Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0022116 (ischemia)
 91,303 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In the management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there is considerable debate regarding the use of invasive strategy versus conservative strategy. The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) III B trial found similar clinical outcomes for the 2 strategies, but the Veterans Administration Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in-Hospital trial found a higher mortality with the invasive strategy. Both these trials were conducted before platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and coronary stenting, both of which improve clinical outcome. Thus, there is a need to reexamine the question of which management strategy is optimal in the current era of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and new coronary interventions. The Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS-TIMI 18) trial is an international, multicenter, randomized trial that is evaluating the clinical efficacy of early invasive and early conservative treatment strategies in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave AMI treated with tirofiban, heparin, and aspirin. Patients are randomized to an invasive strategy, involving cardiac catheterization within 4 to 48 hours and revascularization with angioplasty or bypass surgery if feasible, versus a conservative strategy, where patients are referred for catheterization only for recurrent pain at rest or provokable ischemia. The primary end point is death, MI, or rehospitalization for acute coronary syndromes through a 6-month follow-up. The trial is also testing the "troponin hypothesis," that baseline troponins T and I will be useful in selecting an optimal management strategy.
 ...
PMID:Invasive versus conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction following treatment with tirofiban: rationale and study design of the international TACTICS-TIMI 18 Trial. Treat Angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction. 976 Oct 82

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines has published recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with known or suspected unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The acute ischemia pathway presented in these guidelines encompasses both an early invasive strategy and an early conservative strategy. There are now 4 randomized, controlled trials that have compared the routine early invasive strategy with the selective-invasive or ischemia-guided strategy (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] IIIB, Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital [VANQWISH], Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease [FRISC] II, and Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy [TACTICS]-TIMI 18). The most relevant of these studies to current clinical practice are the FRISC II and TACTICS-TIMI 18 studies. The data from these studies indicate that ST-segment depression or elevated levels of troponin or the MB isoenzyme of creatinine kinase are markers of increased risk and that such patients would benefit from early revascularization. However, the data further suggest that aggressive antiplatelet, antithrombin, and anti-ischemic therapies are also important. Although FRISC II and TACTICS-TIMI 18 support an early invasive approach in most patients (ie, intermediate- and high-risk patients) with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS), all 4 trials support a more conservative approach in those without electrocardiographic changes or enzyme elevations, notably the use of intensive antiplatelet, antithrombotic, and anti-ischemic therapy combined with careful clinical assessment and provocative testing. Patients then undergo catheterization and revascularization only if spontaneous angina occurs or if there is electrocardiographic, enzymatic, or other objective evidence of stress-induced myocardial ischemia. We conclude that tailoring the early initial therapy in hospital to the level of risk is essential to optimizing efficacy and clinical outcomes in this challenging, but common group of ACS patients.
 ...
PMID:Interpreting new treatment guidelines for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. 1169 15

Percutaneous coronary intervention can be safely performed in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina. Although there remains debate about whether an aggressive strategy involving early coronary arteriography and revascularization should be routinely performed in patients who present with non-ST-segment elevation MI and unstable angina, recent clinical trials suggest that an aggressive approach should be taken in both intermediate- and high-risk patients with ACS. There have been 4 clinical trials that have compared the outcomes of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina who were assigned to invasive or conservative strategies. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIIB trial and the Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) trial failed to demonstrate a reduction in death or MI in patients assigned to an invasive approach, but it did demonstrate an important reduction in the frequency of rehospitalization. However, these studies were performed before the availability of coronary stents or the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In contrast, the Fragmin and Fast Revascularisation During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC) II and the Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS) trials demonstrated significant improvements in the rates of death or MI in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina assigned to an invasive strategy. Event reductions were greatest in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina at intermediate or high risk for an adverse outcome. Understanding that these subgroups comprise approximately 75% of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina, we believe that an invasive approach is indicated in most patients who develop non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina. Regardless of the strategy used in ACS patients, lipid-lowering therapy is necessary to reduce recurrent ischemia events at the site of plaque instability and in atherosclerotic disease remote to the target lesion.
 ...
PMID:Use of coronary revascularization in patients with unstable and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. 1169 16

