Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0026986 (myelodysplastic syndrome)
 14,926 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Second malignancy is one of the serious late effects among long-term survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. Of 83 newly diagnosed pediatric ALL patients at our hospital between January 1980 and December 1995, four patients were found to have second malignancies. These included MDS/AML after B-ALL, rhabdomyosarcoma after early pre-B ALL, ependymoma after B-ALL, and astrocytoma after early pre-B ALL. The mean duration from initial ALL to second malignancy was 5.2 years. The possible causes of second malignancy in these patients are discussed in this report, along with a review of recent literature.
 ...
PMID:Second malignancy following treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. 969 13

Between 1986 and 1990, the Pediatric Oncology Group conducted a study in which 198 children younger than 3 years of age with malignant brain tumors were treated with prolonged postoperative chemotherapy in an effort to delay irradiation and reduce long-term neurotoxicity. Children younger than 2 years of age received 24 months of chemotherapy followed by irradiation, and those between 2 and 3 years of age received 12 months of chemotherapy plus irradiation. Chemotherapy was given in 28-day cycles (AAB, AAB), with cycle A = vincristine (0.065 mg/kg) intravenously on days 1 and 8 and cyclophosphamide (65 mg/kg) intravenously on day 1, and cycle B = cisplatinum (4 mg/kg) intravenously on day 1 and etoposide (6.5 mg/kg) intravenously on days 3 and 4. Five of the 198 children developed second malignancies, with a cumulative risk at 8 years of 11.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-39%). Four of the five second malignancies occurred in children younger than 2 years of age at diagnosis, with a cumulative risk at 8 years of 18.9% (CI, 0-70%). Initial diagnoses were choroid plexus carcinoma (2 children), ependymoma (1 child), desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma (2 children), and medulloblastoma (1 child). Duration from diagnosis of initial tumor to second malignancy was 33, 35, 57, 66, and 92 months. Three children younger than 2 years of age developed lymphoproliferative disease, that is, myelodysplastic syndrome (2 children), both with monosomy 7 deletions, and acute myelogenous leukemia (1 child), after 24 to 26 cycles of chemotherapy, including 8 cycles of etoposide. Two of 3 received craniospinal irradiation (2,560/3,840 cGy) and (3,520/5,320 cGy). Time to second malignancy was 7 years 8 months, 4 years 9 months, and 2 years 9 months. Two children developed solid tumors, at 5 years 6 months and 2 years 11 months, respectively, after initiation of treatment. A sarcoma developed after 26 cycles of chemotherapy and no irradiation, and a meningioma developed after 12 cycles of chemotherapy and local craniospinal irradiation. Potential causative factors for this high rate of secondary malignancies include prolonged use of alkylating agents and etoposide with or without irradiation.
 ...
PMID:Second malignancies in young children with primary brain tumors following treatment with prolonged postoperative chemotherapy and delayed irradiation: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. 974 94

The gold standard of cancer diagnosis has long been based on histological characteristics. With the rapid advancement of genetic medicine, such standard algorithm of diagnostic approach is facing a challenge. The genetic findings have been changed from being a "supporting character" into the role of a "main character". More and more disease diagnosis and classification has to be defined by genetic basis. In this article, we focus on the challenges in the field of pediatric oncology. We cited 2 scenarios where genetic information plays a pivotal role in identifying the underlying pathology. The first scenario is that same genetic mutation can lead to variable clinical phenotypes, this includes EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion related neoplasms; BCOR neoplasms; and GATA-2 deficiency related immunodeficiency and myelodysplastic syndrome. Another scenario is relatively more common that is the same clinical and histopathological phenotype with different underlying genotypes. The genotypes actually impact on the treatment response and outcome. We used medulloblastoma as an example. In fact, we can also find similar scenario in many pediatric cancers such as Ewing sarcoma, ependymoma, etc. The essence of this article is to remind clinicians of the rapid development in genetic medicine and it has been reshaping the landscape of the modern disease classification and therapeutic approach. In the near future, it may even lead to a paradigm shift in our disease diagnostic algorithm.
 ...
PMID:Genotypes versus phenotypes: The potential paradigm shift in the diagnosis and management of pediatric neoplasms. 3315 Mar 15