Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and disability in the United States and in most industrialized nations. Major breakthroughs to modern day cardiovascular/lipid research have been attributed to the findings of the Framingham Heart Study and Gofman and colleagues who made associations between lipoprotein levels (LDL, VLDL and HDL) and CVD. Unfortunately, half of all CVD patients have none of the established coronary risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, obesity) and new strategies for identifying patients need be considered. Although there remains little disagreement regarding the necessity to lower elevated plasma cholesterol levels, there remains much controversy regarding appropriate dietary means of accomplish this goal. The National Cholesterol Education Program (1993) proposed a dietary reduction (Step I and Step II diets) to the percent saturated fat and cholesterol consumed by at-risk patients. Many currently question about the effectiveness of these diets and an alternative diet, replacing saturated fats by monounsaturated fats (olive oil), has attracted recent attention. While diet modification is considered the foundation of primary treatment, other interventions are frequently required. Although early drug trials demonstrated that agents such as nicotinic acid, clofibrate, gemfibrozil, bile acid-binding resins generally slowed progression of atherosclerotic lesions, lowered plasma cholesterol levels and decreased mortality from CVD, the greatest advance to current drug therapy involved the discovery of the "statins" (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors). In the current work, mechanisms for vascular dysfunction resulting in myocardial ischemia were explored and potential nutritional (dietary) and pharmacologic interventions were reviewed.
 ...
PMID:Cardiovascular disease: a historic perspective. 1123 77

Compelling evidence from meta-analysis of a number of clinical studies on a large aggregate of patients has established an increased level of triglycerides as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic heart disease. The finding of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in human atheromata has provided substantial pathophysiologic evidence for a direct role in atherogenesis. Hypertriglyceridemia is commonly embedded in the context of a metabolic syndrome that includes central obesity, insulin resistance, low levels of HDL cholesterol, and often hypertension. Hypertriglyceridemia also appears to underlie the phenomenon of small dense LDL in most instances. Therapeutic interventions must be directed at underlying obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes when present, as well as addressing metabolic determinants of dyslipidemia per se. Diet, exercise, weight loss, and avoidance of alcohol are the cornerstones of treatment. The choice of medication should be based on the lipoprotein phenotype. Niacin, fibric acid derivatives, and omega-3 fatty acids are most useful in treating severe hypertriglyceridemia. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are useful in some phenotypes with moderately increased triglyceride levels. Evidence from a number of clinical trials indicates that mitigation of risk of coronary heart disease, and possibly stroke, can be effected by reducing levels of plasma triglycerides.
 ...
PMID:A risk factor for atherosclerosis: triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. 1179 72

The complexity of medical care has led to a dramatic increase in the number of drugs taken by patients. In an effort to improve patient compliance and the effectiveness of clinical care, many drugs are being studied for combination in a single capsule or tablet. The recent success of many combination drugs for hypertension has accelerated the interest in combination drugs for lipids and atherosclerosis. Advicor (Kos Pharmaceuticals, Miami, FL), a combination of nicotinic acid and a statin (mevacor), is the first combination lipid drug. Recently, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved the combination of another statin, pravachol, with aspirin. Therefore, combination drugs are likely to be a significant contribution to clinical practice and drug development.
 ...
PMID:The development of combination drugs for atherosclerosis. 1256 39

