Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Hypertension is often accompanied by type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recently, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) published guidelines on the treatment of hypertension in adult patients with diabetes mellitus. However, the views of general physicians on how to control blood pressure (BP) in diabetic patients and the impact of the ADA guidelines in Japan are still not known. We conducted an internet survey in May 2002: Questionnaires were e-mailed to a total of 3,616 medical doctors, of whom 441 (12.2%) properly responded. About half of the respondents (48.3%) had already read the ADA guidelines. Before being given an outline of the guidelines, the respondents' average BP level for starting medication was 152/94 mmHg, and the BP goal 133/83 mmHg; after reading the outline, these values were 149/92 and 132/82 mmHg, respectively. The goal BP decreased more after reading the guidelines in doctors who had not previously read the ADA guidelines than in those who had already read. After being given an outline of the ADA guidelines, 40.3% of respondents reported that they would select, as a first-line agent, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB), 35.6% an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), and 18.6% a calcium channel blocker (CCB); as a second-line medication, 39.7% of the respondents would select a CCB. Seventy percent of doctors reported having at least one patient receiving CCB monotherapy; after reading the guidelines, 41.5% of these doctors said they would continue CCB monotherapy, 36.6% said they would add an ACEI or ARB, and 29.7% planned to change to an ACEI or ARB. In conclusion, our data suggest the impact of the ADA guidelines on the target BP and the first choice of antihypertensive medication in diabetic patients. ARBs and ACEIs became first-line medications, and CCBs became second-line medications to achieve the BP goal and prevent organ damage.
 ...
PMID:Trends in blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus in Japan. 1462 Sep 27

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an angiotensin-converting enzyne inhibitor (ACEI, quinapril) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB, candesartan) on atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) activity in rats with hypertension induced by nitric oxide (NO) inhibition. ACEI and ARB have a number of pharmacologic effects, including blood pressure reduction, myocardial preservation, and an unknown effect in the circulation. The changes in ANP in NO inhibitor-induced hypertensive rats were evaluated in order to elucidate the interaction between ANP and NO in the regulation of blood pressure. Thirty-six rats were divided into 4 groups and administered the experimental agents for 8 weeks: group CONTROL was given regular food (n=9), group N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) was administered L-NNA (25 mg. kg(-1). day(-1), n=9), group ACEI was administered L-NNA and quinapril (10 mg. kg(-1). day(-1), n=9), and group ARB was administered L-NNA and candesartan (10 mg. kg(-1). day(-1), n=9). Blood pressure, plasma ANP, atrial ANP, ANP mRNA, and ANP granules were measured. A significant elevation in blood pressure was observed in group L-NNA. However, there were no increases in plasma ANP (L-NNA: 138.8+/-64.4, CONTROL: 86.7+/-36.4), ANP mRNA (L-NNA: 2.2+/-1.0, CONTROL: 1.7+/-0.5) or ANP granules (L-NNA: 61.1+/-10.2, CONTROL: 64.5+/-8.5). No increase in blood pressure was seen in groups ACEI and ARB. However, plasma ANP (ACEI: 1,392.3+/-1,034.4, ARB: 1,142.8+/-667.3), ANP mRNA (ACEI: 52.8+/-29.1, ARB: 42.9+/-21.2), and ANP granules (ACEI: 122.5+/-23.4, ARB: 136.3+/-33.2) increased significantly. NO inhibitor-induced hypertension caused no changes in ANP concentrations. However, the ACEI and ARB had a direct effect on the induction of ANP secretion. The findings suggest that ANP secretion is directly effected by ACEI and ARB, which seems to play a key role in lowering blood pressure, relieving heart failure symptoms, and preserving the myocardium.
 ...
PMID:Effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker on atrial natriuretic peptide. 1463 23

