UMLS:C0020538 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system plays a key role in the regulation of fluid and electrolyte balance. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors inhibit angiotensin-converting enzyme and have been shown to be effective in many cardiovascular diseases. They should be considered for the treatment of hypertension in patients with heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, diabetes, or proteinuria. There are a number of side-effects associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, especially persistent dry cough. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (sartans) provide a more specific blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and are associated with fewer side-effects, including cough. Their long-term efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with hypertension has, however, yet to be established. Periodic monitoring of renal function and electrolytes is required in patients treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a sartan.
...
PMID:Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. 1205 64

The coexistence of diabetes mellitus in hypertensive patients doubles the number of cardiovascular events (relative risk: 1.73-2.77) and cardiovascular mortality (relative risk: 2.25-3.66). Therapeutic interventions concentrating on elevated blood glucose alone for prevention of late complications were not effective in essential reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. For that reason therapies, focussing on other macrovascular risk factors, did increase significantly in the last decade. Strategies for reduction of the macrovascular risk include the aggressive treatment of hypertension. In the now published hypertension intervention studies in diabetic patients many different objectives were studied. As we already know, lowering of blood pressure does reduce cardiovascular risk. The optimal blood pressure threshold is not known yet, but of major interest. To find the most effective antihypertensive agent and the most effective combination therapy for diabetic patients, the most frequently used antihypertensive agents were compared with each other. Very interesting are the special effects of some substances, which exceed the lowering of blood pressure, like effects on the endothelinn or on coagulation disturbances. These protective and antiatherosclerotic effects could possibly get relevance even in normotensive patients. Concerning this special question, ACE-inhibitors and Angiotensin II receptor antagonists are getting more and more in the focus of interest and seem to be superior compared to other substances. Concluding the existing evidence from hypertension studies the following recommendations can be deduced: Diabetic patients with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor should get an ACE-inhibitor in combination with other antihypertensive agents or as monotherapy. For combination therapy all the available antihypertensive agents are appropriate and can lower blood pressure adequately.
...
PMID:[Reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by combined antihypertensive drug therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus]. 1209 90

The ideal antihypertensive drug should be effective in reducing blood pressure, but have a low incidence of adverse effects. Angiotensin II receptor blockers, such as eprosartan, are as effective as ACE inhibitors in reducing blood pressure, but lack the main adverse effect of ACE inhibitors, namely cough. Eprosartan has been shown to be well tolerated with a placebo-like adverse-effect profile. When given as monotherapy it is effective in reducing blood pressure; however, some patients require additional blood pressure control, which may be provided by combination therapy. Indeed, the combination of eprosartan and the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide has been shown to be effective in further reducing blood pressure in patients not optimally responding to eprosartan monotherapy. This article reviews the safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide from 17 studies of 1899 patients with hypertension and normotensive volunteers. Of these studies, four were controlled with patients receiving a fixed-dose combination, six were long-term, open-label, and another four were controlled studies with hydrochlorothiazide being given to eprosartan non-responders. The other three studies included healthy subjects receiving the combination of eprosartan and hydrochlorothiazide. There was a high completion rate in all studies evaluated. Most of the patients receiving eprosartan 600mg in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg daily completed the studies, which supports acceptance of this combination therapy by patients. The most frequently reported adverse events in these combination studies were headache, dizziness, myalgia, and upper respiratory tract infection in patients with hypertension. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and were not considered to be related to study treatment. The adverse event that was more common in patients receiving combination therapy compared with those receiving monotherapy was dizziness. This adverse event may be due to hydrochlorothiazide as it has previously been observed in patients taking thiazide diuretics. In healthy volunteers, the most frequently reported adverse events were headache, dizziness, and upper respiratory tract infection. However, none of these adverse events were considered related to study medication. In summary, the combination of eprosartan/hydrochlorothiazide is well tolerated, both as short- and long-term therapy, with most adverse events occurring early. The most frequent adverse events were headache, dizziness, and upper respiratory infection, which would be expected based on the safety profile of each of the components. Therefore, the combination of eprosartan with hydrochlorothiazide can be effectively and safely used in patients not adequately responding to eprosartan monotherapy.
...
PMID:Safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. 1211 44

