Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0023890 (
cirrhosis
)
42,195
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Inter- and intraindividual variability in pharmacokinetics of most drugs is largely determined by variable liver function as described by parameters of hepatic blood flow and metabolic capacity. These parameters may be altered as a result of disease affecting the liver, genetic differences in metabolising enzymes, and various types of drug interactions, including enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition or down-regulation. With the now known large number of drug metabolising enzymes, their differential substrate specificity, and their differential induction or inhibition, each test substance of liver function should be used as a probe for its specific metabolising enzyme. Thus, the concept of model test-substances providing general information about liver function has severe limitations. To test the metabolic activity of several enzymes, either several test substances may be given (cocktail approach) or several metabolites of a single test substance may be analysed (metabolic fingerprint approach). The enzyme-specific analysis of liver function results in a preference for analysis of the metabolites rather than analysis of the clearance of the parent test substance. There are specific methods to quantify the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes such as CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19MEPH,
CYP2D6
, CYP2E1, and CYP3A, and phase II enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferases, glucuronyl-transferases or N-acetyltransferases, in vivo. Interactions based on competitive or noncompetitive inhibition should be analysed specifically for the cytochrome P450 enzyme involved. At least 5 different types of cytochrome P450 enzyme induction may result in major variability of hepatic function; this may be quantified by biochemical parameters, clearance methods, or highly enzyme-specific methods such as Western blot analysis or molecular biological techniques such as mRNA quantification in blood and tissues. Therapeutic drug monitoring is already implicitly used for quantification of the enzyme activities relevant for a specific drug. Selective impairment of hepatic enzymes due to gene mutations may have an effect on the pharmacokinetics of certain drugs similar to that caused by
cirrhosis
. Assessment of this heritable source of variability in liver function is possible by in vivo or ex vivo enzymological methods. For genetically polymorphic enzymes and carrier proteins involved in drug disposition, molecular genetic methods using a patient's blood sample may be used for classification of the individual into: (i) the impaired or poor metaboliser (homozygous deficient); (ii) the extensive (homozygous active) metaboliser group; and (iii) the moderately extensive metaboliser (heterozygous) group. For hepatic blood flow determinations, galactose or sorbitol given at relatively low doses may be much better indicators than the indocyanine green.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:Assessment of liver metabolic function. Clinical implications. 798 3
The pharmacokinetics of fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) with antidepressant properties, are well established. After oral administration, the drug is almost completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, and the extent of absorption is unaffected by the presence of food. Despite complete absorption, oral bioavailability in man is approximately 50% on account of first-pass hepatic metabolism. Peak plasma fluvoxamine concentrations are reached 4 to 12 hours (enteric-coated tablets) or 2 to 8 hours (capsules, film-coated tablets) after administration. Steady-state plasma concentrations are achieved within 5 to 10 days after initiation of therapy and are 30 to 50% higher than those predicted from single dose data. Fluvoxamine displays nonlinear steady-state pharmacokinetics over the therapeutic dose range, with disproportionally higher plasma concentrations with higher dosages. Plasma fluvoxamine concentrations show no clear relationship with antidepressant response or severity of adverse effects. Fluvoxamine undergoes extensive oxidative metabolism, most probably in the liver. Nine metabolites have been identified, none of which are known to be pharmacologically active. The specific cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes involved in the metabolism of fluvoxamine are unknown.