The present studies were undertaken to investigate the potential effect of a calcium channel blocker (CCB) to enhance the inhibitory effect of an angiotensin (Ang) II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker (ARB) on vascular injury and the cellular mechanism of the effect of CCB on vascular remodeling. In polyethylene cuff-induced vascular injury of the mouse femoral artery, proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and neointimal formation associated with activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), and tyrosine-phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)1 and STAT3, inflammatory response assessed by monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression, as well as oxidative stress such as expression of NADH/NADPH oxidase p22(phox) subunit and superoxide production, were less in AT1a receptor null mice. Administration of nonhypotensive doses of a CCB, azelnidipine (0.5 or 1 mg/kg per day) attenuated these parameters in wild-type and AT1a receptor null mice. Coadministration of lower doses of an ARB, olmesartan (0.5 mg/kg per day), and azelnidipine (0.1 mg/kg per day), which did not affect vascular remodeling, significantly inhibited these parameters in wild-type mice. Moreover, the effective dose of azelnidipine (1 mg/kg per day) exaggerated the inhibitory action of olmesartan at effective doses of 1 or 3 mg/kg per day on VSMC proliferation in the injured arteries. These results suggest that azelnidipine could inhibit vascular injury at least partly independent of the inhibition of AT1 receptor activation and that azelnidipine could exaggerate the vascular protective effects of olmesartan, suggesting clinical possibility that the combination of CCB and ARB could be more effective in the treatment of vascular diseases.
Hypertension 2004 Feb
PMID:Calcium channel blocker azelnidipine enhances vascular protective effects of AT1 receptor blocker olmesartan. 1470 52

The frequency of diabetes and hypertension is increasing worldwide. Diabetes mellitus doubles the risk of cardiovascular diseases, even in hypertensive patients who are already at high risk because of their high blood pressure. Combination of 2 or more drugs is usually needed to achieve the target BP goal of less than 130/85 mmHg. Thiazide diuretic, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitor, ARBs and Ca blockers are beneficial in reducing cardiovascular events. However, the ACE inhibitors- or ARB-based treatments favorably affect the progression of diabetic nephrology and reduce albuminuria.
 ...
PMID:[Treatment for hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus]. 1473 48

Even well-conducted randomized controlled trials can only reduce uncertainty, not eliminate it. The trials presented in this article all have gaps, and like many studies, some raise more questions than answers. A summary of the current trials, however, can be presented as follows. For patients with essential hypertension who are at high risk for cardiovascular disease, the use of diuretic therapy (excluding simultaneous use of ACE or CCB) resulted in outcomes at least equivalent to the use of either ACE or CCB without diuretics. Naturally, the dilemma for clinicians is that these drugs are most often used in combination with thiazide diuretics, as indicated by the RENAAL trial where 80% of ARB were used with diuretics in patients with type II diabetes and known nephropathy. The increased risk of heart failure observed with ACE and CCB in that trial may be relevant only to patients in whom diuretics were not also used. The study does raise important awareness, however, that ACE or CCB use without diuretic therapy is no better than diuretic therapy, and may be associated with higher risk of certain outcomes. A substantial number of patients with essential hypertension might achieve adequate blood pressure control with diuretic monotherapy. If so, that certainly has important implications for the cost of medical care in this country. For African Americans with essential hypertension, ACE may have advantages as a component of therapy in comparison with CCBs or beta-blockers, although diuretics should probably be the cornerstone of therapy for them and supported by the Seventh Joint National Committee. For patients with proteinuric renal disease, whether associated with diabetes or hypertension, it should be considered inappropriate to use DHP CCB as monotherapy in any setting, whether as part of a clinical trial or in clinical practice. These drugs should not be considered as ethical placebo arms in trials, most especially in diabetic nephropathy, nor should they be used without an ACE or ARB in patients with proteinuric renal disease in the absence of documented contraindications or intolerance to ACE, ARB, or non-DHP CCB (which are now considered second-line agents for proteinuric renal disease, and are acceptable placebo or comparison arms in clinical trials). For patients with type I diabetes, ACE remain the cornerstone of therapy. Because of recent RENAAL and IDNT trial results, the greatest benefit for slowing progression of renal disease in type II diabetic nephropathy now belongs to ARBs. In contrast, however, the HOPE trial showed that ACE, specifically ramipril, had the greatest evidence for prevention of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with renal insufficiency, regardless of diabetic status. Cardiovascular outcomes were secondary end points in the RENAAL and IDNT trials, and with the exception of heart failure for losartan, no benefits on cardiovascular outcomes were statistically significant. Progression of renal disease has only been studied in a relatively small cohort of Israeli patients comparing enalapril with nifedipine. These gaps lead to a classic dilemma in medical decision-making. Because evidence has shown that patients with elevated serum creatinine (greater than or equal to 1.4 mg/dL) are just as likely to die from cardiovascular disease as they are to reach end-stage renal disease, which outcome should be the focus for clinicians, or for researchers? Using a strictly evidence-based approach, this question can only be answered by yet another large, long, randomized, controlled trial. Given the similarity of actions between the ARB and ACE, it is likely there is considerable overlap of both benefits and side-effects between the two, although ARB may have a lower incidence of cough and hyperkalemia. The decision of which antihypertensive agents to use will have to be tailored carefully to the needs of the patient and careful consideration of both medical and economic factors. Regardless of the choice between an ACE or ARB, however, post hoc analysis of clinical trials [21,47] and observational data clearly indicate that patients with chronic kidney disease, even if considered mild (ie, serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.4 mg/dL) are at significantly greater risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with those with better kidney function. As stated in a recent review by the authors of the HOPE trial [50], "the frequent practice of withholding ACE [or ARB] in patients with mild renal insufficiency is unwarranted," because not only are these patients precisely those who might benefit most from their use, but safety and tolerability are generally excellent. Based on the results of the AASK trial, the authors add the same for the use of ACE inhibitors in African Americans.
 ...
PMID:What have we learned from the current trials? 1487 Oct 59