Combined hyperlipidemia is increasing in frequency and is the most common lipid disorder associated with obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. It is associated with other features of the metabolic syndrome including hypertension, hyperuricemia, hyperinsulinemia and highly atherogenic subfractions of lipoprotein remnant particles including small dense low density lipoprotein-cholesterol. This review examines the mechanisms by which combined hyperlipidemia arises and the various drugs including fibric acid derivatives, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, and nicotinic acid which can be used either as monotherapy or in combination to manage it and to improve prognosis from atherosclerotic disease in diabetes mellitus, insulin resistant states and primary combined hyperlipidemia. The therapeutic approach to combined hyperlipidemia involves determination of whether the cause is hepatocyte damage or metabolic derangements. Combined hyperlipidemia due to hepatocyte damage should be treated by attention to the primary cause. In the case of metabolic dysfunction because of imbalance in glucose and fat metabolism, therapy of diabetes mellitus and obesity should be optimised prior to commencement of lipid lowering drugs. Both fibric acid derivatives and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors can be used in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia with fibric acid derivatives having greater effects on triglycerides and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on LDL-C though both have effects on the other cardiovascular risk factors. There is some evidence of benefit with both interventions in mild combined hyperlipidemias and large scale trials are underway. Fibric acid derivatives and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy can be combined with care, provided that gemfibrozil is avoided, fibric acid derivatives are given in the mornings and shorter half -life HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are used at night. Combined hyperlipidemia emergencies occur with predominant hypertriglyceridemia in pregnancy or as a cause of pancreatitis. Therapy in the former should aim to reduce chylomicron production by a low fat diet and intervention to suppress VLDL-C secretion using omega-3 fatty acids. In the latter case, fluid therapy alone and medium chain plasma triglyceride infusions usually reduce levels satisfactorily though apheresis may be required. Blood glucose levels also need aggressive management in these conditions. Combined hyperlipidemia is likely to become an increasing problem with the increase in the prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus and needs aggressive management to reduce cardiovascular risk.
 ...
PMID:Drug treatment of combined hyperlipidemia. 1472 15

The past 20 years have seen considerable advances in the field of organ transplantation that have together led to a notable increase in survival rates and a reduction in postoperative morbidity of transplant recipients. However, these advances have been accompanied by the appearance of other complications of transplantation, such as post-transplant hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and graft coronary vasculopathy (GCV). GCV is an accelerated form of atherosclerosis in transplanted hearts that has proven to be one of the most important late complications of heart transplantation and is the single most limiting factor for long-term survival. The most important factors favouring the development of hyperlipidaemia after heart transplantation are inappropriate diet in combination with reduced physical activity, adverse effects of immunosuppressive therapy (ciclosporin [cyclosporin], corticosteroids) and polygenic hypercholesterolaemia in combination with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. The treatment of hyperlipidaemia in heart transplant recipients results in a variety of complications and side effects. In particular, interactions between lipid-lowering drugs and immunosuppressive therapy have been observed. Early attempts at treatment with bile acid binding agents and nicotinic acid derivatives often proved insufficiently effective, and led to unacceptable adverse effects and significant disturbances of ciclosporin metabolism. Fibric acid derivatives provided moderate reductions in triglyceride and total cholesterol levels that were mostly--with the exception of gemfibrozil--accompanied by significant impairment of renal function. Probucol achieved only an unsatisfactory reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Omega-3 fatty acids lower cholesterol levels and improve endothelial function in heart transplant recipients; however, the significance of these effects is still under discussion. As in the general patient population, use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) achieved significant reductions in cholesterol levels. Use of these substances has resulted in significantly extended long-term survival times, significantly less GCV and fewer severe graft rejections. Selective cholesterol absorption inhibitors, administered with or without statins, could provide another treatment option for heart transplant patients with hypercholesterolaemia. In severe familial hypercholesterolaemia, which is rarely observed in heart transplant recipients, treatment with statins can be combined with extracorporeal cholesterol elimination procedures such as heparin induced extracorporeal LDL cholesterol precipitation (HELP). HELP enables total cholesterol levels to be kept within any desired target range, and has been used successfully and without adverse effects in heart transplant recipients.
 ...
PMID:Management of hyperlipidaemia associated with heart transplantation. 1513 86

