Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

There is no controlled clinical trial on the treatment of de novo arterial hypertension after liver transplantation (LT) a common complication using calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) for immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker, and carvedilol, an alpha1- and beta-blocker. The study included 50 patients who developed arterial hypertension after LT. The data on the first 30 patients who have completed 12-month follow-up are reported herein. Eighteen patients received nifedipine, and 12 patients received carvedilol. Patients were evaluated monthly at the outpatient clinic for 1 year. If patients developed severe adverse effects to nifedipine, they were switched to carvedilol and vice versa (therapy failure). The two groups were similar for clinical features, indications for LT, immunosuppressive therapy, and baseline blood pressures. A failure of treatment was observed in 9 of 18 patients treated with nifedipine (50.0%) and one of 12 patients treated with carvedilol (8%, P < .025). Nifedipine was effective in 4 of 18 patients, carvedilol, in 4 of 12 patients (22.21% vs 33.3%, P = NS). Two of the nine nonresponders to nifedipine responded to carvedilol. The efficacy of monotherapy was observed in 11 of 40 randomized patients (27.5%). Carvedilol monotherapy is as effective as nifedipine but far better tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Comparison between nifedipine and carvedilol in the treatment of de novo arterial hypertension after liver transplantation: preliminary results of a controlled clinical trial. 1584 84

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important signaling molecules in the vasculature. However, when there is imbalance between their occurrence and antioxidant defense mechanisms, ROS can contribute to the vascular abnormalities that lead to hypertension. Evidence accumulated in the last decade strongly supports the notion that ROS are generated in the vasculature mainly by NAD(P)H oxidase in a mechanism that is angiotensin II-dependent. Activation of this enzyme leads to superoxide production and uncouples endothedial NO synthase (eNOS), which sustains oxidative stress while increasing the levels of tissue-damaging peroxynitrite. The latter can result in vascular dysfunction. NAD(P)H-dependent ROS formation, in particular H(2)O(2), could also contribute to vascular injury by sustaining NAD(P)H oxidase activation, promoting inflammatory gene expression, extracellular matrix reorganization, and growth (hypertrophy/hyperplasia) of vascular smooth muscle cells. The effect of ROS appears to be mediated by redox-sensitive targets such as tyrosine kinases and phosphatases, mitogen-activated protein kinases, transcription factors, matrix metalloproteinases, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha, poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1, Ca(2+) signaling mechanisms and secreted factors such as cyclophilin A and heat shock protein 90-alpha. Redox-sensitive targets appear to play a central role in normal vascular function, but can also lead to remodeling of the vascular wall, increasing vascular reactivity and hypertension. Polymorphisms in the p22phox gene promoter could determine susceptibility to NAD(P)H-mediated oxidative stress in humans and animals with hypertension. Although ROS are strongly implicated in the etiology of hypertension, clinical trials with antioxidants are inconclusive regarding their effectiveness in treating the disease. New drugs with both antihypertensive action and antioxidant properties (Celiprolol, Carvedilol) offer promising results in the management of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Oxidative-nitrosative stress in hypertension. 1602 20

Increases in the cardiovascular risk marker microalbuminuria are attenuated by blood pressure reduction using blockers of the renin-angiotensin system. Such changes in microalbuminuria have not been observed when beta-blockers are used. A prespecified secondary end point of the Glycemic Effects in Diabetes Mellitus Carvedilol-Metoprolol Comparison in Hypertensives (GEMINI) trial was to examine the effects of different beta-blockers on changes in albuminuria in the presence of renin-angiotensin system blockade. Participants with hypertension and type 2 diabetes were randomized to either metoprolol tartrate (n=737) or carvedilol (n=498) in blinded fashion after a washout period of all antihypertensive agents except for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Blinded medication was titrated to achieve target blood pressure, with a-5 month follow-up period. The current analysis examined microalbuminuria, using spot urine albumin:creatinine, in participants who had values at screening and trial end. A greater reduction in microalbuminuria was observed for those randomized to carvedilol (-16.2%Delta; 95% confidence interval, -25.3, -5.9; P=0.003). Of those with normoalbuminuria at baseline, fewer progressed to microalbuminuria on carvedilol versus metoprolol (20 of 302 [6.6%] versus 48 of 431 [11.1%], respectively; P=0.03). Microalbuminuria development was not related to differences in blood pressure or achievement of blood pressure goal (68% carvedilol versus 67%, metoprolol). Presence of metabolic syndrome at baseline was the only independent predictor of worsening albuminuria throughout the study (P=0.004). Beta-blockers have differential effects on microalbuminuria in the presence of renin-angiotensin system blockade. These differences cannot be explained by effects on blood pressure or alpha1-antagonism but may relate to antioxidant properties of carvedilol.
Hypertension 2005 Dec
PMID:Differential effects of beta-blockers on albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. 1628 77

