Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0022116 (ischemia)
 91,303 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Until recently a general consensus existed for the clinical entity diagnosed as myocardial infarction using the world health organisation (WHO) definition. According to the WHO definition myocardial infarction was defined by a combination of two of three typical characteristics: typical symptoms, rise of cardiac enzymes (CK, CK-MB), and a typical ECG pattern involving the development of Q waves. New insights into the development of acute myocardial infarction, the superiority of the biochemical characteristics of cardiac troponin assays over CK and CK-MB measurements in blood, and new therapeutic concepts made a new definition of myocardial infarction, e.g. of the acute myocardial infarction, necessary. Timing of the diagnosis of myocardial necrosis is of outmost importance relative to the time of observation (acute, evolving, healing, healed MI), as is the classification of the extent of myocardial damage (microscopic, small, medium or large). The term "acute coronary syndrome" (ACS) has been established as a working diagnosis for choosing the appropriate therapeutic strategy. In patients with ACS and ST elevation ischemia (STEMI ACS, true posterior ischemia inclusive) as well as in patients with presumably new LBBB, immediate reperfusion therapy should be performed (primary PTCA or thrombolytic therapy), whereas in patients with ECG changes other than ST elevation or new LBBB (NSTEMIACS) additional antiplatlet therapy on top of aspirin and heparin is indicated. In contrast to the acute phase of infarction when troponin in blood often is not detectable yet, the diagnosis of definitive myocardial infarction is based primarily on troponin elevation. Hard criteria for established infarction are the development of pathologic Q waves or healing or healed myocardial necrosis in pathology; troponin may be normal then, depending of time relapsed.
 ...
PMID:[Acute coronary syndrome and myocardial infarct--new definitions]. 1188 51

Platelet activation and aggregation have become increasingly recognized as the primary processes involved in the cascade that leads to thrombus formation in atherosclerotic vascular disease. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) favorably impact thrombus formation and distal embolization by inhibiting the final common pathway of platelet aggregation. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been used effectively in a wide variety of clinical scenarios including unstable angina, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, and low and high risk percutaneous coronary interventions with and without intracoronary stenting, however there is limited data regarding the use of these potent antiplatelet agents in the setting of extracardiac vascular disease. This article will review the non-cardiac applications of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the setting of acute ischemic stroke, carotid and vertebral angioplasty and stenting, acute critical limb ischemia, and percutaneous interventions in peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
 ...
PMID:Noncardiac applications of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. 1527 67

Pharmacologic reperfusion of patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction is designed to achieve prompt high-quality reperfusion, prevent recurrent ischemia and reinfarction, maintain long-term patency, and to enhance patient survival and quality of life. Because monotherapy with fibrinolytics is by itself unable to achieve all of these objectives, antithrombotic, anti-platelet, and other novel agents are required. We discuss herein the role of unfractionated and enoxaparin, the potential added value of direct thrombin inhibitors, and the importance of aspirin. Despite the promise of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, risks associated with intracranial hemorrhage in the elderly have led to restraint in their application to broad populations. Facilitation of urgent percutaneous coronary intervention with combination reduced-dose fibrinolytic and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors remains a promising potential future path. The future is likely to emphasize greater application of the already effective therapies at our disposal and the development of novel anti-platelet and anti-thrombin agents as well as those directed toward inflammation.
 ...
PMID:A marriage of enhancement: fibrinolysis and conjunctive therapy. 1558 23

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether an elevated plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) level provides any additional prognostic information to the validated Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score in patients with acute coronary syndromes. For this purpose, 1,846 consecutive patients with either acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI; 861 patients) or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS; 985 patients) were included. The incidence of 30-day death and 14-day composite of death, myocardial infarction (or repeat myocardial infarction) and recurrent ischemia was the prespecified primary end point in the STEMI and NSTEACS cohorts, respectively. The incidence of the primary end point was 9.8% and 23.6% in the STEMI and NSTEACS cohorts, respectively. A significantly increased risk of the primary end point was present with an increase in the STEMI and NSTEACS TIMI risk score (p(trend) < 0.001 for the 2 groups). A plasma CRP value of > or = 5 and > or = 3 mg/L (defined by receiver-operating characteristic analysis) was associated with a significantly increased risk of the primary end point in the STEMI and NSTEACS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001 for the 2 cohorts), and it was true throughout the subgroups of STEMI and NSTEACS TIMI risk scores. In conclusion, an elevated plasma CRP level appears to be a marker that adds prognostic information to the validated STEMI and NSTEACS TIMI risk score. The plasma CRP and TIMI risk score may be used together for enhanced risk stratification in the setting of acute coronary syndromes.
 ...
PMID:Early prognostic usefulness of C-reactive protein added to the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score in acute coronary syndromes. 1609 7

