UMLS:C0020538 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a prevalence of 3-7% in most Western countries. Decreased insulin secretion and diminished tissue insulin sensitivity are both implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease; both may be exacerbated by persistent hyperglycemia and improved by normalization of blood sugar levels. Measures to control hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia are important in the management of NIDDM and prevention of its long-term complications. The effects of dietary modification, exercise, and antihypertensive and antiplatelet therapy, as well as of pharmacologic control of blood sugar, on the vascular and renal complications of NIDDM have been investigated. Gliclazide is a second-generation sulfonylurea drug whose efficacy in the treatment of NIDDM, alone or in combination with insulin, has been widely demonstrated. Studies of the use of gliclazide, reported at recent symposia, are summarized in this review.
...
PMID:Current status of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type II): management with gliclazide. 187 2

Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of these complications is increased about two- to four-fold in people with diabetes in the United States, and they contribute substantially to morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The pathogenesis of macrovascular disease in diabetes is multifactorial. Endothelial injury is an early event, followed by macrophage adherence and uptake of lipids to produce a fatty streak. Platelet adherence, aggregation, and release of thromboxane and platelet-derived growth factors may then occur. Quantitative and qualitative alterations of lipoproteins are seen, particularly in uncontrolled insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Hyperinsulinemia may be contributory, as may elevated plasma proinsulin levels. Glycation of plasma proteins and of components of the vascular wall occurs, and altered coagulation and/or fibrinolysis may lead to thrombosis. The process is accelerated by hypertension, smoking, and hypercholesterolemia. Gliclazide is an oral sulfonylurea agent that has been reported to have actions on platelet function and fibrinolysis in addition to its effects on glycemia. The evidence for this is reviewed, and recommendations for future studies are made.
...
PMID:Pathophysiology of vascular disease in diabetes: effects of gliclazide. 187 5

Five thousand five hundred seventy-two newly diagnosed non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients (3,225 men and 2,347 women; mean age, 58.5 years) were recruited through the General Practitioners (GPs) network in France. All had persistent hyperglycemia after a preliminary 3-month period with dietary and life-style modification. Gliclazide (80 to 320 mg/d) was then prescribed as diabetic pharmacotherapy for 2 years. Additional therapy for hypertension and dyslipidemia was started if necessary. The aim of the study was mainly to determine the feasibility of a GP-directed protocol for the monitoring and treatment of newly diagnosed NIDDM patients, and to assess the effectiveness of diabetic therapy in this cohort. Diabetes was diagnosed in 78% of the cohort during routine screening. Among the women, 6.5% had a history of gestational diabetes. Eighteen percent of the patients had a parental history of diabetes, and the dominant maternal role in the genesis of NIDDM was confirmed. High blood pressure (Joint National Committee V criteria) was found at inclusion in 38.8% of the whole cohort. Hyperlipidemia was known in 44.6%. A history of stroke was present in 1.6% of the patients, and coronary heart disease (CHD) in 6.3%. These data support the relationship between the atherogenic state and development of NIDDM. Microalbuminuria defined as urinary albumin excretion (UAE) of at least 20 mg/L was found in 29.6% of the patients, and retinopathy in 9.8%. Among the included patients, 23% did not complete the study and were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Of these, 14% (808 patients) had only baseline evaluation data and 9% (499 patients) withdrew later. Comparison of mean baseline and final results in study completers uncovered a significant improvement in fasting blood glucose ([FBG] 182 +/- 48 v 137 +/- 40 mg/dL), post prandial blood glucose ([PPBG] 209 +/- 68 v 162 +/- 52 mg/dL), and hemoglobin A1c ([HbA1c] 8.7% +/- 2.5% v 7.3% +/- 2.0%). A slight improvement in total cholesterol (228 +/- 44 v 222 +/- 41 mg/dL), body mass index ([BMI] 28.5 +/- 4.7 v 27.9 +/- 4.5 kg/m2), and waist to hip ratio (0.99 +/- 0.1 v 0.98 +/- 0.1) was observed. There was a decrease in the percentage of patients with high blood pressure (38.5% v 30.7%). A mild increase in the prevalence of retinopathy (10.2% v 11.8%) was noted during the study, while the incidence of microalbuminuria remained unchanged (30.2% v 29.5%). In conclusion, the data indicate that the GPs involved in this study were able to successfully monitor and manage NIDDM patients in accordance with a standardized protocol. Gliclazide appeared to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment. The high prevalence of chronic diabetic complications at diagnosis emphasizes the delay encountered in reaching the diagnosis of NIDDM and the problems associated with this delay. In addition to the classic risk factors for NIDDM exhibited in this patient cohort, we have identified CHD and a maternal genetic component as further potential predicting factors.
...
PMID:Management of newly diagnosed non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in the primary care setting: effects of 2 years of gliclazide treatment--the Diadem Study. 943 56