Angiotensin (Ang) II-infused hypertensive rats exhibit increases in renal angiotensinogen mRNA and protein, as well as urinary angiotensinogen excretion in association with increased intrarenal Ang II content. The present study was performed to determine if the augmentation of intrarenal angiotensinogen requires activation of Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptors. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200 to 220 g) were divided into 3 groups: sham surgery (n=10), subcutaneous infusion of Ang II (80 ng/min, n=11), and Ang II infusion plus AT1 blocker (ARB), olmesartan (5 mg/d, n=12). Ang II infusion progressively increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared with sham (178+/-8 mm Hg versus 119+/-4 at day 11). ARB treatment prevented hypertension (113+/-6 at day 11). Twenty-four-hour urine collections were taken at day 12, and plasma and tissue samples were harvested at day 13. The Ang II+ARB group had a significant increase in plasma Ang II compared with Ang II and sham groups (365+/-46 fmol/mL versus 76+/-9 and 45+/-14, respectively). Nevertheless, ARB treatment markedly limited the enhancement of kidney Ang II by Ang II infusion (65+/-17 fmol/g in sham, 606+/-147 in Ang II group, and 288+/-28 in Ang II+ARB group). Ang II infusion significantly increased kidney angiotensinogen compared with sham (1.69+/-0.21 densitometric units versus 1.00+/-0.17). This change was reflected by increased angiotensinogen immunostaining in proximal tubules. ARB treatment prevented this increase (1.14+/-0.12). Urinary angiotensinogen excretion rates were enhanced 4.7x in Ang II group (4.67+/-0.41 densitometric units versus 1.00+/-0.21) but ARB treatment prevented the augmentation of urinary angiotensinogen (0.96+/-0.23). These data demonstrate that augmentation of intrarenal angiotensinogen in Ang II-infused rats is AT1-dependent and provide further evidence that urinary angiotensinogen is closely linked to intrarenal Ang II in Ang II-dependent hypertension.
Hypertension 2004 May
PMID:AT1 receptor mediated augmentation of intrarenal angiotensinogen in angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. 1503 65

Hypertension Objective treatment based on Measurement by Electrical Devices of Blood Pressure Study (HOMED BP Study) is the first large-scale intervention trial in Japan using a Prospective Randomized Open Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) design to determine an optimal target blood pressure (BP) level on the basis of self-measured BP at home, and an optimal initial course of antihypertensive medication. The registered patients are randomized to either a more intensive BP-lowering group (home systolic BP < 125 mmHg and diastolic < 80 mmHg) or a less intensive group (home systolic/diastolic BP within the range 134-125/84-80 mmHg) by host computer via the Internet. The differential effect of three classes of initial antihypertensive regimens on the prognosis, i.e., calcium antagonist (Ca-A), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB), which are used most frequently in Japan, are examined. Three regimens are also randomly assigned to the host computer via the Internet. A pilot study was started in May 2001. In March 2002, the number of participating doctors was 461. At the end of March 2002, 546 patients were recruited. Of these, 412 (202 men and 210 women, aged 58.4 +/- 10.2 y) were randomized. Patients will be recruited until February, 2006 and followed for 7 years.
 ...
PMID:Progress report on the HOMED-BP Study: hypertension objective treatment based on measurement by electrical devices of blood pressure study. 1503 22

