. In summary, tegaserod exhibits a favourable safety and tolerability profile in IBS patients based on data from clinical trials. Diarrhoea is the most common adverse event associated with tegaserod use. Continued post-US marketing surveillance will further define the safety and tolerability profile of tegaserod.
 ...
PMID:Safety profile of tegaserod, a 5-HT4 receptor agonist, for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. 1523 Jun 44

Trospium chloride is an orally active, quaternary ammonium compound with antimuscarinic activity. It binds specifically and with high affinity to muscarinic receptors M(1), M(2) and M(3), but not nicotinic, cholinergic receptors. It is hydrophilic and does not cross the normal blood-brain barrier in significant amounts and, therefore, has minimal central anticholinergic activity. Peak plasma trospium chloride concentrations are attained approximately 5-6 hours after oral administration, which should occur before meals as concurrent food ingestion significantly reduces trospium bioavailability. Trospium chloride undergoes negligible metabolism by the hepatic cytochrome P450 system; few metabolic drug interactions are known. While trospium chloride dosage adjustments based on age or sex appear unwarranted, such adjustments may be needed in patients with severe renal impairment. Direct comparative studies in patients with overactive bladder indicate that trospium chloride is at least as effective as oxybutynin and tolterodine. Placebo-controlled studies have also confirmed the efficacy of trospium chloride in terms of improved urodynamic parameters; small-scale, noncomparative studies have documented significant trospium chloride-induced improvements in patients with reflex neurogenic bladder, postoperative bladder irritation and radiation-induced cystitis; and observational studies including >10,000 patients have also revealed favourable findings for trospium chloride, including a marked decrease in incontinence episodes and substantial improvement in health-related quality of life. Trospium chloride is generally well tolerated, and significantly more so than immediate-release oxybutynin. The most frequent adverse events, occurring in >1% of trospium chloride-treated patients, are dry mouth, dyspepsia, constipation, abdominal pain and nausea. Available for many years in several countries outside North America, trospium chloride is likely to develop an important role in the management of overactive bladder following its approval in the US on 28 May 2004.
 ...
PMID:Trospium chloride in the management of overactive bladder. 1548 1

(1) Platinum-based chemotherapy is generally used to treat advanced-stage non small-cell lung cancer (stages III and IV), but has only a modest impact on survival. There is no reference treatment. (2) Gefitinib inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of the receptor for EGF (epidermal growth factor), which is thought to be involved in tumour growth. It has a temporary licence in France and is used on a named-patient basis, but full marketing authorisation has already been granted in Japan, the United States, and elsewhere. (3) Two double-blind dose-finding studies compared two doses of oral gefitinib monotherapy (250 mg/day and 500 mg/day) in patients in whom at least two lines of chemotherapy had failed. The results were favourable, with a median survival of 6 months and a symptomatic improvement in some patients, but they are undermined by the absence of a placebo group and by major protocol violations. (4) Two double-blind trials, each in more than 1000 patients, showed that gefitinib does not increase the efficacy of first-line platinum combinations. (5) About 15% of patients receiving gefitinib monotherapy in clinical trials stopped taking the treatment because of adverse events. The most frequent were gastrointestinal (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting) and cutaneous (rash, acne, dry skin, pruritus). (6) Interstitial pneumonitis occurred in about 1% of patients, and was fatal in about one-third of cases. (7) Gefitinib is metabolised by the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP3A4, so carries a potentially high risk of interactions. (8) In practice, more thorough assessment of gefitinib is needed to determine whether this new drug is beneficial for patients with non small-cell lung cancer. Marketing authorisation is not currently justified.
 ...
PMID:Gefitinib: new preparation. Non small-cell lung cancer: stricter assessment needed. 1549 96

It is well known that during diarrhea episodes decreased cyclosporine and tacrolimus levels are often observed, usually requiring an increase in dose. An increase in tacrolimus trough levels is infrequently recognized as a potential cause of the adverse effect of severe diarrhea. Herein, we report the case of a renal transplant patient who displayed increased tacrolimus trough levels during an episode of gastroenteritis with severe diarrhea. The patient is 32-year-old male who received a renal transplant from his mother. Immunosuppression was initiated with tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. The postoperative course was uneventful. The function of the transplanted kidney was normal. Eight months after transplantation he presented to our hospital with a history of high fever, abdominal pain, nausea and severe diarrhea. He was admitted with a diagnosis of enterocolitis of unknown etiology. The blood trough level of tacrolimus had increased from 6.7 ng/mL to 28.7 ng/mL after the onset of diarrhea. A therapeutic trough level of tacrolimus was reached 6 weeks after complete relief of diarrhea. Tacrolimus shows large variability in bioavailability after oral administration, both due to intestinal metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) and active secretion from enterocyte into intestinal lumen by P-glycoprotein. The epithelial cells of the intestine, may be destroyed abrogating P-glycoproteins during the course of enterocolitis, thereby increasing the levels of tacrolimus. It is recommended to monitor trough levels of tacrolimus during severe diarrhea of any nature to prevent tacrolimus-related complications.
 ...
PMID:Increased tacrolimus trough levels in association with severe diarrhea, a case report. 1551 58

