Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Hypertension and cerebral hyperperfusion are often seen in the immediate postoperative period after craniotomy for supratentorial tumours. Metoprolol is known to attenuate the postoperative hypertensive response after hypotensive anaesthesia and this study was carried out to evaluate the effect of metoprolol on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) before extubation and cerebral arteriovenous oxygen content difference (AVDO2), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), PaO2 and PaCO2 in a 180-min period after extubation. Twenty patients anaesthetized with thiopentone, fentanyl, nitrous oxide 67%, and halothane 0.5% were randomized to receive intravenous metoprolol or placebo at the end of the peroperative period. There were no significant differences in CBF- and CMRO2 values between the two groups. In the period between closure of the dura and 5 min after extubation, an increase in MABP was observed in the control group (P < 0.05), but not in the metoprolol group. During the same period a decrease in AVDO2 was observed in both groups (P < 0.05); during the next 10 min an increase was observed, but with no difference in AVDO2 values between the groups. A higher level of PaO2 in the metoprolol group was observed in the postoperative period. These findings suggest that peroperative treatment with metoprolol reduces postoperative MABP but does not influence the cerebral blood flow and metabolism.
 ...
PMID:The effect of metoprolol upon blood pressure, cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in patients subjected to craniotomy for cerebral tumours. 860 26

The effects of isradipine and metoprolol were studied on the brachial arteries of two groups of 14 patients with hypertension, 90 minutes after the first dose and after 3 months of treatment. Diameter (pulsed Doppler) and compliance (pulse-wave velocity) were measured and calculated in isobaric conditions by way of a model that allowed discrimination of the active intrinsic drug action. Isradipine increased measured and isobaric diameter during short-term (p < 0.05) and long-term administration (p < 0.05), whereas metoprolol did not change it. Active diameter effects were different between drugs during short-term administration (p < 0.05). Isaradipine increased measured and isobaric compliance during short-term (p < 0.05) and long-term administration (p < 0.05). Short-term administration of metoprolol decreased measured compliance (p < 0.01). Metoprolol decreased isobaric compliance during short-term (p < 0.01) and long-term (p < 0.05) administration. Active compliance effects were different between drugs during short- and long-term administration (p < 0.01). These arterial intrinsic drug effects, independent of the pressure-lowering influence, suggested different mechanisms, consisting of a large artery smooth muscle relaxation for isradipine and an isometric arterial constriction for metoprolol.
 ...
PMID:Intrinsic effect of antihypertensive treatment with isradipine and metoprolol on large artery geometric and elastic properties. 833 Apr 68

This was a double-blind, within-patient, crossover study to evaluate the effects of a new formulation of metoprolol on blood pressure (BP) and myocardial ischemia. Twenty outpatients with mild to moderate essential arterial hypertension, chronic stable angina pectoris and positive exercise test, after a 2-week baseline placebo period, were randomized to receive long-acting metoprolol (OROS) 14/190 mg o.d., nifedipine SR 20 mg b.i.d. or their combination in a sequence of a 3 x 3 Latin square design. Two patients withdrew from the study (1 for adverse event during metoprolol and 1 for rise of BP during nifedipine). Nifedipine, metoprolol and their combination significantly reduced the weekly number of angina attacks and nitroglycerin consumption with respect to baseline. The total number of ischemic events (at 24-hour ECG monitoring) significantly decreased after each treatment with respect to baseline. Twenty-four hours mean systolic and diastolic BP were reduced by both nifedipine alone and metoprolol alone; the combination of the two drugs led to a further decrease in both systolic and diastolic BP. The duration of silent ischemic episodes was significantly reduced by nifedipine and combination but not by metoprolol. On the other hand 24 hours symptomatic attacks/patient were significantly reduced by beta-blocker and combination, but not by nifedipine. Metoprolol alone and administered with nifedipine caused a decrease, with respect to placebo baseline, in 24-hour mean heart rate (HR) and reduced the increase of HR and systolic BP at the onset of ST depression during symptomatic ischemic episodes. The effort time and time to ST = -1 mm at treadmill were significantly increased by treatment with nifedipine alone, with metoprolol alone and with their combination, but the combination was more effective than the individual therapies. ST depression at peak exercise was significantly reduced by each treatment. The slopes of correlations between the ST-segment variation and systolic BP, HR and rate-pressure product during exercise, significantly decreased after all treatments with respect to placebo baseline, more with the combination therapy than with nifedipine alone and metoprolol alone. In conclusion, based on our results the favourable interaction of metoprolol OROS and nifedipine given concomitantly, is likely to be due to a better control, respect to each individual therapy, of the pathogenetic mechanism of myocardia ischemia: BP and HR increases during exercise and during symptomatic ischemic episodes are controlled by the beta-blocker and coronary vasoconstriction during silent ischemia is prevented by the calcium-antagonist.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of hypertension associated with stable angina pectoris: favourable interaction between new metoprolol formulation (OROS) and nifedipine. 883 Nov 81

