Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

FK506 (Prograf) is a new immunosuppressive agent, recently approved for use in solid organ transplants. The first use of FK506 was for the indication of refractory liver allograft rejection. This revealed a marked ability to reverse ongoing rejection, even in cases where chronic changes were observed. Between 50 and 70% of patients converted to FK506 had shown improvement. In long-term follow-up of patients with chronic rejection, 75% of patients were still alive at 3 years following FK506 conversion, and 65% of liver allografts were still functioning. FK506 has been compared to cyclosporine in primary liver transplantation. In the three randomized trials, freedom from rejection was statistically greater in the FK506-treated group, as compared to the cyclosporine-treated group. By intent-to-treat analysis, the patient and graft survival in the FK506 group was the same or better than the cyclosporine group. The good results in the cyclosporine limb was due, in part, to the ability of FK506 to treat rejection in the cyclosporine group. Freedom from steroid use, and the lower incidence of hypertension, were prominent features of FK506 patients. FK506 has been used for rescue of rejecting kidney allografts, with results similar to the liver transplant trials. When used as primary immunosuppression, FK506 was shown to be effective, as measured by graft survival. FK506-based immunosuppression has also been used in primary heart transplantation, as well as for primary adult pulmonary transplantation. Results from these small series of patients are equally encouraging. The results of these studies suggest that FK506 is effective for solid organ transplantation. Both FK506 and cyclosporine administration have been associated with side effects, many of which are similar, and some of which are peculiar to a given organ transplant.
 ...
PMID:FK506 in solid organ transplantation. 858 26

Immunosuppressive efficacy of Neoral and Prograf following primary hepatic transplantation was comparable. Incidence of rejection episodes, infectious complications, hypertension, and postoperative diabetes mellitus was comparable. Although clinical use of both immunosuppressants was associated with early compromise in renal function, no progressive renal dysfunction was observed.
 ...
PMID:Renal function in primary liver transplant recipients receiving neoral (cyclosporine) versus prograf (tacrolimus). 963 66

Following primary liver transplantation, immunosuppressive efficacy of Neoral and Prograf was similar and superior to that of Sandimmune. Rejection incidence was statistically increased with Sandimmune therapy. Incidence of hypertension, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, and infectious complications was not statistically different. Although early compromise in renal function was associated with Sandimmune, Neoral, and Prograf immunosuppression, no progressive renal dysfunction was identified.
 ...
PMID:Impact of Sandimmune, Neoral, and Prograf on rejection incidence and renal function in primary liver transplant recipients. 972 99

The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (FK506; Prograf) were determined in 28 adult kidney transplant patients (20 males and 8 females), aged 18-68 years (mean+/-S.D.: 46.9+/-4.03 years). Induction therapy was ATG-F (n=23), daclizumab (n=3), or none (n=2), and maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n=26) or azathioprine (AZA; n=2) and prednisone (Pred). In seven patients, cyclosporine A microemulsion (Neoral) was replaced by tacrolimus for acute rejection (AR; three patients), slow graft function (SGF, two patients) and Neoral side effects (two patients). Acute rejection occurred in five patients (17.8%), three of whom were steroid-resistant treated with a second course of ATG-F. Infection occurred in 10 patients (35.7%) with a total of 15 infectious episodes, comprising bacterial (73%) and viral (27%) infections related to CMV. Other side effects related to tacrolimus were hypertension in four patients (14%) and post-transplantation hyperglycemia in nine patients (32%), three of whom required insulin therapy. In addition, hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia occurred in six (21%) and eight patients (28.5%), respectively. The patient's hospital stay was 12.7+/-1.3 days (range: 8-24 days), and mean serum creatinine upon discharge, and at 1, 3 and 6 months following transplantation were: 2.1+/-0.5, 1.47+/-0.21, 1.41+/-0.53 and 1.23+/-0.11 mg/dl, respectively. The 6-month actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 100%. While tacrolimus is an effective calcineurin inhibitor for kidney transplantation (KT), severe acute rejection seen is related to highly sensitized patients, and the CMV infections noted were related to the presence of more CMV-negative recipients receiving kidneys from CMV-positive donors. Longer follow-up with a larger patient sample is needed to fully assess both the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus, including its metabolic effects.
 ...
PMID:Single-center experience with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation. 1283 78

The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs; cyclosporine and tacrolimus) has dramatically increased medium-term life expectancy after heart transplantation but has had only limited impact on long-term outcomes for heart transplant recipients. The original oil-based formulation of cyclosporine has been superceded by a microemulsion formulation (Neoral), which has more predictable pharmacokinetics and allows more precise dose-tailoring. Cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus (Prograf) have a similar efficacy in the prevention of acute rejection of heart transplants, but their use is accompanied by nephrotoxicity and by cardiovascular side effects. The efficacy of immunosuppression can be improved by adjunctive therapy, such as azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Cellcept), corticosteroids, and induction therapy. One of the most important predictors of patient mortality at >5 years after heart transplantation is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)/late graft failure, which accounts for 31% of deaths. Neither cyclosporine nor tacrolimus have been shown to prevent the development of CAV. In terms of efficacy, MMF provides a modest advantage over azathioprine in preventing CAV, and the combination of cyclosporine plus MMF results in significantly lower mortality than cyclosporine plus azathioprine. Overall, CNIs have multiple cardiovascular side effects, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia and new-onset diabetes after transplantation, although cyclosporine and tacrolimus have somewhat different cardiovascular side-effect profiles. The challenge in choosing the best immunosuppressive regimen is to balance efficacy and safety to optimize graft and patient survival over the course of many decades. Because cyclosporine and tacrolimus have similar efficacy against acute rejection the choice of CNI for heart transplant recipients should be based on the relative risk of cardiovascular and renal side effects.
 ...
PMID:Calcineurin inhibitors in heart transplantation. 1509 6