Despite their inherited nature, familial dyslipidemias show large intra- and interfamilial variability in phenotypic expression, clinical presentations, and levels of abnormalities of serum lipid fractions. Once diagnosed, patients shall be considered at high cardiovascular risk and treated as per secondary prevention National Cholesterol Education Program III guidelines. Comorbidity treatments (ie, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension) are imperative. Lifestyle interventions shall soon be concomitantly followed by lipid-regulating drugs. The major aspects of the above interventions are the following: 1) therapeutic lifestyle change: regular aerobic exercises, conventional low-fat, low-cholesterol, low refined but high complex carbohydrates diet, avoidance of unproven fad diets (ie, Atkins); 2) plant stanols and sterol esters, 3) high-potency statins (eg, rosuvastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin); 4) addition of nicotinic acid, bile acid binders, fibrates, or ezetimibe pending on the lipid fraction affected; 5) statins are the starting drug of choice with these exceptions: in isolated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, niacin or fibrates may be preferable; in isolated severe hypertriglyceridemic conditions, fibrates or fish oil may be preferable; in children with isolated elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, ezetimibe or bile acid binders may be preferable; when serum lipoprotein (a) elevation is the most notable abnormality, niacin may be chosen as the initial drug for its unique effect on this fraction. Plasmapheresis, intestinal shunts, or liver transplantation are to be considered in that order as last resorts if the above fails to accomplish serum lipid level goals.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Other Genetic Dyslipidemias. 1521 22

Patients with diabetes mellitus have a higher risk for cardiovascular heart disease (CHD) than does the general population, and once they develop CHD, mortality is higher. Good glycemic control will reduce CHD only modestly in patients with diabetes. Therefore, reduction in all cardiovascular risks such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking is warranted. The focus of this article is on therapy for dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients with the metabolic syndrome (insulin resistance) share similarities with patients with type 2 diabetes and may have a comparable cardiovascular risk profile. Diabetic patients tend to have higher triglyceride, lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and similar low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) levels compared with those levels in nondiabetic patients. However, diabetic patients tend to have a higher concentration of small dense LDL particles, which are associated with higher CHD risk. Current recommendations are for an LDL goal of less than 100 mg/dl (an option of < 70 mg/dl in very high-risk patients), an HDL goal greater than 40 mg/dl for men and greater than 50 mg/dl for women, and a triglyceride goal less than 150 mg/dl. Nonpharmacologic interventions (diet and exercise) are first-line therapies and are used with pharmacologic therapy when necessary. Lowering LDL levels is the first priority in treating diabetic dyslipidemia. Statins are the first drug choice, followed by resins or ezetimibe, then fenofibrate or niacin. If a single agent is inadequate to achieve lipid goals, combinations of the preceding Drugs may be used. For elevated triglyceride levels, hyperglycemia must be controlled first. If triglyceride or HDL levels remain uncontrolled, pharmacologic agents should be considered. Fibrates are slightly more effective than niacin in lowering triglyceride levels, but niacin increases HDL levels appreciably more than do fibrates. Unlike gemfibrozil, niacin selectively increases subfraction Lp A-I, a cardioprotective HDL. Niacin is distinct in that it has a broad spectrum of beneficial effects on lipids and atherogenic lipoprotein subfraction levels. Niacin produces additive results when used in combination therapy. Recent data suggest that lower dosages and newer formulations of niacin can be used safely in diabetic patients with good glycemic control. Current evidence and guidelines mandate that diabetic dyslipidemia be treated aggressively, and lipid goals can be achieved in most patients with diabetes when all available products are considered and, if necessary, used in combination.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetic dyslipidemia. 1558 39

Use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is associated with the development of cardiovascular risk factors, including dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, fat redistribution, and hypertension. The results of the Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti-HIV Drugs study showed that HAART therapy is associated with a 26% relative risk increase in the rate of myocardial infarction per year of HAART exposure. A number of studies have shown that insulin resistance often precedes lipodystrophy, suggesting that insulin resistance may be a primary feature of the metabolic syndrome in this population. The rate-limiting step in the uptake of glucose is glucose transport, and the predominant glucose transporter (GLUT) in muscle and fat is GLUT-4. Specific protease inhibitors (PIs) have been associated with decreased GLUT-4-mediated glucose transport and insulin resistance both in vitro and in vivo, whereas newer protease inhibitors may have fewer effects on insulin sensitivity. Data also suggest that endothelial dysfunction, impaired fibrinolysis, and excess inflammation may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk in the population infected with HIV. Moreover, recent data suggest that evidence for coronary atherosclerotic disease can be revealed by means of carotid intimal medial thickness (IMT) assessments in specific groups of HIV patients. Pharmacologic strategies for the prevention and/or treatment of HAART-induced dyslipidemia and abnormal glucose homeostasis include 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), resins, nicotinic acid, fibrates, and insulin-sensitizing agents. However, newer PIs such as atazanavir may result in less insulin resistance and dyslipidemia and, as part of a HAART regimen, use of atazanavir may reduce the metabolic complications associated with HAART.
 ...
PMID:Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease in patients with human immunodeficiency virus. 1590 92

