Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0022116 (ischemia)
 91,303 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The hemodynamic responses to 3 different therapeutical regimens: beta-adrenoceptor blockade, calcium inflow inhibition and combined alpha-beta-blockade were evaluated in 3 matched randomized groups of patients with ischemic heart disease and typical exercise-induced angina. The groups consisted of 22, 16 and 15 men, mean age 55-59 years. They were studied at rest and during ischemia-inducing exercise, before and after single oral doses of 100 mg metoprolol, 10 mg nifedipine and 200 mg labetalol. Pressures in the brachial artery and the pulmonary circulation were recorded by means of percutaneously introduced catheters. Cardiac output was determined according to the Fick principle. Metoprolol reduced mean arterial pressures, heart rate and cardiac output. Systemic vascular resistance and left ventricular filling pressure increased. Nifedipine resulted under all conditions in a distinct reduction of systemic vascular resistance and arterial pressures and a slight increase in heart rate and cardiac output. Left ventricular filling pressure was significantly lowered, the more the higher the initial level. The effect of labetalol was similar to that of nifedipine; however, cardiac output was unchanged and heart rate was slightly reduced. Left ventricular filling pressure was significantly lower. It is apparent that suppression of adrenergic stimulation by beta-receptor blockade alone may have adverse hemodynamic effects in ischemic heart disease and prompt further functional deterioration. Conversely, both calcium and combined alpha-beta-receptor blockade tend to improve left ventricular function by lowering both left ventricular preload and total systemic vascular resistance. The results strongly suggest that in patients in whom beta-receptor blockers appear indicated, their adverse hemodynamic effects can be offset by concomitant alpha1-receptor blockade or vasodilation without losing symptomatic efficacy. Combined alpha-beta-receptor blockade has the advantage over calcium antagonists alone to prevent any increase in adrenergic activity and related hyperkinetic response.
 ...
PMID:Differential hemodynamic effects of beta-adrenoceptor blockers, Ca antagonists and combined alpha-beta-receptor blockade in ischemic heart disease. 286 48

Calcium channel blocking agents function as negative inotropic agents when they are administered in vitro directly to the myocardium. In patients with coronary artery disease, however, such direct effects are attenuated by a number of other factors, including decreased afterload and resultant reflex sympathetic stimulation, increased coronary blood flow with improved myocardial perfusion, and protection of mitochondria. Nifedipine has not been observed to cause significant left ventricular depression in patients with angina pectoris; this is primarily due to peripheral arteriolar vasodilatation, which reduces impedance of left ventricular ejection. In addition, the relief of myocardial ischemia by nifedipine plays a major role in improving systolic and diastolic function. The clinical response to calcium channel blockers may differ in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, for whom the factor of fluctuating ischemia is less important.
 ...
PMID:Effect of nifedipine on left ventricular function in patients with angina pectoris. 287 35

Patients with silent myocardial ischemia can be classified as one of three clinical types: those who are totally asymptomatic (type 1), those who are asymptomatic after a myocardial infarction (type 2), and those who demonstrate both asymptomatic and symptomatic episodes (type 3). Total ischemic activity may be similar in any given patient, but the ratio of symptomatic to asymptomatic episodes will differ. Prognosis appears dependent on the degree of total ischemic activity plus the extent of coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. The effects of therapy can be monitored with exercise testing and/or Holter monitoring. Using the latter technique, the largest multicenter study to date, the Nifedipine Total Ischemia Awareness Program, has demonstrated the advantages of adding a calcium antagonist to nitrate and/or beta-blocker therapy regimens in order to maximize the reduction in total ischemic activity in angina patients.
 ...
PMID:Total ischemic burden. Implications for prognosis and therapy. 291 87

