Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0023241 (
Legionella
)
6,990
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The objective of this study was to compare an indirect immunofluorescence assay with culture methods for the identification of
Legionella
pneumophila serogroups 1 to 6 in hot water samples taken from domestic environments. Hot water samples were obtained from the water heater, the shower heads, and the most frequently used faucet of 211 private houses. Concentrated water samples were inoculated on buffered charcoal yeast extract agar (BCYE) and on a semi-selective culture medium (
GPV
). Colonies with a morphology similar to that of Legionellaceae were subcultured on BCYE and on blood agar plates; those that grew on the former but not the latter were further characterized and identified by direct immunofluorescence techniques. The concentrated samples were also smeared on multiple-well microscope slides and tested by indirect immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies against L. pneumophila, serogroups 1 to 6. Of the houses studied, 30% were found to contain culturable L. pneumophila in at least one water sample, whereas 63% were positive by indirect immunofluorescence. The sensitivity of this assay compared with culture varied from 16.7-21.1%, and its specificity was between 76.7% and 88.3% depending on the sample source (water heater, shower heads, or faucet). In the 38 houses with at least one positive sample found by both immunofluorescence and culture, total or partial agreement between serogroups identified by both techniques was only 34%. The results obtained in this study strongly suggest that indirect immunofluorescence is not an adequate alternative for the identification of L. pneumophila in hot water systems.
...
PMID:Comparison of culture methods and an immunofluorescence assay for the detection of Legionella pneumophila in domestic hot water devices. 136 87
To assess risk factors associated with the contamination of the domestic environment by legionellae, 211 houses in the Quebec City area were randomly selected and water samples were collected from the hot water tank, the shower heads, and the most frequently used faucet. After centrifugation, concentrated samples were seeded in triplicate on BCYE and
GPV
media. Data on the characteristics of the hot water system and plumbing in the house and on the personal habits of the occupants were collected for each house. Among these 211 houses, hot water was provided by either an oil or gas heater in 33 and by an electric heater in 178. Legionellae were isolated from none of the samples from houses with oil or gas heaters and from 39% (69 of 178) of those with electric water heaters (P less than 0.0001). This association remained highly significant after control for water temperature and other variables in a stratified analysis. In the 178 houses with an electric heater, 12% of the faucets, 15% of the shower heads, and 37% of the water heaters were contaminated.
Legionella
pneumophila serogroups 2 and 4 were the most frequently isolated strains. Logistic regression showed that factors associated with electric water heater contamination were (i) location of the house in older districts of the city (P less than 0.0001), (ii) old age of the water heater (P = 0.003), and (iii) low water temperature (P = 0.05). Contamination of the water heater was the only factor significantly associated with the contamination of peripheral outlets (P less than 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Risk factors for contamination of domestic hot water systems by legionellae. 176 4