CYP2D6
, which is crucially involved in the metabolism of paroxetine and fluoxetine, appears to play a clinically insignificant role in the metabolism of fluvoxamine. The drug is excreted in the urine, predominantly as metabolites, with only negligible amounts ( < 4%) of the parent compound. Fluvoxamine shows a biphasic pattern of elimination with a mean terminal elimination half-life of 12 to 15 hours after a single oral dose; this is prolonged by 30 to 50% at steady-state. Plasma protein binding of fluvoxamine (77%) is low compared with that of other SSRIs. Fluvoxamine pharmacokinetics are substantially unaltered by increased age or renal impairment. However, its elimination is prolonged in patients with
hepatic cirrhosis
. Fluvoxamine inhibits oxidative drug metabolising enzymes (particularly CYP1A2, and less potently and much less potently CYP3A4 and
CYP2D6
, respectively) and has the potential for clinically significant drug interactions. Drugs whose metabolic elimination is impaired by fluvoxamine include tricyclic antidepressants (tertiary, but not secondary, amines), alprazolam, bromazepam, diazepam, theophylline, propranolol, warfarin and, possibly, carbamazepine. Fluvoxamine is a second generation antidepressant that selectively inhibits neuronal reuptake of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT). Fluvoxamine exhibits antidepressant activity similar to that of the tricyclic antidepressants, but has a somewhat improved tolerability profile, particularly with respect to a lower incidence of anticholinergic effects and reduced cardiotoxic potential. However, gastrointestinal adverse effects, especially nausea, are seen more frequently with fluvoxamine than with the tricyclic antidepressants. Fluvoxamine does not have an asymmetric carbon in its structure (fig. 1) and therefore does not exist as optical isomers. For this reason, the potentially confounding problem of stereoisomerism does not arise with fluvoxamine.
...
PMID:Overview of the pharmacokinetics of fluvoxamine. 884 17
The mutant of CYP2D6*3 allele with A2637 deletion in exon 5 and the mutant of CYP2D6*4 allele G1934-->A, splice site defect are among the most common polymorphic alleles of
CYP2D6
gene, resulting in a decreased or no activity of CYP isoenzyme. In this study, a reliable polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method for identification of CYP2D6*3 and CYP2D6*4 alleles was used to investigate the genotype and phenotype prevalence in the groups of normal controls, and of
cirrhosis
and cancer patients. The results showed none of 36 controls genotyped for 2D6*3 and 2D6*4 allele to have the 2D6*3 allele with frameshift mutation in exon 5, while 33% (n=12) were found to bear the 2D6*4 allele with G to A mutation at the intron 3-exon 4 junction. In breast cancer patients (n=35) genotyped for 2D6*3 and 2D6*4 alleles, none with 2D6*3 allele was found either, but 60% (n=18) were found to bear the 2D6*4 allele. In patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer, there was only one subject with 2D6*3 allele and he was heterozygous. Among them, as many as ten (40%) patients were found to bear 2D6*4 allele. In the
cirrhosis
group, none of the patients was found to have the 2D6*3 allele, while the CYP2D6*4 allele was found in 23% (n=6) patients. The phenotype predicted according to the genotype was as follows: in the control group, 3% of individuals were identified as poor metabolizers, 70% as extensive metabolizers, and 27% as heterozygote extensive metabolizers. In the group of breast cancer, 7% of the patients were identified as poor metabolizer, 57% as extensive metabolizer and 36% as phenotype. In squamous cell cancer and
cirrhosis
patients, the incidence of poor metabolizer was zero, and of heterozygotes extensive metabolizer 42% and 31%, respectively.
...
PMID:Detection of CYP2D6*3 and 2D6*4 allelic variants by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. 980 80
Fluvastatin, the first fully synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce cholesterol in patients with hyperlipidaemia, to prevent subsequent coronary events in patients with established coronary heart disease, and to alter endothelial function and plaque stability in animal models. Fluvastatin is relatively hydrophilic, compared with the semisynthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, and, therefore, it is extensively absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. After absorption, it is nearly completely extracted and metabolised in the liver to 2 hydroxylated metabolites and an N-desisopropyl metabolite, which are excreted in the bile. Approximately 95% of a dose is recovered in the faeces, with 60% of a dose recovered as the 3 metabolites. The 6-hydroxy and N-desisopropyl fluvastatin metabolites are exclusively generated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and do not accumulate in the blood. CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP2C8 and
CYP2D6
form the 5-hydroxy fluvastatin metabolite. Because of its hydrophilic nature and extensive plasma protein binding, fluvastatin has a small volume of distribution with minimal concentrations in extrahepatic tissues. The pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin are not influenced by renal function, due to its extensive metabolism and biliary excretion; limited data in patients with
cirrhosis
suggest a 30% reduction in oral clearance. Age and gender do not appear to affect the disposition of fluvastatin. CYP3A4 inhibitors (erythromycin, ketoconazole and itraconazole) have no effect on fluvastatin pharmacokinetics, in contrast to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors which are primarily metabolised by CYP3A and are subject to potential drug interactions with CYP3A inhibitors. Coadministration of fluvastatin with gastrointestinal agents such as cholestyramine, and gastric acid regulating agents (H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors), significantly alters fluvastatin disposition by decreasing and increasing bioavailability, respectively. The nonspecific CYP inducer rifampicin (rifampin) significantly increases fluvastatin oral clearance. In addition to being a CYP2C9 substrate, fluvastatin demonstrates inhibitory effects on this isoenzyme in vitro and in vivo. In human liver microsomes, fluvastatin significantly inhibits the hydroxylation of 2 CYP2C9 substrates, tolbutamide and diclofenac. The oral clearances of the CYP2C9 substrates diclofenac, tolbutamide, glibenclamide (glyburide) and losartan are reduced by 15 to 25% when coadministered with fluvastatin. These alterations have not been shown to be clinically significant. There are inadequate data evaluating the potential interaction of fluvastatin with warfarin and phenytoin, 2 CYP2C9 substrates with a narrow therapeutic index, and caution is recommended when using fluvastatin with these agents. Fluvastatin does not appear to have a significant effect on other CYP isoenzymes or P-glycoprotein-mediated transport in vivo.
