Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The aim of this study was to investigate the roles of angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor subtypes 1 (AT1) and 2 (AT2) in producing vascular wall hypertrophy and qualitative changes in smooth muscle cell gene expression. Wistar rats were treated for 23 days with osmotic minipumps containing solvent and either Ang II (120 ng.kg-1.min-1) or PD123319 (30 mg.kg-1.d-1), an AT2 receptor antagonist. In addition, rats receiving solvent and either Ang II or PD123319 were given losartan, an AT1 receptor antagonist, in the drinking water (10 mg.kg-1.d-1). Vascular wall hypertrophy and smooth muscle phenotype were characterized by morphometric analysis combined with immunohistochemistry. Ang II-induced hypertension was associated with the development of medial hypertrophy of the aorta and coronary arteries accompanied by reversion of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) toward an immature phenotype, as shown by the expression of cellular fibronectin and nonmuscle myosin. Losartan treatment, which restored normal arterial pressure, prevented all these changes. PD123319 treatment, which had no effect on blood pressure, prevented only vascular hypertrophy, with no effect on VSMC phenotype. Administration of only losartan to normal rats reproduced the Ang II-induced vascular hypertrophy, with no effect on VSMC phenotype. Taken together, these results suggest that (1) the trophic effect of Ang II on VSMCs is mediated via AT2 receptor subtypes and (2) changes in VSMC phenotypes are triggered mainly through AT1 receptor subtypes.
 ...
PMID:Differential roles of AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes in vascular trophic and phenotypic changes in response to stimulation with angiotensin II. 908 79

A 56-year-old man who received a live-related renal transplant in 1988 was started in 1995 on the selective angiotensin II antagonist losartan (Dupont-Merke) to treat worsening hypertension. Two months later because of pulmonary oedema, loop diuretics were started. Within two weeks, serum creatinine had increased from 245 to 571 mumol/l, and the patient became oliguric. A systolic bruit was noted over the graft. Renal angiography showed a 90% stenosis of the transplant renal artery. Losartan was withdrawn, with prompt improvement in renal function. A successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty performed a few days later resulted in further improvement in renal function accompanied by a significant diuresis.
 ...
PMID:Reversible acute renal failure induced by losartan in a renal transplant recipient. 912 87

Losartan, a selective antagonist of AT1 receptors for angiotensin II, is widely used clinically to manage hypertension. We report here that losartan markedly inhibits neutrophil shape change, adherence and chemiluminescence responses triggered by N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), without affecting responses induced by immune complexes, zymosan or concanavalin A. Neither saralasin, another antagonist of angiotensin II receptors, nor captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, reproduced the effects of losartan. It was also observed that neutrophil responses triggered by fMLP were not affected by exogenously added angiotensin II. The effect of losartan on the binding of fMLP was measured using [3H]fMLP. It was found that losartan inhibits the binding of [3H]fMLP to neutrophil receptors. As observed for neutrophils, studies performed with monocytes showed that losartan inhibits chemiluminescence emission triggered by fMLP, without affecting chemiluminescence responses triggered by immune complexes, zymosan or concanavalin A.
 ...
PMID:Losartan, a selective inhibitor of subtype AT1 receptors for angiotensin II, inhibits the binding of N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine to neutrophil receptors. 915 65

Raised blood pressure in the elderly is not a normal consequences of aging, but is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Cardiac and cerebrovascular disease account for > 50% of deaths among people aged > 65 years. Because the percentage of elderly people in most populations is rising, blood pressure control in this group is becoming increasingly important. Several large intervention studies in the elderly have demonstrated that antihypertensive medication reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In addition, the absolute benefits of blood pressure reduction are higher in elderly compared with younger patients. ACE inhibitors are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly. Their success led to interest in alternative ways of blocking the renin angiotensin system, and the subsequent development of angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonists. Losartan was the first drug in this class to become commercially available. Since then, valsartan has been launched in some markets and others are likely to be launched in the near future. Losartan is effective in the treatment of essential hypertension and has a low incidence of adverse effects. First-dose hypotension is very uncommon and, at the present time, cough does not appear to be an adverse effect of these drugs, although long term tolerability studies are needed to confirm this. Angioedema, a rare but life-threatening adverse effect of ACE inhibitors, has also been associated with losartan. Current data suggest that All receptor antagonists are effective in elderly hypertensive patients, although further data are needed to confirm these findings. At present, All receptor antagonists are likely to be used in hypertensive patients who are intolerant of ACE inhibitors, although this may change with the availability of long term tolerability and clinical outcomes data.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Potential in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease. 920 48

