Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0021051 (immunodeficiency)
 71,517 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4, in combination with CD4, mediate cellular entry of macrophage-tropic (M-tropic) and T-cell-tropic strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), respectively, while dualtropic viruses can use either receptor. We have constructed a panel of chimeric viruses and envelope glycoproteins in which various domains of the dualtropic HIV-1(DH12) gp160 were introduced into the genetic background of an M-tropic HIV-1 isolate, HIV-1(AD8). These constructs were employed in cell fusion and virus infectivity assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells, MT4 T cells, primary monocyte-derived macrophages, or HOS-CD4 cell lines, expressing various chemokine receptors, to assess the contributions of different gp120 subdomains in coreceptor usage and cellular tropism. As expected, the dualtropic HIV-1(DH12) gp120 utilized either CCR3, CCR5, or CXCR4, whereas HIV-1(AD8) gp120 was able to use only CCR3 or CCR5. We found that either the V1/V2 or the V3 region of HIV-1(DH12) gp120 individually conferred on HIV-1(AD8) the ability to use CXCR4, while the combination of both the V1/V2 and V3 regions increased the efficiency of CXCR4 use. In addition, while the V4 or the V5 region of HIV-1(DH12) gp120 failed to confer the capacity to utilize CXCR4 on HIV-1(AD8), these regions were required in conjunction with regions V1 to V3 of HIV-1(DH12) gp120 for efficient utilization of CXCR4. Comparison of virus infectivity analyses with various cell types and cell fusion assays revealed assay-dependent discrepancies and indicated that events occurring at the cell surface during infection are complex and cannot always be predicted by any one assay.
 ...
PMID:Identification of determinants on a dualtropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein that confer usage of CXCR4. 949 15

Although the mechanisms of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) neuroinvasion, neuronal injury, and subsequent development of HIV-1-associated AIDS dementia complex are not fully understood, a correlation between monocyte/macrophage infiltrates in the brain and neurological disease exists. In light of the many potential roles that chemokines and chemokine receptors may play in HIV neuropathogenesis, we sought to describe their pattern of expression in the SIV-infected rhesus macaque model of HIV encephalitis. We previously demonstrated elevated expression of the chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, MIP-1beta, RANTES, and interferon-inducible protein (IP)-10 in brain of macaque monkeys with SIV encephalitis. In this study, we demonstrate that the corresponding chemokine receptors CCR3, CCR5, CXCR3, and CXCR4 are expressed in perivascular infiltrates in these same tissues. In addition, we detected CCR3, CCR5, and CXCR4 on subpopulations of large hippocampal and neocortical pyramidal neurons and on glial cells in both normal and encephalitic brain. These findings suggest that multiple chemokines and their receptors contribute to monocyte and lymphocyte recruitment to the brain in SIV encephalitis. Furthermore, the expression of known HIV/SIV co-receptors on neurons suggests a possible mechanism whereby HIV or SIV can directly interact with these cells, disrupting their normal physiological function and contributing to the pathogenesis of AIDS dementia complex.
 ...
PMID:Chemokine receptor expression on resident and inflammatory cells in the brain of macaques with simian immunodeficiency virus encephalitis. 950 6

A major advance in understanding human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) biology was the discovery that the beta-chemokines MIP-1 alpha (macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha), MIP-1 beta (macrophage inflammatory protein-1 beta) and RANTES (regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted) inhibit entry of HIV-1 into CD4+ cells by blocking the critical interaction between the CCR5 coreceptor and the V3 domain of the viral envelope glycoprotein gp120 [1,2]. CD8+ lymphocytes are a major source of beta-chemokines [3], but the stimulus for chemokine release has not been well defined. Here, we have shown that engagement of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) with HIV-1-encoded human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I-restricted peptide antigens caused rapid and specific release of these beta-chemokines. This release paralleled cytolytic activity and could be attenuated by naturally occurring amino acid variation within the HLA class I-restricted peptide sequence. Epitope variants that bound to appropriate HLA class I molecules but failed to stimulate cytolytic activity in CTLs also failed to stimulate chemokine release. We conclude that signalling through the T-cell receptor (TCR) following binding of antigen results in beta-chemokine release from CTLs in addition to cytolytic activity, and that both responses can be abolished by epitope mutation. These results suggest that antigenic variation within HIV-1 might not only allow the host cell to escape lysis, but might also contribute to the propagation of infection by failing to activate beta-chemokine-mediated inhibition of HIV-1 entry.
 ...
PMID:Antigen-specific release of beta-chemokines by anti-HIV-1 cytotoxic T lymphocytes. 951 22

