Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Two devices used to record blood pressure, the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recorder and standard stethoscope and mercury column, were tested for accuracy against the direct intra-arterial blood pressure of patients at rest and during exercise. Recorders were found to be as accurate as mercury column measurement in patients at rest. A number of assessment techniques of ambulatory data are reviewed, including: calculation of mean or median pressures, assessment of blood pressure load, and integration of the area under the blood pressure curve over time. These have been applied during the daytime and nighttime hours. Blood pressure load and area under the blood pressure curve, using different threshold criteria for nighttime and daytime, are recommended because of their potentially closer relation to target-organ disease of hypertension than are office blood pressure readings.
 ...
PMID:Accuracy and analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data. 148 25

In 40 subjects (23 treated with antihypertensive medication), 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was measured with an oscillometric blood pressure monitor (Spacelabs model 90202). We studied applicability in the out-patient department with regard to patient tolerance, correlation with mercury manometer measurements, 24-h blood pressure variability and the use in detecting "white-coat" hypertension. The measurements were tolerated quite well except for complaints of sleep disturbance and local irritation from the cuff. The average percentage of missed measuring points was 9.2%. Correlation between blood pressure with the mercury manometer and the Spacelabs monitor (averages of three consecutive readings) was: systolic 0.87 and diastolic 0.73 (P less than 0.001). No evidence for systematic error between the two methods was found. Diurnal blood pressure variation was significant with an average night-time drop of 12 +/- 15 mmHg systolic and 12 +/- 11 mmHg diastolic. "Office" blood pressure measured with the Spacelabs monitor was in the hypertensive range for 28 patients (systolic greater than or equal to 160 and/or diastolic greater than or equal to 95 mmHg). Only 15 of these subjects still met the hypertension criteria on the basis of mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure values. When ambulatory blood pressures during arbitrary 3-h periods of the daytime were studied, the number of patients with established hypertension did not change. The patients with this "office" or "white-coat" hypertensive response could not be distinguished on the basis of variability in daytime blood pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Experience with noninvasive ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure recording in a community hospital. 160 8

The evaluation and management of hypertension is based on indirect blood pressures obtained in the office (COBPs) using the mercury sphygmomanometer. The usefulness of COBPs is limited by factors such as observer bias, which confound the ability to discern the true blood pressure value. Automated portable monitors have been marketed, which also measure blood pressure (ABP) indirectly throughout 24 hours, but without human intervention. Acceptance of a new device that indirectly records blood pressure depends largely on its the agreement with the established method of blood pressure measurement. This review compares the variability of blood pressures collected indirectly by standard mercury sphygmomanometer and by an auscultatory automated portable blood pressure monitor. The results indicate that blood pressure, when measured indirectly in a hypertensive patient, is quite variable. Automated blood pressures were lower and demonstrated less within-subject variability during repeated measures than COBPs. The agreement between ABPs and COBPs was better than the agreement between COBPs alone on successive visits. In addition, the mean hourly blood pressure profiles recorded throughout 24 hours by automated and manual methods from ten hypertensive patients were nearly identical. These data suggest that blood pressures measured by auscultatory automated methods are similar to and representative of those obtained manually.
 ...
PMID:Variability and similarity of manual office and automated blood pressures. 163 99

The evaluation of mild to moderate hypertension must be carried out under the conditions in which treatments are usually prescribed, i.e., in general practice. After specific training of the physicians in the methods used, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new formulation of verapamil by comparing it with a reference drug: captopril. The main assessment criterion was the restoration of normal blood pressure in mildly to moderately hypertensive patients (blood pressure in excess of 160/95 mmHg). Blood pressure was evaluated by two methods: a mercury column sphygmomanometer, after the patient had rested in a half-sitting position for 10 minutes, and the ambulatory measurement of blood pressure (AMBP) using the SpaceLabs system. The results of this study involving 40 patients followed up for 3 months by 8 GPs in collaboration with our blood pressure unit were as follows: on verapamil, 47% of patients recovered normal values after 30 days of treatment and 71% after 60 days (with no change in dosage). On captopril, the normalization rates were 22 and 27% respectively. The highly significant reduction of blood pressure found by the "occasional" measurement for both treatments (p less than 0.001) was only faintly reflected by AMBP. Verapamil induced a reduction of nighttime blood pressure with no significant impact on heart rate. The clinical, paraclinical and electrocardiographic safety of both treatments was good.
 ...
PMID:[Comparative efficacy of sustained release verapamil and captopril in mild to moderate arterial hypertension by ambulatory measurement and occasional measurement]. 177 3

