Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020672 (hypothermia)
 17,327 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The behavioral effects of paroxetine were investigated in mice and rats in comparison with imipramine and amitriptyline. 1) Locomotor activities were decreased by imipramine and amitriptyline but not by paroxetine in both animal species. 2) Paroxetine antagonized methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity in mice as did imipramine and amitriptyline. 3) Paroxetine showed a more potent antimuricidal effect in raphe-lesioned rats than imipramine and amitriptyline, and it also inhibited muricide in olfactory bulbectomized rats. 4) The immobility of rats in the forced swimming test was markedly decreased by imipramine and amitriptyline, but only slightly by paroxetine. 5) Like imipramine and amitriptyline, paroxetine potentiated the methamphetamine- or L-DOPA-induced stereotyped sniffing, and it inhibited oxotremorine-induced tremor. 6) Paroxetine antagonized reserpine-induced hypothermia, tetrabenazine-induced ptosis, and enhanced ether-induced anesthesia, all less potently than imipramine and amitriptyline. 7) The analgesic action of paroxetine was stronger than that of imipramine and amitriptyline. 8) Paroxetine did not antagonize maximal electroshock- or pentetrazol-induced convulsions and haloperidol- or THC-induced catalepsy in rats. In addition, paroxetine neither exerted muscle relaxation nor affected the shuttle-box type conditioned avoidance in rats. From these results, the behavioral effects of paroxetine, as compared with imipramine and amitriptyline, were characterized by its potent antimuricidal action in raphe-lesioned rats and its weak effect in the forced swimming test and by its less potent muscle relaxant, anticonvulsant, anticataleptic and anesthesia-potentiating actions.
 ...
PMID:[Behavioral pharmacological properties of the novel antidepressant paroxetine, a selective 5-HT uptake inhibitor]. 253 Jan 42

The present study was designed to evaluate the psychopharmacological profile of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine, and thus assess potential noradrenergic and/or serotonergic activity. Paroxetine dose-dependently increased mobility time in the mouse forced swimming test (8, 16, 32 and 64 mg/kg, i.p.) and reduced spontaneous locomotor activity when administered at a high dose (64 mg/kg, i.p.). Prior administration of 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (1 mg/kg, i.p.), (+/-) pindolol (32 mg/kg, i.p.) or 5-methoxy-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydro-4-pyridyl)-1H-indole (RU 24969) (1 mg/kg, i.p.) potentiated the antidepressant-like effects of subactive doses of paroxetine (1, 2 and 4 mg/kg, i.p.) in the mouse forced swimming test. These effects were antagonized by prior administration of 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[-(2-phthalimido)butyl]piperazine) (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Complementary studies suggested that RU24969-induced anti-immobility effects were a result of an increase in locomotor activity; other interactions were without increase/decrease in locomotor activity. Acute administration of paroxetine (8, 16, and 32 mg/kg, i.p.) antagonized the hypothermia induced by the D2/D1 receptor agonist, apomorphine (16 mg/kg, s.c.), while repeated treatment with paroxetine (32 mg/kg) attenuated clonidine-induced (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) hypothermia. Pre-treatment with the serotonergic neurotoxin, para-chlorophenylalanine attenuated the anti-immobility effects of low doses of paroxetine (8 and 16 mg/kg, i.p.) in the forced swimming test, whereas a higher dose of paroxetine remained active (32 mg/kg, i.p.). The results of the present study indicated that paroxetine displayed both noradrenergic-like and serotonergic-like activity in the pre-clinical psychopharmacological tests employed.
 ...
PMID:Psychopharmacological profile of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine: implication of noradrenergic and serotonergic mechanisms. 1006 8

Numerous studies have reported gender differences in the rates of depression in humans, but few behavioural observations of antidepressant drug effects have been investigated in female mice. The forced swimming test (FST) is widely used as a predictor of antidepressant activity in rodents, as is the tail suspension test (TST), where immobility is objectively measured and in this last test, no hypothermia is induced by immersion in cold water. The present study investigated gender differences in the temperature profile of mice after acute antidepressant administration (imipramine and paroxetine) and exposure to two animal models of depression. Imipramine and paroxetine were active at 32 mg/kg in male mice in the FST, whereas they were active at 8, 16 and 32 mg/kg in female mice. In the TST, for both antidepressants immobility duration was reduced at a dose of 16 and 32 mg/kg in male mice and at 32 mg/kg in female mice. No significant difference was observed between male and female mice for immobility duration. Imipramine administration, but not paroxetine, decreased the temperature at the higher dose (32 mg/kg) in male and female mice in the FST. The body temperature was reduced in male and female mice for all treatment groups after FST challenge. Imipramine (16 and 32 mg/kg in male and 32 mg/kg in female mice), paroxetine (4, 16 and 32 mg/kg in male and 4 to 32 mg/kg in female mice) attenuated the reduction in temperature due to the FST. In the TST, imipramine tends to decrease the temperature in male and female mice, even though only imipramine at a dose of 32 mg/kg in female mice significantly decreases the temperature. Paroxetine had no effect on temperature. The TST enhanced the body temperature in male and female mice. In mice, there was no difference between the sexes after imipramine or paroxetine administration in the FST and TST. Both tests can be used to predict the activity of antidepressants as the decrease or enhancement of temperature is not correlated with a reduction in immobility duration.
 ...
PMID:Are there gender differences in the temperature profile of mice after acute antidepressant administration and exposure to two animal models of depression? 1116 36