UMLS:C0020672 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0020672 (hypothermia)
17,327 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Six novel aminoalkylindole analogs, related structurally to the dual cyclooxygenase inhibitor and nonopioid analgesic pravadoline, were evaluated in the mouse to determine whether their pharmacological profile of activity was similar to that exhibited by delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC). Analog I (C2-H; C3-methoxy-benzoyl) reduced locomotion, but had no other effects (hypothermia, antinociception or ring-immobility) up to 21 mumol/kg. Analogs II and III (C3-naphthoyl; C2-H and C2-methyl, respectively) possessed all properties exhibited by delta 9-THC with ED50 values ranging from 0.68 to 18 mumol/kg. Analog IV (C2-methyl; C3-anthroyl) was devoid of activity. Stereoselectivity was demonstrated by the fact that (+)-WIN-55,212 (one isomer of a semirigid derivative possessing C2-H and C3-naphthoyl substituents) was moderately potent in all tests (ED50 values ranging from 0.25-23 mumol/kg), but (-)-WIN-55,212 was inactive up to 57 mumol/kg. Active aminoalkylindole compounds were generally least effective in the production of hypothermia. Analogs were also evaluated for their ability to produce delta 9-THC-like discriminative stimulus effects in rats. The ED50 for delta 9-THC as a discriminative stimuli for this model was 1.9 mumol/kg. Analog II and III and (+)-WIN-55,212 produced delta 9-THC-like discriminative effects with ED50 values ranging from 0.33 to 4.3 mumol/kg, whereas analogs I, IV and (-)-WIN-55,212 did not. Although reported to be cannabinoid receptor antagonists in vitro, neither analog I, analog IV nor (-)-WIN-55,212 (at 20 mumol/kg) antagonized the in vivo pharmacological effects of delta 9-THC in the mouse or rat.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Aminoalkylindole analogs: cannabimimetic activity of a class of compounds structurally distinct from delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol. 133 57

Endogenous opiates are believed to subserve various behaviors and physiological functions. We have examined the effect of U50488H (0-12 mg/kg), a kappa agonist, and WIN 44441-3 (0-4.0 mg/kg), a kappa antagonist, on ethanol (ET)-induced changes in rectal temperature and in plasma corticosterone (CS) levels in rats. The 12 mg/kg dose of U50488H produced marked hypothermia, the other doses either produced hyperthermia comparable to that seen in control animals, or had no effect. The 0.5 mg/kg of WIN44441-3 had a small hypothermic effect while the 4.0 mg/kg produced hyperthermia. U50488H potentiated and the low dose of WIN 44441-3 reversed the hypothermic effect of ethanol. By contrast, neither WIN 44441-3 nor U50488H pretreatments affected the ethanol-induced elevation in plasma CS. These results indicate that kappa agonists increase plasma CS concentration and affect thermoregulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, our data indicate a possible role of endogenous kappa opioids in the hypothermic effect of ethanol, but not in the elevation of plasma CS.
...
PMID:Effects of ethanol on plasma corticosterone and rectal temperature modification by U50488H and WIN 44441-3. 254 75

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the disruptive effects of cannabinoids on working memory as assessed in the eight-arm radial-maze. Systemic administration of delta 9-THC, WIN-55,212-2, and CP-55,940 increased the number of errors committed in the radial-maze. CP-55,940 was the most potent cannabinoid in impairing memory (ED50 = 0.13 mg/kg). delta 9-THC and WIN-55,212-2 disrupted maze-choice accuracy at equipotent doses (ED50 values = 2.1 and 2.2 mg/kg, respectively). In addition, systemic administration of each of these agents retarded completion time. Whereas the doses of delta 9-THC and CP-55,940 required to retard maze performance were higher than those needed to increase error numbers, WIN-55,212-2 was equipotent in both of these measures. On the other hand, neither anandamide, the putative endogenous cannabinoid ligand, nor cannabidiol, an inactive naturally occurring cannabinoid, had any apparent effects on memory. A second aim of this study was to elucidate the neuroanatomical substrates mediating the disruptive effects of cannabinoids on memory. Intrahippocampal injections of CP-55,940 impaired maze performance in a dose-dependent manner (ED50 = 8 micrograms/rat), but did not retard the amount of time required to complete the maze. The effects of intrahippocampal CP-55,940 were apparently specific to cognition because no other cannabinoid pharmacological effects (e.g., antinociception, hypothermia, and catalepsy) were detected. This dissociation between choice accuracy in the radial-maze and other cannabinoid pharmacological effects suggests that the working memory deficits produced by cannabinoids may be mediated by cannabinoid receptors in the hippocampus.
...
PMID:Systemic or intrahippocampal cannabinoid administration impairs spatial memory in rats. 767 62

