Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Risk for cardiovascular events seems to be higher in the early morning, also as consequence of a rise in blood pressure (BP) values due to the characteristic circadian pattern of BP variability. Therefore, a suitable therapeutic BP control should be tightest during the early morning. On the basis of the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) studies, it has been previously demonstrated that the antihypertensive effect of once daily drug, generally administrated in the morning, decreases at the end of the dosing period. A chronotherapeutic approach to the management of hypertension (this field has been pourly investigated so far) would allow the assessment of the optimum timing of drug dosing, according to the circadian BP rhythm and to the chronorisk maps, in hypertensive patients affected by associated vascular pathologies. This would increase the therapeutic effects. The aim of this study was to assess BP changes due to ACE-inhibitor (Lisinopril 20 mg/die) once daily administration at three different times (8.00 AM, 4.00 PM, 10.00 PM), in order to optimise the dosing time. 40 subjects (mean age +/- SD: 45 +/- 10) affected by primary mild to moderate hypertension were submitted to ABPM for 24 hours, by means of Spacelabs 90207, before and after pharmacological treatment. Patients were randomised to take the drug at 8.00 AM, 4.00 PM or 10.00 PM, and they repeated ABPM every two months, by changing the dosing time. The chronobiological analysis showed: 1) a sensible decrease both in Systolic (S)BP and Diastolic (D)BP without affecting the circadian rhythm, in all evaluations; 2) a greater reduction of SBP and DBP from 6.00 AM to 11.00 AM, period in which cardiovascular risk is higher, after 10.00 PM dosing; 3) no other sensible reduction in SBP and DBP occurred after night administration as compared to that caused by other dosing times. Lisinopril administration at 10.00 PM. has been shown to be much more useful since, although BP circadian rhythm was unmodified, it protects hypertensive patients from both vascular chronorisk and Cruickshank effect (J-curve). Therefore, a chronobiologist antihypertensive treatment in order to increase the therapeutic effect already obtained with the traditional statistic methods.
...
PMID:Management of antihypertensive treatment with Lisinopril: a chronotherapeutic approach. 1126 39

The main objective of the CALM (Candesartan And Lisinopril Microalbuminuria) study is to assess the effect of a dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system--using both an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker--in patients with type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and microalbuminuria. The study included 200 patients randomized to receive candesartan 16 mg or lisinopril 20 mg for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of the same monotherapy or a combination treatment. Main outcomes are the reduction of microalbuminuria and blood pressure. All three of the treatments are effective, but the dual blockade is respectively 18%, 8 mmHg and 5 mmHg more effective in reducing microalbuminuria, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. No comparison is made between this "new" association and the more frequently used biotherapy (i.e. ACE-I plus thiazidic diuretic) and therefore its usefulness in regular practice is still to be determined.
...
PMID:[Clinical study of the month. The CALM study assessing the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor antagonist in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy]. 1129 48

In the present study, we evaluated the effect of a nonevaluative social support intervention (pet ownership) on blood pressure response to mental stress before and during ACE inhibitor therapy. Forty-eight hypertensive individuals participated in an experiment at home and in the physician's office. Participants were randomized to an experimental group with assignment of pet ownership in addition to lisinopril (20 mg/d) or to a control group with only lisinopril (20 mg/d). On each study day, blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma renin activity were recorded at baseline and after each mental stressor (serial subtraction and speech). Before drug therapy, mean responses to mental stress did not differ significantly between experimental and control groups in heart rate (94 [SD 6.8] versus 93 [6.8] bpm), systolic blood pressure (182 [8.0] versus 181 [8.3] mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (120 [6.6] versus 119 [7.9] mm Hg), or plasma renin activity (9.4 [0.59] versus 9.3 [0.57] ng. mL(-1). h(-1)). Lisinopril therapy lowered resting blood pressure by approximately 35/20 mm Hg in both groups, but responses to mental stress were significantly lower among pet owners relative to those who only received lisinopril (P<0.0001; heart rate 81 [6.3] versus 91 [6.5] bpm, systolic blood pressure 131 [6.8] versus 141 [7.8] mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure 92 [6.3] versus 100 [6.8] mm Hg, and plasma renin activity 13.9 [0.92] versus 16.1 [0.58] ng. mL(-1). h(-1)). We conclude that ACE inhibitor therapy alone lowers resting blood pressure, whereas increased social support through pet ownership lowers blood pressure response to mental stress.
Hypertension 2001 Oct
PMID:Pet ownership, but not ace inhibitor therapy, blunts home blood pressure responses to mental stress. 1164 Dec 92