It remains unknown whether the actions of verapamil to depress and nifedipine to enhance contractile function of ischemic myocardium influence the degree of myocardial ischemic injury. Thus, we measured intramyocardial pH using fiberoptic pH probes in 43 anesthetized open-chest dogs pretreated for 30 min with verapamil, or nifedipine in doses that decreased aortic pressure 10 to 15 mm Hg before ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery for 15 min. Drugs were continued during the 15-min ischemic period until the animals were euthanized without reperfusion: verapamil, 10-20 micrograms/kg/min and nifedipine, 2 to 4 micrograms/kg/min i.v. Verapamil-treated dogs showed higher pH of ischemic subendocardium after 15 min ischemia (6.75 +/- 0.07) than did the nifedipine (6.48 +/- 0.04) or placebo (6.43 +/- 0.05) groups, even if the animals were paced (6.71 +/- 0.11) to prevent the negative chronotropic effect of verapamil (P less than 0.01). Neither verapamil nor nifedipine changed collateral myocardial blood flow from 0.10 +/- 0.02 in the subendocardium and 0.17 +/- 0.03 ml/min/g in the subepicardium. Left ventricular function estimated by left ventricular dp/dt was depressed 15% by verapamil and enhanced 26% by nifedipine. Thus, verapamil, but not nifedipine, relieves acidosis of ischemic myocardium after acute coronary occlusion in doses that sustain a 10 to 15 mm Hg decrease in aortic pressure. Nifedipine, in doses that produced the same 10 to 15 mm Hg decrease in mean aortic pressure, did not increase intramyocardial pH, as it enhanced contractile function, estimated by left ventricular dp/dt.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Contrasting effects of verapamil and nifedipine on pH of ischemic myocardium in the dog. 291 74

To investigate whether slow Ca2+ channel blockers protect against development of changes in properties of the sarcolemma and in the tissue ultrastructure during myocardial ischemia, nifedipine was administered prior to occlusion (up to 3 hours) of the left anterior descending coronary artery in anesthetized pigs. Intravenous doses which reduced arterial blood pressure by 20-25%, had no effect on the time-dependent reduction of Ca2+-calmodulin and cyclic AMP-dependent 32P incorporation into sarcolemmal phospholamban-like protein. Nifedipine blocked the reduction in the activity of sarcolemmal 5'-nucleotidase. Nifedipine had no significant effect on the long-chain fatty acylcarnitine accumulation in sarcolemma. A marked delay in the appearance of ultrastructural indicators of irreversible tissue injury in subepicardial myocardium was observed, when nifedipine was infused. Particularly the reduced appearance of electron-dense bodies in mitochondria suggested a reducing effect of nifedipine on cellular net gain of Ca2+. Apparently, ischemia-induced loss of the ability of the proteinkinases to incorporate phosphate into sarcolemmal phospholamban-like protein is not a process secondary to Ca2+ overload of the myocardium. The involvement of accumulation of long-chain fatty acylcarnitine within the sarcolemma may also be excluded. The membrane defect as indicated by a change in phosphorylation-mediated control of Ca2+ transport may itself be associated with the development of ischemia (-reperfusion)-induced Ca2+ overload.
 ...
PMID:The effect of nifedipine on ischemia-induced changes in the biochemical properties of isolated sarcolemmal vesicles and the ultrastructure of myocardium. 303 May 20

The effects of nifedipine (60 to 90 mg/day) and propranolol (240 mg/day) on symptoms, angina threshold and cardiac function were compared in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. Five-week treatment periods with nifedipine and propranolol were compared with 2 weeks of placebo treatment in 21 men with chronic stable angina pectoris, 13 of whom had symptoms both at rest and on exertion. Compared with placebo, New York Heart Association functional class improved in patients equally with nifedipine (p = 0.001) and propranolol (p = 0.006). Frequency of chest pain decreased with nifedipine (p = 0.001) and propranolol (p = 0.01), and nitroglycerin consumption similarly decreased with both treatments. Nifedipine significantly delayed the onset of chest pain (p = 0.01) and 1 mm of ST-segment depression (p = 0.002) during bicycle exercise; smaller increases with propranolol were not statistically significant. A preferential clinical response to nifedipine (9 patients) or propranolol (6 patients) was unrelated to the presence or absence of pain at rest or to any baseline hemodynamic finding. Nifedipine and propranolol were equally effective in relieving exertional ischemia as shown by improvements in ejection fraction at identical workloads, from 0.48 +/- 0.11 to 0.58 +/- 0.12 (p less than 0.001) and 0.56 +/- 0.14 (p less than 0.001), respectively. Exercise wall motion, assessed by a semiquantitative wall motion score, also improved with both drugs. Propranolol treatment decreased exercise cardiac output by 14% (p = 0.01) through its effect on heart rate. In contrast, nifedipine treatment had no effect on cardiac output.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Comparison of nifedipine alone with propranolol alone for stable angina pectoris including hemodynamics at rest and during exercise. 308 64