We investigated the possible role of losartan on insulin-mediated glucose uptake, substrate oxidation and blood flow in insulin-resistant hypertensive patients. Sixteen newly diagnosed patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were studied. The study design was a single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. After a 1 week run-in period, each patient was randomly assigned to placebo (n = 7) and losartan (n = 9). Both treatment periods lasted 4 weeks. At baseline, and at the end of the placebo and losartan treatment periods, euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp and indirect calorimetry were performed. Before and along each glucose clamp, blood flow was also determined in the femoral artery by image-directed duplex ultrasonography combining B-mode imaging and pulse Doppler beams. Losartan vs placebo lowered systolic blood pressure by 163 +/- 3.5 and 147 +/- 4.1 mm Hg (P < 0.001), and diastolic blood pressure by 95 +/- 3.2 and 85 +/- 3.2 mm Hg (P < 0.001). Losartan enhanced glucose metabolic clearance rate by 5.1 +/- 0.3 and 6.3 +/- 0.4 mg/kg x min (P < 0.05), and whole body glucose disposal (WBGD) by 29.2 +/- 0.5 and 38.1 +/- 0.4 mumol/kg free fatty mass (FFM) x min (P < 0.01) but did not affect heart rate. Insulin-mediated change in blood flow was greater after losartan than placebo administration (111 +/- 4 vs 84 +/- 3%, P < 0.01). Per cent change in insulin-mediated stimulation of blood flow and WBGD were also correlated (r = 0.76, P < 0.01). Analysis of substrate oxidation revealed that losartan administration improved insulin action and non-oxidative glucose metabolism (NOGM) (30.8 +/- 2.2 vs 22.8 +/- 2.8 mumol/kg FFM x min, P < 0.05). In conclusion losartan improves insulin-mediated glucose uptake through an increase in NOGM and blood flow in hypertensive patients.
 ...
PMID:Losartan mediated improvement in insulin action is mainly due to an increase in non-oxidative glucose metabolism and blood flow in insulin-resistant hypertensive patients. 920 38

The treatment of hypertension mainly with diuretics and beta blockers reduces cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, largely due to a decreased incidence of stroke, whereas the beneficial effects of antihypertensive therapy on the occurrence of coronary events have been less than expected from epidemiological studies. Furthermore, treated hypertensive patients still have a higher cardiovascular complication rate, compared with matched normotensives. This is particularly evident in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), a major independent risk indicator for cardiovascular disease. In addition to elevating blood pressure, angiotensin II (A-II) exerts an important influence on cardiac structure and function, stimulating cell proliferation and growth. Thus, to further reduce morbidity and mortality when treating hypertensive patients, it may be important to effectively block the effects of A-II. This can be achieved directly at the A-II receptor level by losartan, the first of a new class of antihypertensive agents. It therefore seems pertinent to investigate whether selective A-II receptor blockade with losartan not only lowers blood pressure but also reduces LVH more effectively than current therapy, and thus improves prognosis. The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) in Hypertension study is a double-blind, prospective, parallel group study designed to compare the effects of losartan with those of the beta-blocker atenolol on the reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in approximately 8,300 hypertensive patients (initial sitting diastolic blood pressure 95 to 115 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure 160 to 200 mm Hg) with electrocardiographically documented LVH. The study, which will continue for at least 4 years and until 1,040 patients experience one primary endpoint, has been designed with a statistical power that will detect a difference of at least 15% between groups in the incidence of combined cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is also the first prospective study with adequate power to link reversal of LVH to reduction in major cardiovascular events. The rationale of the study, which will involve more than 800 clinical centers in Scandinavia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, is discussed, and the major features of its design and general organization are described. On April 30, 1997, when inclusion was stopped, 9,218 patients had been randomized.
 ...
PMID:The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) in Hypertension study: rationale, design, and methods. The LIFE Study Group. 923 23

