Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Treatment of hypertension with diuretics, beta blockers and alpha blockers may be associated with adverse effects on exercise performance, serum lipids and blood chemistries, as well as with orthostatic effects and fluid retention. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a sustained-release preparation of diltiazem as sole therapy for moderate essential hypertension was conducted. Diltiazem was administered 2 times a day (360 mg/day) to 16 patients and placebo to 14 patients in a 12-week study. Average supine blood pressure with diltiazem therapy fell from 161/100 to 144/87 mm Hg without fluid retention or orthostatic effects. In an open-label study, patients from the placebo and diltiazem groups continued with diltiazem therapy. At an average of over 8 months, supine blood pressure on diltiazem was 147/88 mm Hg, and after withdrawal to single-blind placebo, average supine blood pressure increased to 173/104 mm Hg. All changes were significant compared with baseline and placebo (p less than 0.01). On diltiazem therapy, maximal treadmill exercise was increased by an average of 55 seconds (p less than 0.01), whereas heart rate, blood pressure and double product (heart rate X blood pressure) were reduced at submaximal exercise, and heart rate and double product were reduced at maximal exercise. No changes in serum glucose, potassium or uric acid were found. No adverse effects on serum lipids occurred. Diltiazem treatment was associated with an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (52 to 60 mg/dl, p less than 0.006) and a decrease in total cholesterol:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (4.7 to 4.2, p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Effects of diltiazem on serum lipids, exercise performance and blood pressure: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation for systemic hypertension. 390 22

The safety and efficacy of sustained-release diltiazem 120 to 180 mg, 2 times a day, were compared with hydrochlorothiazide 25 to 50 mg, 2 times a day, and the combination of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide in 56 patients with mild to moderate hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 114 mm Hg) using a placebo-controlled, parallel-design protocol. Data from an additional 21 patients were evaluated for safety only. The data reported herein represent the preliminary experience from a larger 200-patient multicenter study. All patients received placebo for 4 weeks, followed by either hydrochlorothiazide or diltiazem titrated to achieve a diastolic blood pressure reduction of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg to reach a goal supine diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg. Patients not achieving the treatment goal received hydrochlorothiazide plus diltiazem. At week 14, on maintenance monotherapy, diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide produced comparable reductions in blood pressure from placebo baseline (160.3 +/- 24.3/101.7 +/- 5.5 to 145.2 +/- 24.1/89.8 +/- 7.4 mm Hg with diltiazem, 156.0 +/- 15.6/103.7 +/- 4.7 to 134.1 +/- 12.5/89.2 +/- 9.5 mm Hg with hydrochlorothiazide, p less than 0.001 for both). Diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide achieved goal blood pressure in 42% and 45% of patients, respectively. The effects in responders were sustained for 6 months. In patients who did not achieve the treatment goal, 63% responded to diltiazem plus hydrochlorothiazide.No clinically significant postural hypotension was observed on any regimen. Heart rate was slightly lower with diltiazem than with hydrochlorothiazide. Adverse effects were minimal with diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide and diltiazem plus hydrochlorothiazide but more hypokalemia occurred with hydrochlorothiazide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Diuretics versus calcium-channel blockers in systemic hypertension: a preliminary multicenter experience with hydrochlorothiazide and sustained-release diltiazem. 390 23

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, diltiazem and nifedipine were compared in 10 patients with stable angina pectoris and mild to moderate hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg). Patients received placebo for 2 weeks, then increasing doses of diltiazem (90 to 360 mg/day) or nifedipine (30 to 120 mg/day) in 3 daily divided doses over 2 weeks, followed by 1 week of therapy at the maximal dose, a 1-week placebo "washout," then crossover to the other drug. Heart rate and blood pressure at rest and during exercise, anginal frequency, nitroglycerin consumption and treadmill exercise tolerance were assessed. Compared with placebo, anginal frequency and nitroglycerin consumption were reduced with both diltiazem and nifedipine (p less than 0.01) and exercise tolerance was increased with both drugs (p less than 0.01). Standing blood pressure at rest was reduced by diltiazem and nifedipine (146.6 +/- 11.4/97.7 +/- 5.3 mm Hg at placebo, baseline reduced to 129.6 +/- 15.2/79.5 +/- 13.7 mm Hg with diltiazem, and to 122.2 +/- 9.9/82.0 +/- 7.1 with nifedipine, p less than 0.01 for both). Compared with placebo, diltiazem and nifedipine also reduced exercise diastolic blood pressure (p less than 0.01), but not systolic blood pressure. Diltiazem lowered the heart rate at rest from 88.5 +/- 14.4 beats/min at placebo baseline to 79.7 +/- 17.9 beats/min (p less than 0.01); the heart rate with diltiazem was 11 beats/min lower than that with nifedipine (p less than 0.05). Both diltiazem and nifedipine had similar effects on the heart rate-blood pressure product at rest and during exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Comparison of diltiazem and nifedipine for both angina pectoris and systemic hypertension. 393 48