As a consequence of acute ischemia and reperfusion in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction, calcium overload inside myocytes not only affects myocardial contraction, relaxation, and myocyte recovery following reperfusion, but also may be related to myocyte necrosis and fatal arrhythmia. MCC-135 is the first in a new class of agents that reduce intracellular calcium overload. Pre-clinical and early clinical studies yielded promising results for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. The Evaluation of MCC-135 for Left Ventricular Salvage in Acute MI (EVOLVE) study is a Phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 2 new doses of MCC-135 (4.5 mg/kg/48 hours and 9.0 mg/kg/48 hours) as adjunct therapy for preservation of left ventricular function and reduction of infarct size in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for electrocardiographically moderate-large ST elevation myocardial infarction. The primary endpoint will be left ventricular ejection fraction on Day 5 post myocardial infarction as determined by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Secondary endpoints will include SPECT and echocardiographic assessments, serum cardiac markers, clinical outcomes, and safety measures at specific time points through Day 30 post myocardial infarction. Follow-up clinical and safety assessments will be continued until Day 180. The rationale, design, and methods of the EVOLVE study are described in this paper, along with 2 sub-studies, involving a comparison of pre- and post-PCI measurements with either SPECT or echocardiography, to examine myocardial salvage and the time course of changes in myocardial infarction size and left ventricular function. MINIABSTRACT: The Evaluation of MCC-135 for Left Ventricular Salvage in Acute MI (EVOLVE) study is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of two doses of MCC-135, first in a new class of agents that reduce intracellular calcium overload, as adjunct therapy for preservation of left ventricular function and reduction of infarct size in patients with moderate-large STEMI undergoing primary PCI. The rationale, design, and methods of the EVOLVE study, along with two sub-studies, are described in this paper.
 ...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of intravenous MCC-135 as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the evaluation of MCC-135 for left ventricular salvage in acute MI (EVOLVE) study. 1626 Dec 87

The decision to offer patients with myocardial ischemia a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has been largely determined by extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular function, since the early 1970's. Based upon subset analyses, and long-term follow-up, of three moderate-sized trials of stable patients and two small trials of unstable angina (excluding recent myocardial infarction, MI) patients, the notion has persisted that patients with left main narrowing >50% or three-vessel stenoses >70%, or even two-vessel stenoses >70%, where one of the vessels is the proximal left anterior descending, derive a "survival benefit" relative to medical therapy (MED), from CABG (anatomic paradigm). The MED of the original CABG versus MED trials consisted of little more than anti-anginal medications, used on an as-needed basis. In the ensuing 3 decades, multiple large, well done, randomized clinical trials have established a survival benefit for 4 different forms of MED among a broad spectrum of CAD patients. Aspirin; lipid lowering, especially with statins; b-blockers; and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blocking agents; have all been shown to enhance survival, as well as reduce other objective adverse outcomes of CAD. The advances in MED, coupled with the small but significant mortality and morbidities of both CABG and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), are among the reasons to skeptically consider potential "survival benefit" of revascularization. A more common and far more easily justified reason to consider revascularization is to relieve "medically refractory" myocardial ischemia, particularly when the ischemia is accompanied by symptoms. Accordingly, documentation of medically refractory myocardial ischemia provides the answer to the first question of myocardial revascularization, "Is this patient likely to derive clinical benefit from revascularization, at this time?" It is only after this question has been answered that one needs to consider the relative advantages and disadvantages of PCI versus CABG (physiologic paradigm). Two of the relative advantages of PCI, namely speed of reperfusion, and relatively low morbidity, are among the reasons that most randomized trial data, and most clinical application of revascularization to patients with MI (ST-elevation MI [STEMI], and non-STEMI) have been by PCI. In contrast, for stable patients with medically refractory ischemia, anatomic considerations continue to be relevant to the choice between CABG and PCI. Specific advantages of CABG include: its potential to revascularize chronically occluded vessels with collaterals supplying viable myocardium; the fact that conduits protect territories rather than simply treating lesions; and the greater durability of conduits compared to bare-metal stents (drug-eluting stents may change the picture). Based on these principles, physiologic, rather than anatomic, considerations are most useful in determining whether to revascularize, and how urgently to revascularize (STEMI is an emergent indication and high-risk non-STEMI an urgent indication). Coronary anatomy, including both number of vessels and lesion characteristics, continues to help decide between CABG and PCI, and in formulating patient specific strategies.
 ...
PMID:PCI versus CABG versus medical therapy in 2006. 1701