Metoprolol and carvedilol are widely used in the treatment of hypertension, but no randomized comparison of their hemodynamic activity has been previously reported. Their comparative effects on heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and echocardiographically determined aortic and femoral artery blood flow were measured at rest and at 2 and 24 hours after the first dose of each drug, and again after 4 weeks of sustained monotherapy in 12 male and 12 female patients, aged 36-68 years with uncomplicated sustained hypertension according to a randomized single-blind protocol. Nine patients in each drug group achieved the target diastolic blood pressure of < 90 mmHg on the initial doses of each drug; this was achieved in the remainder following doubling of each dose. Neither drug occasioned withdrawal of any patient due to adverse reactions. Both drugs significantly reduced heart rate, although the reduction at 2 hours was significantly greater after metoprolol than after carvedilol. Both drugs reduced systolic pressure throughout the study; the reduction at 2 hours was significantly greater after carvedilol than after metoprolol. In contrast, the diastolic blood pressure was persistently reduced only by carvedilol. The cardiac output, determined as the aortic systolic blood flow, after carvedilol was not significantly different from pretreatment values throughout the study but was significantly reduced in the metoprolol-treated patients at each point of measurement. After metoprolol the systemic and femoral vascular resistances derived from conventional formulae were consistently and significantly increased over pretreatment values throughout the study and were significantly greater than in the carvedilol group at all measurement points. The hemodynamic differences between these two beta-blocking drugs may be explained by the additional vasodilator activity of carvedilol associated with its alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocking activity. The long-term clinical and prognostic implications of these pharmacodynamic differences between beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with and without additional vasodilator activity in the treatment of hypertensive patients remain to be determined.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of metoprolol and carvedilol in hypertensive patients. 884 2

Optimization of antihypertensive drug therapy continues to be a clinical challenge in patients with diabetes mellitus and its complications. We assessed the interference of autonomic neuropathy with drug effects on heart rate variability in 13 hypertensive diabetic subjects (mean age 48.4 years) during treatment with two blood pressure lowering drugs, metoprolol and enalapril. The baseline findings were compared with those obtained in 24 diabetic subjects without hypertension (mean age 32.5 years) and in 24 non-diabetic hypertensive patients (mean age 47.6 years). Cardiovagal autonomic neuropathy was present in 10/13 (77%) of the hypertensive diabetic group, 14/24 (58%) the non-hypertensive diabetic group and 17/24 (71%) the non-diabetic hypertensive group. Heart rate variation was studied by power spectral analysis using total variability and three different frequency bands (low-frequency 0.025-0.075 Hz, mid-frequency 0.075-0.15 Hz and high-frequency 0.15-0.40 Hz). At baseline, the two hypertensive groups showed significantly smaller mid- and high-frequency heart rate variability compared with the diabetes only group. Age and the presence of cardiovagal autonomic neuropathy were important determinants of variability. Both metoprolol and enalapril reduced blood pressure comparably in hypertensive diabetics while metoprolol also reduced heart rate. Metoprolol decreased heart rate variability at the low-frequency and mid-frequency bands even after correction for the change in heart rate. Heart rate variability was not significantly altered by enalapril. In subjects with hypertension, diabetes and autonomic neuropathy, metoprolol almost abolished all heart rate variability. Therefore, an ACE inhibitor is a more neutral treatment alternative in such patients from the point of view of autonomic cardiac control.
 ...
PMID:Antihypertensive treatment and heart rate variability in diabetic patients: role of cardiac autonomic neuropathy. 888 97