Although the calcium channel blocker diltiazem has been shown to be an effective antihypertensive agent, its effect on renal function, salt and water excretion, and body fluid composition has not been well characterized in patients with primary hypertension. Therefore, these parameters were prospectively studied in 18 subjects with primary hypertension after placebo and 8 weeks of diltiazem monotherapy. Diltiazem monotherapy was confirmed to be an effective antihypertensive agent. Although mean arterial pressure was reduced from 121 to 108 mm Hg, diltiazem had no overall effect on glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma blood flow, salt and water excretion, or body fluid composition. Renal vascular resistance, however, was decreased. In subjects with pretreatment glomerular filtration rates of 80 ml/min/1.73 m2 or less, diltiazem therapy was associated with marked improvement in glomerular filtration rate (48%) and effective renal plasma flow (36%). Since the filtration fraction was unchanged, changes in glomerular filtration rate may have been related to the attenuated intrarenal effects of angiotensin II or norepinephrine, or both.
Hypertension 1986 Mar
PMID:Renal effects of diltiazem in primary hypertension. 394 75

Diltiazem and propranolol alone and in combination as antianginal agents were compared with placebo in 12 patients with stable exertional angina at Stanford University Medical Center. The patients performed symptom-limited, multi-stage upright bicycle ergometric exercise while undergoing radionuclide angiographic studies every two weeks while being treated with 90 mg of diltiazem four times daily, 60 mg of propranolol four times daily, a combination of 90 mg of diltiazem and 60 mg of propranolol four times daily, and placebo. Diltiazem, propranolol and a combination all significantly increased exercise duration compared to placebo (526 +/- 149, 525 +/- 115, and 549 +/- 129 vs 430 +/- 132 sec.). Although rate pressure product and heart rate decreased with diltiazem therapy at submaximal workloads, these values were unchanged at peak exercise in contrast to propranolol or the combination of propranolol or diltiazem. Diltiazem decreased the sub-maximal and maximal degree of exercise-induced ST segment depression by over 50% compared to placebo (P less than 0.01 vs placebo). Diltiazem resulted in a higher exercise left ventricular ejection fraction compared to placebo, propranolol or the combination of diltiazem or propranolol (all less than P less than 0.05). Sinus bradycardia or orthostatic hypertension occurred in four patients on the high-dose combination therapy and required dose reduction. We concluded that high-dose diltiazem, appeared to be even more effective than moderate-dose propranolol or the combination of diltiazem and propranolol in improving exercise tolerance, electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischaemia and left ventricular function in patients with stable effort angina due to occlusive coronary artery disease.
 ...
PMID:Diltiazem and propranolol, alone and in combination, on exercise performance and left ventricular function in patients with stable effort angina: a double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. 406 Nov 5

The pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse effects of three calcium-channel blocking agents--verapamil, nifedipine, and diltiazem--are reviewed. Verapamil, nifedipine, and diltiazem are absorbed well after oral dosing, but absolute bioavailability of each is reduced substantially by a first-pass effect. Each drug is metabolized extensively (verapamil and diltiazem to moderately active metabolites) by the liver. A substantial percentage of each drug is bound to plasma proteins, but the binding is of clinical importance only for nifedipine (92--98% protein bound). Intravenous verapamil has become the agent of first choice for treatment of acute paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT); use of chronic oral verapamil therapy for prophylaxis remains controversial. Verapamil and diltiazem have been evaluated with mixed results for atrial flutter and fibrillation. For treatment of myocardial ischemia, calcium-channel blockers may be of some value (possibly in combination with nitrates of B blockers). All three agents have been studied in patients with exertional angina with good results. Calcium-channel blockers appear to be equal with nitrates for treatment of variant angina. Patients with hypertropic cardiomyopathy have been treated with verapamil and nifedipine with promising results. Nifedipine has been effective for treatment of essential hypertension. Adverse effects of calcium-channel blockers have been relatively minor or infrequent. Diltiazem overall has the best side-effect profile, with adverse effects causing discontinuation of therapy in about 2--10% of patients; verapamil in intermediate (8--10%) and nifedipine the worst (17%) in this respect. The most common side effects generally are fatigue, headache, dizziness, skin rash, and peripheral edema. While they generally should be reserved for patients in whom more conventional therapy has failed (except those with PSVT), calcium-channel blockers appear to have a valid role as reserve agents for exertional and variant angina, cardiomyopathy, and hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Update on calcium-channel blocking agents. 635 66

Sixteen patients with uncomplicated systemic hypertension were treated with placebo, diltiazem (180 mg/day) and propranolol (60 mg/day) for 1 month each. Each patient performed multistage symptom-limited treadmill exercise tests during each period of administration. There was no significant difference in maximal exercise duration between placebo, diltiazem and propranolol. Diltiazem significantly decreased both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate at rest, during submaximal exercise at the same work load and maximal exercise. Propranolol produced similar changes in systemic BP and heart rate at rest and during exercise. However, the reductions in systolic BP, heart rate and pressure-rate product with diltiazem during exercise were smaller than those with propranolol at small doses, suggesting that diltiazem in its usual therapeutic dose was almost devoid of beta-blocking activity. Thus, diltiazem may be of benefit to hypertensive patients because it reduces systemic BP even during exercise. It is particularly useful when systemic hypertension occurs in association with coronary artery disease because of its effects of coronary artery dilatation and heart rate reduction.
 ...
PMID:Effects of diltiazem on cardiovascular responses during exercise in systemic hypertension and comparison with propranolol. 663 17

