Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or with angiotensin receptor antagonists confers patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and associated risk factors, target organ lesion or cardiovascular disease with greater protection in morbidity and mortality terms. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of irbesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on the absolute cardiovascular risk in a cohort of hypertensive patients with moderate, high, or very high cardiovascular risk. This was a multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study with 1974 patients (63 11 years; 47% males) with newly diagnosed essential AH or AH non-controlled with anti-hypertensive monotherapy, and moderate to very high cardiovascular risk. Irbesartan therapy at a dosage of 150300 mg was instituted as monotherapy or associated with hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg. The clinical follow-up was 6 months. The evaluated parameters included the absolute cardiovascular risk, measured either quantitatively (Framingham algorithm) or qualitatively (low, moderate, high, and very high risk groups following the WHO/International Hypertension Society guidelines). Irbesartan therapy led to a significant (p = 0.0001) decrease in SBP (from 170.9 18.4 to 138.5 16.5 mmHg) and DBP (from 96.6 11 to 82 9 mmHg). The quantitative absolute cardiovascular risk decreased by 29.8% (from 12.14 8 to 8.65 6.2; p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients with very high cardiovascular risk decreased from 1.52% to 0.51% and that for patients with high cardiovascular risk from 92.77% to 88.32%. The latter patients changed to the moderate risk group. As a result, this moderate risk group increased from 5.71% to 11.17%. The adverse reaction rate was very low as only 2.2% of patients had some adverse reaction. In conclusion, irbesartan as monotherapy or associated with hydrochlorothiazide has been shown to be effective in reducing the absolute cardiovascular risk, which is obtained by a substantial decrease in arterial pressure and a good safety profile on the biochemical parameters. Tolerability was excellent, with a very low rate of adverse reactions.
 ...
PMID:[Effect of anti-hypertensive therapy with irbesartan on the absolute cardiovascular risk]. 1268 Dec 1

In this article, 2 leading physicians debate the strength of outcome data on the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for reducing the incidence of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renovascular events. Dr. Stephen G. Ball notes that the efficacy of ACE inhibitors for reducing the risk for myocardial infarction independent of their effects on blood pressure is controversial. In the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, ramipril treatment in high-risk patients was associated with a 20% reduction in the risk for myocardial infarction; mean reduction in blood pressure was 3 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure and 1 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. The HOPE investigators propose that the 20% reduction was much greater than would be expected based on the observed blood pressure reduction. However, a meta-regression analysis of blood pressure reduction in >20 antihypertensive therapy outcome trials found that the reduction in myocardial infarction risk with ramipril observed in HOPE was consistent with the modest blood pressure reduction seen with that agent. Nevertheless, there are convincing data for prevention of myocardial infarction with ACE inhibitors in patients with heart failure, including those with heart failure after myocardial infarction, as well as supportive evidence from studies in patients with diabetes mellitus and concomitant hypertension. On the other hand, Dr. William B. White takes the position that ARBs are well-tolerated antihypertensive agents that specifically antagonize the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor and provide a more complete block of the pathologic effects of angiotensin II-which are mediated via the AT(1) receptor-than ACE inhibitors. The Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) II study and the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (ValHeFT) suggest that ARBs reduce the risk for mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension trial also demonstrated beneficial effects of ARBs in the prevention of stroke events. The Irbesartan in Patients with Diabetes and Microalbuminuria (IRMA) study, the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), and the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study demonstrated significant reductions in the rate of progression of renal disease in patients receiving ARBs, independent of effects on blood pressure. These data support the use of ARBs, in addition to the standard of care, in hypertensive patients with heart failure who are intolerant of ACE inhibitors, and also provide compelling evidence for their use in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Debate: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin II receptor blockers--a gap in evidence-based medicine. 1451 6