To evaluate the antihypertensive effects of lisinopril, a renally excreted angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, we assessed supervised administration of the drug after hemodialysis (HD) three times weekly. Blood pressure (BP) was assessed by interdialytic 44-hour ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring, and endocrine responses were assessed by plasma renin activity (PRA) before and after dialysis. Lisinopril dose was titrated at biweekly intervals. If this was not effective after full titration (lisinopril to 40 mg three times weekly), ultrafiltration was added to reduce dry weight. The primary outcome variable was change in BP from the end of the run-in period to the end of the study. No change in mean ABP was noted during run-in. However, mean 44-hour ABP decreased from 149 +/- 14 (SD)/84 +/- 9 to 127 +/- 16/73 +/- 9 mm Hg, a decrease of 22/11 mm Hg (P < 0.001) at final evaluation. Of 11 patients who completed the trial, only 2 patients had systolic hypertension (>/=135 mm Hg) and 1 patient had diastolic hypertension (>/=85 mm Hg) at the final visit. Four patients were administered 10 mg of lisinopril; 5 patients, 20 mg; and 2 patients, 40 mg; only 1 of these patients required ultrafiltration therapy. There was a persistent antihypertensive effect over 44 hours. BP reduction was achieved without an increase in intradialytic symptomatic or asymptomatic hypotensive episodes. PRA increased in response to dialysis, as well as lisinopril. In conclusion, supervised lisinopril therapy is effective in controlling hypertension in chronic HD patients. This may be related to blockade of angiotensin II generation by kidneys despite the loss of excretory function.
...
PMID:Lisinopril therapy for hemodialysis hypertension: hemodynamic and endocrine responses. 1172 57

Although current hypertension management guidelines recommend increasingly stringent blood pressure targets, these targets are seldom achieved in clinical practice. Even in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, monotherapy is only effective in approximately 50-70% of patients, and thus there is a clear need for combination therapy if stringent blood pressure targets are to be achieved. Drugs used in combination therapy should satisfy a number of prerequisites, including complementary mechanisms of action, enhanced efficacy in combination, and maintained (or improved) tolerability. Evidence is accumulating that combination therapy with an AT(1)-receptor blocker and a diuretic represents a rational and effective treatment option. In clinical trials, the combination of candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg, and hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg, has been shown to be more effective in lowering blood pressure than either agent alone. Furthermore, this combination has been shown to reduce blood pressure to a greater extent, and control blood pressure in a higher proportion of patients, than the combination of losartan, 50 mg, and hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg, both when used instead of or in addition to previous antihypertensive therapy. The placebo-like tolerability of AT(1)-receptor blockers was maintained when these drugs were used in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. The combination of candesartan and a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist has also been shown to be more effective than either component alone. Furthermore, in the Candesartan and Lisinopril Microalbuminuria (CALM) Study, the combination of candesartan and lisinopril reduced blood pressure to a greater extent than either agent alone, and tended to have a greater effect on microalbuminuria.
...
PMID:Combination therapy with AT(1)-receptor blockers. 1214 Jul 24