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is associated with proliferation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in small pulmonary arteries. Inhibition of proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) may be an effective treatment of patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Recent studies have shown that carvedilol, an alpha- and beta-blocker with antioxidant and calcium channel blocking properties, inhibits the proliferation of cultured normal human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that carvedilol has antiproliferative effects on pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells of patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells from six idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients who had undergone lung transplantation were cultured. To determine cell proliferation, H-thymidine incorporation was measured. Platelet-derived growth factor-induced proliferation of IPAH-PASMCs was significantly greater than that of normal control pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. Carvedilol (0.1 microM to 10 microM) inhibited the proliferation of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension-pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Prazosin (an alpha-blocker) and N-acetyl L cysteine (an antioxidant agent) (0.1 microM to 10 microM) did not inhibit their proliferation, but the high concentration of propranolol (a beta-blocker) and nifedipine (a calcium channel blocker) (10 microM) inhibited the proliferation. The combination of propranolol and nifedipine inhibited the proliferation but only at a high concentration (10 microM) combination. Cell cycle analysis revealed that carvedilol (10 microM) significantly decreased the number of cells in S and G2/M phases. These results indicate that carvedilol inhibits the exaggerated proliferation of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells of patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension partially via its beta-blocking [corrected] and calcium channel blocking effects in vitro.
 ...
PMID:Carvedilol inhibits proliferation of cultured pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells of patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. 1649 63

Right ventricular hypertrophy induced by chronic hypoxia is mainly due to a mechanical stress upon the ventricular wall secondary to pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, the hypoxic chronic activation of the sympathetic nervous system can contribute to the development of right ventricular hypertrophy either via myocardial adrenergic receptors and/or a vasoconstriction and remodeling of pulmonary arteries. To highlight the specific role of the sympathetic nervous system on hypoxia-induced right ventricular hypertrophy and particularly the efficiency of carvedilol, our study compared physiological, myocardial, and pulmonary arterial morphometric data in rats treated by alpha-(prazosin), or beta-(propranolol) or alphabeta-(carvedilol) antagonist and exposed to chronic hypobaric hypoxia (2 weeks at 380 mmHg barometric pressure). In chronic hypoxia, both systolic right ventricular pressure and Fulton's ratio (right/(left+septum) ventricular weight) were lower in rats treated by prazosin (-16.7 and -13.6%), propranolol (-28.6 and -12.7%) and carvedilol (-15.9 and -14.3%) respectively when compared to glucose (p<0.05). Surprisingly, prazosin was unable to reduce right ventricular hypertrophy induced by chronic hypoxia, whereas, left ventricular weight increased. Wall thickness index of pulmonary arteries increased in chronic hypoxia and was reduced by carvedilol. In conclusion, the hypoxia-induced activation of the adrenergic system participates in the development of right ventricular hypertrophy. Carvedilol is effective in reducing hypoxia-induced right ventricular hypertrophy, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and muscularization of pulmonary arteries.
 ...
PMID:Carvedilol inhibits right ventricular hypertrophy induced by chronic hypobaric hypoxia. 1663 51

