Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Arterial hypertension, especially when co-exists with ischemic heart disease, makes an important clinical and social problem. Necessity to continue a treatment during the whole patients life produces many problems for a patient himself as well as for a physician. Thus, for many years, researches have been carried out to find a medicine that would allow to fully control blood pressure for all day, would have minimal side-effects and could be administered once a day. Beside convertase inhibitors such as Prestarium and Gopten, calcium channel blockers, especially retard verapamil forms like Isoptin SR-240 and SR-120 seem to be the most appropriate medicines, especially when hypertension is accompanied by ischemic heart disease and dysrrythmias. The study was performed in 150 hypertensive patients who were administered Isoptin SR-240 once a day and Isoptin SR-120 twice a day. That dose was sufficient to normalize benign and mild hypertension in most patients. Decreased frequency of dyshrrytmias and chest pain relief were also observed. Trials to increase daily dose up to 360 mg were accompanied by evident side effects such as dizziness and constipations. Much more profitable was to join lower Isoptin dose with convertase inhibitors and diuretics.
 ...
PMID:[Isoptin SR-240 and SR-120 in ambulatory treatment of arterial hypertension]. 875 74

The TEAM trial investigated the effectiveness and tolerance of a fixed combination of the ACE inhibitor and calcium channel blocker (2 mg trandolapril and 180 mg verapamil retard) (preparation Tarka) in an open multicentre prospective study of treatment of moderately severe hypertension (diastolic pressure at the end of the two-week wash-out period 100-115 mm Hg). The trial comprised 163 patients who were treated first for four weeks by a monotherapy with 2 mg trandolapril. After these four weeks patients who attained normal blood pressure proceeded with trandolapril treatment. Hypertensive patients who did not attain normal diastolic pressure levels were treated for another four weeks by a fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR. After four weeks of treatment with trandolapril 62 patients of 163 (37%) had a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg. The fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR reduced the diastolic blood pressure to less than 90 mm Hg in 71.6% of the patients resistant to treatment with 2 mg trandolapril and in another 15.6% of patients it reduced the diastolic blood pressure by 10 mm Hg or more. After two months of treatment 60 patients had a normal blood pressure due to trandolapril (37%) and another 73 patients (45%) treated by a combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR, i.e. a total of 133 patients (82%) who originally suffered from moderately severe hypertension, attained a normal diastolic blood pressure. The mean decrease of diastolic pressure after two months of treatment was 19.5 mm Hg in "non-respondents" to trandolapril monotherapy and 23.6 mm Hg in "respondents". The mean decrease of systolic pressure in "non-respondents" and "respondents" after trandolapril treatment was 19.5 mm Hg and 35.0 mm Hg resp. The fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil was not only effective but was associated with a minimum of undesirable effects. The incidence of headaches declined significantly. The combination of the above preparations is useful also because both preparations have a cardio- and nephroprotective effect and do not affect the lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Treatment with a fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR is indicated in moderately severe hypertension not responding to monotherapy, in particular when associated with diabetes, hyperlipoproteinaemia, ischaemic heart disease or left ventricular hypertrophy.
 ...
PMID:[The TEAM study--a study of the effectiveness and tolerance of treatment of essential hypertension with a fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil]. 982 54

Fixed verapamil SR/trandolapril combinations 180/1 mg and 180/2 mg (Tarka, Knoll AG) have a significantly superior antihypertensive effect compared to equal dosages of either agent alone. Verapamil SR/trandolapril 180/2 mg combination produces the best dose-response ratio of different dose combinations of these two drugs. Combination therapy has the most pronounced effect on blunting the early morning rise in blood pressure. Thus, verapamil SR/trandolapril combination therapy may be an appropriate treatment option in patients with moderate essential hypertension, particularly in those who have a tendency toward the early morning rise in blood pressure. The adverse effect profile of the fixed combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril includes the typical side effects of its monocompounds. The fixed combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril is also effective and safe in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly. The fixed low-dose combination therapy with verapamil SR/trandolapril 180/2 mg is a suitable treatment option for patients with moderate essential hypertension and Type 2 diabetes mellitus, because it improves parameters of carbohydrate metabolism and uricaemia and does not alter the lipid profile. The insulin-sensitising effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor monotherapy with its theoretical risk of hypoglycaemia is completely neutralised in the combination with verapamil SR. Comparative studies have shown that the low-dose combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril may be a suitable alternative to combinations containing a thiazide diuretic or a beta-blocking agent for the long-term management of hypertensive patients for whom combination therapy is indicated. The combination of an ACE inhibitor with a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker reduces proteinuria to a greater extent than either agent alone. A combination of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker may provide additional benefit in inducing the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Combination therapy leads to a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction, improvement of wall motion index and increases exercise duration time in patients with coronary heart disease and left heart failure. It also improves the ratio of exercise to rest rate-pressure product and decreases the number of angina attacks. These findings support the hypothesis that the combination of verapamil and trandolapril might be useful in patients with attenuated left ventricular function and angina pectoris. Thus, Tarka is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive agent with a good safety profile and positive metabolic effects.
 ...
PMID:The fixed combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril. 1124 35

