Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0026838 (spasticity)
 6,471 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Vigabatrin was specifically designed to enhance gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) function in the CNS. By increasing brain concentrations of this inhibitory neurotransmitter the drug appears to decrease propagation of abnormal hypersynchronous discharges, thereby reducing seizure activity. At this stage in its development, clinical experience with vigabatrin is limited primarily to patients with refractory seizure disorders. In this difficult-to-treat population, 'add-on' therapy with vigabatrin greater than or equal to 2 g/day has shown impressive efficacy, reducing seizure frequency by greater than or equal to 50% in approximately half of patients. Clinical efficacy does seem to vary with seizure type with the best response reported in adults with complex partial seizures with or without generalisation and in children with cryptogenic partial epilepsy or symptomatic infantile spasm. Vigabatrin appears to have a negative effect on absences and myoclonic seizures. Some disorders of motor control may also be amenable to enhanced GABAergic function. In the small number of patients with tardive dyskinesia treated to date, vigabatrin produced mild to moderate improvement in hyperkinetic symptom scores but Parkinsonism or schizophrenic symptoms occasionally worsened. The best response was reported in a study of patients who had been withdrawn from neuroleptic therapy. In a small but well-controlled comparative trial, vigabatrin was as effective as baclofen in reducing spasm and improving some parameters of spasticity in patients with spinal cord lesions or multiple sclerosis. Most adverse reactions to vigabatrin are mild and transient with central nervous system (CNS) changes being reported most frequently. Of particular note, serial evoked potential studies and the few available histology reports have not found evidence of intramyelinic oedema during therapeutic use, as was reported in rats and dogs on chronic high-dose treatment. Thus, vigabatrin is a promising new anticonvulsant drug. Current evidence supports a trial of this agent as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory seizure disorders, and future investigation of vigabatrin monotherapy and its efficacy relative to established agents is awaited with interest. Wider experience should help to clarify which patients - by seizure type and concurrent CNS pathology - are likely to benefit from vigabatrin and ongoing monitoring should further clarify the potential detrimental effects, if any, of long term use. In the meantime, it is a welcome addition in the difficult setting of resistant epilepsy.
 ...
PMID:Vigabatrin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in epilepsy and disorders of motor control. 171 66

Movement disorders (ataxia, dystonic disorders, gait disorders, Huntington disease, myoclonus, parkinsonism, spasticity, tardive dyskinesia, tics and tremor) are clinically, pathologically and genetically heterogeneous and are characterized by impairment of the planning, control or execution of movement. Current classifications of these disorders have inherent shortcomings due to the complex nature of movement disorders and the lack of diagnostic tests for the majority. Undiscriminating terminology, as well as the clinical, pathological and genetic heterogeneity, further complicate the development of comprehensive categorizations. Modern classification schemes tend to focus on clinical, pathological or genetic/molecular criteria, but more recent attempts have been made to integrate across these levels. From a historical perspective, two 'golden ages' have shaped the current and evolving classification schemes: (1) the definition of clinical pathological entities in the early twentieth century and (2) the application of molecular neurogenetics in the past 10-15 years. However, the classification of movement disorders on clinical grounds (according to age at onset, distribution of symptoms, disease course, provoking factors and therapeutic response) remains one of the most useful modes of categorization. Postmortem criteria have been employed to distinguish between degenerative and nondegenerative disorders, and specific hallmarks may be required to establish or confirm a diagnosis. Genetic features used for classification purposes include mode of inheritance and molecular genetic data, such as linkage to a known gene locus or identification of a specific genetic defect. A final classification scheme is based on alterations in molecular mechanisms (e.g. trinucleotide expansions) or protein function (e.g. channelopathies). Despite recent advances, it may not be possible to develop the 'ultimate' classification of movement disorders, and different patterns of lumping and splitting may be useful for the clinician, the pathologist or the geneticist/molecular biologist. Furthermore, certain individual cases with unique features may not fit into any particular category. Continued research by both clinicians and basic scientists is necessary in order to refine and redefine classification schemes of movement disorders.
 ...
PMID:Movement disorders: classifications. 1586 75