Microvascular remodeling contributes to increased cardiovascular risk in hypertension. The dual angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor omapatrilat improves small artery remodeling in hypertension. The aim of the present study was to compare effects of omapatrilat to the ACE inhibitor fosinopril and the AT(1) antagonist irbesartan on the coronary microvasculature in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Ten-week-old SHR were treated for 10 weeks with omapatrilat (20 or 40 mg/kg/d), irbesartan (50 mg/kg/d), or fosinopril (20 mg/kg/d). Arterioles and capillaries were identified in the myocardium by immunolabeling. After 10 weeks, systolic blood pressure (BP) was significantly reduced in treated versus untreated SHR (P <.01). Myocardial arteriolar density/mm(2) was higher (P <.05) in untreated SHR versus Wistar-Kyoto (WKY), and was reduced by omapatrilat (at both high and low doses) and by fosinopril (P <.01). Irbesartan decreased only subepicardial arteriolar density (P <.05). Myocardial capillary density/mm(2) was decreased in untreated SHR versus WKY (P <.01), associated with increase in cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area and cardiomyocyte-to-capillary ratio, and a decrease in myocyte density. Omapatrilat (at both high and low doses) resulted in increased capillary density, decreased myocyte hypertrophy and cardiomyocyte to capillary ratio, and increased myocyte density (P <.01). Fosinopril and irbesartan reduced myocyte hypertrophy of SHR, but had no effect on capillary density. Dual ACE/NEP inhibition was more effective than ACE inhibition or AT(1) antagonism in improving microvascular and cardiomyocyte remodeling in the hypertensive heart. This suggests a role for NEP inhibition added to blockade of the renin-angiotensin system that may explain the greater efficacy of omapatrilat.
 ...
PMID:Effect of dual angiotensin converting enzyme/neutral endopeptidase inhibition, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, or AT1 antagonism on coronary microvasculature in spontaneously hypertensive rats. 1457 31

During the past decade, the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has risen dramatically, primarily due to an increase in the incidence of diabetes. In patients with diabetes, both hyperglycemia and hypertension are independent risk factors for renal disease. Hypertension is also a risk factor in nondiabetic renal disease and contributes to renal dysfunction by increasing glomerular pressure, glomerular capillary damage, and proteinuria. The resultant nephron damage increases glomerular pressure and damage within remnant functional nephrons, further contributing to deterioration of renal function. In addition to its role in systemic hypertension, angiotensin II has direct effects on the kidney through elevation of glomerular capillary pressure and upregulation of components of the renal injury response. These direct effects of angiotensin II on the kidney support the inclusion of agents that target the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) into treatment regimens for patients at risk for renal disease. Several clinical trials have established the benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with diabetes. The ACE inhibitors have been shown to delay renal decline in patients with type 1 diabetes, whereas the renoprotective effect of these agents in patients with type 2 diabetes is less clear. The ARBs have been shown to provide significant benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, both at early (microalbuminuria) and late (proteinuria) stages of renal decline. In the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study, ARB therapy significantly reduced the progression of overt nephropathy (composite of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, and death), a benefit that has not been shown for ACE inhibitors. Moreover, in RENAAL, losartan significantly reduced the incidence of the individual end point of ESRD. The benefits of ARB therapy in IDNT and RENAAL were associated with significant reductions in proteinuria and were independent of blood pressure reductions. In RENAAL, proteinuria was a strong predictor of both renal and cardiovascular events. These findings underscore the importance of RAS blockade as a strategy for improving clinical outcomes in patients with renal disease.
 ...
PMID:Recommendations for the management of special populations: renal disease in diabetes. 1462 61

We determined the acute hypotensive effect of a single administration and the prophylactic effect of chronic treatment with Irbesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on the development of end-organ damage in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). The acute hypotensive effect was determined by a telemetrical method in SHRSP fed a normal diet. The prophylactic effect was examined by biochemical, histopathological and immunohistochemical methods in SHRSP fed a high-salt and low-protein diet. Irbesartan (3, 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg) reduced blood pressure in a dose-dependent manner without affecting heart rate. Irbesartan (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg) increased the survival rate in SHRSP fed a high-salt and low-protein diet. Furthermore, Irbesartan ameliorated the appearance of stroke symptoms in dose-dependent manner showing association with the prevention of microscopic lesions. Irbesartan ameliorated the increases in urinary protein excretion and N-acetyl-D-glucosamidase activity by preventing nephrosclerosis, as judged by microscopic observations, and ameliorated the increases in the expression of collagen IV and fibronectin in the kidney. These findings demonstrate that Irbesartan is a potent antihypertensive drug offering a protective effect on the development of hypertension-induced end-organ damages in SHRSP. Thus, Irbesartan is useful for the therapy of hypertension with end-organ damage.
 ...
PMID:Hypotensive and prophylactic effects of angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist, irbesartan, in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. 1500 Feb 95

The activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is elevated both in the circulation and in the renal tissue of diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies. The increased RAAS activity plays an important role in the hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic pathogenetic mechanisms involved in kidney disease. Previous studies have demonstrated that albuminuria is not only a marker of glomerular lesions, but also a progression promoter, and finally a powerful predictor of the long-term beneficial effect of blood pressure-lowering therapy. Randomized crossover and parallel blind studies in patients with diabetic nephropathy have demonstrated that angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) induce favorable changes in systemic blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and proteinuria similar to those induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. Studies have revealed the optimal renoprotective dose for some ARBs; however, additional dose titration studies are urgently needed to obtain the maximum benefit of this valuable new class of compounds. The combination of ARB and ACE inhibition is well tolerated and even more effective than monotherapy in reducing systemic blood pressure and albuminuria in diabetic nephropathy. In addition, dual RAAS blockade is safe and well tolerated. Impaired autoregulation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR); demonstrated with some blood pressure-lowering agents implies disturbances in the downstream transmission of the systemic blood pressure into the glomerulus, leading to capillary hypertension or hypotension depending of the level of blood pressure. ARB does not interfere with GFR autoregulation in hypertensive diabetic patients. In contrast to previous observational studies with ACE inhibition, long-term treatment with ARB has similar beneficial renoprotective effect on progression of diabetic kidney disease in hypertensive diabetic patients with ACE II and DD genotypes. ARB can prevent/delay development of diabetic nephropathy independently of its beneficial blood pressure-lowering effect in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Recently, two landmark studies led to the following conclusion: "Losartan and Irbesartan conferred significant renal benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. This protection is independent of the reduction in blood pressure it causes. The ARB is generally safe and well tolerated." A recent metaanalysis indicates that ARBs reduce cardiovascular events mainly because of reduction in first hospitalization for congestive heart failure in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria. The studies mentioned here suggest that ARB represents a beneficial treatment of hypertension and proteinuria in incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin receptor blockers in diabetic nephropathy: renal and cardiovascular end points. 1501 27

Irbesartan (Avapro, Aprovel) is a potent and selective angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist indicated for use in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy. Once-daily administration of irbesartan provided 24-hour control of blood pressure (BP). In patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension irbesartan was as effective as enalapril, atenolol and amlodipine, and more effective than valsartan in terms of absolute reduction in BP and response rates. Irbesartan produced a greater reduction in diastolic BP at trough than once-daily losartan, but had a smaller effect than olmesartan; the reduction in systolic BP achieved with irbesartan was similar or greater than that with losartan and similar to that seen with olmesartan. The combination of irbesartan with hydrochlorothiazide produced additive effects on BP reduction. Irbesartan also induced regression of left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. In two large studies (IRbesartan MicroAlbuminuria type 2 diabetes mellitus in hypertensive patients [IRMA 2] and the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT]) irbesartan exerted a renoprotective effect in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes at both the early and later stages of diabetic nephropathy. The renoprotective effect was at least partly independent of the BP-lowering effect. In the IRMA 2 trial, the proportion of patients progressing to overt nephropathy was significantly lower for recipients of irbesartan 300mg once daily than placebo. In patients with overt nephropathy in the IDNT, irbesartan 300mg once daily provided significantly greater renoprotection than amlodipine 10mg once daily or placebo. The relative risk of doubling of serum creatinine was significantly lower with irbesartan than amlodipine or placebo. Irbesartan is well tolerated in hypertensive patients, including those with type 2 diabetes and incipient or overt nephropathy. The overall incidence of adverse events with irbesartan was similar to that with placebo. Irbesartan was associated with a lower incidence of cough than enalapril and was not associated with ankle oedema or with any clinically significant drug interactions. In conclusion, irbesartan is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent. It also slows the progression of renal disease in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes at both the early and later stages of diabetic nephropathy. Thus, irbesartan is a valuable agent in the management of patients with these indications.
 ...
PMID:Irbesartan: a review of its use in hypertension and in the management of diabetic nephropathy. 1510 93