The metabolic syndrome is defined as a condition characterized by a set of clinical criteria: insulin resistance, visceral obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and hypertension. The major risk factors leading to the epidemic of this syndrome in the United States are visceral obesity, physical inactivity, and an atherogenic diet. The available current evidence suggests that the first step in management of patients with metabolic syndrome should be focused on lifestyle modifications (eg, weight loss and physical activity). The treatment should be based on two major components: behavioral change to reduce caloric intake and an increase in physical activity. A realistic goal for weight reduction should be 7% to 10% over 6 to 12 months. The general dietary recommendations include low intake of saturated fats, trans fats and cholesterol, and diets with low glycemic index. Soy protein could be more beneficial than animal protein in weight reduction and correction of dyslipidemia. Physical activity is associated with successful weight reduction and these therapeutic lifestyle changes can reduce by half the progression to new-onset diabetes in patients with metabolic syndrome. Physical activity recommendations should include practical, regular, and moderated regimens of exercise, with a daily minimum of 30 to 60 minutes. An equal balance between aerobic exercise and strength training is advised. Medication therapy is a critical step in the management of patients with metabolic syndrome when lifestyle modifications fail to achieve the therapeutic goals. There is no single best therapy and the treatment should consist of treatment of individual component(s). Atherogenic dyslipidemia should be controlled with statins if there is concomitant increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and if indicated with combination therapy, including fibrates, nicotinic acid, bile acid-binding resins, or ezetimibe. Drugs such as thiazolidinediones and renin-angiotensin system blockers are a few of the available agents in this category. Some evidence suggests that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and b blockers are more beneficial for treatment of hypertension in patients with metabolic syndrome. Patients with metabolic syndrome also have elevations in fibrinogen and other coagulation factors leading to prothrombotic state and aspirin may be beneficial for primary prevention in these patients. The new developments in the treatment of metabolic syndrome with drugs, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, will broaden the horizons of the current treatment options in metabolic syndrome.
 ...
PMID:Current Treatment Options for the Metabolic Syndrome. 1591 5

The causes of the excess coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in South Asian migrants from the Indian subcontinent remain unclear. Comparisons of CHD risk factors amongst South Asian migrants living in Britain with those of the general UK population provide only a partial explanation. We compared Gujaratis in Britain with similar, non-migrant Gujaratis in India, to test the hypothesis that differences in CHD risk factors associated with migration would be more informative. Randomly sampled Gujaratis aged 25-79 years living in Sandwell (n = 242) were compared with age-, gender- and caste-matched contemporaries remaining in their villages of origin in Navsari, India (n = 295). Lifestyle indices, food intake and physical activity, were assessed with standardised questionnaires and energy expenditure and metabolic parameters measured. British Gujaratis had higher, mean body mass indices by 6 (4.5-7.4) kg/m(2) mean (95% CI), and greater dietary energy intake, fat intake, blood pressure, fasting serum cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) and C-reative protein concentrations than Gujaratis in India. Dietary folate and serum folate and Vitamin B(12) were lower and plasma homocysteine was higher in India. Smoking was less prevalent and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol tended to be higher in Britain. Diabetes prevalence was high in both populations and impaired fasting or 2 h post-glucose challenge plasma glucose was even more prevalent in Gujarat. In India, however, where insulin secretion and NEFA were lower diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance were less frequently accompanied by excess metabolic CVD risk factors. In conclusion, exposure to increased fat intake and obesity related to migration is likely to explain the disproportionate combination of established and emerging CHD risk factors prevalent in Gujaratis in Britain. Strategies to improve nutrition and to identify and treat cardiovascular risk factors such as dyslipidaemia and hypertension are urgently required.
 ...
PMID:Impact of migration on coronary heart disease risk factors: comparison of Gujaratis in Britain and their contemporaries in villages of origin in India. 1600 63


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>