Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In the present study we investigated the effect of a selective alpha 1-adrenergic blocker (doxazosin), an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (captopril), and a calcium channel antagonist (nifedipine) on renal function in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. 30 NIDD hypertensive patients (age = 50 +/- 3 years; BMI = 30 +/- 1 kg/m2) (mean +/- SEM) were studied before and after a 12-week period of antihypertensive treatment. Ten patients were treated with doxazosin (Cardura) (2-8 mg once daily or 8 mg b.i.d.), 9 with captopril (Capoten) (25-50 mg b.i.d.), and 11 with nifedipine (Procardia-XL) (30-60 mg once daily). Blood pressure, creatinine clearance, 24-hour urinary protein excretion, fasting plasma glucose concentration and glycosylated hemoglobin were measured before and after drug treatment. Fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were similar in all three groups prior to the start of antihypertensive therapy and did not change significantly from baseline in any treatment groups. In the doxazosin group creatinine clearance rose from 99 +/- 8 to 122 +/- 8 ml/1.73 m2.min (p < 0.01), while 24-hour urinary protein excretion declined from 2.66 +/- 0.05 to 1.76 +/- 0.02 mg/day/ml/1.73 m2.min (p < 0.01). In diabetics treated with captopril creatinine clearance rose from 93 +/- 6 to 109 +/- 9 ml/1.73 m2.min (p < 0.05), while the 24-hour urinary protein excretion fell from 2.70 +/- 0.05 to 2.03 +/- 0.04 mg/day/ml/1.73 m2.min (p < 0.05). In patients treated with nifedipine creatinine clearance did not change (97 +/- 6 vs. 94 +/- 7 ml/1.73 m2.min), while 24-hour urinary protein excretion decreased from 2.84 +/- 0.04 to 1.95 +/- 0.03 mg/day/ml/1.73 m2.min. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in doxazosin (150 +/- 3/95 +/- 2 mm Hg), captopril (153 +/- 3/93 +/- 1), and nifedipine (155 +/- 4/93 +/- 1) groups prior to the start of antihypertensive therapy and declined to 143 +/- 3/84 +/- 3 (doxazosin), 139 +/- 3/82 +/- 3 (captopril), and 141 +/- 3/84 +/- 1 (nifedipine) mm Hg (all p < 0.01 vs. pretreatment). In summary, both doxazosin and captopril treatment were associated with significant rises in GFR, while all three antihypertensive agents caused a significant decline in proteinuria. These results indicate that alpha-adrenergic blockers, ACE inhibitors, and calcium channel antagonists can safely and effectively be used in the clinical management of non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with hypertension.
 ...
PMID:Effect of alpha-adrenergic blockers, ACE inhibitors, and calcium channel antagonists on renal function in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. 885 95

Issues raised recently concerning the safety of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) prompted an analysis of the occurrence of cardiovascular events and death in the Pfizer Inc. hypertension clinical trial databases for amlodipine (Norvasc) and nifedipine in the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation (Procardia XL). Prospectively defined analyses of data from comparative and noncomparative trials of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS were conducted. Outcome measures included cardiovascular and noncardiovascular deaths, and adverse cardiovascular events including new/worsened angina, myocardial infarction (MI), serious arrhythmia, stroke, congestive heart failure, and bleeding. Among all amlodipine-treated patients (n = 32,920), the incidence rates for all-cause death, MI, and new/worsened angina were 3.0, 3.3, and 1.6/1,000 patient-years of exposure, respectively. Among those in comparative trials alone (n = 4,126), the all-cause death rate was 4.1/1,000 patient-years, which was comparable to that of other non-CCB agents and significantly less than that of other CCBs (23.8/1,000 patient-years, p = 0.015), although the difference in rates represents only 2 deaths. Among all nifedipine-GITS-treated patients (n = 2,645), the rate of all-cause death was 4.1/1,000 patient-years, of MI 6.5/1,000 patient-years, and of new/ worsened angina 5.7/1,000 patient-years. The incidence rates for MI and other cardiac events were low in these hypertension trials, and did not differ among treatment groups in either the amlodipine or nifedipine GITS comparative analyses. In the clinical trial databases analyzed, there is no signal suggesting excessive risk of death or cardiovascular events for hypertensive patients treated with amlodipine or nifedipine GITS.
 ...
PMID:Safety of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients. 959 99

