UMLS:C0023467 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0023467 (acute myeloid leukemia)
35,200 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We have previously reported that mobilization of Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative progenitors is possible in a significant number of Ph1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) patients. In this pilot study we employed the same approach for patients with RAEB-t, secondary AML (sAML) and therapy-related AML (t-AML). All patients except one had double or complex cytogenetic abnormalities in marrow cells before mobilization therapy. All patients received an idarubicin-containing regimen (mini-ICE protocol) followed by rh-G-CSF and the first leukapheresis was performed as they were recovering from aplasia. In six out of nine patients the leukapheresis product was entirely karyotypically normal, combined with a significant number of CFU-GM. CD34+ cells and LTC-IC. Recovery time from mobilization therapy was short and no patient died as a result of the procedure. To date, three patients have undergone autografting using their karyotypically normal collections, of which two (sAML) are alive with karyotypically normal marrow a few months after autografting.
...
PMID:In vivo mobilization of karyotypically normal peripheral blood progenitor cells in high-risk MDS, secondary or therapy-related acute myelogenous leukaemia. 885 49

Umbilical cord blood (CB) has been widely used for related and unrelated transplants in pediatric patients. We present the case of an adult with secondary AML who received an unrelated, one-antigen mismatched CB transplant due to the lack of a matched donor. The patient was a 26-year-old female (35 kg/bw) who had received an autologous bone marrow transplant for Hodgkin's disease in April 1994 and, 6 months later, developed secondary MDS (RAEB, 46, XX, -7, +mar), which slowly evolved into acute myelogenous leukemia. In May 1995, she was transplanted with a 165 ml CB unit containing a total of 1.6 x 10(9) nucleated cells, 11 x 10(6) CD34+ cells and 7.2 x 10(5) CFU-GM. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of standard CsA and methotrexate. Myeloid engraftment occurred on day +28 (PMN > 500) and full donor chimerism was confirmed twice (on days +33 and +56) by means of cytogenetics and DNA microsatellite analysis. Erythroid and megakaryocytic engraftment was documented by immunohistochemical analysis of a bone marrow biopsy on day +40, showing the presence of erythroblastic islands and isolated CD61+ immature cells. The patient did not develop GVHD but died on day +56 from idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and multiorgan failure. To our knowledge, this is one of the first case reports of unrelated mismatched CB transplantation in an adult.
...
PMID:Unrelated mismatched cord blood transplantation in an adult with secondary AML. 886 67

Interest in high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) for both induction and postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prompted the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) to initiate a randomized trial comparing HDAC with standard-dose cytarabine (SDAC) for remission induction of previously untreated AML and to compare high-dose treatment versus conventional doses for consolidation therapy. Patients less than 65 years of age with de novo or secondary AML were randomized for induction between SDAC 200 mg/ m2/d for 7 days by continuous infusion or HDAC at 2 g/ m2 intravenously every 12 hours for 12 doses; both groups received daunorubicin (DNR) at 45 mg/m2/d intravenously for 3 days. Complete responders to SDAC were randomized to receive either two additional courses of SDAC plus DNR or one course of HDAC plus DNR. Complete responders to HDAC were nonrandomly assigned to receive one additional course of HDAC plus DNR. Of patients randomized between SDAC (n = 493) and HDAC (n = 172) induction, 361 achieved complete remission (CR). The CR rate was slightly poorer with HDAC: 55% versus 58% with SDAC for patients aged less than 50, and 45% (HDAC) versus 53% (SDAC) for patients aged 50 to 64 (age-adjusted one-tailed P = .96). With a median follow-up time of 51 months, survival was not significantly better with HDAC (P = .41); the estimated survival rate at 4 years was 32% (HDAC) versus 22% (SDAC) for those aged less than 50, and 13% (HDAC) versus 11% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. However, relapse-free survival was somewhat better following HDAC Induction (P = .049): 33% (HDAC) versus 21% (SDAC) at 4 years for those aged less than 50, and 21% (HDAC) versus 9% (SDAC) for those aged 50 to 64. Induction with HDAC was associated with a significantly increased risk of fatal (P = .0033) and neurologic (P < .0001) toxicity. Among patients who achieved CR with SDAC, survival and disease-free survival (DFS) following consolidation randomization were not significantly better with HDAC compared with SDAC (P = .77 and .46, respectively). Patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had the best postremission outcomes; however, the proportion of CR patients who did not go on to protocol consolidation therapy was more than twice as high after HDAC induction compared with SDAC. Induction therapy with HDAC plus DNR was associated with greater toxicity than SDAC plus DNR, but with no improvement in CR rate or survival. Following CR induction with SDAC, consolidation with HDAC increased toxicity but not survival or DFS. In a nonrandomized comparison, patients who received both HDAC induction and consolidation had superior survival and DFS compared with those who received SDAC induction with either SDAC or HDAC consolidation.
...
PMID:A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. 887 80