The A&D TM-2420 (A&D Engineering, Milpitas, CA) is an automatic, portable, noninvasive blood pressure (BP) recorder which uses a dual microphone system for the detection of Korotkoff sounds. Its accuracy and clinical performance were assessed in a multicenter study that also addressed issues such as observer agreement and the effects of age, arm circumference, heart rate, posture, and blood pressure level on the observer-device differences. We compared 906 simultaneous, same-arm BP measurements in 151 subjects using the TM-2420 versus two skilled clinicians per site using a teaching stethoscope. The agreement between the TM-2420 and mercury column determinations were within 10 mm Hg for 86 to 91% of systolic readings and 91 to 94% of diastolic readings, depending on the posture; a level of agreement which would receive a 'B+' grade from the recent British Hypertension Society guidelines. The limits of agreement (2 standard deviations about the mean difference) for systolic BP between observers and the TM-2420 tended to be greater for the standing position (-20 to 15 mm Hg) compared to supine (-14 to 12 mm Hg) and seated (-13 to 8 mm Hg) positions. Limits of agreement between the observers and device were not dependent upon age, heart rate, arm size, or blood pressure level. Twenty-four-hour blood pressure monitoring in two of the four centers demonstrated an error code rate of 3.4%, excluding 'retries' that are one of the device's features. These data demonstrate an acceptable level of accuracy and performance of the sixth generation of the TM-2420 for use in clinical practice and research.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A multicenter evaluation of the A&D TM-2420 ambulatory blood pressure recorder. 178 52

To investigate the effects of salt loading on cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptor reflexes, 34 hypertensive patients underwent two 4-day periods with different dietary sodium intakes (70 and 370 meq/day). The patients were classified as salt-sensitive or salt-resistant depending on whether the mean arterial pressure value obtained on day 4 of high salt intake did or did not increase by 8% or more. In 22 patients cardiopulmonary and carotid baroreceptor reflexes were assessed during each dietary period by measuring the reflex responses to the application of -10 mm Hg lower body negative pressure and of +60 mm Hg increase in neck tissue pressure. Salt-resistant patients (n = 16) retained less sodium than salt-sensitive patients (n = 6) and showed a reduction in plasma norepinephrine and forearm vascular resistance during high sodium intake, whereas the salt-sensitive patients did not. During low sodium diet, no significant differences could be detected in the reflex responses to cardiopulmonary and carotid baroreceptor unloading between the two groups. High salt diet, however, potentiated the gain of cardiopulmonary baroreceptor reflex, which was expressed as the increase in plasma norepinephrine or forearm vascular resistance per millimeter of mercury decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, only in the salt-resistant hypertensive patients. In addition, the atrial natriuretic factor response to changes in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was significantly enhanced by high salt intake only in the salt-resistant hypertensive patients. The reflex responses to carotid baroreceptor unloading were unaffected by salt loading in either group. In the remaining 12 patients, the hemodynamic effects of graded lower body negative pressure (-5, -10, -15 mm Hg) and neck tissue positive pressure (+30, +45, +60 mm Hg) were tested for both diets. Again, high salt intake significantly potentiated the cardiopulmonary baroreceptor reflex gain, expressed as the slope of the linear correlation between the changes in forearm vascular resistance (mm Hg/ml/min/100 g) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (mm Hg), in salt-resistant (from 3.8 +/- 0.9 to 7.2 +/- 1.0, p less than 0.05) but not in salt-sensitive patients (from 4.2 +/- 0.9 to 3.2 +/- 0.6, NS). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that high salt diet potentiates cardiopulmonary baroreceptor reflexes and enhances atrial natriuretic factor response in salt-resistant but not in salt-sensitive hypertensive patients. The salt-induced plasticity of cardiopulmonary baroreceptor reflexes may exert a protective effect against the development of salt-induced hypertension by augmenting the reflex vasodilatory response to volume expansion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Hypertension 1991 Oct
PMID:Salt-induced plasticity in cardiopulmonary baroreceptor reflexes in salt-resistant hypertensive patients. 183 20

