Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The justification for drug treatment of mild hypertension rests upon epidemiological data demonstrating an increased risk of heart attack and stroke and a very small number of controlled clinical trials. These data provide a slender basis for mass treatment and leave many vital questions unanswered. The incidence of stroke (and heart attack in some countries) appears to be falling irrespective of antihypertensive therapy. Are historic epidemiological findings still relevant? The level of diastolic blood pressure where risk begins to increase appears to be about 95 mmHg. Ought this also to be the target value for blood pressure reduction? Do thiazide diuretics have added risks and beta-adrenergic blocking drugs added benefits over and above their effect upon blood pressure? If the MRC Hypertension trial turns out to be the last of the big placebo controlled trials in hypertension how shall we assess the effects of new types of drugs upon outcome?
 ...
PMID:Management of hypertension: risk-benefit ratio. 615 31

In severe and accelerated hypertension the benefits of treatment are clearcut. In patients < 60 years of age with mild hypertension the main benefit is reduction of stroke by about 40%. The death rate from stroke is declining in many affluent countries for reasons which can only be partly explained by mass treatment of hypertension. In the MRC trial in patients < 60 years old it took 2500 patient/years of treatment to save one stroke. If the number of strokes is declining for other reasons the number of patient/years to save one stroke may be increasing. In older patients the absolute benefit is greater because they suffer more stroke events and because treatment also reduces coronary events.
 ...
PMID:Hypertension trial results: consensus and conflicts. 747 18

Clinical trials show that drug treatment significantly decreases stroke risk in hypertension. The benefit as measured in clinical trials may be affected by changes of blood pressure at entry and by departure from randomised treatment, but the magnitude of such effects is disputed. We have assessed benefit from reduction of stroke using data from the MRC Trial of mild to moderate hypertension, taking these factors into account, and have studied the likely effect of recent guidelines. The original analysis suggested that 850 patients needed treatment for 1 year to prevent one stroke. Under the more conservative of two assumptions made about the effect of treatment, this falls to 695 patients when allowance is made for reduction of stroke in placebo group patients withdrawn and actively treated, to 680 patients when allowance is made for the fall in blood pressure after entry, and to 556 patients with allowance for both. When benefit is assessed in patients whose entry diastolic blood pressure was > or = 100 mm Hg, 557 patients require treatment annually per stroke saved and this is decreased to 360 patients when allowance is made for withdrawal and active treatment of placebo group patients. These results suggest that benefit from reduction of stroke was underestimated in the MRC trial and that this is likely to be present in most trials. Changes to diagnostic criteria for hypertension in new management guidelines are likely to have significant effects on the number of patients treated per stroke prevented.
 ...
PMID:Adjustment of the apparent benefits of treatment on stroke risk in the MRC mild hypertension trial using data from the placebo-treated group. 747 19

During 1991 and 1992 three major intervention trials were published that dealt with the value of antihypertensive treatment in the elderly. The three studies were the American Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP), the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension) and the British Medical Research Council Trial of Treatment of Hypertension in Older Adults. (MRC trial.) The three trials all compared active antihypertensive treatment, mainly consisting of diuretics or beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents or the two in combination, with placebo. Two of the trials were double-blind (SHEP and STOP) whereas the MRC trial was single-blind. All three were multicenter and prospective, and patients were randomized to either of the treatment modalities. One of the trials (SHEP) was specifically designed to evaluate antihypertensive treatment in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The SHEP, STOP and MRC trials all showed that treatment of hypertension in the elderly reduces the risk of stroke and cardiovascular events. In the STOP-Hypertension trial, which included the oldest patients with the most severe hypertension, total mortality was reduced by 43%. It could be argued that novel antihypertensive compounds offer equal or better results than the ones obtained with beta blockers and/or diuretics. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists are currently being compared with diuretics and beta-blockers in the STOP-Hypertension-2 study which prospectively evaluates morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients aged 70-84 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Treatment of hypertension in the elderly with special reference to urapidil. 780 12

beta-blockers are one of the first-line therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of hypertension. Their role in this position appears stronger than earlier in view of the results of the three large intervention trials in elderly hypertensive patients (SHEP, STOP-Hypertension and MRC), which all used beta-blockers as one of their therapeutic alternatives. The secondary preventive effect of beta-blockers against coronary heart disease is well established, whereas convincing evidence from placebo-controlled trials regarding their primary preventive effect still is missing. In animal studies beta-blockers have been shown to prevent the development of coronary atherosclerosis and some of the newer agents have been shown to be markedly effective against experimentally induced myocardial ischemia. For reasons such as these, it appears safe to predict that beta-blockers will continue to play an important therapeutic role also in 1993 and beyond.
 ...
PMID:The place of beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension in 1993. 790 76

There is ample evidence that antihypertensive therapy prevents strokes, congestive heart failure, and other blood pressure-related complications, but most trials have failed to show a reduction in coronary events and mortality. Recently, the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) showed a reduction in MIs and other coronary events in older patients with moderate to severe ISH. Cardiovascular mortality was also reduced and there was a trend toward a reduction in coronary events in the Swedish STOP-Hypertension Trial and the British MRC Trial in Older Patients. These studies have in common the use of diuretics and/or beta blockers. Although there are no similar long-term data with calcium channel blockers and ACE inhibitors, they will be the drugs of choice for many patients, based on individual responses and accompanying medical conditions.
 ...
PMID:First-line therapy for hypertension: different patients, different needs. 790 5