The authors performed a long-term, double-blind, crossover, randomized study on the effects of two drugs (atenolol, 100 mg/day, or nifedipine, 10 mg t.i.d.) when administered alone or in combination on the exercise tolerance in 10 patients with stable angina on effort (mean age 52 +/- 4 years, 8 males and 2 females) and documented significant (greater than or equal to 70%) obstructive coronary lesions at angiography. None of the drug treatments improved exercise duration or maximal sustained work load. Atenolol decreased significantly ST segment depression to -1 +/- 0.8 from -1.91 +/- 0.7, baseline and -2.05 +/- 0.5, placebo. Nifedipine was not better than placebo. The atenolol plus nifedipine treatment was better than placebo (p less than 0.001) or nifedipine alone (p less than 0.05) but was not more significantly efficacious than atenolol alone. Long-term management of exertional angina can be usefully performed using atenolol. The use of nifedipine at the present dose of 10 mg, although well tolerated, did not improve the ST signs of ischemia.
 ...
PMID:Atenolol and/or nifedipine in effort angina: which is the treatment of choice for exercise coronary protection? 319 3

Sympathetic hyperactivity plays a major role in the genesis of malignant arrhythmias during acute myocardial ischemia. An experimental model in which life-threatening arrhythmias are specifically and consistently induced by the interaction between acute myocardial ischemia and left stellate ganglion stimulation has been developed in alpha-chloralose anesthetized cats. In this preparation, drugs that share antiischemic, antiadrenergic, and specific electrophysiologic effects, such as verapamil, diltiazem, and amiodarone, were most effective. To evaluate the relative role of these different properties in mediating the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs, we used this same model to test nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker that is able to counteract the consequences of sympathetic stimulation on coronary circulation but has no electrophysiologic properties at concentrations relevant in the clinical setting. Nifedipine (15 micrograms/kg) prevented the occurrence of ventricular fibrillation in 10 of 13 animals (77%). Its efficacy was independent of changes in the peripheral hemodynamics. Plasma concentrations of nifedipine were within the therapeutic range in humans. To evaluate if this rather striking protective effect was specifically related to the prevention of the deleterious consequences of sympathetic stimulation, the effect of nifedipine on ventricular fibrillation threshold was studied in an additional group of 13 cats in the nonischemic state, during acute myocardial ischemia and during ischemia plus sympathetic stimulation. Nifedipine did not modify ventricular fibrillation threshold in nonischemic or in ischemic conditions. However, nifedipine specifically prevented the further reduction in ventricular fibrillation threshold occurring when sympathetic stimulation was superimposed on acute ischemia. These data suggest that the extension of ischemic damage by sympathetic stimulation is an important progenitor of arrhythmogenic action during acute ischemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Ventricular fibrillation induced by the interaction between acute myocardial ischemia and sympathetic hyperactivity: effect of nifedipine. 339 31