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for the first time issued guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in spring 2005. The strengths of recommendations stated in the ESC guidelines (as in those of the AHA/ACC [American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology]) are traditionally a combination of recommendation classes (I, IIa, and IIb) and a level of evidence (A, B, or C). This paper explains and discusses selected focal points of the ESC PCI guidelines based on three representative cases from daily practice. 1. Stable coronary artery disease (CAD): PCI in a 53-year-old patient without angina pectoris and proof of myocardial ischemia. With a clear indication of ischemia in the anterior myocardial wall, the ESC PCI guidelines indicated coronary angiography with possible PCI, even without angina pectoris symptoms. Cardiac catheterization showed a 99% proximal LAD stenosis, which was immediately dilated and stented based on the indicated ischemia. According to the ESC PCI guidelines, an intervention is indicated for CAD when a larger ischemic area is clearly evident even in the absence of typical angina (recommendation class I A). 2. ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): PCI even after successful thrombolysis. A 70-year-old patient experienced acute substernal pain and immediately went to his nearby hospital. The ECG clearly showed anterior myocardial wall STEMI, which in this hospital without a cardiac cath lab indicated thrombolysis, since it could be initiated within 3 h after the onset of chest pain. Pain relief was evident soon after thrombolysis, combined with a resolution of the ST segment elevations. As suggested by the ESC PCI guidelines, a transfer to a cardiac cath lab took place the next day, where the 50% residual stenosis of the LAD was stented. The ESC PCI guidelines suggest coronary angiography with possible PCI within 1-2 days following successful thrombolysis (recommendation class I A). Thus, even "successful" thrombolysis is not regarded as the final treatment for STEMI. 3. Premature termination of clopidogrel after stent implantation: stent thrombosis with acute myocardial infarction. A 46-year-old patient visited the practice due to increasing dyspnea. 4 months earlier, a Taxus stent had been implanted at a heart center into the second RPLS of the RCX; 3 days later, a Cypher stent was implanted in the LAD. Upon being discharged on a Friday at noon, the patient was advised to see his general practitioner soon to attain a prescription for clopidogrel. The patient was given an appointment at his general practitioner for the following Wednesday afternoon. But on that Wednesday morning the patient went into cardiogenic shock. Although the occluded LAD (stent thrombosis) could be quickly reopened, left ventricular myocardium became severely damaged. Until a cardiac transplantation will be performed, a defibrillator was implanted. This "organizational" gap in clopidogrel administration did not conform to the ESC PCI guidelines: after implantation of any coronary stent, dual antiplatelet treatment (acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel) must be consistently administered for at least 4 weeks. After implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES), the ESC PCI guidelines call for clopidogrel administration for at least 6 months; when small vessels, long lesions or a complex anatomy (e. g., bifurcation stenting) are involved, a duration of 1 year or even longer is recommended. The optimal duration of platelet aggregation inhibition following PCI with DES of unprotected left main stem stenoses is unknown at this time. The traditional levels of evidence according to ESC, AHA and ACC criteria (levels A, B, or C) do no longer meet the actual requirements to assess the scientific evidence of randomized PCI trials and registry studies. For example, only two small randomized studies with few patients and insufficient statistical power utilizing a clinically insignificant surrogate endpoint would be enough to attain level of evidence A. Consequently, a new scoring system will be proposed, which considers criteria such as the importance of a primary clinical endpoint, the statistical power achieved, and the presence of an independent external data review and safety monitoring board.
 ...
PMID:[The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Three case reports]. 1718 Jun 46

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are frequent in the elderly and carry a poor prognosis. Severe coronary artery disease, frequent comorbidity, late diagnosis, and treatments themselves are responsible for high morbidity and mortality rates. Reluctance to treat elderly patients with new mechanical or chemical revascularization techniques is due to the higher risk profile. ACS may or may not be accompanied by ST elevation: STEMI corresponds to acute myocardial infarction before myocardial necrosis, while non STEMI corresponds to unstable angina and subendocardial necrosis. Despite the high incidence of STEMI in the elderly, older patients have been excluded from large randomized trials. Chemical and mechanical reperfusion are the two recommended treatments for patients hospitalized before the 6th hour. Intravenous thrombolysis is the most common strategy: it offers a 26% reduction in mortality compared to conventional treatment, but carries a higher risk of brain hemorrhage than in younger patients. In high-throughput centers with experienced cardiologists, primary angioplasty seems to be the optimal strategy, with fewer deaths and recurrent ischemia. Two approaches are possible for NST-ACS: conservative or interventional. The latter includes medical treatment, early coronarography and revascularization by angioplasty or surgery. This strategy, combined with aspirin, clopidogrel, and glycoprotein II B/IIIa receptor inhibitors, offers a larger absolute reduction in the 30-day major adverse clinical event rate than conservative management. Dedicated randomized trials are needed to provide a more thorough picture of ACS management in the elderly.
 ...
PMID:[Coronary syndromes in the elderly]. 1719 8

