Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0026986 (myelodysplastic syndrome)
 14,926 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Preclinical data suggest that retinoids, eg, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), lower concentrations of antiapoptotic proteins such as bcl-2, possibly thereby improving the outcome of anti-acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been considered to be potentially synergistic with ATRA in this regard. Accordingly, we randomized 215 patients with newly diagnosed AML (153 patients) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (refractory anemia with excess blasts [RAEB] or RAEB-t, 62 patients) to receive fludarabine + ara-C + idarubicin (FAI) alone, FAI + ATRA, FAI + G-CSF, or FAI + ATRA + G-CSF. Eligibility required one of the following: age over 71 years, a history of abnormal blood counts before M.D. Anderson (MDA) presentation, secondary AML/MDS, failure to respond to one prior course of chemotherapy given outside MDA, or abnormal renal or hepatic function. For the two treatment arms containing ATRA, ATRA was given 2 days (day-2) before beginning and continued for 3 days after completion of FAI. For the two treatment arms including G-CSF, G-CSF began on day-1 and continued until neutrophil recovery. Patients with white blood cell (WBC) counts >50,000/microL began ATRA on day 1 and G-CSF on day 2. Events (death, failure to achieve complete remission [CR], or relapse from CR) have occurred in 77% of the 215 patients. Reflecting the poor prognosis of the patients entered, the CR rate was only 51%, median event-free survival (EFS) time once in CR was 36 weeks, and median survival time was 28 weeks. A Cox regression analysis indicated that, after accounting for patient prognostic variables, none of the three adjuvant treatment combinations (FAI + ATRA, FAI + G, FAI + ATRA + G) affected survival, EFS, or EFS once in CR compared with FAI. Similarly, there were no significant effects of either ATRA ignoring G-CSF, or of G-CSF ignoring ATRA. As previously found, a diagnosis of RAEB or RAEB-t rather than AML was insignificant. There were no indications that the effect of ATRA differed according to cytogenetic group, diagnosis (AML or MDS), or treatment schedule. Logistic regression analysis indicated that, after accounting for prognosis, addition of G-CSF +/- ATRA to FAI improved CR rate versus either FAI or FAI + ATRA, but G-CSF had no effect on the other outcomes. We conclude that addition of ATRA +/- G-CSF to FAI had no effect on CR rate, survival, EFS, or EFS in CR in poor prognosis, newly diagnosed AML or high-risk MDS.
 ...
PMID:Randomized phase II study of fludarabine + cytosine arabinoside + idarubicin +/- all-trans retinoic acid +/- granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in poor prognosis newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. 1019 25

Drug resistant cells often have an increased capacity to repair their DNA after damage by cytotoxic agents. Aphidicolin can inhibit this DNA repair. We describe a study of the effect of aphidicolin to modulate the sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs of blast cells from 13 patients with AML, 11 with de novo disease on presentation and 2 secondary to MDS. Three patients had relapsed following previous therapy and samples were received from 1 patient both on presentation and relapse. Blast cells were exposed to anthracyclines, antimetabolites or etoposide +/- aphidicolin (15 microM) for 48 hours. The MTT assay was used to measure cell survival and the LC50 (concentration of drug required for 50% cell kill) was calculated. Overall, there was a significant increase in sensitivity to ara-C on co-incubation with aphidicolin in 12/14 samples (p = 0.007). The median increase in sensitivity was 3.88-fold (range 1.26- to 80-fold). Interestingly, when patients were grouped according to in vitro sensitivity to ara-C, cells from resistant patients demonstrated the greatest increase in sensitivity (median 14-fold compared to 2-fold for the sensitive group, p = 0.02). Despite the documented evidence for altered DNA repair as a mechanism of resistance to the topoisomerase II inhibitors, we found no significant increase in sensitivity to daunorubicin, doxorubicin or etoposide on co-incubation with aphidicolin. Nevertheless, we believe the unparalleled modulation of ara-C warrants further investigation.
 ...
PMID:Aphidicolin markedly increases the in vitro sensitivity to ara-C of blast cells from patients with AML. 1050 Aug 35