In previous studies it was shown that the structurally dissimilar compounds delta 9-THC, CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212 produced more or less the same pharmacological effects and interacted with the same cannabinoid receptor. However, their potencies vary across a number of pharmacological assays, suggesting that a single mechanism may not account for all of their actions. To further explore possible differences among these cannabinoids, cross-tolerance studies were conducted. Specifically, the ability of delta 9-THC, CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212 to produce hypoactivity, hypothermia, antinociception and catalepsy was assessed in mice that had been chronically treated with either delta 9-THC or CP 55,940. The results indicated the delta 9-THC-treated mice were tolerant to delta 9-THC. The degrees of tolerance were 15.9, 7.8, and 13.4 for spontaneous activity, hypothermia and antinociception, respectively. Mice chronically treated with delta 9-THC also exhibited tolerance to some of the behavioral effects of CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212. The tolerance induced by repetitive administration of CP 55,940 was substantial. The ED50 for CP 55,940 was shifted 102 fold for spontaneous activity, 100 for hypothermia and 44 for catalepsy. Also, some cross-tolerance to delta 9-THC and WIN 55,212 was observed in CP 55,940 chronically treated mice. These findings indicate that cross-tolerance develops between delta 9-THC, CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212 and that these agents have some actions in common. However, quantitative differences in their development of cross-tolerance suggests that all of their actions may not be identical.
...
PMID:Development of cross-tolerance between delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212. 799 50

1. Mice pretreated intraperitoneally for 2 days with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC) at a dose of 20 mg kg-1 day-1 and then challenged intravenously with this drug, 24 h after the second pretreatment, showed a 6 fold tolerance to the hypothermic effect of delta-9-THC. This pretreatment also induced tolerance to the hypothermic effects of the cannabimimetic agents, CP 55,940 (4.6 fold) and WIN 55,212-2 (4.9 fold), but not to the hypothermic effect of the putative endogenous cannabinoid, anandamide. 2. Vasa deferentia removed from mice pretreated intraperitoneally with delta-9-THC twice at a dose of 20 mg kg-1 day-1 were less sensitive to its inhibitory effect on electrically-evoked contractions than vasa deferentia obtained from control animals. The cannabinoid pretreatment induced a 30 fold parallel rightward shift in the lower part of the concentration-response curve of delta-9-THC and a marked reduction in the maximal inhibitory effect of the drug. It also induced tolerance to the inhibitory effects on the twitch response of CP 55,940 (8.7 fold), WIN 55,212-2 (9.6 fold) and anandamide (12.3 fold). 3. The results confirm that cannabinoid tolerance can be rapid in onset and support the hypothesis that it is mainly pharmacodynamic in nature. The finding that in vivo pretreatment with delta-9-THC can produce tolerance not only to its own inhibitory effect on the vas deferens but also to that of three other cannabimimetic agents, suggests that this tissue would be suitable as an experimental model for investigating the mechanisms responsible for cannabinoid tolerance. 4. Further experiments are required to establish why tolerance to anandamide-induced hypothermia was not produced by a pretreatment with delta-9-THC that did induce tolerance to the hypothermic effects of delta-9-THC, CP 55,940 and WIN 55,212-2 and to the inhibitory effects of delta-9-THC,CP 55,940, WIN 55,212-2 and anandamide on the twitch response of the vas deferens.
...
PMID:Cross-tolerance between delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and the cannabimimetic agents, CP 55,940, WIN 55,212-2 and anandamide. 830 90

The role of nitric oxide (NO) in the development of cannabinoid tolerance was examined by using N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) as an inhibitor of NO synthase. R(+)-[2,3-Dihydro-5-methyl-3 [(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-yl]-(1-napht halenyl)methanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2), a cannabinoid receptor agonist, or L-NAME plus WIN 55,212-2 was acutely or chronically injected i.p. to mice and analgesia, body temperature and immobility were measured. A single injection of WIN 55,212-2 induced time- and dose-dependent analgesia, hypothermia and catalepsy. L-NAME (50 mg/kg), which per se was ineffective, administered 20 min before WIN 55,212-2 did not modify the analgesic, hypothermic and cataleptic responses to the cannabinoid. When WIN 55,212-2 was administered once a day, the animals became completely tolerant to the analgesic, hypothermic and cataleptic effects within five, seven and nine days respectively. L-NAME injected once daily 20 min before WIN 55,212-2 inhibited the development of tolerance to the hypothermic and cataleptic actions but not to the analgesic action of WIN 55,212-2. Since L-NAME given chronically by itself did not modify the analgesia, hypothermia and catalepsy induced by acute administration of WIN 55,212-2, our findings suggest L-NAME acts with some selectivity on the mechanisms involved in cannabinoid tolerance.
...
PMID:A role of nitric oxide in WIN 55,212-2 tolerance in mice. 957 Apr 63

