Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Sorafenib is a small molecule inhibitor of several kinases involved in tumour proliferation and tumour angiogenesis including Raf, VEGFR and platelet derived growth factor receptor. In vivo Raf kinase inhibition has been observed in pharmacodynamic studies. Sorafenib is one of several VEGF-targeting compounds with recently demonstrated substantial anti-tumour effects in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Delay in time to disease progression has been demonstrated in cytokine-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and further investigation is ongoing in a wide variety of tumour types. Sorafenib is well tolerated, with common toxicities including rash, diarrhoea, hand-foot skin reaction, fatigue and hypertension, when administered as the standard dose of 400 mg b.i.d.
 ...
PMID:Sorafenib. 1650 17

black triangle Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets the mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumour proliferation and angiogenesis.black triangle In the large, phase III, randomised, double-blind, multicentre Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial (TARGET) of patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell cancer in whom previous systemic therapy had failed, median progression-free survival was doubled in patients receiving sorafenib compared with those receiving placebo (5.9 vs 2.8mo).black triangle Significantly more patients receiving sorafenib than those receiving placebo in the phase III trial experienced complete or partial responses or stable disease.black triangle Age, risk-assessment score, prior treatment, metastasis in lung or liver, or time from diagnosis did not affect the improved progression-free survival in sorafenib recipients.black triangle In a randomised, phase II discontinuation trial of patients with advanced renal cancer, in which only those showing stable disease with sorafenib were randomised to further sorafenib or placebo, more patients receiving sorafenib were free of progressive disease 12 weeks after randomisation than were those receiving placebo, and median progression-free survival was longer in sorafenib recipients.black triangle In clinical trials, most drug-related adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Grade 3/4 hand-foot skin reaction and hypertension occurred more often with sorafenib than with placebo.
 ...
PMID:Sorafenib: in advanced renal cancer. 1733 1

Renal cell cancer (RCC) is a relatively uncommon malignancy, with 51,190 cases expected to be diagnosed in 2007. Localized disease is curable by surgery; however, locally advanced or metastatic disease is not curable in most cases and, until recently, had a limited response to drug treatment. Historically, biologic response modifiers or immunomodulating agents were tested in clinical trials based on observations that some cases of RCC can spontaneously regress. High-dose aldesleukin is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration as a treatment for advanced RCC; however, the drug is associated with a high frequency of severe adverse effects. Responses have been observed with low-dose aldesleukin and interferon alfa, but with little effect on overall survival. Sorafenib and sunitinib are novel therapies that target growth factor receptors known to be activated by the hypoxia-inducible factor and the Ras-Raf/MEK/ERK pathways. These pathways are important in the pathophysiology of RCC. Sorafenib and sunitinib have shown antitumor activity as first- and second-line therapy in patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic RCC who have clear-cell histology. Although complete responses are not common, both drugs promote disease stabilization and increase progression-free survival. This information suggests that disease stabilization may be an important determinant for response in RCC and possibly other cancers. Sorafenib and sunitinib are generally well tolerated and are considered first- and second-line treatment options for patients with advanced clear cell RCC. In addition, sorafenib and sunitinib have shown promising results in initial clinical trials evaluating antitumor activity in patients who are refractory to other antiangiogenic therapy. The most common toxicities with both sorafenib and sunitinib are hand-foot syndrome, rash, fatigue, hypertension, and diarrhea. Research is directed toward defining the optimal use of these new agents.
 ...
PMID:Sorafenib and sunitinib: novel targeted therapies for renal cell cancer. 1765 13

(1) Sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is marketed for the treatment of advanced-stage and metastatic renal carcinoma, and for second-line treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Sorafenib arrived on the market almost simultaneously for second-line treatment of kidney cancer. (2) In second-line treatment of kidney cancer, two non comparative trials showed an unusually high rate of at least partial tumour regression with sunitinib (25%, compared to only 2% with sorafenib). Head-to-head trials of the two drugs are lacking. Although indirect comparisons are notoriously unreliable, sunitinib appears to provide longer progression-free survival than sorafenib (about 9 months versus 5.5 months), although overall survival times are similar. (3) Preliminary results of a trial comparing sunitinib with interferon alfa as first-line treatments in 750 patients with kidney cancer show a 6-month event-free survival advantage in the sunitinib arm. The precise overall survival time has not yet been calculated. (4) In 312 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours in whom imatinib has failed, a double-blind placebo-controlled trial showed that sunitinib prolonged overall survival time, but potential biases undermine these results. (5) The adverse effect profile of sunitinib appears to be similar to those of imatinib and sorafenib, apart from more thyroid disorders. The principal adverse effects are cutaneous, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular and haematological disorders. Arterial hypertension, sometimes severe, occurred in 16% of patients treated with sunitinib. Other serious adverse events included tumour haemorrhage and pulmonary embolism. A risk of cardiac toxicity leading to heart failure cannot currently be ruled out. (6) Sunitinib is metabolised by cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP 3A4, increasing the likelihood of drug interactions. (7) These results support the use of sunitinib as second-line therapy for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Additional clinical evaluation is needed, however. In first-line treatment of kidney cancer, it is preferable to wait for detailed results of the ongoing trial, especially effects on survival time, before judging the possible advantages and disadvantages of sunitinib compared to interferon alfa. In second-line treatment, sorafenib is better-assessed than sunitinib and should therefore be preferred, pending a direct comparison of the two drugs.
 ...
PMID:Sunitinib: new drug. For some gastrointestinal stromal tumours. 1772 33