More than a decade after the first description of HIV DNA in the nervous system the pathophysiology of HIVD remains largely enigmatic, with data supporting a number of potential mechanisms for the development of neuronal dysfunction. Nevertheless, a few key findings have considerable support in the literature devoted to this subject: 1. HIV dementia is caused by HIV itself; no other pathogen has been consistently found in the brains of patients with HIVD. 2. In comparison with other viral encephalopathies, there appears to be a significant discordance between the amount of virus being produced in the brains of patients with HIVD and the degree of neurological deterioration. 3. The key cell types responsible for viral production within the CNS are the resident macrophages or microglial cells. 4. Other elements within the CNS, particularly astrocytes, are probably infected with HIV as well, but all of these infections are highly restricted in terms of production of virus or viral structural proteins. 5. At least one component of the pathogenesis of HIVD may be the generation of neurotoxins by infected microglia, although the type of neurotoxin, and the specific compound most likely to be involved, are quite controversial. Advances with combination antiviral therapy have successfully reduced plasma viral load in a high proportion of individuals, leading to the speculation (previously almost heretical) that it may be possible to eradicate HIV completely from the systemic immune system. If that were the case, potential "sanctuary" sites such as the immunologically protected CNS might remain as important reservoirs for reseeding of lymphoid tissues. Microglia may be particularly suited for this purpose because they are long lived, can produce HIV for several weeks (at least in culture), and they are apparently relatively immune to virus-induced cytopathology such as syncytium formation. One can speculate about several scenarios resulting from the continued presence of replication-competent HIV within brain. In the worst case, a smoldering infection of the nervous system could lead to neurological deterioration without reinfection of systemic immune cells. The epidemiological data indicating that HIVD is a disease primarily associated with immunodeficiency suggest that the systemic immune system plays a role in maintaining virus residing within the CNS under control. Thus it is quite possible that this scenario would not occur for many years after the systemic infection is controlled. Alternatively, virus could be transported from the CNS by circulating lymphocytes and monocytes and reinfect systemic organs. This would necessitate restarting therapy for those individuals who were previously thought to be cured, but presumably virus within the CNS would not have developed resistance to antivirals. In either case, the techniques currently available do not permit an accurate assessment of CNS HIV load in living people, and this question will remain unanswered until antivirals are discontinued in a few individuals with persistently negative tests for systemic virus. In addition to this most critical question, the relationship between viral levels and HIVD is largely unexplored, as is the possibility that some strains are particularly virulent or neuroinvasive. Furthermore, the potential contribution of host genotype in the development of dementia is unknown. In view of the strong influence of major chemokine receptor (CCR5) truncations on HIV replication, it is entirely possible that more discrete genetic polymorphisms have a subtle effect on either brain invasion or virulence.
 ...
PMID:The effects of human immunodeficiency virus in the central nervous system. 952 Sep 95

It has been proposed that changes in cell surface concentrations of coreceptors may control infections by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), but the mechanisms of coreceptor function and the concentration dependencies of their activities are unknown. To study these issues and to generate stable clones of adherent cells able to efficiently titer diverse isolates of HIV-1, we generated two panels of HeLa-CD4/CCR5 cells in which individual clones express either large or small quantities of CD4 and distinct amounts of CCR5. The panels were made by transducing parental HeLa-CD4 cells with the retroviral vector SFF-CCR5. Derivative clones expressed a wide range of CCR5 quantities which were between 7.0 x 10(2) and 1.3 x 10(5) molecules/cell as measured by binding antibodies specific for CCR5 and the chemokine [125I]MIP1beta. CCR5 was mobile in the membranes, as indicated by antibody-induced patching. In cells with a large amount of CD4, an unexpectedly low trace of CCR5 (between 7 x 10(2) and 2.0 x 10(3) molecules/cell) was sufficient for maximal susceptibility to all tested HIV-1, including primary patient macrophagetropic and T-cell-tropic isolates. Indeed, the titers as indicated by immunoperoxidase staining of infected foci were as high as the tissue culture infectious doses measured in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In contrast, cells with a small amount of CD4 required a much larger quantity of CCR5 for maximal infection by macrophagetropic HIV-1 (ca. 1.0 x 10(4) to 2.0 x 10(4) molecules/cell). Cells that expressed low and high amounts of CD4 were infected with equal efficiencies when CCR5 concentrations were above threshold levels for maximal infection. Our results suggest that the concentrations of CD4 and CCR5 required for efficient infections by macrophagetropic HIV-1 are interdependent and that the requirements for each are increased when the other component is present in a limiting amount. We conclude that CD4 and CCR5 directly or indirectly interact in a concentration-dependent manner within a pathway that is essential for infection by macrophagetropic HIV-1. In addition, our results suggest that multivalent virus-receptor bonds and diffusion in the membrane contribute to HIV-1 infections.
 ...
PMID:Effects of CCR5 and CD4 cell surface concentrations on infections by macrophagetropic isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. 952 5