Early intervention studies have challenged the notion that lowering blood pressure is beneficial in women with mild hypertension. In contrast, results of more recent trials have clearly shown that treatment of hypertension is of benefit in women, particularly in elderly women. Aggressive treatment of hypertension is advisable in this subset of the population that is exposed to a greater risk of hypertension-related cardiovascular diseases because of the greater prevalence of hypertension and of its inadequate treatment. Hypertensive women are preferentially treated with diuretics but the rationale for this therapeutic selection is unclear. Calcium antagonists, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors exert an antihypertensive action similar to that of diuretics, but their use is limited by the adverse effects that are more frequent in women than in men. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists, being effective in lowering blood pressure and particularly well tolerated, may represent, in the future, the first-line drugs for treating hypertension in women.
...
PMID:Treating hypertension in women: open-ended questions and therapeutic options. 1218 51

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) directly inhibit the angiotensin II type 1 receptors, which suppresses the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS). Six ARBs are approved in Canada for the treatment of hypertension, none are yet approved for the treatment of heart failure (HF). Evidence comparing ARBs to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in HF is still limited. A recent meta-analysis of 17 clinical trials could not confirm that ARBs are superior to ACEIs in reducing either mortality or hospitalization in HF patients. ARBs may be used as an alternative in HF patients intolerant of ACEIs. A meta-analysis indicates that, compared to using an ACEI alone, adding an ARB to an ACEI carries the potential for additional benefits in terms of reduced hospitalization, but not mortality. However, the FDA determined there is currently insufficient evidence of such additional benefit when valsartan is combined to an ACEI in patients with HF.
...
PMID:Heart failure: is there a role for angiotensin II receptor blockers? 1224 2

Recently, both researchers and clinicians have focused their attention to the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Their efforts resulted in discovery of ACE inhibitors. ACE inhibitors proved to be effective antihypertensive drugs. However, their excellent antihypertensive efficacy has been limited by frequent occurrence of adverse effects, among which cough occupies a prominent place. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists could completely block RAS, having significantly less adverse effects than ACE inhibitors. Clinical studies have demonstrated that angiotensin II receptor antagonists are equally effective in the treatment of hypertension as diuretics, beta blockers, calcium antagonists and ACE inhibitors. Also the studies showed angiotensin II receptor antagonists to have an additional advantage, i.e. the frequency of their adverse effects matches that of placebo. All today available angiotensin II receptor antagonists--losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, candesartan, eprosartan, and telmisartan--equally lower both systolic and diastolic pressure. This new class of drugs can be used as monotherapy or can be combined with other antihypertensive drugs, especially with diuretics. Trials now underway will demonstrate whether angiotensin II receptor antagonists can prevent target-organ damage and reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
...
PMID:[Role of angiotensin II antagonists in the treatment of hypertension]. 1237 64

The continued poor rates of blood pressure (BP) control to the recommended target BP of <140/90 mm Hg in patients with hypertension indicate a persistent need for improved antihypertensive therapy. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) constitute the newest approved class of antihypertensive agents. As with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, ARBs block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, but do so through a more specific mechanism. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors block the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, but angiotensin II may be produced by several alternate pathways. Angiotensin II receptor blockers, by contrast, inhibit the binding of angiotensin II to the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor, independent of the pathway of angiotensin II production. Comparative safety and efficacy trials indicate that ARBs are similar to other antihypertensive drugs in terms of BP-lowering effectiveness and have superior tolerability. Olmesartan medoxomil is the newest and one of the most effective of the ARBs. In controlled trials, it has been shown to provide 24-h BP control with antihypertensive efficacy at least as good as that of the calcium channel blockers amlodipine besylate and felodipine and the beta-blocker atenolol. In a comparative study, olmesartan medoxomil demonstrated significantly greater reductions in diastolic BP than did three other leading ARBs-losartan potassium, irbesartan, and valsartan. With the convenience of placebo-like tolerability and once-daily dosing, combined with excellent antihypertensive efficacy, olmesartan medoxomil may be a useful addition to our management of hypertension.
...
PMID:Strategies to meet lower blood pressure goals with a new standard in angiotensin II receptor blockade. 1238 91

Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States, accounting for about 50% of all new cases. Although we previously established the renoprotective benefits of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with coexisting hypertension and type 1 diabetes, evidence of the renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes is less clear. We conducted the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) to determine whether the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) irbesartan slows the progression of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes independently of its blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect. In this randomized, controlled trial, we found that irbesartan was associated with a 20% reduction in the risk for the primary composite end point (doubling of the baseline serum creatinine concentration, development of end-stage renal disease, or death from any cause) compared with placebo (P =.02) and a 23% reduction compared with amlodipine therapy (P =.006). These results were not explained by differences in the BP that was achieved. In a separate study, losartan was shown to reduce the risk for progression of renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy has also been demonstrated to slow the progression to overt nephropathy when initiated early in the course of type 2 diabetic renal disease (ie, in patients with microalbuminuria). Based on these studies, ARBs are clearly effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. This protection is independent of their BP-lowering effect. Preclinical studies with the newest ARB, olmesartan medoxomil, suggest that this agent may provide renoprotective benefits as well.
...
PMID:The role of angiotensin II receptor blockers in preventing the progression of renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. 1238 93