In 102 cases of severe hypertension (DBP > or = 115 mm Hg), with or without acute complications, efficacy and safety of SL Nifedipine 10 mg (NIF), SL Captopril 25 mg (CAP), IV Metoprolol 15 mg (MET) and SL NIF + IV MET were studied in an inpatient trial. Maximum mean percent reduction in SBP was 13.3, 9.7, 15.7 and 19.9 and in DBP was 21.2, 13.9, 12.5 and 20.4 with NIF, CAP, MET and NIF + MET respectively. A safe DBP of < or = 110 mm Hg (Kaplan) was achieved in 90, 61, 72.2 and 95.2 percent of patients. A statistically significant fall in DBP was observed at 5 minutes with all regimens except CAP which was at 15 minutes. Mild side effects observed were palpitations and flushing (NIF n = 4), taste disturbances (CAP n = 3), heaviness of head (CAP n = 1) and giddiness (MET n = 2, NIF + MET n = 2). The trial data suggest that hypertensive crisis can be managed, without intensive care facility, with all four regimens; this implies significant cost containment.
 ...
PMID:Nifedipine, captopril, metoprolol and nifedipine with metoprolol in hypertensive crisis in non-intensive care setting. 928 10

It was first reported by our group in 1975 that heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) could be improved by long term treatment with a beta-blocker, starting at a low dose and continuing with a stepwise up-titration. Since then, many studies have been performed in patients with heart failure of various aetiologies and the beneficial effects of long term beta-blockade have been confirmed. About 3000 patients have been included in randomised studies in which beta-blockade, given for more than 2 months, mostly elicited significant improvements in functional class, exercise capacity, cardiac function, quality of life and/or morbidity. When started at a very low dose (one-tenth to one-twentieth of the doses generally used in angina or hypertension), the treatment is well tolerated in most patients. In these studies, various types of beta-blockers were used, including beta1-selective blockers and nonselective blockers with additional properties (vasodilator and antioxidative) such as metoprolol, bisoprolol, bucindolol and carvedilol. Several large studies have also reported benefits on mortality and morbidity. In the Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy (MDC) trial, metoprolol treatment in patients with IDC resulted in a 34% reduction of the primary combined endpoint, total number of deaths and need for cardiac transplantation. In the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS), in patients with idiopathic as well as ischaemic cardiomyopathy, there was a nonsignificant 20% reduction in mortality. In the US carvedilol studies (n = 1094), also in patients with ischaemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathy, carvedilol reduced mortality by 65%, which was highly significant. A nonsignificant reduction in mortality was observed in the Australia-New Zealand (ANZ) Heart Failure Study with carvedilol. In all these studies there was a reduction in hospitalisations, with all drugs being generally well tolerated. It can thus be concluded that the beneficial effects of beta-blockers on cardiac function and morbidity have been documented in a large number of studies in selected groups of patients. The treatment has been accepted in some countries by the regulatory authorities. Larger, placebo-controlled studies are needed to convincingly demonstrate a reduction in total mortality as observed in the pooling of the 4 US carvedilol studies. Such studies are in progress for various beta-blockers, which may lead to acceptance of their routine clinical use in patients with congestive heart failure.
 ...
PMID:The role of beta-blockers in left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. 933 58