Subjects with type 2 diabetes have markedly increased rates of coronary heart disease (CHD) that are only partly explained by the increased levels of conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as total cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking. Although an increasing number of studies have suggested a role for glycemia in cardiovascular disease, considerable controversy remains. This issue may be resolved when the results of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) are presented. One possible promising relatively new risk factor that may explain high levels of CHD in diabetic subjects is increased oxidative stress. Type 2 diabetic subjects have an increased preponderance of small dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL), which predisposes to the oxidation of LDL. Almost all studies show that diabetic subjects have increased oxidative stress. In addition, they may have lower levels of alpha-tocopherol. In most studies, increased oxidative stress has been associated with cardiovascular disease, although prospective data are lacking. If levels of oxidative stress are increased, what are the best levels to reduce it to? Improved glycemic control has been associated with decreased oxidative stress. Antioxidant replacement such as alpha-tocopherol may also be beneficial. Interestingly, some special properties of hypoglycemic agents have been described. Gliclazide has been reported to favorably affect both free radicals and platelet reactivity. Gliclazide may have a more favorable effect on tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) than tolbutamide. In conclusion, increased levels of oxidative stress may underlie some of the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetic subjects. Interventions to decrease levels of oxidative stress by methods such as improved glycemic control, antioxidant therapy (ie, alpha-tocopherol), and gliclazide are indicated.
...
PMID:Clinical relevance of the oxidative stress concept. 1069 18

The progression of diabetes and hypertension complications is associated with microalbuminuria. Intensive glycemic control prevents or retards microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes, but little is known about the respective benefits of different antidiabetic drugs. We studied the effect of gliclazide and pioglitazone on microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. We excluded patients with very poor glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] >10%), impaired liver function, nondiabetic renal diseases, and those whose urine contained red blood cells, hemoglobin, or casts. Each patient received the designated drug for 12 weeks and their body weight, blood pressure (BP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA(1c), lipids (triglycerides [TG], total, and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol [HDL-C]), 1,5 anhidroglucitol (1,5-AG), immunoreactive insulin (IRI), and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) were measured every month. The effects of the drugs were analyzed using 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The 2 groups of patients were well matched for age, duration of diabetes, retinal status, blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), IRI, FPG, HBA(1c), 1,5-AG, lipids, and UACR, as well as the use of antihypertensive drugs. After treatment, no significant differences were seen in drug efficacy between the 2 groups. Gliclazide and pioglitazone significantly reduced FPG (F = 26.0, P <.0001), HBA(1c) (F = 48.1, P <.0001), and total cholesterol (TC) levels (F = 3.5, P <.05). Decrements in these metabolic parameters were comparable between the groups. 1,5-AG increased in both groups (F = 27.5, P <.0001), and the increment was comparable in both groups. Gliclazide and pioglitazone significantly reduced UACR (F = 15.7, P <.0001) with a comparable decrement in both groups. No other variables changed significantly throughout the 12-week treatment. These results suggest that 12 weeks of treatment with gliclazide or pioglitazone are equally effective in reducing microalbuminuria with similar improvements in blood glucose and cholesterol levels, independent of their mechanisms of actions.
...
PMID:Effect of antidiabetic medications on microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. 1501 49