The hemopoietic stem cell marker CD34 has been reported to be a useful predictor of treatment outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Previous data suggested that CD34 expression may be associated with other poor prognosis factors in AML such as undifferentiated leukemia, secondary AML (SAML), and clonal abnormalities involving chromosome 5 and 7. In order to analyze the correlations between the clinicopathologic features, cytogenetic and CD34 expression in AML, we retrospectively investigated 99 patients with newly diagnosed AML: 85 with de novo disease and 14 with secondary AML (SAML). Eighty-six patients who received the same induction chemotherapy were available for clinical outcome. Defining a case as positive when > or = 20% of bone marrow cells collected at diagnosis expressed the CD34 antigen, forty-five patients were included in the CD34 positive group. Ninety patients had adequate cytogenetic analysis. Thirty-two patients (72%) with CD34 positive AML exhibited an abnormal karyotype whereas 15 patients (28%) with CD34 negative AML had abnormal metaphases (P < 0.01). Monosomy 7/7q- or monosomy 5/5q- occurred in 10 patients and 8 of them expressed the CD34 antigen (P < 0.05). All patients with t(8;21) which is considered as a favorable factor in AML had levels of CD34 >/= 20% (P < 0.05). We did not find any association between CD34 expression and attainment of complete remission, overall survival, or disease-free survival. In conclusion, the variations of CD34 expression in AML are correlated with cytogenetic abnormalities associated both with poor and favorable outcome. The evaluation of the correlations between CD34 antigen and clinical outcome in AML should take into account the results of pretreatment karyotype.
...
PMID:Correlation between CD34 expression and chromosomal abnormalities but not clinical outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. 949 90

Three cases of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that developed after long term treatment with oral etoposide were reported. Case 1 was a 72-year-old male in whom small cell lung cancer was diagnosed in January 1987. He developed AML (M4) in February 1993 after long-term treatment with oral etoposide (total dose 14,650 mg) t(9; 11) (p21; q23) with rearrangement of MLL genes was recognized. Case 2 was a 68-year-old female non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) was diagnosed in February 1989. AML (M4Eo) with inv(16) (p13q22) developed in March 1994 after long-term treatment with oral etoposide (total dose 5,100 mg). Case 3 was a 39-year-old male in whom NHL was diagnosed in January 1991. He developed AML(M2) with t(11; 19) (q23; p13) in May 1994 after long-term treatment with oral etoposide (total dose 20,450 mg). These three cases suggest that long-term treatment with oral etoposide may be associated with a risk of developing a secondary AML in patient with malignancies.
...
PMID:[Three cases of secondary acute myeloid leukemia after long-term treatment with oral etoposide]. 896 Jun 61

We report the case of a 47-year-old patient who developed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) 18 months after receiving high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell support (PBPCT) for relapsed low-grade follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Cytogenetic analysis of the leukemic cells showed the translocation (9;22)(q34;q11). In three mitoses, an additional Philadelphia chromosome (Ph1) was present. In the literature, Philadelphia chromosome-positive secondary AML has been described only once before in a patient with multiple myeloma.
...
PMID:Philadelphia chromosome-positive secondary acute myeloid leukemia following high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell support for relapsed low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. 900 59

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) developing after exposure to genotoxic agents has been recognized as a distinctive entity for more than 40 years. Secondary, or therapy-related, AML accounts for 10% to 20% of all AML cases. The basic and clinical investigation of these complex malignancies can be approached from four major vantage points: (I) dissection of the molecular structure of the induced genetic lesions and identification of the functional consequences of these changes, thereby providing clues to the pathogenesis of secondary AML and potentially serving as a basis for innovative therapeutic interventions; (2) identification and characterization of mechanisms of DNA damage and the orderly repair of such damage; (3) identification and application of accurate biomarkers of leukemogenesis for the purpose of risk prediction and quantification, potentially allowing recognition of patients especially susceptible to the leukemogenic effects of chemotherapy (for genetic or acquired reasons) and allowing their treatment for cancer to be modified based on this susceptibility; and (4) design and implementation of longitudinal clinical and genetic monitoring of high-risk populations (ie, individuals undergoing cytotoxic therapies for primary malignancies). In this article, we build on these themes, and attempt to integrate these seemingly disparate areas of research so that they can be more effectively used together to address the problem of secondary AML. Ultimately, the evaluation of these areas will inform our understanding of de novo leukemia and serve as a springboard for the development of new concepts of therapy and prevention.
...
PMID:The molecular pathogenesis of treatment-induced (secondary) leukemias: foundations for treatment and prevention. 904 96