Although sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stroke can occur at any time of day, event rates increase during the waking hours, particularly in the morning. In most people-both normotensive and hypertensive-blood pressure (BP) rises rapidly in the early morning hours, the time when most individuals wake and begin their day. This rise in BP corresponds to increased secretion of catecholamines and increased plasma renin activity. Thus, vascular tone and total peripheral resistance increase in the morning hours, and BP rises as a result. At the same time, heart rate increases. In the late morning or early afternoon, BP reaches its peak. After that, BP declines, falling 15 to 20 mm Hg between about 8 PM and 2 AM, the time when BP is usually lowest. These findings have led to an interest in chronotherapy for hypertension. A major objective of chronotherapy for hypertension is to deliver the drug in higher concentrations during the early-morning post-awakening period, when BP is highest, and in lesser concentrations during the middle of a sleep cycle, when BP is low. Traditional sustained-release pharmacologic agents, which deliver a near-constant drug concentration, were not designed to complement the circadian pattern. There are currently two antihypertensive agents, Verelan PM (verapamil HCl) and Covera HS (verapamil HCl), that provide chronotherapy for hypertension. These drugs use novel delivery systems that provide 24-h BP control while maximizing drug concentrations in the morning and minimizing drug concentrations during sleep.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacology of cardiovascular chronotherapeutic agents. 1158 43

BACKGROUND: In general clinical practice, physicians prescribe calcium channel blockers to a wide range of patients with differing demographic characteristics and hypertension history. This study was undertaken to investigate the effectiveness and safety of sustained-release verapamil (Verelan((R)), verapamil HCl) in patients with essential hypertension, studied under "usual use" conditions. METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, postmarketing surveillance study, 25 089 patients with hypertension received once-daily verapamil therapy for 4 weeks, during which they were evaluated by 8106 physicians at baseline and at two follow-up visits (weeks 2 and 4). In this study, hypertension was defined as an average sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of greater-than-or-equal 90 mm Hg at baseline. Previously diagnosed hypertensive patients with a sitting DBP <90 mm Hg but experiencing untoward effects requiring discontinuation of current antihypertensive therapy were also included. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent (n = 21 446) of the total patients enrolled at baseline completed this office-based trial. Nearly 24% of patients were newly diagnosed hypertensives. At baseline, the mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure were 161 and 96 mm Hg, respectively. In evaluable patients with mild, moderate, and severe hypertension, as stratified by baseline measurements, treatment with verapamil produced DBP reductions of 12, 19, and 29 mm Hg, respectively. Verapamil treatment produced clinically similar SBP, DBP, and HR (heart rate) reductions across gender and racial groups studied (white, black, Hispanic, and Asian). Only 6.1% of patients failed to complete the study because of any reported adverse experiences (4.5% of patients discontinued because of adverse experiences considered drug related). Constipation (5.0%) and headache (1.1%) were the most commonly reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: In general clinical practice, verapamil is well tolerated and effective in a broad range of hypertensive patients.
 ...
PMID:Large-Scale Postmarketing Surveillance of Hypertensive Patients Treated with Verapamil. 1185 Jun 91

Trandolapril/verapamil sustained release (SR) [Tarka] is an oral, fixed-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor trandolapril and the SR formulation of the phenylalkylamine calcium channel antagonist verapamil. It is indicated for the treatment of hypertension in patients who require more than one agent to achieve blood pressure (BP) targets. In the large, randomised, multicentre INVEST (INternational VErapamil SR/trandolapril STudy), a verapamil SR-based treatment strategy that included trandolapril in most patients was as effective as an atenolol-based treatment strategy in reducing the risk of the primary outcome (first occurrence of death [all-cause], nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] or nonfatal stroke) in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD) and was as well tolerated. Trandolapril/verapamil SR is generally more effective at controlling hypertension than either component as monotherapy, and is as effective as a number of other fixed-dose combination therapies. The combination is as well tolerated as trandolapril monotherapy and is at least as well tolerated as verapamil SR monotherapy. In hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the BENEDICT (BErgamo NEphrologic DIabetes Complications Trial), trandolapril/verapamil SR prolonged the time to the onset of persistent microalbuminuria compared with placebo, as did trandolapril monotherapy. Thus, trandolapril/verapamil SR is an effective option for the treatment of essential hypertension in patients requiring more than one agent to achieve BP targets, including those with compelling indications, such as CAD or type 2 diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Trandolapril/verapamil sustained release: a review of its use in the treatment of essential hypertension. 1611 84

