Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Telmisartan is a new angiotensin receptor antagonist possessing potent, selective, and insurmountable inhibitory activity specific to the angiotensin II type 1 (AT 1 ) receptor. The current study was performed to determine the inhibition of the angiotensin II pressor response by telmisartan in 48 healthy volunteers challenged with hypertension-inducing doses of i.v. angiotensin II. Subjects were challenged with this dose of angiotensin II at intervals between 0.25 and 48 h after double-blind single-dose oral administration of telmisartan 20 mg (n = 12), 40 mg (n = 12), or 80 mg (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) in parallel groups. Diastolic and systolic blood pressure and pulse rate were recorded continuously using a servophotoplethysmograph. Urine samples were collected during the study for urinalysis. Tolerability of telmisartan, in comparison with placebo, was also monitored throughout the study. Telmisartan 20-80 mg dose dependently inhibited the increase in diastolic and systolic blood pressure induced by angiotensin II. Telmisartan 40 mg produced 80.1% maximum inhibition, and with 80 mg 89.6% maximum inhibition of diastolic blood pressure was achieved. Inhibition was apparent after 0.3-1.1 h and was still observed 48 h after administration for all telmisartan doses. The inhibitory effect of telmisartan 20, 40, and 80 mg, 48 h after dosing was significantly greater than that of placebo. A > 25% inhibition of the angiotensin II response on diastolic blood pressure was detected until 26.9, 35.4, and 40.5 h, respectively, after telmisartan 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg. Anti-clockwise hysteresis was observed, indicating a delay and longer persistence of effect than to be expected from the plasma concentration-time course. The slow dissociation of telmisartan from the receptor probably contributed to this hysteresis. The incidence of adverse events was comparable in telmisartan-and placebo-treated subjects and was not dose dependent. In conclusion, telmisartan 40 mg provides rapid-onset, well-tolerated, and near-maximal inhibition of angiotensin II-induced hypertension, with maintenance of the inhibitory effect for 48 h.
 ...
PMID:Inhibitory effect of telmisartan on the blood pressure response to angiotensin II challenge. 1160 14

Proven cardiovascular benefit from angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. The first study to show dramatic benefits from ACE inhibition was the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS-I), in which a 31% decrease in the rate of death was observed in patients with severe heart failure at the end of 1 year of enalapril treatment (p = 0.001). This result led to large long-term studies-including Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE), Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE), Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE), and Study of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD)-which verified that ACE inhibition decreases heart failure, myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality, and that striking benefit could be observed within 30 days. Short-term studies of patients in the acute phase of a heart attack verified that ACE inhibition provided rapid benefits. A meta-analysis of short-term (up to 8 weeks) studies of ACE inhibition (including CONSENSUS-II, Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico [GISSI]-3, International Study of Infarct Survival [ISIS]-4, and the Chinese Captopril Study [CCS]-1) demonstrated that post-MI risk was reduced by 10% within the first day of treatment. The immediacy of the benefit suggested that ACE inhibition not only improved cardiovascular function in failing hearts but also affected important mechanisms in patients without overt heart failure. Effects on more general mechanisms of heart disease suggested that patients with problems other than hypertension or heart failure might benefit from ACE inhibitors. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study investigated the hypothesis that ACE inhibition would confer benefits to patients who were at high risk for cardiovascular events, but who were without left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure. Long-term reductions in MI, stroke, cardiac arrest, and heart failure, as well as improvements in mortality, were observed in this population after treatment with ACE inhibitors. Substudies of the HOPE study revealed that ACE inhibition reduced progression of atherosclerosis and improved myocardial remodeling. Taken together, these studies provide evidence that supports treatment of a broad population of patients at risk for cardiovascular events with ACE inhibitors. The next step is to combine ACE inhibition with other treatments to maximize patient benefit. The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) will compare the efficacy of an ACE inhibitor (ramipril) with an angiotensin receptor blocker (telmisartan), and determine whether these treatments in combination will further reduce morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II and trials of cardiovascular outcomes. 1183 5

This study compared the cardiovascular and renal effects of long-term telmisartan (3 and 10 mg/kg/day)and lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day) in an animal model combining hypertension and diabetes mellitus. It was a parallel-group study of diabetic, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), treated with control or active treatment for eight months. A non-diabetic SHR control group was run in parallel. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin (45 mg/kg i.v.) in SHRs aged 9-10 weeks. Animals were treated with telmisartan (3 or 10mg/kg/day), lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Plasma glucose levels, blood pressure (BP), and urinary protein and albumin excretion were measured monthly. Telmisartan treatment significantly reduced BP of diabetic SHRs in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.05, low-dose, n= 18; p<0.01, high-dose, n=15). The BP reduction in the lisinopril group was similar to that in the telmisartan 10 mg/kg/day group. Compared with non-diabetic SHRs, untreated diabetic SHRs developed severe proteinuria and albuminuria over the experimental period (p<0.01). In diabetic SHRs, proteinuria and albuminuria were dose-dependently and significantly attenuated by treatment with telmisartan (p<0.01 with the higher dose) and lisinopril (p<0.01). Compared with the untreated diabetic SHRs, cardiac hypertrophy was significantly reduced after treatment with both doses of telmisartan and with lisinopril. Telmisartan, 10 mg/kg/day, but not lisinopril, significantly attenuated the diabetes-induced increase in glomerular volume. In conclusion, telmisartan, 10 mg/kg/day, is at least as beneficial as lisinopril, 10 mg/kg/day, in lowering BP, reducing cardiac hypertrophy and attenuating renal excretion of protein and albumin in this model.
 ...
PMID:Comparative antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of telmisartan and lisinopril after long-term treatment in hypertensive diabetic rats. 1188 Oct 63