Patients sustaining acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often require urgent percutaneous revascularization within the first 24 h from onset of the infarction due to continuous ischemia and hemodynamic instability. Upon arrival to the cardiac catheterization, the electrocardiogram of AMI patients may exhibit acute ST-elevation (STEMI) with or without accompanying Q-wave or depression of the ST segment (non-STEMI or non-Q-wave infarction). Data comparing acute outcome of device application in patients presenting for urgent revascularization with established Q-wave myocardial infarction (QWMI) versus those with non-STEMI (NQMI) are sparse. Excimer laser is a revascularization modality applied for debulking of atherosclerotic plaque and vaporization of associated thrombus in the setting of AMI. One hundred fifty-one AMI patients with continuous chest pain and ischemia who enrolled into a multicenter study and underwent urgent revascularization were divided for the purpose of a retrospective analysis into two groups. One group presented with established electrocardiographic Q-wave, whereas the other had ST-depression (NQMI). In comparison with the NQMI group, the QWMI patients had a higher incidence of failed thrombolytic therapy (17% vs 3, p = 0.006), cardiogenic shock (20 vs 6%, p = 0.01), left anterior descending as a culprit infarct-related vessel (46 vs 14%, p < 0.0001), a higher incidence of TIMI 0 flow (48 vs 24%, p = 0.04), a heavier thrombus burden (grade 4 TIMI thrombus, 58 vs 23%; p = 0.0001), and higher CPK (1272 +/- 2180 vs 404 +/- 577, p = 0.001) and troponin levels (62 +/- 95 vs 14 +/- 48, p = 0.0003). Both groups underwent laser angioplasty and stenting for relief of continuous chest pain and ischemia within 24 h of infarction onset. Quantitative coronary arteriography in an independent core laboratory measured similar improvement in baseline minimal luminal diameter and percent diameter stenosis by application of laser energy in both groups. Among the QWMI patients, a significantly higher acute gain was recorded with the laser treatment in lesions containing a large/extensive thrombus burden as compared with lesions containing only a small clot burden (1.2 +/- 0.7 vs 0.8 +/- 0.5, p = 0.01). Such a phenomenon was not detected among the NQMI patients (1.0 +/- 0.5 vs 0.8 +/- 0.6, p=ns). Baseline TIMI flow grade (0.9 +/- 1.0 for QWMI vs 1.5 +/- 1.2 for NQMI, p = 0.0001) increased with laser emission to 2.8 +/- 0.5 and subsequently reached a final level of TIMI 3 in both groups. In comparison with the QWMI patients, there was a trend toward a reduced rate of major adverse coronary events among the NQMI patients (12% QWMI vs 4% NQMI, p = 0.09). Significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics, extent of myocardial damage, location of infarct related vessel, thrombus burden, and TIMI flow exist between QWMI and NQMI patients who require urgent intervention. However, application of excimer laser results in similar high procedural success and low complication rates in both groups. Maximal acute laser gain is achieved among QWMI patients whose lesions are laden with a heavy thrombus burden.
 ...
PMID:Excimer laser in myocardial infarction: a comparison between STEMI patients with established Q-wave versus patients with non-STEMI (non-Q). 1742 22

Thrombolytic agents and primary angioplasty (ACP) are two well defined methods for the treatment of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The use of both methods consecutively, called facilitated angioplasty, is a third alternative, that offers few advantages and is restricted to a small group of patients. The experience abroad demonstrated that ACP offers a higher reduction in mortality than thrombolysis. This is also the case in a national report published in this issue, showing that hospital mortality of patients treated with thrombolysis and ACP was 10.5% and 5.6%, respectively (p <0.01). The figures for long term mortality were 20.4% and 9.7%, respectively (p <0.01). The crucial factor to improve the treatment results in myocardial infarction in to reduce the time of total ischemia, from the onset of symptoms to the start of reperfusion therapy. Nowadays, the therapeutic challenges, besides improving percutaneous and pharmacological interventions, are to achieve an early consultation and to reduce institutional timing.
 ...
PMID:[Timing is crucial in acute myocardial infarction]. 1903 Jun 52


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>