The cardioprotective effect of the addition of the slow calcium-channel blocker nifedipine to cardioplegic solution was tested in two double-blind placebo controlled randomized studies. The first study included 24 patients undergoing aortic-coronary bypass grafting, and the second included 24 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Nifedipine at a dose of 200 micrograms/L or placebo was added to St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution. The following markers of ischemia were used: adenosine triphosphate and its catabolites, creatine phosphate and inorganic phosphate, determined in transmural left ventricular biopsy specimens taken before, at the end of, and after aortic cross-clamping; hemodynamic recovery 15 minutes after cessation of cardiopulmonary bypass; clinical outcome in terms of the incidence of arrhythmias, low cardiac output, positive inotropic support immediately after operation, and follow-up at 15 months. The main difference between the two studies was that myocardial temperature during cross-clamping remained constant at 14 degrees C in coronary bypass grafting but increased to 25 degrees C in valve operations despite the application of the same amounts of cardioplegic solutions. This lower temperature resulted in better preservation of high-energy phosphates in coronary bypass operations as compared to the placebo group having valve replacement operations. According to analysis of variance, a drug effect could be demonstrated only in the aortic valve replacement study: Accumulation of breakdown products of the adenine nucleotide pool was less in the nifedipine group than in the placebo group (p less than 0.05). Adenosine triphosphate decreased only to 84% in the nifedipine group and to 72% in the placebo group. Despite this adenosine triphosphate-sparing effect, weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass was more difficult in the nifedipine group. Left ventricular stroke work index 15 minutes after bypass was decreased to 72% of the prebypass value in the nifedipine group (t test, p less than 0.01) and only to 86% in the placebo group (p = NS). In contrast, after the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, the incidence of low cardiac output tended to be lower in the nifedipine group than in the placebo group: 33% versus 58% (p = NS). In conclusion, ischemia-induced degradation of nucleotides as it occurs when myocardial cooling is inadequate can be prevented by the addition of nifedipine to the St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution. This effect, however, is not associated with an improved clinical outcome.
 ...
PMID:Nifedipine as an adjunct to St. Thomas' Hospital cardioplegia. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. 351 8

The calcium antagonists provide a unique tool to reduce myocardial oxygen demand and prevent increases in coronary vasomotor tone. For patients with Prinzmetal's variant angina, diltiazem, nifedipine and verapamil are extremely effective in preventing episodes of coronary vasospasm and symptoms of ischemia. Unstable angina pectoris is a more complex pathophysiologic syndrome with episodes of ischemia due to increases in coronary vasomotor tone, intermittent platelet aggregation or alterations in the underlying atherosclerotic plaque. Each of the calcium antagonists is effective as monotherapy in decreasing the frequency of angina at rest. Nifedipine is the only calcium antagonist that has been studied in a combination regimen with beta blockers and nitrates for patients with unstable angina, and control of angina is better with the combination regimen than with either form of therapy alone. Although symptoms of myocardial ischemia in unstable angina are reduced by calcium antagonists, these agents do not seem to decrease the incidence of adverse outcomes. Antiplatelet therapy appears to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with unstable angina, suggesting that thrombus formation may play a central role in that disorder. Episodes of silent or asymptomatic myocardial ischemia, identified by ST-segment monitoring, occur in a variety of disorders of coronary disease. Among patients with Prinzmetal's variant angina and unstable angina, episodes of silent ischemia appear to be as frequent as episodes of angina and the calcium antagonists are effective in decreasing episodes of ischemia regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms. Persisting episodes of silent ischemia among patients with unstable angina despite maximal medical therapy identify patients at high risk for an early unfavorable outcome. Among patients with stable exertional angina, episodes of silent ischemia may be up to 5 times as frequent as episodes of angina, and may be due to increases in coronary vasomotor tone, transient platelet aggregation or increases in myocardial oxygen demand. Preliminary experience suggests that calcium antagonists and beta blockers are effective in decreasing episodes of silent ischemia in patients with stable exertional angina and that a combination regimen may be more effective than either form of therapy alone.
 ...
PMID:Calcium antagonists for Prinzmetal's variant angina, unstable angina and silent myocardial ischemia: therapeutic tool and probe for identification of pathophysiologic mechanisms. 354 88


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>