Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Since its introduction in renal transplantation in 1999, sirolimus is being used by an increasing number of liver transplant centers. Compared to the calcineurin inhibitors, sirolimus acts through a separate signal transduction pathway and has a myriad of important biologic effects including: inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation, inhibition of fibrosis and fibroblast proliferation, and antineoplastic effects. The clinical side-effect profile of this drug is also different than calcineurin inhibitors. Most important, sirolimus does not cause glucose intolerance, hypertension, or renal insufficiency. As a result, this drug offers significant potential advantages over conventional immunosuppressive agents. However, sirolimus may cause hyperlipidemia and has also been associated with hepatic artery thrombosis in liver transplant recipients. This review will summarize the published data on sirolimus in liver transplantation, focusing on the potential advantages and disadvantage of the use of this drug in liver transplant recipients. Finally, the potential benefits of antifibrosis and antineoplastic effects of sirolimus in liver transplant recipients will be discussed.
 ...
PMID:Sirolimus in liver transplantation. 1274 96

With current immunosuppression elevated blood pressure is found in almost 90% of renal graft recipients. Major causes of this finding are impairment of renal function, secondary to chronic allograft nephropathy or (less frequently) recurrence of primary renal disease, the use of calcineurin inhibitors as immunosuppresants, uncontrolled renin secretion by the shrunken kidneys of the recipient, stenos- ing lesions of the transplant artery (or the upstream arteries of the recipient), polycytemia and (genetic predisposition to) hypertension of the graft donor. Even minor degrees of blood pressure elevation have a significant impact on survival of the recipient and on graft survival, presumably by amplifying vascular injury to the graft. In this respect, elevation of systolic blood pressure and an abnormal circadian blood pressure profile are of particular relevance. In contrast to previous opinion, ACE inhibitors are indicated in the treatment, but, given the causal role of sodium retention in graft vasoconstriction, diuretics and calcium channel blockers remain main stays of antihypertensive treatment in the renal allograft recipient.
 ...
PMID:Hypertension after renal transplantation. 1277 71

Posttransplantation hypertension has been identified as an independent risk factor for chronic allograft dysfunction and loss. Based on available morbidity and mortality data, posttransplantation hypertension must be identified and managed appropriately. During the past decade, calcium channel blockers have been recommended by some as the antihypertensive agents of choice in this population, because it was theorized that their vasodilatory effects would counteract the vasoconstrictive effects of the calcineurin inhibitors. With increasing data becoming available, reexamining the use of traditional antihypertensive agents, including diuretics and beta-blockers, or the newer agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, may be beneficial. Transplant clinicians must choose antihypertensive agents that will provide their patients with maximum benefit, from both a renal and a cardiovascular perspective. Beta-blockers, diuretics, and ACE inhibitors have all demonstrated significant benefit on morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease. Calcium channel blockers have been shown to possess the ability to counteract cyclosporine-induced nephrotoxicity. When compared with beta-blockers, diuretics, and ACE inhibitors, however, the relative risk of cardiovascular events is increased with calcium channel blockers. With the long-term benefits of calcium channel blockers on the kidney unknown and a negative cardiovascular profile, these agents are best reserved as adjunctive therapy to beta-blockers, diuretics, and ACE inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Calcium channel blockers as the treatment of choice for hypertension in renal transplant recipients: fact or fiction. 1282 Aug 20

It is estimated that there are greater than 100000 kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft in the United States. Recent advances in immunosuppression have improved short-term graft survival rates and decreased early mortality by decreasing the incidence and therapy for acute rejection episodes. For those accepted on the waiting list, transplant prolongs patient survival compared with remaining on dialysis. During the 1990s, 3 new immunosuppressive drugs were introduced in clinical kidney transplantation. All were approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration after large, controlled, randomized trials. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), when combined with cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone, lowered acute rejection rates by nearly 50% compared with control. Tacrolimus compared with CSA also significantly reduced acute rejection rates in kidney transplant recipients, but was associated with a significant increase in posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) in the early trials. When evaluated in combination with MMF, the incidence of PTDM was much lower. At the end of the decade, sirolimus was shown in several randomized trials to lower acute rejection rates and is believed to be less nephrotoxic compared with calcineurin inhibitors. All of the randomized trials were not statistically powered to assess long-term superiority. Registry analyses have been performed that appear to show some long-term benefit of immunosuppressive therapy with MMF. Other outcome assessments in kidney transplant recipients include risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and bone disease. Although there are few randomized trials, understanding of the significance of these common complications has progressed and strategies for therapy and intervention have been developed. This article focuses on the randomized trials of immunosuppressive therapy and complications associated with use of these drugs. In addition, we review the current management and intervention for the comorbidities associated with the long-term clinical management of the kidney transplant recipient.
 ...
PMID:Outcomes in kidney transplantation. 1283 99