Although beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) have effects on metabolism via their mechanism as blockers of adrenergic stimulation, most interest in the metabolic effects of beta-blockers is caused by their effect on glucose metabolism. Strict metabolic control and management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes mellitus has proven to be of great importance in the improvement of prognosis. Beta-blockers are necessary tools for the treatment of heart failure and hypertension. The use of beta-blockers in patients with diabetes mellitus has been controversial because of fear of deterioration of metabolic control of glucose and lipids and blunting of the symptoms of hypoglycemia. Currently, it appears that there is a beneficial metabolic effect with the third-generation beta-blocker carvedilol. Comparisons have been made between the second-generation beta-blocker metoprolol and carvedilol, with a clear advantage for carvedilol in terms of metabolic control. In the GEMINI (Glycemic Effects in Diabetes Mellitus: Carvedilol-Metoprolol Comparison in Hypertensives) trial, a decrease of 9.1% (p = 0.004) in insulin resistance, compared with baseline values, was seen in patients treated with carvedilol, whereas no significant difference was seen in the group of patients treated with metoprolol. Additionally, an increase in glycosylated hemoglobin of 0.15% from baseline was seen in the metoprolol group (p < 0.001) compared with no significant change in the carvedilol group. These findings indicate that, as carvedilol exerts favorable effects on glucose metabolism compared with metoprolol, patients with diabetes mellitus could benefit from treatment with carvedilol rather than metoprolol. The mechanisms behind these findings are not yet fully understood. Several mechanisms have been suggested, and special interest has been paid to the investigation of the potential beneficial role of the beta2- and alpha1-adrenoceptor-blocking effects of carvedilol, along with its known antioxidant properties.
 ...
PMID:Metabolic effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with special emphasis on carvedilol. 1691 22

Carvedilol is indicated for the treatment of essential hypertension and mild-to-severe chronic heart failure, as well as the reduction of cardiovascular mortality in clinically stable post-myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Carvedilol is a racemic mixture of R(+) and S(-) enantiomers that combines beta(1)-, beta(2)-, and alpha(1)-adrenoceptor blockade. For all indications, the immediate-release (IR) formulation of carvedilol is taken twice daily. A controlled-release (CR) formulation of carvedilol that allows once-daily dosing has recently been developed. In this double-blind, parallel-group, crossover study, 122 patients with essential hypertension were randomly allocated to receive low and high doses of carvedilol or placebo. Patients received either a constant low dose (CR 20 mg once daily or IR 6.25 mg twice daily) or were titrated to a high dose (CR 80 mg once daily or IR 25 mg twice daily) before being crossed over to an equivalent dose of the alternative formulation. The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles were compared between patients receiving carvedilol CR and carvedilol IR. The PK profiles for R(+)- and S(-)-carvedilol for the 2 formulations were equivalent (based on area under the curve, maximum plasma concentration [C(max)], and trough drug concentration). Consistent with an extended-release formulation, carvedilol CR delayed C(max) by 3.5 hours compared with carvedilol IR. For both carvedilol CR and IR, the attenuation of exercise-induced heart rate in patients with hypertension was maintained over the entire 24-hour period, and the 2 formulations demonstrated equivalent beta(1)-blocking effects at trough (end of the dosing interval [PD(min)]), suggesting that the rate of absorption does not interfere with the PD effect. In this first direct comparison of carvedilol CR and IR in subjects with hypertension, fewer adverse events were reported while subjects were receiving carvedilol CR (59.1% overall) compared with carvedilol IR (77.5% overall). This was true regardless of dose received. Headache was the most commonly reported adverse event for subjects receiving either formulation of carvedilol and placebo. Importantly, dizziness and headache were reported less often when subjects received carvedilol CR. This is the first study to show that both formulations had comparable beta(1)-adrenergic blockade in patients with essential hypertension under steady-state conditions. Notably, carvedilol CR provides consistent beta(1)-adrenergic blockade over 24 hours with a once-daily dose.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of controlled-release carvedilol and immediate-release carvedilol at steady state in patients with hypertension. 1702 28