...
PMID:Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin. 1136 92
In addition to the usual associations with insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, central obesity, and hypertriglyceridemia, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has been associated with several drugs and toxins. However, drug-induced liver disease is a relatively uncommon cause of steatohepatitis. The term drug-induced steatohepatitis is preferred when the association appears to result from a direct toxic effect of the drug on the liver. For some agents implicated as causing
cirrhosis
or fatty liver disorders, the association may be coincidental because NASH is a common component of the insulin resistance (or metabolic) syndrome. In other instances, corticosteroids, tamoxifen, and estrogens may precipitate NASH in predisposed persons by exacerbating insulin resistance, central obesity, diabetes, and hypertriglyceridemia, and methotrexate may worsen hepatic fibrosis in NASH. Drug-induced steatohepatitis is associated with prolonged therapy (more than 6 months) and possibly drug accumulation, which in the case of perhexiline maleate is favored by a genetic polymorphism of
CYP2D6
that leads to slow perhexiline oxidation. The toxic mechanism appears to involve mitochondrial injury, which causes steatosis because of impaired beta-oxidation of fatty acids, and leads to generation of reactive oxygen species and ATP depletion. Thus, drug-induced steatohepatitis may provide clues to injurious events in the more common metabolic forms of NASH. A clinical feature of some types of drug-induced steatohepatitis is progression after discontinuation of the causative agent. It follows that early recognition of hepatotoxicity is crucial to prevent the development of severer forms of liver disease and improve the clinical outcome.
...
PMID:Drugs and steatohepatitis. 1201 49
Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is the main (or partial) cause for large differences in the pharmacokinetics of a number of clinically important drugs. On the basis of their ability to metabolise (S)-mephenytoin or other CYP2C19 substrates, individuals can be classified as extensive metabolisers (EMs) or poor metabolisers (PMs). Eight variant alleles (CYP2C19*2 to CYP2C19*8) that predict PMs have been identified. The distribution of EM and PM genotypes and phenotypes shows wide interethnic differences. Nongenetic factors such as enzyme inhibition and induction, old age and
liver cirrhosis
can also modulate CYP2C19 activity. In EMs, approximately 80% of doses of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole seem to be cleared by CYP2C19, whereas CYP3A is more important in PMs. Five-fold higher exposure to these drugs is observed in PMs than in EMs of CYP2C19, and further increases occur during inhibition of CYP3A-catalysed alternative metabolic pathways in PMs. As a result, PMs of CYP2C19 experience more effective acid suppression and better healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers during treatment with omeprazole and lansoprazole compared with EMs. The pharmacoeconomic value of CYP2C19 genotyping remains unclear. Our calculations suggest that genotyping for CYP2C19 could save approximately 5000 US dollars for every 100 Asians tested, but none for Caucasian patients. Nevertheless, genotyping for the common alleles of CYP2C19 before initiating PPIs for the treatment of reflux disease and H. pylori infection is a cost effective tool to determine appropriate duration of treatment and dosage regimens. Altered CYP2C19 activity does not seem to increase the risk for adverse drug reactions/interactions of PPIs. Phenytoin plasma concentrations and toxicity have been shown to increase in patients taking inhibitors of CYP2C19 or who have variant alleles and, because of its narrow therapeutic range, genotyping of CYP2C19 in addition to CYP2C9 may be needed to optimise the dosage of phenytoin. Increased risk of toxicity of tricyclic antidepressants is likely in patients whose CYP2C19 and/or
CYP2D6
activities are diminished. CYP2C19 is a major enzyme in proguanil activation to cycloguanil, but there are no clinical data that suggest that PMs of CYP2C19 are at a greater risk for failure of malaria prophylaxis or treatment. Diazepam clearance is clearly diminished in PMs or when inhibitors of CYP2C19 are coprescribed, but the clinical consequences are generally minimal. Finally, many studies have attempted to identify relationships between CYP2C19 genotype and phenotype and susceptibility to xenobiotic-induced disease, but none of these are compelling.