The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan has shown activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes. The present study was designed to assess whether topotecan with cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) or with etoposide (VP-16) should be studied in phase II trials in patients with refractory or relapsed AML. Patients with refractory or relapsed AML were assigned to one of 3 strata defined by expected CR rates of 7%, 20% and 40%, then randomly assigned to receive topotecan (dl-5) and ara-C (1 g/m2 over 2 hours; dl-5), topotecan (d1-5) followed by VP-16 (250 mg/m2 twice daily, d6-7), or VP-16 (250 mg/m2 twice daily dl-2) followed by topotecan (d3-d7). A dose-finding phase was conducted in the poorest stratum of each arm (topotecan starting dose: 1.0 mg/m2/day x 5). A Bayesian pre-phase II selection design was used to assess whether the CR rate with a given arm was sufficient to merit investigation in phase II. Thirty-seven patients, median age 58 years, were treated. Their median first CR duration was 28 weeks and 24% were primary refractory. Grade 3-4 mucositis occurred in the initial patients in the topotecan --> VP-16, but not in the topotecan + ara-C or VP-16 --> topotecan arms. Consequently, in subsequent patients, the topotecan dose was lower in the topotecan --> VP-16 than in the other 2 arms (1.0 vs 1.25 mg/m2 daily x 5) and the VP-16 dose was lower in the topotecan --> VP-16 arm (200 vs 250 mg/m2 twice daily x 2). One CR occurred (topotecan --> VP-16 arm), and the treatment arms were terminated after 10, 15, and 12 patients were treated on the topotecan + ara-C, topotecan --> VP-16, and VP-16 --> topotecan arms, respectively. The principal cause of failure was insufficient anti-leukemia effect rather than death on study, and toxicity was minimal at the final doses used. We concluded that none of the combinations studied here warrants phase II evaluation in very poor prognosis AML salvage patients.
 ...
PMID:Combination of topotecan with cytarabine or etoposide in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized phase I/II study. 1055 27

Intensive chemotherapy followed by treatment with interleukin-2 (IL-2) was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial including 18 patients with refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation (RAEB-T), 86 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolving from myelodysplastic syndromes, and six patients with secondary AML after previous chemotherapy. Median age was 58 years (range: 18-76 years). Forty-nine patients (45%) achieved a complete remission (CR) after two induction cycles with idarubicin, ara-C, and etoposide, 52% of them aged </=60 years and 35% aged >60 years (p=0.06). After two consolidation courses, patients were randomized to four cycles of either high- or low-dose IL-2. Patients aged up to 55 years with an HLA-identical sibling donor were eligible for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The median relapse-free survival was 12.5 months, with a probability of ongoing CR at 6.5 years of 19%. Overall survival of all patients was 8 months, and 21 months for the CR patients. Median survival was significantly longer among patients aged </=60 years than among the older patients (16 vs 6 months, p<0.001). Median duration of survival and relapse-free survival were not statistically different in the two IL-2 treatment arms.
 ...
PMID:Intensive chemotherapy with idarubicin, ara-C, etoposide, and m-AMSA followed by immunotherapy with interleukin-2 for myelodysplastic syndromes and high-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). 1066 18

Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with significant activity in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Pre-clinical data suggest a synergistic activity with DNA damaging agents such as cyclophosphamide, where topotecan might prevent the repair of cyclophosphamide-induced DNA damage. We thus designed a combination including cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 every 12 hours given on days 1 to 3; topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion on days 2 to 6, and cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) 2 g/m2 over 4 hours daily for 5 days on days 2 to 6 (CAT). Sixty six (63 evaluable) patients were treated. Fifty two patients had refractory (n=12) or relapsed (n=40) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), and eleven had acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) (refractory n=3, relapsed n=8); their median age was 57 years (range, 18 to 79 years). Eleven patients (17%) achieved a complete remission (CR), and two patients (3%) had a hematologic improvement (HI; met all criteria for CR except for platelets < 100x10(9)/L), for an overall response rate of 20%. Responses occurred in 12 of 52 AML patients (23%), including 10 CR (19%) and 2 HI (4%), and in 1 of 11 patients with ALL (9%). Myelosuppression was universal; there were 23 episodes of pneumonia or sepsis and 18 episodes of fever of unknown origin complicating 74 courses of CAT. Non-hematologic toxicity was mostly gastrointestinal, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and mucositis, but was severe in only 8%. In summary, the CAT regimen is well tolerated and has significant anti-leukemia activity which warrants further investigation.
 ...
PMID:Cyclophosphamide, ara-C and topotecan (CAT) for patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia. 1078 92

Chemotherapy of secondary leukemias is currently still considered to be associated with poor results. However, recent data suggest that the response to remission induction may substantially differ according to the previous medical history of the patients. Therapy related leukemia, arising following exposure to previous alkylating agents or radiotherapy, is often associated with chromosomal abnormalities involving chromosomes 5 and 7 and has a particularly bad response, whereas AML after exposure to epipodophyllotoxins or topoisomerase-II active agents could have a somewhat better response. Acute promyelocytic leukemia secondary to treatment of a primary malignant neoplasm seems to be associated with a better response if compared to other cytotypes of AML or to AML arising after transformation of myelodysplasia. However, here the literature data are not in full agreement, as different kinds of approaches have been applied. In fact, even if the problems encountered in treating patients with secondary leukemia are similar to those seen in patients with AML arising in a background of myelodysplasia (resistant disease and prolonged cytopenia after treatment), there are data suggesting that the use of high dose ara-C, with or without fludarabine, can circumvent resistance in a small but significant number of cases. One of the unsolved problems which still remains is how to consolidate the CR induced with high dose ara-C or with cycles based on anthracycline derivatives. In addition, another question relates to the categories of patients in whom chemotherapy may change the expected survival. Intensive post-remission chemotherapy, with or without autologous HSCT, may constitute an appropriate alternative for patients lacking a suitable sibling donor or for older patients who are in remission after chemotherapy and also able to tolerate other cycles of intensive chemotherapy. In this respect, the specific cytogenetic abnormality involved should be considered the most important prognostic factor for response and disease free survival; patients with abnormalities of chromosome 5 and 7 have a particularly low possibility of response and duration of CR. Furthermore, it is still debatable whether patients, especially the elderly, with these characteristics should go through a series of conventional treatments or just receive supportive treatment. On the other hand, patients with better prognostic factors should be entitled to further intensive treatments, taking into account possible delayed recovery and/or possible less successful collection of peripheral or marrow stem cells.
 ...
PMID:Chemotherapy of secondary leukemias. 1104 14