Two subtypes of cannabinoid receptors have been identified to date, the CB1 receptor, essentially located in the CNS, but also in peripheral tissues, and the CB2 receptor, found only at the periphery. The identification of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) as the major active component of marijuana (Cannabis sativa), the recent emergence of potent synthetic ligands and the identification of anandamide and sn-2 arachidonylglycerol as putative endogenous ligands for cannabinoid receptors in the brain, have contributed to advancing cannabinoid pharmacology and approaching the neurobiological mechanisms involved in physiological and behavioral effects of cannabinoids. Most of the agonists exhibit nonselective affinity for CB1/CB2 receptors, and delta9-THC and anandamide probably act as partial agonists. Some recently synthesized molecules are highly selective for CB2 receptors, whereas selective agonists for the CB1 receptors are not yet available. A small number of antagonists exist that display a high selectivity for either CB1 or CB2 receptors. Cannabinomimetics produce complex pharmacological and behavioral effects that probably involve numerous neuronal substrates. Interactions with dopamine, acetylcholine, opiate, and GABAergic systems have been demonstrated in several brain structures. In animals, cannabinoid agonists such as delta9-THC, WIN 55,212-2, and CP 55,940 produce a characteristic combination of four symptoms, hypothermia, analgesia, hypoactivity, and catalepsy. They are reversed by the selective CB1 receptor antagonist, SR 141716, providing good evidence for the involvement of CB1-related mechanisms. Anandamide exhibits several differences, compared with other agonists. In particular, hypothermia, analgesia, and catalepsy induced by this endogenous ligand are not reversed by SR 141716. Cannabinoid-related processes seem also involved in cognition, memory, anxiety, control of appetite, emesis, inflammatory, and immune responses. Agonists may induce biphasic effects, for example, hyperactivity at low doses and severe motor deficits at larger doses. Intriguingly, although cannabis is widely used as recreational drug in humans, only a few studies revealed an appetitive potential of cannabimimetics in animals, and evidence for aversive effects of delta9-THC, WIN 55,212-2, and CP 55,940 is more readily obtained in a variety of tests. The selective blockade of CB1 receptors by SR 141716 impaired the perception of the appetitive value of positive reinforcers (food, cocaine, morphine) and reduced the motivation for sucrose, beer and alcohol consumption, indicating that positive incentive and/or motivational processes could be under a permissive control of CB1-related mechanisms. There is little evidence that cannabinoid systems are activated under basal conditions. However, by using SR 141716 as a tool, a tonic involvement of a CB1-mediated cannabinoid link has been demonstrated, notably in animals suffering from chronic pain, faced with anxiogenic stimuli or highly motivational reinforcers. Some effects of SR 141716 also suggest that CB1-related mechanisms exert a tonic control on cognitive processes. Extensive basic research is still needed to elucidate the roles of cannabinoid systems, both in the brain and at the periphery, in normal physiology and in diseases. Additional compounds, such as selective CB1 receptor agonists, ligands that do not cross the blood brain barrier, drugs interfering with synthesis, degradation or uptake of endogenous ligand(s) of CB receptors, are especially needed to understand when and how cannabinoid systems are activated. In turn, new therapeutic strategies would likely to emerge.
...
PMID:Behavioral effects of cannabinoid agents in animals. 1080 37

Active cannabimimetic drugs are known to bind to two receptor subtypes: one, called CB1, is mainly localised in the central nervous system while the other (CB2) is expressed preferentially in the immune system. SR 141716A has been demonstrated to have a nanomolar affinity for CB1 receptor subtypes and a micromolar affinity for CB2 receptors. Moreover, it is an effective antagonist at these receptors both in vitro (antagonism of cannabinoid activity in vas deferens) and in vivo (suppression of the hypothermia elicited by WIN 55,212-2). The present experiments were thus undertaken to investigate the role of CB1 receptors in cannabinoid discrimination. Rats were trained to discriminate WIN 55,212-2 (0.3mg/kg s.c.) from saline in a standard operant (FR10) food rewarded discrimination procedure. Acquisition of the discrimination required 16 days on average and the ED(50) of WIN 55,212-2 was 0.032mg/kg s.c. CP55,940 and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) generalised to the WIN 55,212-2 stimulus with the respective ED(50)s of 0.007mg/kg (s.c.) and 0.64mg/kg (p.o.). Pretreatment with SR 141716A antagonised the cue elicited by WIN 55,212-2 (ED(50) = 1.6mg/kg) as well as the generalisation to CP 55,940 (ED(50) = 0.08mg/kg) and to Delta(9)-THC (ED(50) = 0.15mg/kg). SR 140098 is a CB1 antagonist as potent as SR 141716A in vitro. This compound is unlikely to pass into the brain since it failed to displace [(3)H]-CP55, 940 from rat brain membranes ex vivo, and to reverse WIN 55,212-2-induced hypothermia. SR 140098, in contrast to SR 141716A, did not antagonise the WIN 55,212-2 stimulus. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that the brain CB1 receptor subtype mediates the cannabinoid cue.
...
PMID:Central mediation of the cannabinoid cue: activity of a selective CB1 antagonist, SR 141716A. 1122 95

