Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In untreated hypertensive patients, blood pressure is decreased during the hours that follow a single bout of exercise, but the mechanisms involved are as yet unknown. As antihypertensive chemotherapy may interfere with cardiovascular regulation, we investigated the effects of calcium antagonism with isradipine (slow-release oral formulation, SRO) on postexercise blood pressure and on the reflex control of forearm vascular resistance in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The results show that isradipine SRO exerted an additional blood pressure-lowering effect after exercise that was associated with a further decrease in forearm vascular resistance. The reflex changes in forearm vascular resistance were potentiated after exercise, but were not further affected by isradipine SRO. Therefore, isradipine SRO does not interfere with the cardiovascular mechanisms that act to decrease blood pressure after exercise in patients who have hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Postexercise reflex control of forearm vascular resistance during calcium antagonism with slow-release oral isradipine. 137 40

Fifty consecutive black patients with very severe hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure > or = 120 mm Hg and systolic > or = 210 mm Hg by the conventional cuff method) were treated in an open-label study (without a placebo or active drug control group) for 3 months with a long-acting preparation of isradipine (Dynacirc SRO), during which time serial changes in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), left ventricular (LV) mass index, and LV systolic function were evaluated. Mean 24-h ABPM was reduced from 184 +/- 13/119 +/- 6 to 148 +/- 18/96 +/- 11 mm Hg at 3 months (P < .0001). The reduction in BP was sustained for 24 h after dosing. Simultaneous BP measurements using a conventional cuff method and Dinamap were significantly different from the ABPM pre- and posttherapy, suggesting a marked "white coat" pressor effect. LV mass index regressed from 143 +/- 36 to 122 +/- 32 g/m2 at 3 months (P < .02). Heart rate and mean body weight were unchanged. Left ventricular performance was not adversely affected. Cardiac index and fractional shortening changed insignificantly, from 2.6 +/- 0.6 to 2.7 +/- 0.5 L/min/m2, and from 28 +/- 6 to 31 +/- 7%, respectively. Adverse effects were few and tended to disappear during the treatment period. All of the clinical laboratory parameters tested remained unchanged. We conclude that in this group of patients long-acting isradipine 1) showed a marked and sustained antihypertensive action demonstrated by 24-h ABPM; and 2) was well tolerated and associated with LV mass regression without adverse effect on systolic cardiac function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Effect of isradipine in black patients with very severe hypertension. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic evaluation. 770 99

Myocardial hypertrophy is a response to many diseases, above all hypertension, that involves morphological and functional damage and may be the basis for the development of myocardial dysfunction. We attempted to verify the effectiveness of a new calcium antagonist, isradipine 5 mg SRO, on the reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy. For this purpose 13 hypertensive patients (pts) were treated for 12 weeks, which is the minimum period described in the literature for the regression of hypertrophy. At the end of the study, blood pressure in all patients returned to normal levels (mean blood pressure from 120.15 +/- 4.4 to 108 +/- 6.4 mmHg, p < 0.001); end-systolic stress (from 128 +/- 30 to 65 +/- 14 g/cm2, p < 0.001), and left ventricular mass index (from 142 +/- 31 to 97 +/- 23 g/m2, p < 0.001) showed significant reduction. Moreover, Doppler-derived indexes of left ventricular filling improved, particularly early to late peak velocity of the mitral valve (E/A ratio) and deceleration time (from 235 +/- 37 to 198 +/- 17 msec, p < 0.001), which were normalized after 12 weeks. In conclusion isradipine shows rapid effects in the reversal of morphofunctional damage in hypertension. For this reason it also appears to be useful for the treatment of myocardial hypertrophy in the absence of chronic hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of the effectiveness of isradipine SRO in the treatment of hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. 808 26

The effects of spirapril and isradipine on blood pressure, urinary albumin excretion and sodium-volume homeostasis in hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients with nephropathy were assessed. Fifteen Type 1 diabetic patients aged 28-53 years with a diabetes duration of 19-37 years were studied. All had hypertension and diabetic nephropathy with a urinary albumin excretion of more than 300 mg/24 h. After a single blind placebo treatment period of 4 weeks the patients were randomly assigned to treatment with the calcium antagonist isradipine SRO 5 mg once daily or the ACE inhibitor spirapril 6 mg once daily for 6 months in a double-blind design. Isradipine lowered ambulatory systolic blood pressure from 152 +/- 12 to 141 +/- 11 mmHg (p < 0.05) and ambulatory diastolic pressure from 91 +/- 9 to 86 +/- 8 mmHg (p < 0.05). The blood pressure lowering effect of spirapril was similar: 156 +/- 13 vs 143 +/- 11 mmHg (p < 0.01) and 90 +/- 4 vs 84 +/- 4 mmHg (p < 0.05). The fractional albumin clearance was unchanged on isradipine but decreased after 6 months treatment with spirapril with on average 20% (p < 0.05). Total body exchangeable sodium decreased on spirapril treatment: 2994 +/- 296 vs 2636 +/- 194 meq/1.73 m2 (p < 0.05) and extracellular volume tended to do so (p = 0.12). On isradipine treatment these parameters remained unchanged. In conclusion both isradipine and spirapril lowered blood pressure in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Only the ACE inhibitor had demonstrable beneficial effects on urinary albumin excretion rate and the sodium-volume expansion seen in these patients.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of spirapril and isradipine in patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension. 817

Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a 4-week treatment each with the modified release formulation of the calcium antagonist isradipine (5 mg; Lomir SRO, CAS 75695-93-1) were compared with those of nitrendipine (20 mg) (both with morning intake) in 51 patients with mild to moderate hypertension using a double-blind, intraindividual crossover study. Blood pressure was measured over 24 h at the end of a 2-week placebo phase and after both treatment phases by means of a continuous ambulatory recording device. Upon statistical evaluation of all patients with 3 complete 24-h profiles (n = 44) and combined analysis of data from same treatments the following 24-h mean values were obtained: blood pressure (syst./diast.) was lowered from 151/98 mmHg to 141/91 mmHg by isradipine retard (IS) and to 141/92 mmHg by nitrendipine (NI), whereas heart rate remained nearly unchanged (78 vs 79 beats/min on both therapies). The 24-h profiles differed significantly between placebo and both therapies, the profile as a whole was more even on IS. Starting from a day-time mean value (6:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m.) on placebo of 155/102 mmHg blood pressure was reduced by IS to 143/94 mmHg and by NI to 144/95 mmHg; the corresponding night-time mean values were; placebo 138/85 mmHg, IS 132/82 mmHg, NI 134/83 mmHg. If one compares the area under the blood pressure curves during the hours from 6 p.m. to 12 p.m. significant differences (2p = 0.0128) were found for systolic pressure and borderline significance (2p = 0.0668) for diastolic differences in favour of IS.
 ...
PMID:[Circadian antihypertensive action and tolerability of a sustained-release form of isradipine in an intra-individual comparison with nitrendipine]. 832 96

Fifty-two black men who had supine diastolic blood pressures (DBP) above 95 mm Hg at the end of a 2-week placebo wash-out period were randomized to receive either isradipine SRO at 2.5 mg/day or enalapril at 10 mg/day for 8 weeks. After 4 weeks, the dosages were doubled if DBP remained above 90 mm Hg. Reductions in blood pressure were comparable in both groups. Mean supine DBP was reduced from 100.6 to 93.9 mm Hg in the isradipine-treated group, and from 103.9 to 98.2 mm Hg in the enalapril-treated group. At the end of the study, 24/27 patients were taking 5 mg isradipine SRO once daily, and 20/25 patients were taking 20 mg enalapril once daily. There were no serious adverse events. The results of this study indicated that monotherapy with isradipine SRO at the recommended initial dosage of 5 mg once daily is appropriate in black patients with hypertension. This was, however, not the case with enalapril at 10 mg once daily. The concurrent administration of a diuretic with enalapril may be more appropriate.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of isradipine SRO and enalapril in black patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. 846 35

The antihypertensive effects of four different antihypertensive medications (beta-blocking agent, atenolol 50 mg; calcium-antagonist, isradipine SRO [slow release] 2.5 mg; diuretic, hydrochlorothiazide [HCTZ] 25 mg; and angiotension converting enzyme-inhibitor, spirapril 6 mg) on obese patients with sleep disordered breathing and hypertension were compared by the ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM). Eighteen patients were randomized in a double-blind, crossover fashion to receive each of the four different medications for 8 weeks. ABPM was performed at baseline and after an 8-week treatment with these medications. A 2- to 3-week washout period occurred both at baseline and between each of the four medications. Three patients were omitted from statistical analysis because of technical problems of ABPM. Atenolol, isradipine SRO, and spirapril decreased significantly (P < .01) the mean 24-h systolic blood pressure, whereas HCTZ did not. The mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly after all four medications: 12 (SD+/-14) mm Hg with atenolol, 7 (SD+/-10) mm Hg with isradipine SRO, 3 mm Hg (SD+/-14) with HCTZ, and 6 (SD+/-15) mm Hg with spirapril (P < .01). During nighttime none of the medications reduced the mean diastolic or systolic blood pressure significantly. According to the 24-h blood pressure curve the influence of these four medications during the whole measurement period was not similar. Atenolol and spirapril lost their antihypertensive effect during the early morning hours. The antihypertensive effect of HCTZ varied markedly from hour to hour. The trough-to-peak ratio of no medication was >0.50. Negative correlation was observed between the apnea time and the mean systolic 24-h (r = -0.604, P = NS) and the mean systolic nocturnal blood pressure change (r = -0.590, P = NS). Our study revealed that the daytime high blood pressure was quite easily controlled by the ordinary monotherapy in these patients with partial upper airway obstruction and hypertension. Instead none of the medications used decreased nocturnal high blood pressure markedly.
 ...
PMID:Little effect of ordinary antihypertensive therapy on nocturnal high blood pressure in patients with sleep disordered breathing. 954 66