Investigation of hemodynamic changes in 180 women liable to operations of supravaginal amputation were carried out in order to chose the optimum method of curative premedication in patients with essential arterial hypertension. The results obtained show that Adalat in dosage 60 mg daily during 7 days is most effective in cases with concomitant border-line hypertension. Anaprilin in dosage 160 mg daily and Adalat in dosage 60 mg/day during 7 days have the best hypotensive effect at the first stage of essential hypertension. Clopheline in dosage 300 mg/day or Adalat in dosage 60 mg/day during 7 days are most expedient in the course of hypotensive preparing the patients with the II stage of essential hypertension.
 ...
PMID:[Premedication with different groups of hypotensive drugs in preparation of patients with concomitant arterial hypertension to planned surgical treatment]. 961 19

It is widely accepted that abdominal obesity presents with exaggerated insulin secretion, insulin resistance and a trend toward glucose intolerance. Hypertension is frequently associated to abdominal obesity, and hyperinsulinism could play a role in its pathogenesis. Some studies reported that Ca-antagonists positively influence insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in obese patients with normal or elevated blood pressure. However, other studies reported worsening of metabolic balance during treatment with Ca-antagonists in hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients and in normal subjects. We studied 19 patients with abdominal obesity, mild hypertension and insulin resistance on balanced, mild hypocaloric diet (1400 Kcal), to verify the effects of the Ca-antagonist nifedipine on both basal and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-induced glucose and insulin levels as well as on IGF-I basal and DHEA-S levels and fat mass (FM). To achieve this goal, 10 hypertensive obese subjects (HOB-NIFE, 3 males, 7 females, mean age +/- SD 44.6 +/- 1.7 yr; body mass index (BMI) 37.1 +/- 2.5 Kg/m2, WHR 0.95 +/- 0.02) received 3-month treatment with nifedipine (Adalat Crono 30 Bayer, 1 tab daily) while other 9 hypertensive obese (HOB, 3 males, 6 females, 42 +/- 2.4 yr, BMI 35.8 +/- 1.8 Kg/m2, WHR 0.91 +/- 0.03) were studied during diet only. The same parameters were studied also in 8 normotensive obese patients (OB: 3 males, 5 females, 48.1 +/- 2.1 yr, BMI 35.8 +/- 2.4 Kg/m2, WHR 0.90 +/- 0.03) on the same balanced hypocaloric diet. Basal systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure levels in HOB-NIFE and HOB were similar. At baseline, all groups had similar basal and OGTT-induced glucose, insulin and glucose insulin ratio (GIR) levels as well as IGF-I and DHEA-S levels. After 3 months BMI fell to the same extent in all groups (p < 0.05 vs baseline) while WHR and FFM/FM ratio did not change. SBP and DBP decreased HOB-NIFE (p < 0.02) but also during diet alone in both HOB and OB, though to a lesser extent (p < 0.05). Both basal and OGTT-stimulated glucose and insulin levels as well as IGF-I and DHEA-S levels were not modified in HOB-NIFE as well as in HOB and OB. In conclusion, our data indicate that nifedipine treatment does not modify glucose tolerance as well as insulin secretion and sensitivity, IGF-I and DHEA-S levels in hypertensive abdominal obese patients. Thus, nifedipine treatment has no detrimental effects on endocrine-metabolic balance in hypertensive obese patients.
 ...
PMID:Effects of 3-month nifedipine treatment on endocrine-metabolic parameters in patients with abdominal obesity and mild hypertension. 963 24

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel group comparison of nifedipine GITS 20 mg (Adalat LA) once daily and bendrofluazide 2.5 mg once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension was conducted. Two hundred patients with a diastolic blood pressure (BP) in the range 95 to 109 mm Hg were randomised to active treatment for 6 weeks. For the per-protocol efficacy population, both treatments resulted in clinically significant mean reductions of trough diastolic BP (nifedipine GITS -8.9 mm Hg, bendrofluazide -7.9 mm Hg) and systolic BP (nifedipine GITS -10.4 mm Hg, bendrofluazide -10.5 mm Hg). The study demonstrated that nifedipine GITS was 'at least equivalent' to bendrofluazide in the reduction of trough diastolic BP (one-sided upper 95% confidence limit, 0.5 mm Hg), where inequivalence had been pre-defined as a difference in mean diastolic BP of > or =5 mm Hg. Both drugs were well tolerated, the overall incidence of adverse events in the nifedipine GITS treatment group being 34.0% (34/100) and in the bendrofluazide treatment group being 29.0% (29/100). The commonest events (incidence > or =5%) were headache, constipation, 'flu syndrome and vasodilatation with nifedipine GITS and headache and nausea with bendrofluazide. An increased incidence of elevations of plasma urea and glucose was observed in patients treated with bendrofluazide (9.6% and 30.4% respectively) compared to those treated with nifedipine GITS (3.1% and 18.8% respectively). Nifedipine GITS 20 mg once daily is 'at least equivalent' to bendrofluazide 2.5 mg once daily in reduction of blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.
 ...
PMID:A randomised double-blind study comparing nifedipine GITS 20 mg and bendrofluazide 2.5 mg administered once daily in mild-to-moderate hypertension. 992 55