Hypertension continues to be a major public health issue in the world. To combat this problem, many anti-hypertensive drugs have been developed and proven effective at controlling blood pressure in the last half century. In recent decades, antihypertensive drugs have been shown to have cardiovascular benefits beyond the reduction of blood pressure, and the focus has shifted to clarification of these effects. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and calcium channel blockers are the most widely used antihypertensive drugs in Japan. However, these two classes of drugs have not yet been compared with respect to their efficacy for treating cardiovascular events. The Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial described herein is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, 2-arm parallel group comparison with a response-dependent dose titration and blinded assessment of endpoints in high-risk hypertensive patients treated with either an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (candesartan cilexetil) or a third-generation calcium channel blocker (amlodipine besilate). The eligibility criteria in this study were 1) age between 20 and 85 years; 2) systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or = 140 mmHg in those below 70 years of age or > or = 160 mmHg in those above 70 years of age or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 90 mmHg on two consecutive measurements at clinic; and 3) at least one of the following high risk factors for cardiovascular events: a) SBP > or = 2180 mmHg or DBP > or = 110 mmHg on two consecutive visits, b) type 2 diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose > or = 126 mg/dl, casual blood glucose > or = 200 mg/dl, HbA1c > or = 6.5%, 2 h blood glucose on 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) > or = 200 mg/dl, or current treatment with hypoglycemic therapy), c) history of cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, or transient ischemic attack until 6 months prior to the screening, d) left ventricular hypertrophy on either echocardiography or ECG, angina pectoris, or history of myocardial infarction until 6 months prior to screening, e) proteinuria or serum creatinine > or = 1.3 mg/dl, and f) symptoms of arteriosclerotic artery obstruction. The therapeutic goals of blood pressure control were set as follows: SBP < 130 mmHg and DBP < 85 mmHg for patients below 60 years of age, SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg for those in their 60s, SBP < 150 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg for those in their 70s, and SBP < 160 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg for those in their 80s. A total of 3,200 patients, equally allocated to each of the two treatment arms, were required based on a two-sided alpha level 0.05 and 90% power. The CASE-J is also the first study to employ the newly developed Automatic Bar Code Data-Capturing/Allocation, Booking & Trial Coding, Data Management (ABCD) system for data collection and management. Enrollment of patients started in September 2001 and ended in December 2002. Follow-up data will be collected every 6 months until December 2005. The CASE-J trial will provide important evidence on the comparative effectiveness of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine besilate on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among Japanese. In addition, the use of the ABCD system is expected to contribute to the development of more efficient data management systems for large-scale clinical trials.
...
PMID:Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan (CASE-J) trial of cardiovascular events in high-risk hypertensive patients: rationale, design, and methods. 1471 41

Heart failure is a common and costly medical condition. Ischemic heart disease and hypertension account for most cases of heart failure in developed countries. Estimates of the one-year mortality rates for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, III, and IV are 10%, 20%, and 40%, respectively. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce mortality of heart failure patients by approximately 25% (odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.67 0.88). Larger doses of ACE inhibitors are more effective in preventing hospitalization than are lower doses. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors because of their side effects (e.g., cough). Evidence for benefits of using combination of ACE inhibitors and ARBs is encouraging, but requires further study. For patients who cannot tolerate either ACE inhibitors or ARBs, vasodilator therapy with hydralazine and nitrates will probably provide benefit. (Diuretic therapy, while a mainstay of heart failure treatment, is primarily used for symptom relief.) There is also evidence that spironolactone reduces mortality (relative risk reduction 30%, 95% CI 18 40%) for patients with NYHA class III and IV heart failure. When administering spironolactone to heart failure patients, monitoring for hyperkalemia is essential. After two centuries of use, randomized controlled trials have finally demonstrated that digoxin is effective in preventing hospitalizations (relative risk reduction 28%, 95% CI 21 34%). There is now overwhelming evidence that beta-blockers are safe for heart failure patients but that they reduce the risk of death for these patients by approximately 30%. In addition to these medical interventions, heart failure patients may also benefit from a number of non-pharmacological interventions.
...
PMID:A review of heart failure treatment. 1477 Feb 50

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>