This study investigated the differences in the effect of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) compared with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) on blood pressure (BP) and pulse pressure (PP) measured in the clinic (CBP and CPP, respectively), at home (HBP, HPP) and with ambulatory monitoring (ABP, APP). Twenty-seven hypertensive patients were randomised to receive lisinopril (20 mg) or losartan (50 mg) for 5 weeks, and were subsequently crossed-over to the alternative treatment for a second 5-week period. Measurements of CBP, 24-h ABP and 5-days HBP were performed before randomisation and at the end of each treatment period. All measurement methods showed that lisinopril was more effective than losartan in reducing BP. However, the difference between the two drugs was demonstrated with greater precision using HBP (P<0.001) than 24-h ABP (P<0.01), whereas the poorest precision for demonstrating this difference was provided by CBP (P<0.05). Lisinopril was also found more effective than losartan in reducing HPP (P=0.01) and 24-h APP (P=0.03) whereas no such a difference was detected using measurements of CPP. It was concluded that the antihypertensive drugs may differ in their effects not only on BP, but also on PP. HBP monitoring appears to be as reliable as 24-h ABP monitoring in detecting differences in the effect of drugs on both BP and PP. Clinic measurements seem to be the least reliable method, particularly in the detection of differences in PP.
...
PMID:Assessment of drug effects on blood pressure and pulse pressure using clinic, home and ambulatory measurements. 1242 Jan 98

Diabetes mellitus increases the risk for hypertension and associated cardiovascular diseases, including coronary, cerebrovascular, renal and peripheral vascular disease. The risk for developing cardiovascular disease is increased when both diabetes and hypertension co-exist; in fact, over 11 million Americans have both diabetes and hypertension. These numbers will continue to climb, internationally, since the leading associated risk for diabetes development, obesity, has reached epidemic proportions, globally. Moreover, the frequent association of diabetes with dyslipidemia, as well as coagulation, endothelial, and metabolic abnormalities also aggravates the underlying vascular disease process in patients who possess these comorbid conditions. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) are overactivated in both hypertension and diabetes. Drugs that inhibit this system, such as ACE inhibitors and more recently angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARBs), have proven beneficial effects on the micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes, especially the kidney. The BRILLIANT study showed that lisinopril reduces microalbuminuria better than CCB therapy. Numerous other long-term studies confirm this association with ACE inhibitors including the HOPE trial. Furthermore, the European Controlled trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-dependent Diabetes (EUCLID) study, showed that lisinopril slowed the progression of renal disease, even in individuals with mild albuminuria. In fact, there are now five appropriately powered randomized placebo-controlled trials to show that both ACE inhibitors and ARBs slow progression of diabetic nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes. These effects were shown to be better than conventional blood pressure lowering therapy, including dihydropyridine CCBs. In patients with microalbuminuria, ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduce the progression of microalbuminuria to proteinuria and provide a risk reduction of between 38 and 60% for progression to proteinuria. This is important since microalbuminuria is known to be associated with increased vascular permeability and decreased responsiveness to vasodilatory stimuli. Recently, increased AVP levels have been lined to microalbuminuria and hyperfiltration in diabetes. The microvascular and macrovascular benefits of ACE inhibition, ARBs and possible role of AVP antagonists in diabetic patients will be discussed, as will be recommendations for its clinical use.
...
PMID:Treatment of the diabetic patient: focus on cardiovascular and renal risk reduction. 1243 44