There are substantial healthcare costs associated with the provision of renal replacement therapy. Patients with diabetes mellitus are the largest and fastest growing group developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the United Kingdom (UK). Treatment leading to a slowing of progression to ESRD in diabetic patients could lead to considerable cost savings. Using treatment-specific probabilities derived from the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT), the cost effectiveness of treating patients with hypertension, type II diabetes and nephropathy with irbesartan, amlodipine or control was calculated using a Markov model. UK-specific ESRD-related data were retrieved from published sources to reflect local management practices, ESRD outcomes and costs. Mean 10-year costs and changes in life expectancy due to ESRD delayed or avoided were calculated. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 6.0 and 1.5% per annum and extensive sensitivity analyses were performed. Delay in the onset of ESRD with irbesartan led to cost savings of pound sterling 5125 and pound sterling 2919/patient and improvements in projected discounted life expectancy of 0.07 and 0.21 years over 10 years vs amlodipine and control, respectively. The costs of treatment of ESRD were the main contributor to the total costs. The cost of trial medications had only a minor impact. These results were robust in a wide range of plausible assumptions. Given that the IDNT efficacy results could be translated to a UK setting, treating patients with hypertension, type II diabetes and overt nephropathy with irbesartan was cost saving over a 10-year period compared to amlodipine and control.
 ...
PMID:An economic evaluation of the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) in a UK setting. 1511 42

Type 2 diabetes is increasing globally and is a major cause of conditions such as cardiovascular disease, retinopathy and nephropathy. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and the UK Prospective Diabetes Study demonstrated that the progression of renal disease could be slowed by tight glycaemic control and treating any associated hypertension with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Recent clinical trials have supported the use of angiotensin II receptor antagonists in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, resulting in the approval of new therapeutic indications in the United States and Europe. The objective of this review is to demonstrate how results from the Program for Irbesartan Mortality and morbidity Evaluation studies apply to clinical practice, and to show how the benefits of irbesartan therapy can be realised at any stage of renal disease in patients with diabetes.
 ...
PMID:What is the impact of PRIME on real-life diabetic nephropathy? 1511 95

Regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with improved prognosis. The aim of this trial was to compare the effects of irbesartan versus atenolol on LVH in subjects with essential hypertension. Because electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters of LVH carry disparate prognostic information, both methods were applied in this trial. In the randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial CardioVascular Irbesartan Project, 240 patients with essential hypertension were treated with irbesartan or atenolol for 18 months. Voltage criteria used for LVH were Sokolow index, Cornell index, Cornell voltage x QRS duration product and Lewis index. In parallel, left ventricular mass (LVM) was determined by 2-dimensional guided M-mode echocardiography. After 6 and 18 months, reductions of LVM and voltage criteria for LVH were only found in subjects treated with irbesartan. However, a reduction of LVM was only detectable in subjects within the highest quartile of baseline LVM but not overall. In contrast, reductions of voltage criteria for LVH were detectable after 6 and 18 months even within commonly used normal limits. In conclusion, treatment of hypertension with irbesartan resulted in a significant reduction in the voltage criteria for LVH, although an effect on LVM was only seen in subjects with high baseline LVM. In contrast, atenolol did not lead to reductions in electrocardiographic or echocardiographic parameters of LVH. Because voltage criteria for LVH have been shown to predict cardiovascular outcome independently from LVM, we suggest that both methods should be used to accurately assess the benefits of antihypertensive treatment.
Hypertension 2004 Jul
PMID:Effect of irbesartan versus atenolol on left ventricular mass and voltage: results of the CardioVascular Irbesartan Project. 1558 72


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>