Carvedilol is a beta1-, beta2-, and alpha1-adrenergic blocker that is approved for the treatment of hypertension. A new once-daily, controlled-release (CR) formulation of carvedilol has been shown to be effective in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. In this article, we summarize the primary results of, and present additional analyses from, that trial. A total of 338 patients with essential hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >/=90 and </=109 mm Hg) were randomized to receive carvedilol CR 20, 40, or 80 mg or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary objective was to compare the effects of the 3 carvedilol CR doses with placebo on 24-hour mean blood pressure using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Mean DBP and systolic BP (SBP) at the drug trough (20-24 hour) blood levels for carvedilol CR and comparison of DBP and SBP at the drug peak (3-7 hour) blood levels for each dose of carvedilol CR and placebo were investigated. The effects of carvedilol CR on heart rate and pulse pressure were also examined. Once-daily administration of carvedilol CR, alone or in combination with other agents, produced clinically and statistically significant reductions compared with placebo for both DBP and SBP after 6 weeks of treatment for the following parameters: trough blood pressure by office cuff or ABPM measurements, peak blood pressure by ABPM, and 24-hour mean blood pressure by ABPM. Placebo-corrected trough-to-peak ratios for DBP were >0.6 for each carvedilol CR dose. Heart rate and pulse pressure were each significantly reduced compared with placebo for each carvedilol CR dose. We conclude that carvedilol CR is a very effective antihypertensive agent with clear dose-related peak blood pressure reduction and continuous 24-hour control.
 ...
PMID:Controlled-release carvedilol in the treatment of essential hypertension. 1702 30

Carvedilol's adrenergic antagonism does not fully explain its therapeutic actions. We therefore tested the hypothesis that its action is associated with an increase in NO synthesis. Wistar rats (male, 9 weeks, n = 10) anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital were used. Arterial NO concentration ([NO]), determined by chemiluminescence, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored throughout the experiment. In protocol 1), the effects of carvedilol (1 mg/kg, iv) were studied over a eriod of 90 min. In protocol 2), carvedilol was p administered, followed by the NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NAME (5 mg/kg, iv) and by a second carvedilol administration. In protocol 1), carvedilol induced a significant fall in MAP (from 125,0 +/- 4,5 mmHg to 78.2 +/- 2.6 mmHg; p <0.001), reaching a minimum at t = 11.7 +/- 2.1 min and recovering 60 min afterwards (105.7 +/- 5.9 mmHg). Plasma [NO] varied in response to carvedilol in inverse proportion to MAP: baseline, 19.8 +/- 0.9 microM; t = 11.7 +/- 2.1 min, 32,3 +/- 2,3 microM; t = 60 min, 17.3 +/- 1.9 microM. In protocol 2), L-NAME administration blocked the effects of carvedilol (L-NAME: MAP, 129.9 +/- 5.0 mmHg; [NO], 13,1 +/- 2,3 microM. Post-L-NAME carvedilol administration resulted in MAP of 108.3 +/- 8.0 mmHg, NS, and [NO], 21.3 +/- 1.3 microM, NS. These results suggest that carvedilol increases plasma [NO], which is associated with a fall in MAP. Furthermore, carvedilol's hemodynamic action was blocked by NOS inhibition, suggesting that it depends on endogenous NO production, thus possibly explaining carvedilol's effects in hypertension and in cardiac failure.
 ...
PMID:Carvedilol's actions are largely mediated by endogenous nitric oxide. 1719 Feb 40

Oxidative and inflammatory stresses are cardinal in the pathogenesis of hypertension and atherosclerosis. Oxidative stress also leads to the induction of inflammation through the activation of proinflammatory transcription factors. Understanding the mechanisms leading to oxidative stress and the means of suppressing it are important in controlling complications related to atherogenesis, since oxidative and inflammatory stress are important in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The failure of chemical antioxidants [which scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS)], such as vitamins E and C, has led to further exploration of the ROS-suppressive effects of drugs used in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Carvedilol has been shown to possess both ROS-scavenging and ROS-suppressive effects, and its use is associated with a reduction in oxidative stress. Furthermore, anti-inflammatory effects of carvedilol have now been described. Although further clinical investigations are required, these properties may contribute to the improvement in clinical outcomes observed with carvedilol.
 ...
PMID:Antioxidant activity of carvedilol in cardiovascular disease. 1735 62


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>