...
PMID:Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism. 1222 94
Cancer risk can be influenced by the exposure to endogenous or environmental toxins. Polymorphic enzymes involved in the metabolic activation/detoxification of carcinogens may account for individual variations of risk. We studied the polymorphisms of five enzymes of the P450 superfamily, CYP1A1, CYP1A2,
CYP2D6
, CYP2E1 and CY3A4, as risk factors for liver disease progression and cancer in hepatitis C virus-infected patients. CYP genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) restriction fragment length polymorphism or allele-specific PCR. Different stages of disease were considered, as follows: 90 asymptomatic carriers and 87 chronic hepatitis, 92
cirrhosis
and 91 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases. Reference allele frequencies were obtained from 99 blood donors. Allele distributions among categories were compared using the chi(2) test. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to express relative risks. Independent associations were modeled by correspondence analysis and logistic regression. Frequencies of the CYP1A1 highly inducible alleles, MspI m2 and Val, were increased in liver disease patients compared with carriers; no specific association with HCC was found. The high-activity CYP2E1 c2 allele was underrepresented among HCC patients with respect to other HCV categories, including
cirrhosis
.
CYP2D6
poor metabolizer (PM) genotypes were significantly more frequent in healthy subjects (7.1%) and carriers (11.1%) than in hepatitis/
cirrhosis
(4.6%) and HCC (1.2%) patients. This was confirmed by multivariable analysis. PM genotypes protected against progressive disease as ORs reduced proportionally to stage. The age at diagnosis for HCC was anticipated in non-PM individuals. No differences were seen for CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 genes. Polymorphic variants of CYP genes may contribute to the progression of liver disease and HCC risk in HCV-infected subjects.
...
PMID:CYP enzyme polymorphisms and susceptibility to HCV-related chronic liver disease and liver cancer. 1256 54
Several phase I and phase II multi-drug metabolizing enzymes, such as
CYP2D6
, 3A4, and UGTA1, were reported to act as immunotargets in a subset of autoimmune hepatitis and hepatic autoimmunity. However, it is uncertain whether glutathione S-transferase (GST) A1-1, one of the phase II multi-drug metabolizing enzymes, is also an immunotarget in autoimmune hepatitis. So, in the present study, we investigated the frequency and significance of anti-GST A1-1 in sera from patients with autoimmune hepatitis. A total of 74 serum samples from patients with autoimmune hepatitis were examined in the present study. As controls, 20 serum samples from patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, 10 serum samples from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, 40 serum samples from patients with
liver cirrhosis
type B and C, 32 serum samples from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and 20 serum samples from normal controls were used. Anti-GST A1-1 antibody was determined by immunoblotting using the recombinant full-length GST A1-1 protein as the antigen. The immunofluorescent staining pattern of anti-GST A1-1 was investigated using rat liver and kidney sections. We compared clinicopathologic findings between anti-GST A1-1-positive and -negative autoimmune hepatitis patients. Anti-GST A1-1 was detected in 12 (16%) of 74 patients with autoimmune hepatitis, however, it was not detected in any control serum samples except for two patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The immunofluorescence staining pattern of anti-GST A1-1 was found to be unique and different from those of anti-mitochondrial antibody or anti-liver-kidney microsome type 1 antibody. Anti-GST A1-1 coexisted with other autoantibodies such as anti-nuclear or anti-smooth muscle antibodies, but did not coexist with anti-soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas. Anti-GST A1-1-positive autoimmune hepatitis patients had severe clinical features and a poor prognosis compared with anti-GST A1-1-negative patients. These findings suggested that despite the low frequency, anti-GST A1-1 might be the marker of an early progression in autoimmune hepatitis.