The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus (Prograf) in renal transplantation is well established. Achieving longterm patient and graft survival are the ultimate goals following transplantation. Many factors negatively impact long-term transplant outcomes, including graft rejection, renal dysfunction and cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM)). Accordingly, careful consideration of the immunosuppressive strategy and its impact on these factors is critical to optimising outcomes. Clinical trials and registry studies conducted over the past decade have demonstrated tacrolimus to be a cornerstone immunosuppressant in renal transplantation. Compared with cyclosporine treatment, tacrolimus has been shown to be associated with decreased acute and chronic rejection, improved renal function over the long-term post-transplant, and a lower incidence of hyperlipidaemia and hypertension. In early studies, the incidence of PTDM was significantly higher in patients receiving tacrolimus; however, recent large clinical trials have revealed no significant between-group differences in the incidence of PTDM with tacrolimus treatment and cyclosporine microemulsion treatment. Together, these findings may translate into improved long-term transplant outcomes with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Although approved only for kidney and liver transplantation in the US, Prograf was the calcineurin inhibitor used in the majority of patients transplanted in 2003: kidney (67%), liver (89%), kidney/pancreas (81%), pancreas (77%), lung (65%), heart/lung (48%), and heart (42%).
 ...
PMID:Tacrolimus based immunosuppression. 1559 82

Corticosteroids are a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation despite their side effects and morbidity. Newer immunosuppressive agents may be more effective to allow corticosteroid sparing. An interim analysis of 60 completed out of 100 planned primary kidney transplant recipients is presented. All patients on tacrolimus (Prograf) and MMF (Cellcept) were randomized into two groups following a 1:1 distribution for early steroid reduction at posttransplant day 7 (G1; n = 31) versus to long-term maintenance steroids (G2; n = 29). Primary efficacy endpoints were composite endpoint of death, graft loss, or severe acute rejection at 6 and 12 months follow-up. Safety evaluation included severity and frequency of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, leukopenia, infection, malignancy, and severe adverse events. Mean age was 39.1 years, with 45.0% males and 66.7% Caucasians. African-Americans were 25.8% in G1 and 27.6% in G2. One death occurred in each group, as well as one case of severe (Banff III) rejection in G1 (P = 1.00). The incidence of rejection episodes between groups was not significant, namely, 41.9% in G1 and 20.7% in G2 (P = .077). There were no differences between groups concerning mean, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c, or creatinine at 12 months. This interim analysis showed no evidence of an increased risk of poorer performance among the early steroid reduction or safety differences in kidney transplant recipients versus a regular dosage steroid group of patients. Further analysis of the complete study data is underway.
 ...
PMID:Corticosteroid reduction with tacrolimus (CORRETA) TRIAL: a prospective Brazilian multicenter, randomized trial of early corticosteroid reduction versus regular corticosteroid dosage maintenance on a tacrolimus (Prograf) and mycophenolate mofetil (Cellcept) immunosuppression regimen in kidney transplant recipients: interim analysis. 1845 88

Immunosuppression management in clinical transplantation aims to balance delivery of efficacy against adverse reactions using therapeutic drug monitoring. Adherence to posttransplant immunosuppressive medications and minimizing variability in drug exposure are important considerations in preventing rejection and maximizing overall transplant outcomes. The availability of once-daily tacrolimus may add a potential benefit by simplifying immunosuppressive regimens, though improving compliance among transplant recipients. The aim of our study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of the once-daily formulation of tacrolimus (Advagraf) against the usually used twice daily tablets (Prograf). A prospective randomized trial 1:2 was designed for 99 consecutive live-related renal transplant recipients who received their grafts at a single center (study group, Advagraf, 33 recipients and control group, Prograf, 66 recipients). The demographic data were homogeneous among both groups regarding donors and patients' characteristics. Posttransplant hypertension, infection, malignancy, and diabetes mellitus were comparable among both groups. Renal function and rejection episodes showed no statistical significance among recipients of both groups. Despite slight higher Advagraf unit doses, there was no statistical difference regarding the tacrolimus trough levels, between the two groups. Our singlecenter experience revealed that the availability of once-daily tacrolimus formulation could give potential benefit of improved medication compliance and better allograft outcomes by decreasing pill burden and thereby simplifying dosing schedule, Advagraf was non-inferior to twice-daily tacrolimus regarding safety and efficacy. Although being nonsignificant, a trend for better kidney function was noted in this short-term study in the Advagraf group, so long-term follow-up is needed to verify this.
 ...
PMID:Comparative analysis for optimizing the modified release tacrolimus (Advagraf) after kidney transplantation: A prospective randomized trial. 3058 56