Untreated acute leukemia is a uniformly fatal disease with a median survival time shorter than 3 months. Current treatment strategies provide a significant increase in survival time for most patients, some of whom may be cured. The majority of patients with acute leukemia, however, ultimately die of the disease or complications of treatment. The effective treatment of acute leukemia requires (1) differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) from acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and recognition of clinically relevant subtypes; (2) identification of patients who are more likely or less likely than average to benefit from a conventional treatment; and (3) selection of therapy that provides a reasonable likelihood of response with acceptable risk of toxic effects. The diagnosis of acute leukemia is established in most cases by a bone marrow aspirate that demonstrates at least 30% blast cells. The traditional criteria to distinguish between AML and ALL rely on morphology and cytochemical reactions. Immunologic analysis of antigen expression and analysis for numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities of leukemia cells are routinely feasible. Karyotypic analysis is of prognostic importance and should be performed on all diagnostic specimens of bone marrow aspirate. Immunophenotypic analysis may be useful to confirm the disease classification in selected cases. The importance of the routine immunophenotypic characterization of acute leukemia, however, is controversial. The subtypes that must be recognized because of the need for specific treatment include (a) acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), which is the M3 subtype of AML, and (b) the L3 subtype or mature B-cell ALL. Induction therapy for acute leukemia is treatment intended to achieve induction of complete remission (CR). Complete remission is defined as the absence of morphologic evidence of leukemia after recovery of the peripheral blood cell counts. Failure to achieve CR may be attributed to death during chemotherapy-induced bone marrow hypoplasia or to drug resistance manifested either as failure to achieve hypoplasia or as persistent leukemia after recovery from hypoplasia. Postremission therapy is treatment administered in CR to prevent or delay relapse of the leukemia. However, the majority of patients have disease relapse. Intensification of therapy is a treatment strategy designed to overcome resistance to chemotherapy. Recent clinical trials of intensified induction or postremission therapy suggest improved outcome. However, the toxic effects of dose intensification can be substantial, limiting any potential benefit of this approach. Identification of prognostic factors may allow one to estimate the likelihood of an outcome, to determine an optimal treatment strategy. It is well established that age at the time of diagnosis, leukemia cell karyotype, and whether the leukemia is de novo or secondary are factors that influence treatment decisions. Patients with favorable prognostic factors should probably receive conventional therapy. Patients with unfavorable prognostic factors have shown little benefit from conventional therapy. In addition, factors that indicate poor outcome with conventional therapy are also predictive of poor outcome with intensified therapy. Consequently, these patients should be considered for investigational therapeutic strategies. The bias may be to counsel them to accept the potential increased morbidity of such treatment before there is definite evidence of the possibility of improved outcome. Induction chemotherapy for younger patients with AML (less than 55 years of age) in general consists of one or more courses of cytarabine (ara-C) and an anthracycline or an anthracycline derivative. Randomized trials have failed to confirm that treatment with either etoposide or high-dose ara-C induces disease remission. Patients with secondary AML, high levels of CD34 antigen expression, or an unfavorable karyotype, however, may benefit from ind
...
PMID:Adult acute leukemia. 905 27

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a multifunctional cytokine involved in angiogenesis, inflammation, and wound healing. It is secreted by a variety of tumor cell lines, including hematopoietic lines. Therefore, we investigated expression of VEGF and its receptors on fresh leukemic blasts. VEGF-specific transcripts were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 20 of 28 patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and in 3 of 5 patients with secondary AML. Using immunocytochemistry, we found VEGF protein in 2 leukemic cell lines and in 8 AML patients, in concordance with PCR results. Supernatants of fresh leukemic cells from 24 AML patients contained significantly more VEGF than supernatants from bone marrow cells of 9 normal donors or of CD34-enriched cells from 3 normal volunteer donors as determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. VEGF possesses two high-affinity receptors, KDR and FLT1. Using a sensitive nested PCR assay, we detected expression of FLT1 in 10 of 20 patients with de novo AML and 3 of 5 patients with secondary AML. KDR was expressed in 4 of 22 patients with de novo AML and 1 of 4 with secondary AML. To study possible paracrine growth stimulation of AML blasts, endothelial cells from human umbilical cords were incubated with increasing concentrations of VEGF. A dose-dependent increase of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor secretion from endothelial cells was identified.
...
PMID:Vascular endothelial growth factor, a possible paracrine growth factor in human acute myeloid leukemia. 905 6

The clinical significance of the multidrug resistance (MDR 1) gene phenotype was investigated in newly diagnosed AML and was compared with other clinical and biological prognostic factors in patients who received at least one course of induction therapy with intercalating agents and conventional doses of Ara-C. MDR 1 gene was overexpressed in 40% of the 110 cases of AML at presentation, MRP in 15% of the 48 patients tested for both markers. Both gene expressions were closely linked (p = 0.008). Except for a lower frequency in the "good risk" cytogenetic group, MDR 1 overexpression was not associated with other prognostic factors. In univariate analysis, MDR 1 overexpression, age over 50 years, and cytogenetic were associated with a higher rate of resistance to induction treatment. The overall survival was shorter in the case of intermediate or poor cytogenetics, high leukocytosis, MDR 1 overexpression, age over 50 years, secondary AML, and poor cytologic differentiation. Using multivariate analysis on 64 patients receiving intensive treatment, MDR 1 overexpression was the first significant prognostic factor for resistance to the first course of induction treatment. Cytogenetic analysis maintained its prognostic value only in MDR 1-negative patients. These data underline the value of MDR 1 gene expression as a powerful prognostic factor in AML for response to the first induction treatment and overall survival, sustaining the use of MDR 1 modulators for first-line therapy in this disease.
...
PMID:Multidrug resistance gene expression in acute myeloid leukemia: major prognosis significance for in vivo drug resistance to induction treatment. 906 75

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>