Three separate randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 12-week trials compared telmisartan with enalapril, lisinopril, and amlodipine for treating mild to moderate hypertension. Telmisartan 80 mg was associated with a significantly greater mean decrease in trough systolic and diastolic blood pressure than enalapril 20 mg (p<0.05). Mean decreases in trough systolic and diastolic blood pressure with telmisartan (40, 80, and 160 mg) and lisinopril (10, 20, and 40 mg) were similar. Telmisartan (40, 80, and 120 mg) provided greater decreases in mean hourly systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the 24-hour dosing interval, including the last 4 hours of the dosing period, than amlodipine (5 and 10 mg). Telmisartan was associated with a lower incidence of treatment-related cough than lisinopril and enalapril and less treatment-related angioedema than amlodipine. These data suggest that for treating mild to moderate hypertension, telmisartan has efficacy similar to lisinopril, greater efficacy than enalapril and amlodipine throughout the 24-hour dosing interval, and better tolerability than these angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and amlodipine.
 ...
PMID:Comparative effects of telmisartan in the treatment of hypertension. 1214 25

Population surveys on hypertension management reveal worrying deficiencies in the awareness and treatment of high blood pressure. Many patients with hypertension will require two or more drugs with complementary mechanisms of action (which generally have additive effects, producing greater blood pressure reductions than either agent alone) to attain the blood pressure goals specified in internationally accepted guidelines. Nevertheless, physicians are often reluctant to prescribe multiple anti-hypertensive drugs due to concerns over side-effects, inconvenient dosing regimens and costs. Fixed-dose formulations combining two agents from different classes in a single tablet should help to allay these concerns. A fixed-dose combination containing telmisartan (an angiotensin II receptor blocker) and hydrochlorothiazide (a thiazide diuretic) has recently been developed. Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide provides additional anti-hypertensive efficacy compared with the respective monotherapies in a wide range of patients, including black patients, requires once-daily dosing, is cost-effective, well tolerated and is associated with less potassium depletion than hydrochlorothiazide administered alone.
 ...
PMID:A new fixed-dose combination for added blood pressure control: telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide. 1223 18

We assessed the blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) achieved with 2 angiotensin (Ang) antagonists given either alone at different doses or with an ACE inhibitor. First, 20 normotensive subjects were randomly assigned to 100 mg OD losartan (LOS) or 80 mg OD telmisartan (TEL) for 1 week; during another week, the same doses of LOS and TEL were combined with 20 mg OD lisinopril. Then, 10 subjects were randomly assigned to 200 mg OD LOS and 160 mg OD TEL for 1 week and 100 mg BID LOS and 80 mg BID TEL during the second week. Blockade of the RAS was evaluated with the inhibition of the pressor effect of exogenous Ang I, an ex vivo receptor assay, and the changes in plasma Ang II. Trough blood pressure response to Ang I was blocked by 35+/-16% (mean+/-SD) with 100 mg OD LOS and by 36+/-13% with 80 mg OD TEL. When combined with lisinopril, blockade was 76+/-7% with LOS and 79+/-9% with TEL. With 200 mg OD LOS, trough blockade was 54+/-14%, but with 100 mg BID it increased to 77+/-8% (P<0.01). Telmisartan (160 mg OD and 80 mg BID) produced a comparable effect. Thus, at their maximal recommended doses, neither LOS nor TEL blocks the RAS for 24 hours; hence, the addition of an ACE inhibitor provides an additional blockade. A 24-hour blockade can be achieved with an angiotensin antagonist alone, provided higher doses or a BID regimen is used.
Hypertension 2003 Jan
PMID:Angiotensin II receptor blockade: is there truly a benefit of adding an ACE inhibitor? 1251 26

Arterial wall stiffness, an important independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients with hypertension, is worsened by the coexistence of diabetes mellitus. This randomised, prospective, double-blind, crossover trial assessed the effects of telmisartan on arterial stiffness in patients with Type 2 diabetes with essential hypertension. After a two-week placebo wash out period, 28 ambulatory patients received telmisartan (40 mg) or placebo for three weeks. Following a second two-week placebo wash out period, patients received the alternate treatment for a further three weeks. Augmentation index and central blood pressure (BP) were determined using the SphygmoCor device and pulse wave velocity (PWV) was measured using an automatic device, the Complior trade mark, at the beginning and the end of each period. Telmisartan significantly reduced the carotid femoral PWV compared with placebo (mean adjusted treatment difference 0.95 m/s; 95% CI: 1.67, 0.23 m/s; p=0.013). Peripheral and central diastolic, systolic and pulse pressures were also significantly reduced with telmisartan compared with placebo. In conclusion, telmisartan reduces arterial stiffness and peripheral and central BPs as assessed by PWV and pulse contour analysis in hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes. These properties of telmisartan suggest that it may improve cardiovascular outcome in this patient population.
 ...
PMID:Effects of telmisartan on arterial stiffness in Type 2 diabetes patients with essential hypertension. 1256 68