The present study investigated the effect of the selective cannabinoid agonist, WIN 55212-2 [(4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-4(4-morpholinylmethyl)-1-(1-naphthalenyl-carbonyl)-6H-pyrrolo[3,2,1ij]quinolin-6-one], on body temperature. WIN 55212-2 (1, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg, i.m.) induced hypothermia in a dose-dependent manner. The peak hypothermia occurred 60 to 180 min postinjection. Body temperature was still suppressed 5 h after the injection of the highest dose of WIN 55212-2. The selective CB(1) antagonist, SR141716A [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride] (5 and 10 mg/kg, i.m.), blocked the WIN 55212-2-induced hypothermia, suggesting that CB(1) receptor activation mediated the hypothermia. In contrast, the selective CB(2) antagonist, SR144528 [N-((1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide)] (5 mg/kg, i.m.), did not alter the WIN 55212-2-induced hypothermia. Neither SR141716A nor SR144528 alone altered body temperature. WIN 55212-2 (1-30 microg/microl) injected directly into the preoptic anterior hypothalamic nucleus (POAH) induced hypothermia in an immediate and dose-dependent fashion. The hypothermia produced by intra-POAH injection of WIN 55212-2 was brief, with body temperature returning to baseline 60 min postinjection. SR141716A (5 mg/kg, i.m.) abolished the hypothermia induced by intra-POAH injection of WIN 55212-2 (30 microg/microl), indicating that CB(1) receptors in the POAH mediated the hypothermia. The present results confirm the idea that CB(1) receptors mediate the hypothermic response to cannabinoid agonists. Moreover, the present data suggest that 1) the POAH is the central locus for thermoregulation, and 2) CB(1) receptors within the POAH are the primary mediators of cannabinoid-induced hypothermia.
...
PMID:CB1 receptors in the preoptic anterior hypothalamus regulate WIN 55212-2 [(4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-4(4-morpholinylmethyl)-1-(1-naphthalenyl-carbonyl)-6H-pyrrolo[3,2,1ij]quinolin-6-one]-induced hypothermia. 1202 25

CB(1) cannabinoid receptors mediate profound hypothermia when cannabinoid agonists are administered to rats. Glutamate, the principal excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS), is thought to tonically increase body temperature by activating N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Because NMDA antagonists block cannabinoid-induced antinociception and catalepsy, intimate glutamatergic-cannabinoid interactions may exist in the CNS. The present study investigated the effect of two NMDA antagonists on the hypothermic response to WIN 55212-2 [4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-4(4-morpholinylmethyl)-1-(1-naphthalenyl-carbonyl)-6H-pyrrolo[3,2,1-i,j]quinolin-6-one], a selective cannabinoid agonist, in rats. WIN 55212-2 (1-10 mg/kg i.m.) produced dose-dependent hypothermia that peaked 60 to 180 min postinjection. Dextromethorphan (5-75 mg/kg i.m.), a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist, or LY 235959 [(-)-6-[phosphonomethyl-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-decahydro-isoquinoline-2-carboxylate]](1-4 mg/kg i.m.), a competitive and highly selective NMDA antagonist, evoked hypothermia in a dose-sensitive manner, suggesting that endogenous glutamate exerts a hyperthermic tone on body temperature. A dose of dextromethorphan (10 mg/kg) that did not affect body temperature by itself potentiated the hypothermic response to WIN 55212-2 (1, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg). The enhancement was strongly synergistic, indicated by a 2.7-fold increase in the relative potency of WIN 55212-2. Similarly, a dose of LY 235959 (1 mg/kg) that did not affect body temperature augmented the hypothermia associated with a single dose of WIN 55212-2 (2.5 mg/kg), thus confirming that NMDA receptors mediated the synergy. We have demonstrated previously that CB(1) receptors mediate WIN 55212-2-evoked hypothermia in rats. The present data are the first evidence that NMDA antagonists exert a potentiating effect on cannabinoid-induced hypothermia. Taken together, these data suggest that interactions between NMDA and CB(1) receptors produce synergistic hypothermia.
...
PMID:N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists and WIN 55212-2 [4,5-dihydro-2-methyl-4(4-morpholinylmethyl)-1-(1-naphthalenyl-carbonyl)-6H-pyrrolo[3,2,1-i,j]quinolin-6-one], a cannabinoid agonist, interact to produce synergistic hypothermia. 1223 76

1 2 3 Next >>