The burden of Type II diabetes is growing rapidly worldwide, across high-, middle- and low-income countries. This burden is associated primarily with increased risks of macrovascular and microvascular diseases, and it is agreed that multifactorial treatment regimens are required to reduce it. ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation) is a large-scale, 2 x 2 factorial, randomised clinical trial. It will investigate the potential benefits of blood pressure lowering, using a fixed low-dose combination of perindopril and indapamide vs placebo, and of tighter glucose control, using an intensive gliclazide-MR-based glucose control regimen vs a standard guidelines-based regimen, separately and together. The two primary outcomes are a composite macrovascular end point of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death; and a composite microvascular end point of new or worsening nephropathy or microvascular eye disease. Following successful recruitment and randomisation of 11,140 participants by March 2003, the study is currently half way through its planned follow-up of 4.5 years. Adherence to randomised study treatment is good; and loss to follow-up is minimal. It is hoped that the study will answer a number of unresolved issues. The blood pressure lowering arm will investigate the possible reduction in major vascular disease in patients with Type II diabetes whether or not they have hypertension, and the possible benefits of blood pressure lowering in such patients already receiving background therapy with the ACE inhibitor perindopril. The glucose control arm will investigate the possible reduction in both macrovascular and microvascular disease achieved with tighter glucose control, targeting an HbA1c of 6.5% and a fasting blood glucose of 6.0 mmol/l. Finally, the factorial design will enable investigation of the combined effects of more intensive glucose control and tighter control of blood pressure.
...
PMID:ADVANCE: action in diabetes and vascular disease. 1607 30

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension represents a cost-effective way of preventing cardiovascular and renal complications. To benefit maximally from antihypertensive treatment, blood pressure should be brought to below 140/90 mmHg in every hypertensive patient, and even lower (< 130/80 mmHg) if diabetes or renal disease co-exists. Such targets cannot usually be reached using monotherapies. This is especially true in patients who present with a high cardiovascular risk. The co-administration of two agents acting by different mechanisms considerably increases the blood pressure control rate. Such combinations are not only efficacious, but are also well tolerated, and some fixed low-dose combinations even have a placebo-like tolerability. This is the case for the preparation containing the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril (2 mg) and the diuretic indapamide (0.625 mg), a fixed low-dose combination that has been shown in controlled trials to be more effective than monotherapies in reducing albuminuria, regressing cardiac hypertrophy and improving the stiffness of large arteries. Using this combination to initiate antihypertensive therapy has been shown in a double-blind trial (Strategies of Treatment in Hypertension: Evaluation; STRATHE) to normalize blood pressure (< 140/90 mmHg) in significantly more patients (62%) than a sequential monotherapy approach based on atenolol, losartan and amlodipine (49%) and a stepped-care strategy based on valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (47%), with no difference between the three arm groups in terms of tolerability. An ongoing randomized trial (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation; ADVANCE) is a study with a 2 x 2 factorial design assessing the effects of the fixed-dose perindopril-indapamide combination and of the intensive gliclazide modified release-based glucose control regimen in type 2 diabetic patients, with or without hypertension. A total of 11 140 patients were randomly selected. Within the first 6 weeks of treatment (run-in phase), the perindopril-indapamide combination lowered blood pressure from 145/81 +/- 22/11 mmHg (mean +/- SD) to 137/78 +/- 20/10 mmHg. Fixed-dose combinations are becoming more and more popular for the management of hypertension, and are even proposed by hypertension guidelines as a first-line option to treat hypertensive patients.
...
PMID:Managing hypertension in high-risk patients: lessons and promises from the STRATHE and ADVANCE trials. 1672 62