Monocytes/macrophages (M/M) and CD4+ T cells are two important targets of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Different strains of HIV-1 vary markedly in their abilities to infect cells belonging to the M/M lineage. Macrophagetropic (M-tropic) HIV-1 strains replicate well in primary lymphocytes as well as in primary macrophages; however, they generally infect T-cell lines poorly, if at all. Although promonocytic cell lines such as U937 have been used as in vitro models of HIV-1 infection of M/M, these cell lines are susceptible to certain T-cell-tropic (T-tropic) HIV-1 strains but are resistant to M-tropic HIV-1. In this study, we demonstrate that (i) certain U937 clones ("plus" clones), which are susceptible only to T-tropic HIV-1, become highly susceptible to M-tropic HIV-1 upon differentiation with retinoic acid (RA); (ii) other U937 clones ("minus" clones), which are resistant to both T- and M-tropic HIV-1, remain resistant to both viruses; and (iii) RA treatment induces expression of CCR5, a fusion/entry cofactor for M-tropic HIV-1 in both types of U937 clones, and yet enhances the fusogenicity of the plus clones, but not the minus clones, with M-tropic Env's. These results indicate that the major restriction of M-tropic HIV-1 infection in promonocytic cells occurs at the fusion/entry level, that differentiation into macrophage-like phenotypes renders some of these cells highly susceptible to infection with M-tropic HIV-1, and that CD4 and CCR5 may not be the only determinants of fusion/entry of M-tropic HIV-1 in these cells.
 ...
PMID:Differentiation of promonocytic U937 subclones into macrophagelike phenotypes regulates a cellular factor(s) which modulates fusion/entry of macrophagetropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1. 952 69

Multiple extracellular domains of the CC-chemokine receptor CCR5 are important for its function as a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) coreceptor. We have recently demonstrated by alanine scanning mutagenesis that the negatively charged residues in the CCR5 amino-terminal domain are essential for gp120 binding and coreceptor function. We have now extended our analysis of this domain to include most polar and nonpolar amino acids. Replacement of alanine with all four tyrosine residues and with serine-17 and cysteine-20 decrease or abolish gp120 binding and CCR5 coreceptor activity. Tyrosine-15 is essential for viral entry irrespective of the test isolate. Substitutions at some of the other positions impair the entry of dualtropic HIV-1 isolates more than that of macrophagetropic ones.
 ...
PMID:Alanine substitutions of polar and nonpolar residues in the amino-terminal domain of CCR5 differently impair entry of macrophage- and dualtropic isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. 952 83

Infection by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) requires the presence of a chemokine receptor on the susceptible cell. The expression of two different chemokine receptors on macrophages and lymphocytes explains the selectivity of different HIV isolates. The rationale behind the choice of the chemokine receptor (CCR5) expressed on macrophages as a therapeutic target is based on the epidemiological studies of the impact on HIV infectivity of a human mutation that prevents expression of this receptor. CCR5 is a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor family, which has yet to be characterized structurally at atomic resolution. Efforts to model the three-dimensional structure of such receptors and to characterize them experimentally are underway in many laboratories. As an example, structural studies determining the bound conformation of the C-terminal peptide of the alpha-subunit of transducin, the relevant G-protein of vision, with rhodopsin are presented.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic approaches to human immunodeficiency virus: structural studies on G-protein-coupled receptors. 953 75

Cellular infection by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) requires interaction of the viral envelope protein with CD4 and at least one additional cell surface molecule, termed a "cofactor" or "coreceptor." Recent discoveries have determined that macrophage-tropic strains of HIV-1 which are largely responsible for sexual transmission require the beta-chemokine receptor CCR5 in addition to CD4, while the T cell tropic viruses that emerge later after infection use the alpha-chemokine receptor CXCR4. Thus, both CD4 and the appropriate chemokine receptor must be expressed on the cell surface in order for HIV-1 to enter the cell and establish an infection. The in vivo importance of CCR5 for HIV-1 is demonstrated by the finding that individuals homozygous for a 32 bp deletion (delta 32) in the CCR5 gene that renders them effectively CCR5-negative are highly resistant to virus infection. In this review, the structure-function correlates of the chemokine receptors that serve as major coreceptors for HIV-1 and simian immunodeficiency virus entry will be reviewed. Since certain chemokines have been implicated as stem cell inhibitory factors, the biological consequences of chemokine receptor expression as it relates to HIV-1-associated hematodyspoiesis will also be discussed.
 ...
PMID:An intricate Web: chemokine receptors, HIV-1 and hematopoiesis. 955 31

Like human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), HIV-2 requires a coreceptor in addition to CD4 for entry into cells. HIV and SIV coreceptor molecules belong to a family of seven-transmembrane-domain G-protein-coupled receptors. Here we show that primary HIV-2 isolates can use a broad range of coreceptor molecules, including CCR1, CCR2b, CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, and CXCR4. Despite broad coreceptor use, the chemokine ligand SDF-1 substantially blocked HIV-2 infectivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, indicating that its receptor, CXCR4, was the predominant coreceptor for infection of these cells. However, expression of CXCR4 together with CD4 on some cell types did not confer susceptibility to infection by all CXCR4-using virus isolates. These data therefore indicate that another factor(s) influences the ability of HIV-2 to replicate in human cell types that express the appropriate receptors for virus entry.
 ...
PMID:A broad range of chemokine receptors are used by primary isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 as coreceptors with CD4. 955 95


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>