...
PMID:Frequency and significance of anti-glutathione S-transferase autoantibody (anti-GST A1-1) in autoimmune hepatitis. 1504 Oct 41
Cytochrome P-450 (CYPs) are involved in the metabolism of drugs, chemicals and endogenous substrates. The hepatic CYPs are also involved in the pathogenesis of several liver diseases. CYP-mediated activation of drugs to toxic metabolites induces hepatotoxicity. Well-known examples include acetaminophen and halothane. In some instances, covalent binding of the toxic metabolite to CYP leads to the formation of anti-CYP antibodies and immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (hydralazine, tienilic acid). Anti-
CYP2D6
antibodies are also present in the serum of patients with type II autoimmune hepatitis, but the mechanism leading to their presence and their pathogenic significance remains unclear. Several studies support a role for CYP2E1 in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. In these conditions, enhanced CYP2E1 activity is associated with lipid peroxidation and the production of reactive oxygen species with secondary damage to cellular membranes and mitochondria. Because of its ability to activate carcinogens, a role for CYP2E1 as a cofactor for hepatocellular carcinoma has also been postulated. On the other hand, drug metabolism is impaired in patients with liver disease, particularly that mediated by CYPs. The content and activity of CYP1A, 2C19 and 3A appear to be particularly vulnerable to the effect of liver disease while
CYP2D6
, 2C9 and 2E1 are less affected. The pattern of CYPs isoenzymes alterations also differs according to the etiology of liver disease. A strong relationship between the activity of CYPs and the severity of
cirrhosis
has been demonstrated, but the usefulness of measuring CYP activity to assess hepatic functional reserve remains uncertain.
...
PMID:Cytochrome P450 and liver diseases. 1518 Apr 96
Many drugs, including most antiarrhythmics (some of which are now of limited clinical use) are eliminated by the hepatic route. If liver function is impaired, it can be anticipated that hepatic clearance will be delayed, which can lead to more pronounced drug accumulation with multiple dosing. Consequently, the potential risks of adverse events could be increased, especially as antiarrhythmics have a narrow therapeutic index. The present review summarises the available pharmacokinetic data on the most popular antiarrhythmic drugs to identify the enzymes involved in the metabolism of the various agents and confirm whether liver disease affects their elimination. Despite long usage of some of these drugs (e.g. amiodarone, diltiazem, disopyramide, procainamide and quinidine), surprisingly few data are available in patients with liver disease, making it difficult to give recommendations for dosage adjustment. In contrast, for carvedilol, lidocaine (lignocaine), propafenone and verapamil, sufficient clinical studies have been performed. For these drugs, a marked decrease in systemic and/or oral clearance and significant prolongation of the elimination half-life have been documented, which should be counteracted by a 2- to 3-fold reduction of the dosage in patients with moderate to severe
liver cirrhosis
. For sotalol, disopyramide and procainamide, renal clearance contributes considerably to overall elimination, suggesting that dosage reductions are probably unnecessary in patients with liver disease as long as renal function is normal. The hepatically eliminated antiarrhythmics are metabolised mainly by different cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes (e.g. CYP3A4, CYP1A2, CYP2C9,
CYP2D6
) and partly also by conjugations. As the extent of impairment in clearance is in the same range for all of these agents, it could be assumed that they have a common vulnerability and that, consequently, hepatic dysfunction will affect CYP-mediated phase I pathways in a similar fashion. The severity of liver disease has been estimated clinically by the validated Pugh score, and functionally by calculation of the clearance of probe drugs (e.g. antipyrine). Both approaches can be helpful in estimating/predicting impairments in drug metabolism, including antiarrhythmics. In conclusion, hepatic impairment decreases the elimination of many antiarrhythmics to such an extent that dosage reductions are highly recommended in such populations, especially in patients with
cirrhosis
.
...
PMID:Antiarrhythmics: elimination and dosage considerations in hepatic impairment. 1802 86
1
2
Next >>