Atazanavir is the first once-daily protease inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and should be used only in combination therapy, as part of a highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen. In addition to being the most potent protease inhibitor in vitro, atazanavir has a distinct cross-resistance profile that does not confer resistance to other protease inhibitors. However, resistance to other protease inhibitors often confers clinically relevant resistance to atazanavir. Currently, atazanavir is not a preferred protease inhibitor for initial HAART regimens. In treatment-naive patients, atazanavir can be given as 400 mg/day. However, atazanavir should be pharmacologically boosted with ritonavir in treatment-experienced patients or when coadministered with either tenofovir or efavirenz. Patients who receive atazanavir experience similar rates of adverse events compared with patients receiving comparator regimens. An exception is an increased risk of asymptomatic hyperbilirubinemia, which is due to competitive inhibition of uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1. Although hyperbilirubinemia is a common adverse drug reaction of atazanavir therapy (22-47%), fewer than 2% of patients discontinue atazanavir therapy because of this adverse effect. Common adverse effects reported with atazanavir include infection, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, headache, peripheral neuropathy, and rash. Of significance, fewer abnormalities have been observed in plasma lipid profiles in patients treated with atazanavir compared with other protease inhibitor-containing regimens. As with other protease inhibitors, atazanavir is also a substrate and moderate inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system, in particular CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. Clinically significant drug interactions include (but are not limited to) antacids, proton pump inhibitors, histamine type 2 receptor antagonists, tenofovir, diltiazem, irinotecan, simvastatin, lovastatin, St. John's wort, and warfarin. We conclude that atazanavir is a distinctively characteristic protease inhibitor owing to its in vitro potency, once-daily dosing, distinct initial resistance pattern, and infrequent association with metabolic abnormalities.
 ...
PMID:Atazanavir for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. 1558 41

We describe a 68-year-old male patient, treated with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid for 18 days and oral anticoagulants. He developed a cholestatic hepatitis with conjugated bilirubin of 11 mg/dL and a concomitant overdose of oral anticoagulants (INR 7). Nausea, vomiting, jaundice and large ecchymoses occurred 41 days after treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; the clinical manifestations resolved within 1 week and the liver tests returned to normal 48 days after therapy withdrawal. The mechanism of the amoxicillin-clavulanate-induced hepatitis is probably immunoallergic; this complication occurs mainly in subjects with a metabolic and/or immunologic idiosyncrasy. The pharmacokinetics of this antibiotic, which is not directly metabolized by cytochrome P450, may be affected by the concomitant use of drugs under cytochrome P450 control. When using amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, one should take into account its potential hepatic toxicity and possible interaction with oral anticoagulants. However, it appears to be crucial to follow the correct indications for both drugs. In fact, in the patient described above amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was wrongly administered as prophylaxis after a cutaneous biopsy of the nose. The same occurred with the oral anticoagulants prescribed to the patient for a single episode of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation which had occurred one year previously.
 ...
PMID:[Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and oral anticoagulants: a possible dangerous association]. 1567 8

Venlafaxine is a new antidepressant that inhibits the reuptake of both 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin; 5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA). It is somewhat more potent as an inhibitor of the reuptake of 5-HT than NA. Its potency to inhibit the reuptake of 5-HT is comparable to that of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) such as amitriptyline or imipramine, but it is less potent than these drugs at inhibiting the reuptake of NA. Consequently, at low doses, venlafaxine may be a more effective inhibitor of the reuptake of 5-HT than that of NA. The major metabolite of venlafaxine in humans, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, has comparable potency to the parent drug for inhibiting the reuptake of either NA or 5-HT in vitro, but it is less potent in vivo. Both venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine are essentially devoid of activity at muscarinic cholinergic, H1 histaminergic, and 1-adrenoceptors. This probably accounts for venlafaxine having a side-effect profile similar to that of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) rather than that of TCAs. Venlafaxine is subject to extensive first-pass metabolism and is metabolised by the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme IID6 in the liver. The half-life of venlafaxine is 3-4 h and that of its principal metabolite is about 10 h. The daily dose of venlafaxine can be administered as either two or three divided doses without altering significantly the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine. The most common side-effects of venlafaxine are nausea, sedation, dizziness, dry mouth and sweating, as well as sexual dysfunctions, primarily problems with erection and delayed ejaculation. In some patients, venlafaxine also causes sustained elevations in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure; this effect is dose-dependent. Venlafaxine is much safer in overdosage than the TCAs. Antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine has been found both in out-patients and in-patients. In general, its efficacy is comparable to that of comparator drugs (primarily TCAs or SSRIs), and in some cases even greater, and its efficacy is greater than that measured with placebo.
 ...
PMID:Venlafaxine:a novel antidepressant compound. 1598 62