The tendency of subjects to maintain their relative position within the distribution of blood pressure (BP) has been defined as "tracking". Regarding this phenomenon, the purpose of the study was to evaluate the interest of ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in the assessment of arterial hypertension in young adults (YA) with childhood hypertension history (CHH). 52 subjects, 20.1 +/- 2.4 years old, 26 men, 26 women issued from a cohort of 150 children with high BP levels (greater than 97.5 th percentile) during their infancy (school check-up), were included in the study. An ABPM was performed with space-labs system 90202 from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., measurements every 15 minutes (37.6 +/- 7.4 readings). Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was determined with echocardiography, (Penn convention). Office BP, measured with mercury apparatus in lying and standing position, was respectively, 131.0 +/- 14.6/81.9 +/- 9.7 and 130.1 +/- 14/86.6 +/- 9.9. According to JNC 1988, this casual BP identified 40 normotensives (NT), 9 borderlines (BL) and 5 hypertensives (HT); 10 of them had a "high normal" diastolic BP (85-90 mmHg) ABP recordings of the study group were compared to day-time reference values of NT. Three subgroups are individualized: G1 NT, G2 HT, G3 BL. [table; see text] *p: less than 0.001; p: less than 0.01. Wall thickness (WTh) and LVMI were significantly higher in hypertensives (G2 + G3) than in normotensives (G1): [table; see text] There was a significant correlation between LVMI and mean systolic ABP (p less than 0.01: r = 0.44), but not with office SBP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Ambulatory blood pressure in the young adult with hypertension history during childhood]. 183 56

The SpaceLabs 90202, a non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure recorder for the measurement of 24 hr blood pressure, was assessed according to the standard of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the grading criteria of the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol were applied to the results. Two observers measured BP simultaneously in the same arm with the SpaceLabs 90202 and a standard mercury sphygmomanometer at 4 mmHg deflation steps in 85 subjects [age range 22-79 years, BP range 96-212 mmHg (systolic) and 52-134 mmHg (diastolic)]. The mean difference was -2 +/- 5 mmHg (systolic) and -2 +/- 5 mmHg (diastolic). The mean difference (+/- SD) between observers was 1 +/- 3 (systolic) and -2 +/- 3 (diastolic). The SpaceLabs 90202 fulfills the criteria of the AAMI standard (5 +/- 8 mmHg) and a B grading for both systolic and diastolic pressure is achieved with the BHS criteria.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of the SpaceLabs 90202 non-invasive ambulatory recorder according to the AAMI Standard and BHS criteria. 192 Mar 45

To examine the accuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer two studies were done with subjects with a wide range of blood pressure. When readings made by one observer on the UK model of the Hawksley sphygmomanometer were compared with readings by two independent observers on separate mercury sphygmomanometers, the Hawksley device underestimated systolic readings by a mean (SD) of 2.0 (2.4) and 0.5 (3.6) mm Hg and diastolic readings by a mean of 3.7 (2.7) and 2.8 (2.9) mm Hg. When readings made on the UK and US models of the Hawksley sphygmomanometer were compared with those made on mercury sphygmomanometers, with observers exchanging devices half way during the experiment, the UK Hawksley device underestimated systolic pressure by a mean of 3.8 (SD 3.5) mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure by 7.5 (3.8) mm Hg; and the US model by 2.6 (3.4) mm Hg for systolic pressure and 6.2 (3.7) mm Hg for diastolic pressure. There was better agreement between two observers using standard sphygmomanometers than between an observer using the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer and an observer using a standard sphygmomanometer. Thus, the quantitative aspects of blood pressure in epidemiological and intervention studies in which the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer was used need re-evaluation. Moreover, the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer, in its present design, should not be used in hypertension research.
 ...
PMID:Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. 167 64

The aim of the study was to assess the evolution of Alerting reaction (AR) under beta blocker treatment and to discuss its incidence on the management of arterial hypertension (AH). In 28 patients (pts), 19 men, 9 females, 46 +/- 12 years old, suffering from a mild to moderate AH, blood pressure (BP) was measured, according to a ritual circuit by a nurse (N), then a 12-minutes recorded monitoring, then a physician (Ph) using a mercury sphygmomanometer in upright, then in supine position at the end of the visit (165 +/- 18/108 +/- 13 mmHg, 161 +/- 14/100 +/- 9 mmHg). Pts received a cardioselective beta blocker, bisoprolol (B), 10 mg once daily and BP was evaluated after 1 and 2 months (D30; D60) under identical conditions. When compared to monitoring BP, there was a significant increase in systolic (S) and diastolic (D) BP, taken by the nurse and the physician, attributed to AR (delta SBP; delta DBP). Under B, AR remained unchanged, even increased regarding upright DBP at D30, D60 in spite of its efficacy: (formula; see text) The study demonstrates that there is no incidence of beta blocker on alerting reaction and that AR must be considered to evaluate the treatment and avoid an unnecessary or overtreatment. In case of discrepancies, it is suggested to perform an ambulatory BP monitoring.
 ...
PMID:[Outcome of "white coat reaction" induced by nurse and physician in patients with hypertension treated with a beta blockader (bisoprolol)]. 197 28


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>