Blood pressure is an important determinant of the risk of macro- and microvascular vascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Current European guidelines for the management of hypertension recommend lowering blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial (n = 11,140), is the first trial designed to address the issue of whether routine blood pressure lowering with the fixed combination of perindopril/indapamide is beneficial in patients with diabetes with a broad range of baseline blood pressure values. In addition, it aimed to determine if clinical benefit is achieved over and above that observed with background angiotension-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. In the perindopril/indapamide arm, the reduction in blood pressure led to significant clinical benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, irrespective of baseline blood pressure values, and subsequently improved mortality rates, and macro- and microvascular outcomes, beyond the improvements associated with patients' existing antihypertensive therapies. ADVANCE is a robust well-designed trial, the results of which are directly applicable to current clinical practice. The ADVANCE study defines the relevant blood pressure goals for patients with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk of cardiovascular events and underscores the benefits of aggressive blood pressure reduction even in normotensive patients with diabetes. It is likely that these findings will have a significant impact on the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. In view of the evidence indicating that clinical benefits obtained with the perindopril/indapamide combination can be expected even in patients who are normotensive, vascular risk rather than initial blood pressure should be employed to determine appropriate treatment protocols in patients with type 2 diabetes.
...
PMID:Implications of the ADVANCE study for clinical practice. 1936 50

Cardiovascular disease is the predominant cause of death in diabetic patients, and reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetics has recently been the focus of several highly publicized large trials, including ACCORD (Action To Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes), ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation), and VADT (Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial). These studies randomized high-risk diabetic patients into either intensive treatment or standard treatment. The glycemic control arm of ACCORD was terminated 17 months before the planned end of the study because of a finding of significantly increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the intensive treatment group. These findings were not duplicated in either ADVANCE or VADT. Multiple possible explanations have been brought forward, including a higher incidence of death from unrecognized hypoglycemia, effects due to increased exposure to particular antidiabetic medications, adverse effects of rapid correction of hyperglycemia, weight gain, and differences in baseline characteristics. None of these were validated in post hoc analyses of the trial data, and the cause of the increased mortality remains elusive. Subgroup analyses suggest that those who start off with better control of their diabetes or without preexisting cardiovascular disease may have the most to gain from tight glycemic control. Reducing the risk of macrovascular disease and death in diabetic patients requires not only attention to glucose control but also meticulous attention to control of nonglycemic risk factors, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, lack of exercise, and unhealthy diet as well as timely prescription of medications with proven preventative benefits, such as aspirin and statins.
...
PMID:Glycemic targets for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1942 66

The relative importance of various blood pressure indices on cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been established. This study compares the strengths of the associations between different baseline blood pressure variables (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], pulse pressure [PP], and mean arterial pressure) and the 4.3-year risk of major cardiovascular events in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-Modified Release Controlled Evaluation Study. Mean (SD) age for the 11 140 participants was 65.8 years (6.4 years). During follow-up, 1000 major cardiovascular events, 559 major coronary events, and 468 cardiovascular deaths were recorded. After adjustment for age, sex, and treatment allocation, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) associated with 1 increment in SD for the risk of major cardiovascular events were 1.17 (1.10 to 1.24) for SBP; 1.20 (1.13 to 1.28) for PP; 1.12 (1.05 to 1.19) for mean arterial pressure; and 1.04 (0.98 to 1.11) for DBP. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were slightly higher for SBP and PP compared with mean arterial pressure and DBP for major cardiovascular and coronary events. Using achieved instead of baseline blood pressure values marginally improved the effect estimates for SBP, DBP, and mean arterial pressure, with no significant differences in the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve between models with SBP and those with PP. In conclusion, SBP and PP are the 2 best and DBP is the least effective determinant of the risk of major cardiovascular outcomes in the relatively old patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus participating in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-Modified Release Controlled Evaluation Study. However, SBP may be the simplest and most useful predictor across a wider range of age groups and populations.
Hypertension 2009 Aug
PMID:Blood pressure variables and cardiovascular risk: new findings from ADVANCE. 1947 Aug 69

1 2 Next >>