The "manometric" way of considering the complex management of high blood pressure (HBP) must remain ancient history. The huge therapeutical armamentarium existing nowadays allows us to select the drug/s most appropriate for the comorbidities/particularities of each case. The BP level target, unanimously considered a very important element of HBP management, must not be the only one. The so-called pleiotropic effects of the different classes of antihypertensive drugs must always influence our way of thinking. Another important possibility to improve the therapeutical efficacy of the antihypertensive treatment is chronotherapy. The aim of the present study is to demonstrate the possibility of some benefic effects by imposing, by chronotherapy, a "normal" "dipping" status of the BP values. Among the surrogate end-points that can be used to demonstrate the benefits of this kind of HBP management we chose the structural and functional cardiac parameters, echocardiographically determined--using the criteria of the American Society of Echocardiography. We studied the evolution of these parameters of the left ventricle (LV) and we have evaluated them after 3 months of once-a-day morning (at awakening) administration, and respectively after 3 months of once-a-day administration in the evening (at bedtime) of: Prestarium (perindopril) cp 10 mg Tarka (cp 180 mg verapamil hydrochloride/2 mg trandolapril) Norvasc (amlodipine besilat) cp 10 mg as monotherapy, in 60 patients. We studied the anatomical parameters of the left ventricle (dimensions measured enddiastolically: the thickness of the interventricular septum, the thickness of the posterior wall, the internal diameter of the LV), the LV mass (which has a cutedge value for hypertrophy of the LV-LVH--of 134 g/m2 for men and 110 g/m2 for women) and the functional parameters, systolic as diastolic of the LV. We noticed a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) in all the 3 subgroups, of the functional parameters, these ones becoming similar to those in normotensive subjects only after the evening (at bedtime) administration of the studied drugs. The differences between the 3 subgroups for all the studied parameters, also in comparison with the normotensive subjects, have not been statistically significant after vesperal (at bedtime) administration of the studied drugs. It is, thus, possible that by an optimal treatment, chronotherapeutically "tailored", to obtain a normalisation of the anatomical and functional parameters of the LV and a significant improvement of the prognosis of these patients.
 ...
PMID:Bedtime versus at awakening administration of BP lowering drugs--is it the way to success? 2117 17

Gingival enlargement is common among patients and can be caused by a variety of etiological factors. The most common reason is poor oral hygiene and high bacterial load that leads to gingival inflammation and enlargement. Other implicated factors include systemic drugs, such as phenytoin (Dilantin) taken by epileptic patients, calcium channel blockers such as nifedipine (Procardia) and verapamil (Calan) for the treatment of hypertension, arrhythmia and angina. Another class of medication associated with gingival enlargement is immunosuppressive agents given to organ-transplant patients to prevent rejection of the new element such as cyclosporine. Some enlargements could be associated with other conditions such as puberty, pregnancy or diabetes or be a symptom of a systemic disease (leukemia, Wegener's granulomatosis or sarcoidosis). In rare cases the cause for the enlargement is genetic and termed hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF). HGF is a genetic disorder characterized by a progressive enlargement of the gingiva. Histologically, the gingiva is characterized by an accumulation of dense fibrous connective tissue. This is believed to be due to an imbalance between synthesis and degradation of extracellular matrix composed mainly of collagen molecules or due to an alteration in fibroblast proliferation. Different pathogenic mechanisms have been proposed and examined over the years but no precise process has been identified. The main objective of this paper is to discuss this genetic anomaly and support it with clinical cases of a mother and her two children. It will focus on the clinical and histologic characteristics of HGF as well as known biologic and genetic features and treatment modalities.
 ...
PMID:Gummy smile: could it be genetic? Hereditary gingival fibromatosis. 2287 May 49

Gingival enlargement is common among patients and can be caused by a variety of etiological factors. The most common reason is poor oral hygiene and high bacterial load that leads to gingival inflammation and enlargement. Other implicated factors include systemic drugs, such as Phenytoin (Dilantin) taken by epileptic patients, Calcium Channel Blockers such as Nifedipine (Procardia) and Verapamil (Calan) for the treatment of hypertension, arrhythmia and angina. Another class of medication associated with gingival enlargement is immunosuppressive agents given to organ-transplant patients to prevent rejection of the new element, such as Cyclosporine. Some enlargements could be associated with other conditions such as puberty, pregnancy or diabetes or be a symptom of a systemic disease (leukemia, Wegener's granulomatosis or sarcoidosis). In rare cases the cause for the enlargement is genetic and termed Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis (HGF). HGF is a genetic disorder characterized by a progressive enlargement of the gingiva. Histologically, the gingiva is characterized by an accumulation of dense fibrous connective tissue. This is believed to be due to an imbalance between synthesis and degradation of extracellular matrix composed mainly of collagen molecules or due to an alteration in fibroblast proliferation. Different pathogenic mechanisms have been proposed and examined over the years but no precise process has been identified. The main objective of this paper is to discuss this genetic anomaly and support it with clinical cases of a mother and her two children. It will focus on the clinical and histologic characteristics of HGF as well as known biologic and genetic features and treatment modalities.
 ...
PMID:Gummy smile: could it be genetic? Hereditary gingival fibromatosis. 2334 94


<< Previous 1 2