Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0026764 (multiple myeloma)
 36,148 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Discussion of the total costs and cost-effectiveness ratios of patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and peripheral blood stem cell support (PBSCS) is controversial. In Germany, no reliable data are available, whereas in other countries this issue has been extensively studied. We performed a pharmacoeconomic evaluation on all patients (n = 37) treated with HDC and PBSCS at our institution between July 1994 and June 1997. Patients suffered from high-risk or poor-prognosis breast cancer (n = 24), Hodgkin's disease (n = 3), high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 4), multiple myeloma (n = 2), small-cell cervical cancer (n = 1), malignant hystiocytosis (n = 1) and testicular cancer (n = 2). For pharmacoeconomic evaluation, the period from initiation of induction chemotherapy (IC) until reconstitution after the last course of HDC and PBSCS was considered. A total of 18 patients received IC/HDC/PBSCS for locally advanced or systemic disease, and 19 patients received adjuvant or consolidation IC/HDC/PBSCS. Treatment protocols were heterogeneous. Patients were treated with two to five courses (median two) respectively of IC and sequential mono-HDC (n = 26), tandem-HDC (n = 10) or triple-HDC (n = 1). All patients received granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for stem cell mobilisation and for amelioration of neutropenia after HDC. The relative costs (based on supplier prices) for the total amount of drugs prescribed during the in-patient period was 29.8% for G-CSF, 35.8% for blood products 18.5% for chemotherapy, 2.4% for antiemetics, 5.9% for antimicrobial drugs and 7.6% for other drugs. Contrary to expectations, antimicrobial drugs had only a minor pharmacoeconomic impact during IC/HDC/PBSCS in patients with high-risk or poor-prognosis malignancies, indicating that prolonged septic complications were uncommon in our institution. We conclude that pharmacoeconomic evaluations in IC/ HDC/PBSCS might be integrated into the effort to ensure quality control and monitoring.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell support in high-risk or poor-prognosis malignancies. 964 62

Transplantation of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for rescue of bone marrow function after high-dose chemo-/radiotherapy is widely used in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Mobilization of stem cells to the peripheral blood can be achieved by cytokine treatment of the patients. The main advantage of autologous PBSC transplantation over bone marrow transplantation is the faster recovery of neutrophil and platelet counts. The threshold number of PBSC required for adequate rescue of bone marrow is thought to be about 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, if the stem cells are collected by leukapheresis and subsequently cryopreserved. We show that this critical number could be further reduced to as few as 0.2 x 10(6) cells/kg. In 30 patients with multiple myeloma and 25 patients with bad risk lymphoma 1 liter of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized unprocessed whole blood (stored at 4 degrees C for 1-3 days) was used for transplantation. Compared to a historical control group, a significant reduction in the duration of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and the length of hospital stay was documented. Furthermore, the effect of stem cell support was reflected by a lower need for platelet and red cell transfusions and a reduced antibiotic use. Considering the data as a whole, a cost saving of about 50% was achieved. To date, this easy to perform method of transplantation is only feasible following high-dose therapies that are completed within 72 h, since longer storage of unprocessed blood is accompanied by a substantial loss of progenitor cell function. Ongoing investigations include attempts to prolong storage times for whole blood.
 ...
PMID:New strategies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: G-CSF-mobilized unprocessed whole blood. 968 78

Patients who receive transplants of autologous peripheral stem cells have a shorter duration of neutropenia than patients who receive autologous bone marrow transplants. There is conflicting evidence regarding the risk of infections. A retrospective analysis on 123 patients who received transplants of either autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells for multiple myeloma or breast cancer was performed to study whether this shorter duration of neutropenia can influence the risk of and the severity of infection. Patients who underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) had faster engraftment than the group treated with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Furthermore, the requirement for transfusions of red blood cells and platelets was a reduced. The number of days needed in hospital was significantly lower in PBSCT patients. No reduction in the frequency of infectious complications was found in PBSCT as compared with ABMT patients, but the numbers of days with fever and with antibiotic treatment were significantly lower in the PBSCT patients. Breast cancer patients had significantly faster engraftment but no fewer infectious complications than myeloma patients, regardless of the type of transplantation. Significantly lower numbers of clinically verified infections were found in the group of patients receiving colony-stimulating factors (CSF) after transplantation even though there was no difference in the duration of neutropenia. The need for antibiotic treatment was also significantly less in the group treated with CSF.
 ...
PMID:Faster engraftment but no reduction in infectious complications after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation compared to autologous bone marrow transplantation. 969 6

A 46-year-old female presented with acute myeloid leukemia during complete remission of multiple myeloma after extensive treatment with alkylating agents. Leukemic blasts expressed CD34, platelet esterase and gp IIIa. RT-PCR analyses of peripheral blood cells detected a p190 type BCR-ABL rearrangement and high levels of MDR1. The patient expired during neutropenia shortly after induction chemotherapy. Autopsy revealed persistent blasts in the bone marrow, spleen and liver. 'Secondary' acute myeloid leukemia with megakaryoblastic features and p190-type BCR-ABL rearrangement has not previously been reported. The possibility that the combination of a BCR-ABL rearrangement with overexpression of MDR1 may have contributed to the treatment-refractory course is discussed.
 ...
PMID:Drug resistance of secondary acute myeloid leukemia with megakaryoblastic features and p190 BCR-ABL rearrangement. 978 5