Both type 2 diabetes and hypertension are multifactorial diseases. Several lines of evidence suggested that common genetic factors contribute to both conditions. Genes responsible for obesity and insulin resistance are candidates for common genetic factors. Among candidate genes are genes encoding glycogen synthase, beta 3-adrenergic receptor, glycogen-associated regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase-1, peroxisome proliferator--activated receptor-gamma (PPAR gamma), leptin and adiponectin. In addition, recent genome scans mapped loci linked to type 2 diabetes, hypertension and/or metabolic syndrome. Identification of genes responsible for both type 2 diabetes and hypertension will increase our understanding of molecular mechanisms of these conditions and facilitate the development of effective methods for prevention and intervention of diabetes and hypertension as well as metabolic syndrome.
 ...
PMID:[Genetic susceptibility to diabetes and hypertension]. 1287 70

Kidney grafts from suboptimal donors are more likely to suffer the nephrotoxic side-effects of cyclosporine than kidneys from standard donors. In an attempt to avoid the use of cyclosporine, we carried out a prospective study in low-immunological risk recipients of suboptimal kidneys, using an immunosuppressive protocol combining Thymoglobuline in induction with a bi-therapy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids. Patients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) <50% receiving a first renal transplant from a suboptimal donor (age >or=50, non heart beating, arterial hypertension, or acute renal failure) or a kidney at risk of delayed graft function (DGF) because of a prolonged cold ischaemia time (CIT) of 24 h or more, were eligible for this trial. Between September 1996 and December 1999, 30 patients were enrolled for the trial and treated with MMF 2 g orally, pre-operatively, and 3 g daily, post-operatively; Thymoglobuline 2 mg/kg IV pre-operatively, 1.5 mg/kg IV the next day, and for doses of 1 mg/kg IV given on alternate days; and prednisolone 0.25 mg/kg per day, reduced progressively from the end of the first month to 0.1 mg/kg per day by 3 months post-transplant. Cyclosporine was added only if rejection grade II or higher, or a reduction in MMF below 1 g daily, occurred. Ten patients (30%) suffered from DGF, and one kidney suffered primary non function. Seven patients (24%) suffered acute rejection (six were biopsy proven, 3 grade I and 3 grade II). MMF dosage was reduced in 28 patients because of adverse events, and calcineurin inhibitors were introduced in 16 patients. There were 14 episodes of opportunistic infection (cytomegalovirus (CMV 10), Herpes zoster 2, Listeria monocytogenes 1, Pseudomonas aeuruginosa 1), and 7 malignancies (skin 2, thyroid 1, lung 1, Kaposi's sarcoma 2, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder 1). Mean serum creatinine was 178, 199, 213, and 218 micromol/l at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years after transplantation, respectively. Actuarial patient and graft (after censoring for death) survival was 94% and 83% after 1 year and 79% and 65% after 5 years, respectively. These results show that with the combination of MMF, Thymoglobuline and steroids the use of cyclosporine can be delayed, and in a few cases completely avoided, with good efficacy in terms of prevention of rejection and recovery of renal function. Regardless of acceptable patient and graft survival, side-effects of MMF at the doses used in this protocol were common and led to overimmunosuppression in the long-term. Starting MMF at low dose, MPA monitoring and probably CMV prophylaxis may improve the results of this regimen.
 ...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression based on antithymocyte globulin and mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric kidney transplantation: results after 5 years. 1287 30

Recently, new calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus (FK-506) and microemulsion cyclosporin, have been approved for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients and short-term outcomes have been accumulating. In the majority of patients, these calcineurin inhibitors have been used in combination with new immunosuppressive drugs, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus. Under these circumstances, a comparison of cyclosporin and tacrolimus provides the answer to a very important controversial issue. Which drug should we choose in individual patients? In an attempt to answer this question, this review compared the use of tacrolimus and cyclosporin in modern immunosuppressive regimens, which have already been published in well designed clinical studies, and discusses how immunosuppression should be individualised in renal transplant patients.Overall, short-term patient and graft survival with cyclosporin microemulsion and tacrolimus is almost identical. The incidence of acute rejection is generally lower in tacrolimus/azathioprine- than in cyclosporin/azathioprine-treated patients. However, in conjunction with MMF, the difference in the incidence of acute rejection between tacrolimus- and cyclosporin-treated patients became smaller. Adverse events, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cosmetic changes (gum hypertrophy, hirsutism) seem to be less frequent in tacrolimus-treated than in cyclosporin-treated patients. Recent randomised studies showed that the incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was almost identical between low-dose tacrolimus- and cyclosporin-treated patients. According to the data discussed in this review, the recommendation on the choice of calcineurin inhibitors at this moment is that either cyclosporin or tacrolimus can be used safely and effectively for patients without any risk factors. However, at our centre, we prefer tacrolimus to cyclosporin in patients with a high risk for rejection, such as those with ABO-incompatibility, delayed graft function, sensitisation, and African American race and some other risk factors, such as hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. Moreover, tacrolimus may be preferable to cyclosporin for women because of hirsutism and for children because of the steroid-sparing effect. We consider that cyclosporin should be chosen when patients experience tacrolimus-related adverse events, such as severe chest pain, tremor, gastrointestinal symptoms and encephalopathy. In conclusion, well tolerated and effective immunosuppression is feasible with both cyclosporin and tacrolimus. In the current immunosuppressive regimens, a calcineurin inhibitor, either tacrolimus or cyclosporin, is the essential basic standard immunosuppressant. Clinicians need to decide the best means of optimising therapy for individual patients, based on various risk factors, such as risk of rejection, i.e. sensitisation, delayed graft function and ABO-incompatibility, and some adverse events, such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cosmetic changes.
 ...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: what is the best option? 1288 61