Beta-adrenergic receptor-blocking agents are commonly used for treatment of hypertension, angina pectoris and arrhythmias and as secondary prevention after myocardial infarction. The modest protection against myocardial infarction conferred by these compounds in primary-preventive studies has suggested that beneficial effects of beta-blockade are counteracted by known adverse influences on lipid and glucose metabolism. As most beta-blockers increase plasma triglycerides and decrease the high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration, a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study was conducted to evaluate whether a 12-week treatment with metoprolol (100 mg o.d.) or placebo affected the metabolism of postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in 15 middle-aged men with a modestly increased cardiovascular risk. Metoprolol treatment significantly increased the postprandial responses of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and VLDL remnants to a mixed meal-type of oral fat tolerance test. The effect was particularly prominent for larger (Svedberg flotation rate (Sf) > 400 and Sf 60-400) particle species (P < 0.001 in repeated measures ANOVA), whereas the smaller (Sf 20-60) particles were less affected (P < 0.05). The changes in the postprandial responses of the different VLDL species were mainly related to an effect on the fasting plasma concentrations, with limited or no influences on VLDL catabolism during the postprandial state. In contrast, metoprolol treatment did not significantly influence the postprandial responses of chylomicrons and chylomicron remnants. Notably, the enhanced fasting and postprandial triglyceridaemia during metoprolol treatment was neither accompanied by a rise in fasting or postprandial free fatty acid concentrations, nor by alterations of the glucose and insulin responses to a standard oral glucose challenge. The ensuing shift in the LDL particle size distribution towards smaller particles was limited (fraction small LDL: metoprolol 22.8 +/- 15.7% versus placebo 19.3 +/- 15.0%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, metoprolol treatment primarily enhances fasting and postprandial triglyceridaemia in middle-aged men by increasing the basal hepatic production of VLDL.
 ...
PMID:Effects of a cardioselective beta-blocker on postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, low density lipoprotein particle size and glucose-insulin homeostasis in middle-aged men with modestly increased cardiovascular risk. 962 82

The aim of the present analysis was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of metoprolol versus thiazide diuretics in middle-aged men with mild to moderate uncomplicated hypertension. The analysis was based on the Metoprolol Atherosclerosis Prevention in Hypertensives (MAPHY) study, a randomised trial which showed a significantly lower risk for coronary events in patients taking metoprolol than in patients on thiazide diuretics. The main analysis was based on Swedish costs, but the costs were also varied in a special sensitivity analysis. Metoprolol was shown to be cost-saving compared with thiazide diuretics when both direct and indirect costs of morbidity were included. When only direct costs were included, the cost per life-year gained was $US2400. The result of the present analysis suggests that metoprolol is to be preferred to thiazide diuretics from a cost-effectiveness standpoint in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension in middle-aged men. These findings regarding cost-effectiveness should, however, not be extrapolated to patient groups not included in the MAPHY trial.
 ...
PMID:Cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment: metoprolol versus thiazide diuretics. 1014 86

Metoprolol is a beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist that is widely used in several indications. A recent investigation has also highlighted a potential role for metoprolol in selected patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life data for metoprolol are limited to the areas of hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. In these settings, metoprolol has shown beneficial effects on morbidity and mortality, or closely-related end-points. Controlled release formulations offer the potential to maximise the confirmed antihypertensive benefits of metoprolol by maintaining clinically effective plasma drug concentrations within a narrow range over a 24-hour interval between doses. Recent data support the use of controlled release metoprolol at the low dose of 50 mg/day. Metoprolol is at least as effective as many other antihypertensive drugs, although compared with thiazide diuretics at relatively high doses in the MAPHY (Metoprolol Atherosclerosis Prevention in Hypertensives) trial, metoprolol was associated with a more favourable effect on mortality. Pharmacoeconomic analysis, also based on the MAPHY trial, indicates that metoprolol is more cost effective than high dose thiazide diuretics in middle-aged men with mild to moderate hypertension. However, the advantage for beta-blockade in this trial is not supported by results of other studies, and the applicability of these data to current medical practice using lower thiazide doses is therefore questionable. Quality of life in patients with mild to moderate hypertension did not deteriorate in most investigations with metoprolol. Furthermore, quality of life was similar for controlled release metoprolol and atenolol. With conventional/matrix-based sustained release metoprolol, quality of life was less satisfactory than with lisinopril but was only marginally different from that with diltiazem (at lower than usual therapeutic doses). Nevertheless, these newer agents have no proven beneficial effect on mortality, and further studies are also warranted with controlled release metoprolol 50 mg/day. When administered post-myocardial infarction, conventional metoprolol was associated with significant improvements in quality of life and was cost saving over a 3-year period. Significant improvements in quality of life were also evident for metoprolol-treated patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. In summary, available data support the continued extensive usage of metoprolol as treatment for hypertension and as therapy post-myocardial infarction. Pharmacoeconomic data supporting an advantage for metoprolol over high dose thiazides in hypertension needs further assessment in settings reflecting usual general practice approaches to managing patients with hypertension, while differences in quality of life between metoprolol and other antihypertensive agents appear to be marginal.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy. 1014 74


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>