To assess the efficacy of losartan (2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxymethyl-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphe nyl-4-yl)methyl]imidazole, potassium salt), an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on acute myocardial ischemia, 36 four-month-old spontaneously hypertensive rats were used. The animals underwent 45 min of left coronary artery occlusion and 1 h of reperfusion and were randomly assigned to control and losartan-treated groups (2, 5, and 10 mg/kg, intravenously). Losartan was administered 15 min before ischemia. Electrocardiograms (lead II) were monitored continuously throughout the experiment. To assess the anti-infarct effect of losartan, the area at risk was determined by methylene blue dye and the infarct size was determined by nitroblue tetrazolium chloride staining. The areas of risk and infarct were measured by computerized planimetry. Results demonstrated that the low and intermediate doses (2 and 5 mg/kg) of losartan significantly decreased the incidence of ventricular fibrillation and mortality during the ischemic period induced by left coronary artery occlusion. However, a significant reduction in infarct size, calculated as a percentage of the area at risk, was noted in all three losartan-treated groups (control: 41.5% +/- 5.2%, losartan, 2 mg/kg: 11.2% +/- 5.8%, 5 mg/kg: 8.5% +/- 2.7% and 10 mg/kg: 13.7% +/- 1.6%). The results suggest that losartan may be useful in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias induced by acute myocardial infarction and attenuation of reperfusion injury in hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Losartan attenuates myocardial ischemia-induced ventricular arrythmias and reperfusion injury in spontaneously hypertensive rats. 927 79

Health economy is often addressed in terms of acquisition cost, i.e. the cost of the pill. For various reasons, mainly the stricter demands from drug regulatory agencies (increased development costs), novel agents must be expected to be more expensive than older drugs. However, if the costs of changing therapy and the costs induced by side effects and extra clinic visits are considered, the economic aspects become less of a consideration. If compliance is enhanced and better blood pressure control is achieved with the newer agents, then the therapeutic gains must be weighed against the economic aspects. Losartan, the first agent of the new class of angiotensin II receptor antagonists of the AT1 type, has been available for clinical use for more than 2 years. Losartan has proven antihypertensive effects and its safety profile in the initial controlled trials (approximately 2900 patients) and in general practice (more than 14,000 patients in Sweden) has been very good. Its effect on long-term morbidity and mortality has not yet been established but a large mortality endpoint trial is underway in hypertensive patients with cardiac hypertrophy (the LIFE trial). In heart failure, losartan has been shown to reduce 3-month mortality (the ELITE trial). Although it is too early to assess the full therapeutic benefit of losartan in relation to the total patient costs, its efficacy and low incidence of side effects has made it a useful new therapy for the treatment of hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Medical and cost-economy aspects of modern antihypertensive therapy--with special reference to 2 years of clinical experience with losartan. 928 10

Losartan is a novel orally active nonpeptidal antihypertensive agent that specifically blocks the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. This paper compares the short- and long-term safety and tolerability of losartan with those of placebo. Approximately 3800 patients with mild-to-severe essential hypertension were enrolled in 16 double-masked and 4 open clinical trials worldwide. Of these, approximately 2900 were treated with losartan either alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. These trials included patients with diabetes mellitus (n = 133). An additional 5 trials enrolled hypertensive patients with compromised renal function (n = 115) or heart failure (n = 220). Losartan dosages primarily ranged from 10 to 150 mg once daily, with most patients receiving 50 to 100 mg per day. Hypertension trials generally lasted 12 weeks. The most frequently reported adverse events were headache, upper respiratory tract infection, dizziness, and asthenia/fatigue, but only dizziness occurred more frequently (> or = 1%) in the losartan-treated groups. Cough occurred in 3.1% of patients treated with losartan and 2.6% of patients treated with placebo. The overall incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events in the losartan- and placebo-treated groups was similar among patients with hypertension and either diabetes mellitus, renal impairment, or heart failure. The data suggest that losartan can be safely administered in hypertensive patients with concomitant illnesses. It can be considered for first-line therapy and is suitable as an alternative therapy in patients already experiencing side effects with other agents.
 ...
PMID:Clinical safety and tolerability of losartan. 937 6

The objective of this article is to give more information about the pharmacology of and recent clinical data on the angiotensin II receptors antagonists. The angiotensin II receptors antagonists, of which Losartan will be the first representative on the Belgian market, constitute a new therapeutic class in the treatment of hypertension and even heart failure. They are non peptic and orally active and their long mechanism of action allows one daily administration to improve therapeutic compliance. These agents block all known effects of the angiotensin II through binding to the AT1 receptors. Thanks to this unique mechanism of action they reduce blood pressure with a lower incidence of the adverse effects commonly associated with other antihypertensives. In controlled clinical trials, overall incidence of adverse experiences was comparable to placebo. Addition of thiazide-type diuretics provides additive efficacy.
 ...
PMID:[The advent of a new class of antihypertensive agents: angiotensin II receptor antagonists]. 941 19


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>