Insulin rapidly and completely inhibits expression of the hepatic insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) genes. This inhibition is mediated through a phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase-dependent regulation of a DNA element, termed the thymine-rich insulin response element, found within the promoters of each of these genes. This has led to the conclusion that these three promoters are regulated by insulin using the same molecular mechanism. However, we recently found that the regulation of the IGFBP1 but not the PEPCK or G6Pase genes by insulin was sensitive to rapamycin, an inhibitor of mTOR. Here, we present further evidence that different regulatory pathways mediate the insulin regulation of these promoters. Importantly, we identify a protein phosphatase activity in the pathway connecting mTOR to the IGFBP-1 promoter. These data have major implications for the development of molecular therapeutics for the treatment of insulin-resistant states such as diabetes and hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Different mechanisms are used by insulin to repress three genes that contain a homologous thymine-rich insulin response element. 1291 28

Tacrolimus (Tac), which blocks T- and B-cell proliferation by inhibiting calcineurin, was first used for immunosuppression following heart transplant (HT) in 1989. Two multicenter randomized trials have compared Tac to the oil-based cyclosporine (CsA) formulation (both combined with azathioprine and steroids) in HT patients. The two drugs displayed similar patient survival rates and incidences of rejection, nephrotoxicity, diabetes, and infections. The Tac group however, showed a lower incidence of arterial hypertension (and, in one study, of dyslipidemia). A pilot study of Tac in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids suggested that maintenance of serum mycophenolic acid levels at 2.5 to 4.5 microg/mL yields lower rejection rates without greater toxicity than previous regimens. Currently, a European multicenter randomized trial is comparing Tac with Neoral CsA, both used in combination with MMF, steroids, and induction antibodies. For patients undergoing primary immunosuppression with CsA, Tac has proved effective for rescue from steroid-resistant acute rejection. It also has tentatively been used without other drugs in selected patients. It is a valid alternative to CsA in current immunosuppressive regimens, because it does not cause gingival hyperplasia or hirsutism and, thus, may improve the quality of life and treatment compliance of female and pediatric patients. It may be preferable to CsA for patients with arterial hypertension or intractable dyslipidemia. Current and future studies will clarify the efficacy and safety of regimens combining Tac with MMF or rapamycin.
 ...
PMID:Tacrolimus in heart transplantation. 1296 69

The anti-interleukin-2 receptor (anti-IL-2R) antibody therapy is an exciting approach to the prevention of acute rejection after renal allograft transplantation whereby immunosuppression is exerted by a selective and competitive inhibition of IL-2-induced T cell proliferation, a critical pathway of allorecognition. The anti-IL-2R antibodies specifically block the alpha-subunit of the IL-2R on activated T cells, and prevent T cell proliferation and activation of the effector arms of the immune system. The anti-IL-2R antibodies are used as induction therapy, immediately after renal transplantation, for prevention of acute cellular rejection in children and adults. During acute rejection, the IL-2Ralpha chain is no longer expressed on T cells; thus, the antibodies cannot be used to treat an existing acute rejection. Two anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibodies are currently in clinical use: daclizumab and basiliximab. In placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials in adults, daclizumab and basiliximab in combination with calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression, significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection and corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection without increasing the risk of infectious or malignant complications, and neither antibody was associated with the cytokine-release syndrome. Children who receive calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression, as well as children who receive augmented immunosuppression to treat acute rejection, are at increased risk of growth impairment, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, lymphoproliferative disorders, diabetes mellitus, and cosmetic changes. In older children, the cosmetic adverse effects frequently reduce compliance with the treatment, and subsequently increase the risk of allograft loss. Being effective and well tolerated in children, the anti-IL-2R antibodies reduce the need for calcineurin inhibitors while maintaining the overall efficacy of the regimen; thus, the anti-IL-2R antibodies increase the safety margin (less toxicity, fewer adverse effects) of the baseline immunosuppression. Secondly, the anti-IL-2R antibodies decrease the need for corticosteroids and muromonab CD3 (OKT3) in children as a result of decreased incidence of acute rejection. The recommended pediatric dose of daclizumab is 1 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days for five doses, with the first dose administered within 24 hours pre-transplantation. This administration regimen maintains daclizumab levels necessary to completely saturate the IL-2Ralpha (5-10 microg/mL) in children for at least 12 weeks.The recommended pediatric dose of basiliximab for recipients <35 kg is 10 mg, and 20 mg for recipients > or =35 kg, intravenously on days 0 and 4 post-transplantation. This administration regimen maintains basiliximab levels necessary to completely saturate the IL-2Ralpha (>0.2 microg/mL) in children for at least 3 weeks.
 ...
PMID:Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies for the prevention of rejection in pediatric renal transplant patients: current status. 1451 Jun 27


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>