Many patients with solid tumours or haematological malignancies develop anaemia, and the use of chemotherapy aggravates this condition. Red blood cell transfusions are often necessary but are associated with many risks, including immunosuppressive effects that may increase the risk of tumour recurrence. Many clinical studies have shown that epoetin (recombinant human erythropoietin) therapy can ameliorate, or even prevent, the anaemia associated with chemotherapy and cancer (including solid tumours as well as multiple myeloma or lymphoma). Response, defined as a significant (>50%) reduction in the rate of transfusions and/or a significant (>2 g/dl) elevation of haemoglobin levels, is usually observed in about 60% of the patients, irrespective of the type of standard chemotherapy given. The decrease in transfusion requirements is the major objective of epoetin therapy, because they are costly, inconvenient and are associated with potential adverse effects. Epoetin therapy also brings about substantial improvements in various indices of quality of life that are proportional to changes in haemoglobin level. However, large dosages of epoetin are generally required and about 40% of patients do not respond even to very high dosages. A number of adverse effects of epoetin therapy have been observed in patients with renal failure. The most prominent include hypertension, headaches, seizures and thrombotic events. These complications can also occur in patients with renal failure who are not receiving epoetin. Their exact incidence has been assessed in placebo-controlled studies, which have demonstrated that there is no increased risk of thrombosis or seizure with epoetin. However, it is now generally accepted that 10 to 20% of haemodialysis patients will experience an elevation of blood pressure because of epoetin and there is no doubt that a rapid elevation of blood pressure may cause generalised seizures. In other settings, including anaemia associated with cancer, very few adverse effects have been attributed to epoetin. However, close monitoring of blood pressure should be implemented in patients with hypertension. There is no evidence that epoetin stimulates tumour growth. With the dosages of epoetin currently used, there is no evidence of stem cell competition, resulting in thrombocytopenia or neutropenia, or of stem cell exhaustion, producing secondary anaemia when treatment is stopped. Epoetin is a remarkably well tolerated drug that offers significant benefits in patients with cancer.
 ...
PMID:A risk-benefit assessment of epoetin in the management of anaemia associated with cancer. 980 42

This open, comparative, randomized, multicentre equivalence study compared cefepime 2 g bd and imipenem-cilastatin 1 g tds (50 mg/kg/day) as empirical monotherapy for febrile episodes in a homogeneous cohort of cancer patients with short duration neutropenia following chemotherapy for solid tumour, lymphoma or myeloma. The study was conducted in 17 French anti-cancer centres in 1995 and 1996. Response to monotherapy was assessed 7 days after treatment and was based on resolution of fever and signs and symptoms, eradication of pathogens, absence of new infection, relapse, and death of infectious origin, without addition of other antibiotics. Patients were treated for a minimum of 4 days. Of the 400 episodes randomized, 344 (86%) were evaluable for efficacy. Patient characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Success of monotherapy was observed in 79% of episodes with cefepime and 72% with imipenem-cilastatin (equivalence, P <0.0001). The response rate for microbiologically documented infections was 66% with cefepime and 61% with imipenem-cilastatin (bacteraemic episodes: 63% for cefepime; 44% for imipenem-cilastatin). A second antibiotic (usually a glycopeptide) was added in 20% and 21% of the cases, respectively. Overall, the response to therapy, with or without an additional antibiotic, was 95% (cefepime) and 90% (imipenem-cilastatin). Survival was similar in both groups (95% and 98%, respectively). Cefepime treatment was better tolerated, with 9% of the patients experiencing related intercurrent events compared with 19% in the imipenem-cilastatin group (P = 0.003). Nausea/vomiting was significantly more frequent in the imipenem-cilastatin group (15%) than in the cefepime group (5%; P = 0.001). Cefepime monotherapy was as effective as, and better tolerated than, imipenem-cilastatin in the empirical treatment of fever during short duration neutropenia.
 ...
PMID:Cefepime versus imipenem-cilastatin as empirical monotherapy in 400 febrile patients with short duration neutropenia. CEMIC (Study Group of Infectious Diseases in Cancer). 981 51