Hypertension (HTN) is a significant problem in pediatric renal transplant (TP) recipients, predisposing the individuals to the development of cardiovascular disease and graft dysfunction. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) are considered excellent agents to treat post-TP HTN. We compared the efficacy and adverse effects of the two most commonly prescribed CCBs in our pediatric renal TP population: nifedipine (Procardia, or P) and amlodipine (Norvasc, or N). All patients (n = 24) had been started on a CCB for systolic (SBP) and/or diastolic BP (DBP) > 95%. There were no other changes in adjunctive antihypertensive medications or doses during the cross-over period. Post-TP, pretreatment (pretx) SBP was 137.6 +/- 10.9 mmHg. The post-treatment SBP were (in mmHg): 128.5 +/- 11.9 (all patients, n = 24) (p = 0.009 vs. pretx); 126.4 +/- 10.0 (P alone, n = 15) (p = 0.007 vs. pretx); 132.8 +/- 14.4 (P + other antihypertensive(s), n = 9) (p = 0.331, NS vs. pretx). The post-TP, pretreatment DBP was 88.2 +/- 11.1 mmHg. The post-treatment DBP were (in mmHg): 78.5 +/- 6.9 (all patients, n = 24) (p = 0.03 vs. pretx); 77.2 +/- 7.4 (P alone, n = 15) (p = 0.008 vs. pretx); 80.7 +/- 6.1 (P + other antihypertensive(s), n = 9) (p = 0.063, NS vs. pretx). P and N were equally effective in reducing SBP (p = 0.843, NS) and DBP (p = 0.612, NS). Cyclosporin A (CyA) dose (p = 0.81) and trough levels (p = 0.19) were similar in P- and N-treated patients. Calculated GFR was virtually identical in P- and N-treated patients (p = 0.89). Patients (or parents of) reported a higher incidence of various side-effects while receiving P, including headache, flushing, dizziness and leg cramps. Furthermore, 22/24 (91.7%) reported some degree of gingival hyperplasia during treatment with P, and all these patients reported a stabilization or reduction of hypertrophy after the switch from P to N. We conclude that CCBs (N) are efficacious drugs for the purpose of BP control and renal protection in pediatric renal TP recipients.
 ...
PMID:Use of calcium-channel blockers in pediatric renal transplant recipients. 1056 73

Coral reef aorta is a rare calcifying disease of the juxtarenal and suprarenal aorta. We report here our surgical experience in treating 21 patients, with a mean follow-up of 4 years and 7 months. Both genders were equally affected. Ten male (48%) and 11 female (52%) patients with a mean age of 54.6 years (range 42-76 years) underwent surgery. The main symptoms were limb claudication (n = 11, 52%), renovascular stenosis (n = 9, 43%) with concurrent renovascular hypertension (n = 5, 24%), and angina abdominalis (n = 7, 33%). Most patients had multiorgan vascular disease such as iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease (n = 14, 66%), coronary artery obstruction (n = 8, 38%), or obstruction of the carotid artery (n = 6, 28%). Risk factors did not differ between coral reef patients and those with other occlusive vascular diseases. All patients were treated through vascular operations, including open thromboendarterectomy of the suprarenal (n = 9, 43%), infrarenal (n = 4, 19%), or supra- and infrarenal aorta (n = 8, 38%), and thromboendarterectomy of the following vessels: celiac artery (n = 7, 33%), superior mesenteric artery (n = 12, 57%), inferior mesenteric artery (n = 3, 14%), unilateral renal artery (n = 3, 14%), or bilateral renal artery (n = 9, 43%). Bypass reconstructions were performed in 39% (n = 8). A thoracoabdominal approach was used in 14 patients (67%) and a median laparotomy in 7 (33%). Our results show that coral reef aorta is not confined to either gender. It appears most frequently in the context of general atherosclerotic disease and patients benefit from timely diagnosis and operation before onset of severe, life-threatening visceral and renal complications.
 ...
PMID:Coral reef aorta: a long-term study of 21 patients. 1112 58