This study was carried out to assess whether with a similar degree of blood pressure reduction, Lisinopril compares favorably or otherwise with lacidipine in respect of effects on urinary albumin excretion and renal function as assessed by creatinine clearance, plasma creatinine, urea and electrolytes. Thirty hypertensive diabetic nephropathy patients with moderate hypertension were studied. After a 2-week washout period, they were allocated into two groups matched at baseline for age, sex, weight, blood pressure, and urinary albumin excretion rate as well as creatinine clearance. There were 8 males and 7 females in each group. One group received lisinopril (with furosemide if needed to control BP) and the other group received lacidipine. Staged increases in doses of antihypertensives were used until BP was controlled or maximum dose of 40 mg/day lisinopril or 8 mg/day lacidipine was reached. Furosemide was added to lisinopril if BP was not controlled at 40 mg/day. These medications were given for 12 weeks at the end of which measurements done at baseline were repeated. Comparison of baseline and end of study values of these parameters within the groups and between the two groups were made. Lisinopril group and lacidipine group achieved similar and highly significant reduction in blood pressure levels P < 0.001. There was reduction in urinary albumin excretion rate in both groups but this only reached statistical significance in the lisinopril group [480] [269] mg/day vs. 315 [202] mg/day P < 0.05] while for the lacidipine group it was not significant [491] [257] mg/day vs. 335 [182] mg/day P > 0.05]. However, comparison of albumin excretion rate between both groups at baseline and at end of the study did not show any significant difference, P > 0.1. With both drugs there is a tendency for creatinine clearance to increase and plasma creatinine to drop while plasma potassium tended to rise more with lisinopril than lacidipine but differences within and between both groups, did not reach statistical significance P > 0.05. In conclusion, blood pressure reduction was comparable in both drugs; both drugs reduced albuminuria but lisinopril appeared superior. Treatment with both drugs tended to increase creatinine clearance but both had no significant effects on blood sugar.
...
PMID:Comparative effect of lisinopril and lacidipine on urinary albumin excretion in patients with type 11 diabetic nephropathy. 1251 31

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) has a critical role in cardiovascular function by cleaving the carboxy terminal His-Leu dipeptide from angiotensin I to produce a potent vasopressor octapeptide, angiotensin II. Inhibitors of ACE are a first line of therapy for hypertension, heart failure, myocardial infarction and diabetic nephropathy. Notably, these inhibitors were developed without knowledge of the structure of human ACE, but were instead designed on the basis of an assumed mechanistic homology with carboxypeptidase A. Here we present the X-ray structure of human testicular ACE and its complex with one of the most widely used inhibitors, lisinopril (N2-[(S)-1-carboxy-3-phenylpropyl]-L-lysyl-L-proline; also known as Prinivil or Zestril), at 2.0 A resolution. Analysis of the three-dimensional structure of ACE shows that it bears little similarity to that of carboxypeptidase A, but instead resembles neurolysin and Pyrococcus furiosus carboxypeptidase--zinc metallopeptidases with no detectable sequence similarity to ACE. The structure provides an opportunity to design domain-selective ACE inhibitors that may exhibit new pharmacological profiles.
...
PMID:Crystal structure of the human angiotensin-converting enzyme-lisinopril complex. 1254 Aug 54

The potential clinical effect of aspirin (ASA) in patients treated with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is debatable. Several studies have suggested that ASA attenuates the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors in hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF) or coronary artery disease (CAD) and have questioned the safety of using ASA concomitantly with these agents. The present study aims to investigate the possible interaction between ASA and ACE inhibitor in hypertensive rats. Hypertension was induced in adult male Wistar rats using Methylprednisolone (MP) 20 mg/kg per week s.c. for 2 weeks. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured by noninvasive BP technique. The effect of Lisinopril (LS) 15 mg/kg per day and that of combination of LS and ASA; 100 and 25 mg/kg per day p.o. was studied on hypertension induced by glucocorticoid. Concurrent ASA treatment with LS did not hinder the hypotensive effect of LS at either dose. However ASA 100 mg/kg per day caused mortality in animals and produced massive cardiac necrosis and renal damage as evident from histopathology. Treatment with ASA 25 mg/kg per day caused lower mortality with variable effects on cardiac and renal tissues. These results indicate that ASA attenuates the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitor on survival in hypertensive rats and this effect was more pronounced at higher dose of ASA.
...
PMID:Potential adverse interaction between aspirin and lisinopril in hypertensive rats. 1272 95


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>

---