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of delayed granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use on hematopoietic recovery post-autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation. Patients were randomized to begin G-CSF on day +1 or day +7 post transplantation. Thirty-seven patients with lymphoma or myeloma undergoing high-dose therapy and autologous PBPC rescue were randomized to daily subcutaneous G-CSF beginning on day +1 or day +7 post-transplant. Patients < or =70 kg received 300 microg/day and >70 kg 480 microg/day. All patients were reinfused with PBPCs with a CD34+ cell count >2.0 x 10(6)/kg. Baseline characteristics of age, sex and CD34+ cell count were similar between the two arms, the median CD34+ cell count being 5.87 x 10(6)/kg in the day +1 group and 7.70 x 10(6)/kg in the day +7 group (P=0.7). The median time to reach a neutrophil count of >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 9 days in the day +1 arm and 10 days in the day +7 arm, a difference which was not statistically significant (P=0.68). Similarly, there was no difference in median days to platelet recovery >20000 x 10(9)/l, which was 10 days in the day +1 arm and 11 days in the day +7 arm (P=0.83). There was also no significant difference in the median duration of febrile neutropenia (4 vs 6 days; P=0.7), intravenous antibiotic use (7 vs 8 days; P=0.54) or median number of red blood cell transfusions (4 vs 7 units; P=0.82) between the two arms. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days post-PBPC reinfusion in both groups. The median number of G-CSF injections used was 8 in the day +1 group and 3 in the day +7 group (P < 0.0001). There is no significant difference in time to neutrophil or platelet recovery when G-CSF is initiated on day +7 compared to day +1 post-autologous PBPC transplantation. There is also no difference in number of febrile neutropenic or antibiotic days, number of red blood cell transfusions or length of hospital stay. The number of doses of G-CSF used per transplant is significantly reduced with delayed initiation, resulting in a significant reduction in drug costs. For patients with an adequately mobilized PBPC graft, the initiation of G-CSF can be delayed until day +7 post-PBPC reinfusion.
 ...
PMID:A randomized trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Neupogen) starting day 1 vs day 7 post-autologous stem cell transplantation. 984 93

As in other malignancies, peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) have almost completely replaced bone marrow as the source of stem cells for autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma. PBPC collection could be optimized either by reducing contamination by the malignant clone or by increasing hematopoietic quality of the graft. Currently, the most promising technique for purifying the harvest is CD34 cell selection. Several pilot studies have shown the feasibility of this method in MM. However controlled studies are necessary to assess the clinical impact of CD34+ cell selection. In the IFM 94 study, CD34+ selection was optional. There was no significant difference between 50 patients receiving a CD34+ selected graft and 133 patients receiving non-selected PBPC, as regards duration of neutropenia, duration of thrombocytopenia, response rate, EFS or survival. Hematopoietic recovery after transplantation is related to the number of CD34+ cells infused. The optimal regimen for mobilizing the requested CD34+ yield is not yet known. We have completed a randomized study comparing the combination of SCF plus G-CSF and G-CSF alone after priming with cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2. The median number of leukaphereses to reach the target yield of 5x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was 1 in the SCF group (N=55) versus 2 in the G-CSF group (N=47) (p=0.008). The median number of CD34+ cells collected in the first leukapheresis was 11. 6x10(6) in the SCF group versus 4x10(6) in the G-CSF group (p=0.003). These results are in line with those observed in other trials testing the combination of SCF and G-CSF to improve PBPC collection.
 ...
PMID:Optimizing peripheral blood progenitor cell autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma. 1036

Sixty-eight patients suffering from breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lymphoma or multiple myeloma were treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. They underwent placement of a central venous port via the subclavian vein for delivery of chemotherapy and reinfusion of stem cells. All patients were followed prospectively for device-related and overall complications, comprising a total of 18,213 days in situ (median: 267 days, range: 90-480). One patient experienced a pneumothorax (1.4%) spontaneously resolved, as an acute toxicity. Two patients (2.8%, 0.1 episodes/1000 days of use) were forced to have the port removed due to infection, caused by Streptococcus mitis in one case, while the causative agent was not identified by laboratory tests in the second. The other 66 patients completed the therapeutic programme, including peripheral stem cell reinfusions and supportive care, such as i.v. antibiotics, antiemetics or fluid administration and blood sample collection, without additional complications. In conclusion, the use of totally implantable central venous access ports has resulted in good long-term access to central veins, in spite of the severe neutropenia and increased septic risk of this category of oncology patients.
 ...
PMID:Totally implantable central venous access ports for high-dose chemotherapy administration and autologous stem cell transplantation: analysis of overall and septic complications in 68 cases using a single type of device. 1043 41

A gram-positive bacillus was isolated repeatedly from blood taken through the lumina of a central venous catheter of a patient with multiple myeloma who developed febrile neutropenia following chemotherapy. The bacterium was identified by the API CORYNE system as 'Corynebacterium aquaticum'. Gene analysis targeting the 16S rRNA indicated that the organism had a 99.5% identity with Aureobacterium liquefaciens although there were two phenotypic characteristics at variance with the description of this species. Problems remain with the routine identification of 'C. aquaticum' and Aureobacterium species. The few clinical reports on patients infected with 'C. aquaticum' and A. liquefaciens indicate that these are rare infections often associated with immunocompromise.
 ...
PMID:Aureobacterium masquerading as 'Corynebacterium aquaticum' infection: case report and review of the literature. 1051 Sep 74


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>