The role of calcium in the cardiovascular system, and the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and studies evaluating the clinical use of three calcium-channel blocking agents--verapamil hydrochloride, nifedipine, and diltiazem hydrochloride--are reviewed. Inhibition of calcium conductance and alteration of calcium availability cause profound changes in: slow inward current of the cardiac action potential, myocardial contractility and metabolism, blood pressure regulation, and smooth-muscle activity. Calcium-channel blocking agents affect the movement of calcium through these channels in smooth and cardiac muscle; the specific agents in this class differ markedly in their inhibitory effects. Verapamil hydrochloride is useful intravenously for treating supraventricular rhythm disturbances. It is absorbed well when taken orally, but there is an extensive first-pass effect, so that about 20% enters the systemic circulation. The incidence of side effects in patients receiving verapamil is 9-10%; about 1% require discontinuation of therapy. Verapamil is contraindicated in patients with sinus-node disease, unstable atrioventricular block, and shock. Nifedipine has proven useful for hypertension, coronary-artery spasm, and exertional angina; it has little negative inotropic effect. Approximately 90% of an oral dose is absorbed, and 65-70% reaches the systemic circulation after first-pass metabolism. Protein binding of nifedipine ranges from 92 to 98%. Side effects of nifedipine, usually associated with the peripheral vasodilatory action, occur in approximately 15% of patients, requiring discontinuance in 2-5%. Diltiazem hydrochloride has been shown effective in the treatment of coronary-artery spasm; limited studies indicate it may be useful in treating exertional angina, hypertension, and possibly arrhythmias. Diltiazem's oral bioavailability is good (90% reaches systemic circulation), but there is significant interindividual variability between administered dose and resulting plasma concentration. Geriatric patients have delayed absorption and reduced clearance of diltiazem given in sustained-release tablets. Studies of diltiazem are limited at this time. The exact role of calcium-channel blocking agents has not yet been elucidated. However, their ability to influence the calcium channel greatly expands the therapeutic armamentarium for cardiovascular disease and other disorders.
 ...
PMID:Calcium-channel blocking agents. 676 59

The hypotensive effects of intravenous injection and infusion of diltiazem, l- and d-verapamil were investigated in conscious and anaesthetized rats with spontaneous hypertension (SHR) and normal blood pressure (NT-WKY). The inhibitory actions of these calcium-influx blockers on the pressor responses to angiotensin II (AII) and noradrenaline (NA) were also examined in anaesthetized SHR and NT-WKY. The intravenous injections of these three drugs (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 mg/kg) lowered mean arterial pressure (MAP) in a dose related manner in conscious NT-WKY and SHR. The small dose of the blockers administered by intravenous infusion (0.02 mg/kg per min) also decreased MAP in both groups. The potency of the antihypertensive action was in the order l-verapamil greater than d-verapamil = diltiazem. The fall in blood pressure expressed as percentage of the initial MAP produced by the compounds was significantly enhanced in SHR compared to NT-WKY. The pressor responses to AII (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0 micrograms/kg i.v.) were suppressed by the intravenous infusion of 20 micrograms/kg per min with l-verapamil but not with d-verapamil, diltiazem and vehicle in NT-WKY, while no calcium blocker significantly diminished the vasopressor action of AII in SHR. The pressor effects of NA (0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0 micrograms/kg i.v.) were inhibited by the same doses of l-verapamil and diltiazem but not with d-verapamil and vehicle in NT-WKY. Diltiazem reduced the response to NA in SHR but the other compounds (l- and d-verapamil) did not alter the pressor response to NA in SHR. The pressor responses to arginine vasopressin (3, 10, 30 and 100 mU/kg i.v.) were not altered by diltiazem infusion in either SHR or NT-WKY. It is concluded that these compounds are different in the potency of their hypotensive action and also the inhibition of the pressor responses to AII and NA. Calcium entry blockers are more effective antihypertensive agents in SHR than in NT-WKY. It appears that their inhibitory effects on the responses to AII and NA do not explain the exaggerated hypotensive responses in SHR.
 ...
PMID:Exaggerated hypotensive responses to calcium antagonists in spontaneously hypertensive rats. 688 45

1. The effects of 10-min perfusions of diltiazem (o.1-2.5 mg/kg, i.v.) on arterial blood pressure were studied in anesthetized renovascular-hypertensive and in normotensive rats. 2. Diltiazem produced a dose-dependent decrease in blood pressure in hypertensive rats (ED50 congruent to 1 mg/kg). 3. Diltiazem also decreased blood pressure in normotensive rats, but this action was less sustained than in hypertensive rats. 4. These results support the contention that diltiazem might be useful for treating arterial hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Effects of diltiazem on renovascular-hypertensive and on normotensive rats. 709 96


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>