Results of all major clinical trials on the efficacy of treatment of hypertension provide convincing evidence that judicious treatment of hypertension in a clinical setting and effective control of hypertension in a community setting significantly reduce the rate of morbidity and mortality from stroke. It is especially noteworthy to review the results of some of the trials on prevention of stroke mortality in the elderly. HDFP: Antihypertensive drug treatment reduced the incidence of stroke among the HDFP cohort in the age group 60-69 years as significantly as it did in the younger age group. SHEP: Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) reduced the incidence of stroke in the SHEP cohort by 36% in five years. MRC Trial: Similar results were reported by the follow-up of the cohort enrolled in the MRC Trial. The Swedish Study: Antihypertensive treatment reduced significantly the incidence of stroke in this cohort as well.
 ...
PMID:Risk management in stroke prevention: major clinical trials in hypertension. 791 92

1. Using the MRC trial placebo group as the data source, we examined relationships between cardiovascular risk, gender, and blood pressure (BP) at screening, on entry to the trial, and after 3 months of follow up. 2. Blood pressure on entry to the trial (162/98 mmHg) was significantly higher than at the second screening (154/95 mmHg) visit and at 3 months (144/91 mmHg). The entry BP was higher, and the changes from screening to entry and from entry to 3 months were greater in females. Females had a low cardiovascular risk, but because of the greater changes of BP at entry they were over-represented at the top of the entry BP distribution, whereas males were over-represented at the bottom. The result of these effects was that the relationship between cardiovascular risk and entry BP was shifted to the right and was flatter than the corresponding curves measured at screening or after 3 months of follow up. 3. In consequence, the severity of hypertension in the trial population was overestimated from measurement of BP at entry, and the capacity of trial entry BP to predict cardiovascular risk was weakened. 4. BP on entry to the MRC Trial was affected by a pressor effect that diminished the value of BP as a cardiovascular risk factor because it differentially affected sub-populations by gender.
 ...
PMID:Effect of sex-related changes in blood pressure at entry to the MRC trial on prediction of cardiovascular risk. 803 73

Several studies have demonstrated an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in relation to high blood pressure in elderly patients aged below 70-75, whereas the risk seemed to decline with age in the older elderly. Early studies on the effect of treatment of mild to moderate hypertension in the elderly indicated (but did not convincingly show) a reduction of CVD. In the 1980s, both the EWPHE trial (European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly) and the HEP study (The Randomised Trial of the Treatment of Hypertension in Elderly Patients in Primary Care) provided evidence of the benefit of treating high blood pressure in the elderly, at least up to the age of 70-74. These results have lately been confirmed by three major trials SHEP (Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program), STOP (Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension) and MRC (Medical Research Council), also including older patients (STOP) and those with isolated systolic hypertension (SHEP). This satisfactory effect was not impaired by a low tolerability of the drugs used (beta-blockers and diuretics). In conclusion, drug treatment with beta-blockers and diuretics in hypertensive men and women aged 70 and above confers highly significant and clinically relevant reductions in cardiovascular (especially stroke) morbidity and mortality. The clinical implication of this is that blood pressure lowering therapy should be considered in elderly hypertensives, at least up until they are 80. It should also be remembered that elderly hypertensives often have other diseases as well and that the drug treatment should be adjusted accordingly.
 ...
PMID:Hypertension in the elderly. 826 94

Although hypertension accounts for approximately 15-20% of end-stage renal disease and renal impairment occurs in 15% of patients with essential hypertension, there are few data available on the clinical features of patients with benign hypertensive nephrosclerosis, the histological consequence of hypertension on the kidney. To determine its prevalence on renal biopsy and its clinical features (including proteinuria and renal function), we used the U.K. MRC Glomerulonephritis Registry of 7339 biopsies from 20 centres to define all patients with benign hypertensive nephrosclerosis. In patients with no co-existing disease, 185 biopsies were classified solely as benign hypertensive nephrosclerosis (2.5%). Sixty-nine percent of patients were male and 72% aged over 50 years. Sixty-four percent had diastolic blood pressure above 90 mmHg and severe hypertension (diastolic > 120 mmHg) was present in 9%. Protein excretion of > 1.5 g/day was noted in 40%, with 22% excreting > 3 g/day. Eighteen percent had serum albumin values under 30 g/l. Eighty-one percent had serum creatinine > 120 mumol/l; in 51% this was > 250 mumol/l. There was significant correlation between serum creatinine and systolic blood pressure at time of biopsy (p = 0.01) and between serum creatinine and serum albumin (p = 0.001). Benign hypertensive nephrosclerosis accounts for 2.5% of all registered biopsies. Significant proteinuria is a common finding and proteinuria within the nephrotic range does occur. Systolic blood pressure appears to influence serum creatinine levels. Hypertensive nephropathy should be considered in all patients with heavy proteinuria and renal impairment.
 ...
PMID:Clinical features of benign hypertensive nephrosclerosis at time of renal biopsy. 832 42


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>