Immunization against components of the renin-angiotensin system offers a potential alternative to daily medication in some patients with hypertension or heart failure. Our primary objective was to determine whether a sustained antibody titre to Ang I (angiotensin I) can be achieved in hypertensive patients. The secondary objective was to determine whether the antibodies block the renin system. Patients (n=27) with essential hypertension responsive to an ACEi (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) or ARB (angiotensin blocker) were randomly assigned to receive three or four injections of the Ang I vaccine PMD3117 or aluminium hydroxide (Alhydrogel trade mark ) over a 6 week period. Antibody titre was measured prior to each injection and every 30 days until disappearance. Indices of renin blockade were changes in renin and aldosterone (blood and urine) and a within-patient comparison of the pre- and post-vaccination rise in 24 h ambulatory blood pressure after 2 weeks of withdrawal of ACEi or ARB. The anti-(Ang I) antibody titre rose from the second injection in both regimes and peaked on day 64. Median half-life was 85 (95% CI, 44 and 153) days (where CI is confidence interval). Vaccination did not influence blood pressure, but significantly blunted the fall in plasma renin following withdrawal of ACEi or ARB. At 42 days after the first injection, aldosterone excretion was decreased by PMD3117 to 6 (95% CI, 1 and 31)% of values in patients receiving Alhydrogel trade mark (P=0.012). In patients with essential hypertension, PMD3117 generated a prolonged antibody response to Ang I. Biochemical measurements show evidence of blockade of the renin system, but higher titres will be required to achieve a decrease in blood pressure.
 ...
PMID:Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of an angiotensin immunotherapeutic vaccine (PMD3117) in hypertensive subjects. 1510 32

Telmisartan (Micardis) is a potent, long-lasting, nonpeptide angiotensin II type-1 (AT(1)) receptor blocker (ARB) that is indicated for the treatment of essential hypertension. In receptor binding studies, telmisartan showed a high affinity and selectivity for the human AT(1) receptors compared with AT(2) receptors and a slower dissociation rate from the human AT(1) receptor than those of ARBs. In isolated aorta rings, telmisartan was shown to be an insurmountable antagonist of AII-induced contractions. The inhibitory effects of telmisartan on AII-induced contraction persisted even after wash-out procedures. In animal models such as spontaneous hypertension rats and renovascular hypertensive rats, telmisartan produced the consistent reduction of blood pressure. Furthermore, there were no rebound phenomenon and no tolerance to the drug developed in the repeated oral administration. Telmisartan has a longer terminal elimination half-life (about 24 h) than the other ARBs. In patients with mild-moderate hypertension, trough/peak ratios for telmisartan were above 80%. In Japanese patients with mild-moderate hypertension, telmisartan produced a significant reduction in blood pressure (effective rate: 76.0%) with a good safety profile. Therefore, telmisartan is expected to be effective in the treatment of hypertension, producing sustained 24-h blood pressure control.
 ...
PMID:[Pharmacological and clinical profile of telmisartan, a selective angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker]. 1522 20

Diabetic nephropathy affects both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with a frequency of 20-30%. The first sign is microalbuminuria within a range of 30-300 mg/24h, frequently evolving towards frank proteinuria and renal failure. Tight glucose control, control of arterial hypertension with the use of ACEi or ARB can retard progression. Once renal failure is established, kidney transplantation can be considered for type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. Quality of life and survival are improved with this procedure. In type 1 diabetes, simultaneous grafting of a kidney and pancreas considerably improves quality of life and diabetic complications. Surgical and infectious complications are sporadic drawbacks of this procedure. Pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) remains controversial, since a retrospective study in 2003 by Venstrom concluded that survival for PTA patients is worse than for comparable patients remaining on the waiting list. PTA can be considered for type 1 diabetic patients without advanced renal failure with severe and frequent metabolic instability (hypoglycaemia, ketoacidosis). Islet transplantation is still an experimental but promising procedure in highly selected patients, avoiding major abdominal surgery.
 ...
PMID:Transplantation as a therapeutic option for diabetic nephropathy. 1546 8


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>