(1) Kidney cancer is infrequent. Most renal malignancies are adenocarcinomas. The prognosis varies markedly from one patient to another. Interferon alfa generally increases survival time by a few months in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancers, but it has a negative impact on quality of life. (2) Sorafenib inhibits several kinases implicated in angiogenesis and tumour growth. It was recently approved for second-line treatment of advanced-stage kidney cancer. (3) A double-blind placebo-controlled trial involving 903 patients evaluated second-line sorafenib therapy at an oral dose of 400 mg twice a day. Patients with a poor prognosis were not eligible. (4) Sorafenib increased overall survival time by about three months (50% mortality was reached at 19 months in the sorafenib group and at 16 months in the placebo group). The median progression-free survival time also increased by about three months (5.5 months with sorafenib versus about 3 months with placebo). The impact of sorafenib on quality of life was not reported. (5) An indirect comparison shows a higher rate of tumour regression with sunitinib than with sorafenib (25% versus 2%), and also longer progression-free survival (3 to 4 months longer with sunitinib). However, there was no difference between the two drugs in overall survival time, which is the most relevant outcome. Note that no practical conclusions can be drawn from indirect comparisons of this type, as they are subject to too many biases. (6) The main adverse events among patients treated with sorafenib in this trial were cutaneous disorders (about 30% of patients), diarrhoea (about 20%), hypertension (10%), and bleeding (10%). Cases of myocardial ischaemia and neuropathies also occurred. (7) Sorafenib is teratogenic in several animal species. (8) Sorafenib is metabolised by the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP 3A4. The risk of clinically relevant drug interactions is poorly documented. (9) For second-line treatment of patients with kidney cancer and no factors of poor prognosis, available data favour the use of sorafenib, which is better assessed than sunitinib.
 ...
PMID:Sorafenib: new drug. Second-line treatment of kidney cancer: better evaluated than sunitinib. 1772 34

Diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) frequently occurs at advanced stages, severely limiting the success of treatment, and median survival is barely more than a year. Previously, treatment of renal cancer was limited to nephrectomy or immunotherapy (interleukin or interferon-alpha), which was effective in a small subset of patients but often was accompanied by severe side effects. New orally administered targeted therapies have become available, offering broader benefits to patients with advanced RCC. Sorafenib is an oral, multikinase inhibitor recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as treatment for advanced RCC based on its extension of median progression-free survival from 12-24 weeks. Oncology nurses must ensure patient adherence and manage side effects of emerging treatments. This article reviews the management of skin rash, hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, diarrhea, and fatigue in patients receiving sorafenib. In addition, a case study of a patient receiving sorafenib is presented.
 ...
PMID:Sorafenib: a promising new targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma. 1856 57

Until 2006, immunotherapy (interferon-alpha or interleukin 2) was the standard medical treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and its results were disappointing: despite a few cases of complete response with prolonged survival, median survival was one year. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis, especially in clear cell carcinoma, has led to the development of multiple targeted therapies to inhibit key effectors: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), VEGF receptor, and mTOR (target of rapamycin). Two inhibitors targeting several protein kinases, including the VEGF receptor, have increased progression-free survival in patients with metastatic RCC and are now commercially available: sunitinib (Sutent) as first-line treatment and sorafenib (Nexavar) as second-line treatment. These targeted therapies will certainly affect overall survival, but it is too early for any firm conclusions. Their side-effects, usually low or moderate, include asthenia, anorexia, diarrhea, hand-and-foot syndrome and hypertension. Optimal management is required to ensure prolonged exposure. Other drugs have been effective: bevacizumab (Avastin), a monoclonal antibody inhibiting VEGF, increases progression-free survival as second-line treatment, and temsirolimus (Torisel), an mTOR protein kinase inhibitor, increases overall survival in the population of patients with poor prognosis. These targeted drugs will serve as the basis for development of future therapeutic strategies.
 ...
PMID:[Renal cell carcinoma and antiangiogenic therapies]. 1803 17