The availability of chemotherapeutic drugs administrable by oral route represents a step forward in the management of cancer patients. Among oral agents, vinorelbine is particularly interesting for its pharmacological characteristics and clinical efficacy. Oral vinorelbine is rapidly absorbed (1.5-3 hours) with an elimination half-life of approximately 40 hours. It shows a low level of binding to plasma proteins (13%), is highly bound to platelets (78%) and has a hepatic metabolism and an absolute bioavailability of 40% with a moderate and similar interpatient variability for the two forms. Food has no influence on the pharmacokinetic profile of oral vinorelbine even if nausea/vomiting is less frequent and less severe in the fed patients than in the fasting patients. Therefore, to ensure patient comfort, it is recommended that oral vinorelbine is administered with a snack. All the metabolites of oral vinorelbine have been identified and, among these, only deacetyl-vinorelbine presented activity demonstrating that for both oral and intravenous (i.v.) routes of administration the drug has the same metabolism pattern. Oral vinorelbine is eliminated mainly in a unconjugated form via the bile. In this process, the CYP 3A4 isoform of cytochrome P450 is mostly involved. Absorption of oral vinorelbine is not delayed in elderly patients. After oral administration, blood concentrations of vinorelbine in elderly patients are within the range of values observed in younger patients. The absolute bioavailability is close to 38% in elderly whereas it is close to 40% in younger patients. This difference is not significant. As compared to the intravenous drug, oral vinorelbine demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics as well an absolute bioavailability of approximately 40%, and a reliable dose-correspondence of 80 mg/m2 oral form --> 30 mg/m2 i.v. and 60 mg/m2 oral --> 25 mg/m2 i.v. Therefore, i.v. and oral forms show similar interindividual variability, same metabolism pattern, reproducible intra-patient blood exposure, and same pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship. Oral vinorelbine has shown significant activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Given at 60 mg/m2/week for the first 3 administrations and then increased to 80 mg/m2/week achieved the same efficacy as i.v. vinorelbine in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response. Mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal toxicity, easily manageable with standard treatment was recorded. Reproducible efficacy compared to previously reported results with vinorelbine i.v. Also, in advanced breast cancer, oral vinorelbine has shown significant activity with a good therapeutic index. Albeit no formal comparison between the oral and the intravenous formulations of vinorelbine has been made, however, the oral route seems to offer major advantages to patients who are faced with a clear decrease in the frequency of hospital admissions as compared to that needed to give intravenous chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Oral versus intravenous vinorelbine: clinical safety profile. 1611 53

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a multicomponent, chronic inflammatory disease of the lungs with systemic complications. The majority of the inflammation occurs in the peripheral airways and lung parenchyma. It is a progressive disease, leading to disability and eventual death, despite conventional therapy. Inflammatory activity can be reduced by increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP) through inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE) IV, the principal PDE isoenzyme within pro-inflammatory cells, including eosinophils, mast cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils and epithelial cells. PDE IV inhibition also has other effects, including relaxation of airway smooth muscle, suppression of smooth muscle mitogenesis and modulation of excitatory activity in pulmonary nerves. Cilomilast is a systemically available, second-generation, selective PDE IV inhibitor. It retains the therapeutic activity of the first-generation PDE IV inhibitors but lacks their profound emetic effect. Cilomilast is the first drug to demonstrate a reduction of tissue cells considered central to the ongoing inflammatory process (macrophages and CD8+ lymphocytes) in patients with stable COPD. Cilomilast is completely absorbed following oral administration and has negligible first-pass metabolism. It exhibits linear pharmacokinetics, with low between-subject variability. Cilomilast is highly protein bound (99.4%), but this binding is concentration-independent at clinically relevant doses, and it has a small volume of distribution at steady state (17L). Plasma clearance (approximately 2 L/h) is almost entirely metabolic, through multiple parallel pathways. Its terminal elimination half-life is approximately 6.5 hours and steady state is rapidly achieved with twice-daily administration. The most abundant metabolite, formed by the action of cytochrome P450 2C8, has <10% of the activity of the parent molecule. Cilomilast pharmacokinetics in COPD patients were consistent with those in healthy subjects. Smoking, age and ethnicity had no clinically relevant effects. Total plasma cilomilast pharmacokinetic parameters did not change significantly with renal or hepatic impairment, but concentrations of unbound cilomilast increased with declining renal or hepatic function. Cilomilast had no clinically relevant interactions with a range of drugs likely to be coadministered to patients with COPD, with the exception of erythromycin where concurrent administration with cilomilast was associated with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events, a pharmacodynamic interaction predicted by their secondary pharmacology. Nausea was the principal adverse reaction seen in healthy subjects taking cilomilast, but this was reduced by administration with food or by use of simple dose-escalation regimens. Cilomilast has not shown a propensity for any of the serious cardiac or neurological adverse effects associated with theophylline. Cilomilast exhibits favourable and predictable pharmacokinetics, has few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions and has demonstrated effects on measures of inflammation of potential benefit in the treatment of COPD. It is generally well tolerated and has not generated safety concerns in any clinical study.
 ...
PMID:Clinical pharmacology of Cilomilast. 1650 57


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>