Costs of providing a particular medical service can be measured, but it is more difficult to assess whether the service provides good value for the money spent. Rigorous trials have demonstrated the health benefits connected with interventions for treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and in-depth analyses of the costs associated with many of those interventions have been performed. Careful use of terminology clearly differentiating among cost-minimization (relative costs of proved equivalent therapeutics), cost-effectiveness (lives saved or years of life added), and cost-benefit (total net effect in monetary terms) analyses is warranted. Although trials commonly assess clinical effectiveness as reductions in mortality or CVD-specific outcomes, improvement in quality of life may be equally important and is expressed in quality-adjusted life-years. Comparisons between therapies can be assessed as a cost-effectiveness ratio. Extensive cost-effectiveness studies have been conducted on many important cardiovascular therapies: (1) beta-blockers and diuretics for multiple CVD outcomes, mortality, and prevention of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI); (2) statins for both primary and secondary prevention of CVD; (3) enalapril for prevention and treatment of congestive heart failure; (4) tissue plasminogen activator treatment of acute MI; (5) coronary artery bypass graft for left main, single-, and 2-vessel coronary artery disease, or severe angina; (6) physician counseling for smoking; and (7) radiofrequency ablation therapy for Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Therapies considered economically attractive include (1) secondary prevention with statins in hyperlipidemia, (2) smoking cessation programs, (3) primary prevention in treatment of high blood pressure with diuretics and beta-blockers, (4) primary prevention with regular exercise programs, (5) secondary prevention with cardiac rehabilitation, and (6) postinfarction treatment with beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. A recent cost-minimization analysis has been performed showing aspirin to be a "best buy" therapy for secondary prevention of CVD. The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) and Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE-I Intolerant Patients with Cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND) program provide potential opportunities for both cost-minimization and cost-effectiveness analyses.
 ...
PMID:How cost-effective are new preventive strategies for cardiovascular disease? 1278 5

There is close relationship between hypertension, organ damage and cardiovascular mortality. The control of hypertension or the regression of organ abnormalities can cause reduction in mortality but this is to be proven by each drug. Similar degree of antihypertensive effect with different type og drugs can result in different amount of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Telmisartan can cause reduction of LVH even in small, non-hypotensive doses. Combination of ACE inhibitors and ARB has a lot of theoretical advantage, the available clinical data are positive however some conflicting data are to be clarified yet. The ongoing ONTARGET study will give answers to a lot of this questions in 4 years.
 ...
PMID:[Effects of angiotensin receptor inhibitors on cardiovascular endpoints--current and future evidence]. 1278 35

Telmisartan is a type 1 angiotensin II (AT(1)) receptor blocker, effective and safe in the treatment of arterial hypertension. However, data with respect to circadian blood pressure (BP) monitoring and urinary protein (uP) excretion are lacking in normotensive or mild hypertensive patients with chronic renal diseases. This study has evaluated the effects of 80 mg telmisartan, given as monotherapy, on 24 h BP levels and uP loss in 16 non-diabetic patients affected by proteinuric renal disease. These patients did not meet the recommended values of mean BP, i.e. < 98 mmHg, when proteinuria was 0.5-1.0 g/d and mean BP < 92 mmHg, when proteinuria was 1-3 g/d. Patients with diastolic BP > 114 mmHg, nephrotic syndrome or severe renal failure (creatinine clearance < 20 ml/min) were excluded. After 4.2 +/- 2.7 month therapy, ambulatory BP monitoring showed a significant decrease (P < 0.001) of 24 h BP levels: systolic 135 +/- 11 vs. 122 +/- 13 mmHg, diastolic 84.4 +/- 8.1 vs. 75.9 +/- 8.5 mmHg, mean 101 +/- 8 vs. 91 +/- 9 mmHg. The effect was quite evident during either day-time or night-time. Clinic BP levels also significantly decreased (P < 0.001), and five patients reached the target values. uP excretion lowered by 37% (median) from 1.60 +/- 0.90 to 1.06 +/- 0.63 g/24 h (P < 0.01). No change in creatinine clearance (53.3 +/- 31.1 vs. 51.7 +/- 30.9 ml/min) or serum potassium level (4.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.4 mEq/l) was observed. Our results show that 80 mg of telmisartan, taken once daily, is effective in reducing uP excretion and BP throughout the 24 h, in normotensive or mild hypertensive renal patients. Since evidence exists that adequate control of BP, including during night-time, and reduction of proteinuria play a crucial role in the protection of renal function, telmisartan can be usefully considered in the conservative treatment of renal patients.
 ...
PMID:Effect of telmisartan on the proteinuria and circadian blood pressure profile in chronic renal patients. 1281 79


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>