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors are beneficial in unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI). In large trials, the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors tirofiban and eptifibatide were each found to reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction (MI) in these patients at 30 days. These agents appear to be of greatest benefit in patients with a positive troponin at baseline, diabetes or ST-segment depression, recurrent angina, prior aspirin use, or a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score > or = 4. The Treat angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS) TIMI-18 trial was designed to compare the benefits of an early invasive versus a conservative strategy in high-risk UA/NSTEMI patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. Patients were treated with tirofiban (for 48 h) plus aspirin and heparin and randomized to either invasive therapy (coronary angiography and revascularization when feasible) or conservative treatment (angiography only for patients with recurrent ischemia at rest or a positive stress test). A significant reduction in death or MI was demonstrated at 30 days (p = 0.02) and at 6 months (p = 0.0498). Death, MI, or rehospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome was also reduced with the invasive therapy at six months (p = 0.025). These results provide evidence to physicians that early GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in combination with a prompt invasive approach should be used more widely in UA/NSTEMI patients, particularly those at high risk.
 ...
PMID:Small molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors as upstream therapy in acute coronary syndromes: insights from the TACTICS TIMI-18 trial. 1264 40

Is a "routine invasive" or "selective invasive" strategy the best approach for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS)? A "selective invasive" strategy incorporates ischemia-guided use of aggressive medical therapy followed by angiography and revascularization for angina or stress-induced myocardial ischemia. The "routine invasive" strategy (cardiac catheterization followed by percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 to 48 h of symptom-onset) is frequently employed, but no randomized, controlled trials have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes. Recently, the second Fragmin and fast Revascularization during InStability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC-II) and the Treat angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TACTICS TIMI-18) trials found significant reductions in death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for biomarker-positive ACS. Also, the third Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina (RITA-3) recently reported a halving of refractory angina and reduction in the use of antianginal medication with early intervention. Early trials failed to demonstrate the superiority of the "routine invasive" approach, presumably because of fewer revascularizations, unavailability of stents, and more recent use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and low-molecular-weight heparins. The FRISC-II, TACTICS TIMI-18, and RITA-3 studies indicate that higher-risk patients benefit from early revascularization, but that aggressive antiplatelet, antithrombin, and anti-ischemic therapy are also important. While all three trials support an "early invasive" approach in intermediate- and high-risk patients, other trials support a more "conservative" approach in those without electrocardiographic changes or enzyme elevations. Optimal management should incorporate both strategies.
 ...
PMID:"Routine invasive" versus "selective invasive" approaches to non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes management in the post-stent/platelet inhibition era. 1264 49

Chronic hypertension is a well established risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease; however, its prognostic significance after a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome remains to be established. Data from 15,414 patients included in six randomized Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trials (TIMI 3B, TIMI 11A, TIMI 11B, TIMI 12, the Orbofiban in Patients With Unstable Coronary Syndromes [OPUS]-TIMI 16, and the Treat Angina With Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy With an Invasive or Conservative Strategy [TACTICS]-TIMI 18) were analyzed. A history of hypertension was present in 10,998 (71.35%) patients; comorbidities and higher TIMI risk scores were more likely in these patients. However, positive troponin and ST-segment deviations were less frequent among hypertensive patients. After multivariate analysis, the history of hypertension was associated with more adverse outcomes, specifically the composite end point of death/myocardial infarction at 30 days and 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.81; p<0.001 at 1 year) than in patients without this history. An independent relationship was also observed with mortality (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.34-2.16; p<0.001 at 1 year), myocardial infarction (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.23-1.82; p<0.001 at 1 year), recurrent ischemia (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.38; p<0.001 at 1 year), and major bleeding (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03-2.06; p=0.036 at 30 days). It was concluded that chronic hypertension remains an independent marker for major short- and long-term cardiac adverse outcomes after non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.
 ...
PMID:Association of a history of systemic hypertension with mortality, thrombotic, and bleeding complications following non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. 1668 39