The aim of the study was to compare the effects of long-term treatment with different types of antihypertensive drugs on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic function in patients with essential hypertension. We examined 60 patients with mild to moderate hypertension from 35 to 55 years old (middle age 44.3 +/- 2.3 yrs) having no concomitant diseases. Patients were treated for six months with different types of antihypertensive drugs: 21 patient received nifedipine-retard 40 mg/day, 20--atenolol 100 mg/day, 10--losartan potassium 100 mg/day, 9--perindopril 4 mg/day. Cardiac structure and function was studied by echocardiography. For the left ventricle (LV) the diastolic mass normalised for body surface area (LVMI), the ratio of the early and atrial mitral inflow velocities (E/A), isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), relative wall thickness (RWT) were measured. After six months of treatment LVMI decreased by 9% in nifedipine group (P < 0.01), by 10.5% in atenolol group (P < 0.01), by 12% in losartan group (P < 0.01) and by 8.2% in perindopril group (NS). RWT decreased in all groups, while diastolic dimension index remained unchanged. The reversal of LVH was not related to blood pressure reduction. It was more significant in patients with initially higher values of LVMI. Antihypertensive effects of the drugs were comparable. Long-term treatment with all types of selected drugs improves cardiac structure and function independently of their antihypertensive action. Our data suggest that on the basis of the influence on cardiac remodelling no preference for any studied drug can be discerned. The work had the following source of support: the atenolol (Falitonsin) and nifedipine-retard (Corinfar-retard) were provided by the AWD Company (Germany), losartan potassium has been provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme Company and perindopril (Prestarium) by the Servier Group.
 ...
PMID:Correction of hypertensive cardiac remodelling: comparison of different antihypertensive therapies. 1120 28

The efficacy and tolerability of Felodipine extended-release was compared with Nifedipine retard in the management of patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. A total of one hundred and thirty three patients were screened out of which one hundred and twenty-one patients were enrolled in a 9-week multicentre open, randomised rising-dose trial to receive either Felodipine 5-10 mg once daily or Nifedipine 10-20 mg twice daily. Blood pressure was measured at the end of the dosing interval that is 24 hours and 12 hours after Felodipine and Nifedipine respectively. Both drugs, Felodipine and Nifedipine were found to lower blood pressure significantly compared with baseline. After three weeks of treatment, seated blood pressure was reduced by 20/14 mmHg (systolic/diastolic) and by 24/16 mmHg after 6 weeks in the felodipine group. Corresponding values in the Nifedipine group were 16/09 mmHg and 24/13mmHg. Pulse rate was not significantly affected by either drugs. The percentage of patients who had satisfactory control after 3 weeks treatment was 57.6% for Felodipine and 33.3% for Nifedipine (significant). After dose titration (where necessary), at the end of the study the response rates were 76.3% (n=45) and 79.6% (n=43) for Felodipine and Nifedipine respectively (non significant). Both drugs were metabolically inert and did not derange the haematologic and biochemical profile of patients. They produced no significant weight changes. The pattern of side effects were similar in both groups but tended to be more severe with Nifedipine necessitating withdrawal of two patients in this group. In conclusion, Felodipine ER 5mg - 10mg once daily, and Nifedipine Retard, 20mg twice daily were equally effective medications for mild-to-moderate hypertension but Felodipine was better tolerated.
 ...
PMID:A randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of Felodipine (Plendil) and Nifedipine (Adalat) retard in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. 1188 71

The year 2004 was not marked by major pharmacological advances, but by confirmation of previous "evidence". Several innovative drugs for stable angina (ranolazine, ivabradine), some interesting results in acute coronary syndrome (PROVE IT study), some classic concepts (cannabinoid receptors and their antagonists such as rimonabant) applied to novel indications (treatment of obesity), hopes for the "sartans" revived in the light of new evidence (VALUE study), advances in the management of diabetes and hypertension (ASCOT and CARDS studies), nebivolol which is not just a betablocker but also produces the NO radical (is this why it decreased the mortality of heart failure in the elderly in the SENIOR study?). In contrast, although Chronadalate did not live up to expectations for coronary insufficiency, the year was marked above all by the much heralded withdrawal of Vioxx for increasing cardiovascular risk. The old adage: primum non nocere springs to mind.
 ...
PMID:[The best of clinical pharmacology in 2004]. 1571 64


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>