The IPSS scoring system is useful to establish the appropriate treatment plan in MDS. Growth factors may alleviate both anemia and neutropenia in some MDS patients. Serum Epo levels and need for transfusion serve as good predictors of the erythroid response to the combination of Epo and G-CSF. Subgroups of MDS patients may respond favorably to immunosuppressive therapies such as CyA and ATG. Low-dose chemotherapy may also improve peripheral blood counts. Platelet counts, bone marrow cellularity, chromosome aberrations, and ringed sideroblasts combine to create a model predicting the response to low-dose ara-C. High-dose chemotherapy may lead to complete remission in about half of MDS patients, but the duration of remission is often short. The only proven curative therapy for MDS is allogeneic stem cell transplantation, resulting in an overall disease-free survival rate of about 40%. Only a minority of patients, however, can undergo allogeneic transplantation, both because of patient age and the availability of suitable donors. Autologous stem cell transplantation may be an option for selected patients who are unable to find allogeneic donors. Because the clinical features of patients with MDS are quite heterogeneous, the development of more accurate predictive models may be necessary to improve the efficacy of treatment.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. 1170 53

Secondary myelodysplastic syndrome (sMDS) and secondary acute leukemia (sAL) are hematologic neoplasms occurring a few years following another primary malignancy, and are believed to be related to the chemotherapy used for the primary disease. Alkylating agents are considered to be more leukemogenic than other chemotherapeutic agents. Hodgkin's disease and multiple myeloma, among the hematologic neoplasms, and breast cancer among the solid tumors, are associated with this late complication more than other malignancies. The clinical picture is similar to primary MDS. However, the course is rapid, with early leukemic transformation and poor prognosis. since many sMDS patients are relatively young, it is reasonable to suggest an aggressive approach, i.e. bone-marrow transplantation (BMT) or antileukemic chemotherapy. The older patients may be offered low dose ara-c (LDAC), differentiating agents or clinical trials with growth factors. Even the responders survive no more than a few months.
 ...
PMID:Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes and acute leukemias. 1205 Dec 92

Comparisons of the effectiveness of chemotherapy and transplantation in AML in first complete remission (CR) have focused almost exclusively on patients with de novo disease. Here we used Cox modelling to compare these strategies in patients with MDS and s-AML treated by the Leukemia Group of the EORTC or at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. All patients were aged 15-60. The 184 EORTC patients received conventional dose ara-C + idarubicin + etoposide for remission induction, and after one consolidation course, were scheduled to receive an allograft, or an autograft if a sibling donor was unavailable. The 215 MDA patients received various high-dose ara-C containing induction regimens, and in CR, continued to receive these regimens at reduced dose for 6-12 months. CR rates were 54% EORTC and 63% MDA (P = 0.09). Sixty-five of the 100 EORTC patients who entered CR received a transplant in first CR. Disease-free survival in patients achieving CR was superior in the EORTC cohort, the 4-years DFS rates were 28.9% (s.e. = 4.8%) EORTC vs 17.3% (s.e. = 3.7%) MDA (P = 0.017). Survival from CR was not significantly different in the EORTC and MDA groups, as was survival from start of treatment. After accounting for prognostic factors the conclusions were unchanged. Despite various problems with the analysis discussed below, the data suggest that neither transplantation nor chemotherapy, as currently practised, can be unequivocally recommended for these patients in first CR and that questions as to the superior modality may be less important than the need to improve results with both.
 ...
PMID:Chemotherapy only compared to chemotherapy followed by transplantation in high risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia; two parallel studies adjusted for various prognostic factors. 1220 Jun 72

We report a patient with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) overt leukemia who developed an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in donor cells shortly after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from his HLA-matched sibling. Molecular analysis using microsatellite repeats by polymerase chain reaction proved the new leukemia to be of donor cell origin. The patient received chemotherapy with idarubicin and ara-C, but he died due to mucormycosis.
 ...
PMID:[Donor cell-derived acute myeloid leukemia developed shortly after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for MDS overt leukemia]. 1246 35


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>