As newer, molecularly targeted, anticancer drugs are entering clinical practice, a wide array of previously unrecognised and ill defined side effects of these drugs are increasingly observed. Sorafenib and sunitinib are two of these novel agents, acting on tumour angiogenesis as well as on other key proliferative pathways; recently approved for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer, they may cause peculiar cutaneous, vascular and mucosal toxicities, including hand-foot skin reaction, skin rash, hypertension and GERD-like oesophagitis/gastritis. In this review, we shall deal with these poorly recognised, but sometimes extremely distressing, toxicities; pathophysiologic mechanisms will be discussed and suggestions for treatment of each toxicity will be proposed, based on the few pieces of evidence available and, especially, on our empirical experience.
 ...
PMID:Uncovering Pandora's vase: the growing problem of new toxicities from novel anticancer agents. The case of sorafenib and sunitinib. 1818 24

Sorafenib (Nexavar) is an orally active multikinase inhibitor that is approved in the EU for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Monotherapy with sorafenib prolongs overall survival and delays the time to progression in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who are not candidates for potentially curative treatment or transarterial chemoembolization. Sorafenib is generally well tolerated in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, sorafenib represents an important advance in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and is the new standard of care for this condition. The bi-aryl urea sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that inhibits cell surface tyrosine kinase receptors (e.g. vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta) and downstream intracellular serine/threonine kinases (e.g. Raf-1, wild-type B-Raf and mutant B-Raf); these kinases are involved in tumour cell proliferation and tumour angiogenesis. In vitro, dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis was seen with sorafenib in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells lines. Sorafenib demonstrated dose-dependent antitumour activity in a murine xenograft model of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Steady-state plasma concentrations were reached within 7 days in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours who received twice-daily oral sorafenib. Metabolism of sorafenib occurs primarily in the liver and is mediated via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A9. In advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, differences in sorafenib pharmacokinetics between Child-Pugh A and B patients were not considered clinically significant. Sorafenib may be associated with drug interactions. For example, sorafenib exposure was reduced by an average 37% with concomitant administration of the CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin (rifampin); sorafenib concentrations may also be decreased by other CYP3A4 inducers. Monotherapy with oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily prolonged median overall survival and delayed the median time to progression in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase III trials (the SHARP trial and the Asia-Pacific trial). There was no significant difference between sorafenib and placebo recipients in the median time to symptomatic progression in either trial. The vast majority of patients included in these trials were Child-Pugh A. Combination therapy with sorafenib plus doxorubicin did not delay the median time to progression to a significant extent compared with doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. However, the median durations of overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly longer in patients receiving sorafenib plus doxorubicin than in those receiving doxorubicin alone. Combination therapy with sorafenib plus tegafur/uracil or mitomycin also showed potential in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of noncomparative trials. Monotherapy with oral sorafenib was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, with a manageable adverse effect profile; diarrhoea and hand-foot skin reaction were consistently the most commonly occurring drug-related adverse events in clinical trials. In the SHARP trial, drug-related adverse events of any grade occurring in significantly more sorafenib than placebo recipients included diarrhoea, hand-foot skin reaction, anorexia, alopecia, weight loss, dry skin, abdominal pain, voice changes and 'other' dermatological events. A similar tolerability profile was seen in the Asia-Pacific trial. As expected given the addition of a chemotherapy agent, the adverse event profile in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received combination therapy with sorafenib plus doxorubicin differed somewhat to that seen with sorafenib monotherapy in the SHARP trial. In patients receiving sorafenib plus doxorubicin, the most commonly occurring all-cause adverse events (all grades) included fatigue, neutropenia, diarrhoea, elevated bilirubin levels, abdominal pain, hand-foot skin reaction, left ventricular dysfunction, hypertension and febrile neutropenia.
 ...
PMID:Sorafenib: a review of its use in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. 1922 77

Sorafenib(Nexavar)is a multikinase inhibitor, with disruptive activity at intracellular C-RAF, B-RAF and mutant BRAF receptors, and extracellular C-KIT, FLT-3, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and PDGFRb receptors. In the phase III study, as compared with placebo, treatment with sorafenib significantly prolonged progression free survival(PFS)in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in whom previous therapy has failed. Diarrhea, rash, fatigue, hand-foot skin reactions, and hypertension were the most common adverse events associated with sorafenib. As sorafenib was associated with similar rates of clinically manageable side effects in elderly patients as compared to younger patients, response rates to sorafenib in elderly patients were comparable to those of younger patients. Sorafenib was approved multinationally for the treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Sorafenib and sunitinib are reference standards of care for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and are recommended by current clinical guidelines. For the future, research of biomarker, adverse drug reaction, and combined regimens are needed to maximize the effects of molecular-targeted drugs.
 ...
PMID:[Sorafenib(Nexavar)]. 1954 31


1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>