Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0020538 (hypertension)
 170,190 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Overexpression of regulator of G protein signaling 5 (RGS5) in arteries over veins is the most striking difference observed using microarray analysis. The obvious question is what arterial function might require RGS5. Based on functions of homologous proteins in regulating cardiac mass and G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, we proposed that RGS5 and vascular expressed RGS2 and RGS4 could participate in regulating arterial hypertrophy. We used the suprarenal abdominal aorta banding model to induce hypertension and hypertrophy. All 3 RGS messages were expressed in unmanipulated aorta with RGS5 predominating. After 2 days, thoracic aorta lost expression of RGS5, 4, and 2. At 1 week, all three returned to normal, and at 28 days, they increased many fold above normal. Valsartan blockade of angiotensin II (angII)/angII type 1 receptor signaling prevented upregulation of RGS messages but only delayed mass increases, implying wall mass regulation involves both angII-dependent and angII-independent pathways. The abdominal aorta showed less dramatic expression changes in RGS5 and 4, but not 2. Again, those changes were delayed by valsartan treatment with no mass changes. Thoracic aorta contraction to GPCR agonists was examined in aortic explant rings to identify vessel wall physiological changes. In 2-day aorta, the response to Galphaq/i agonists increased above normal, while 28-day aorta had attenuated induced contraction via Galphaq/i agonist, implicating a connection between RGS message levels and changes in GPCR-induced contraction. In vitro overexpression studies showed RGS5 inhibits angII-induced signaling in smooth muscle cells. This study is the first experimental evidence that changes in RGS expression and function correlate with vascular remodeling.
 ...
PMID:RGS5, RGS4, and RGS2 expression and aortic contractibility are dynamically co-regulated during aortic banding-induced hypertrophy. 1820 59

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the recommended first-line antihypertensive treatment for managing chronic kidney disease, and strict blood pressure (BP) regulation is crucial for the reduction of proteinuria. Valsartan and candesartan are commonly used ARBs in Japan, with maximum permissible doses of 160 mg/day and 12 mg/day, respectively. We evaluated BP and proteinuria after changeover from the maximum dose of candesartan to the maximum dose of valsartan, in 55 poorly controlled hypertensive patients undergoing candesartan treatment who were unable to achieve optimal BP according to the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2004). We measured BP and pulse rate and assessed urinary protein excretion (UPE) before and after changeover. Changeover was associated with decreases in systolic BP and diastolic BP from 158/89 mmHg to 150/86 mmHg (p<0.01). Changeover was also associated with a reduction in UPE adjusted to urinary creatinine from 0.35+/-0.19 g/g creatinine to 0.19+/-0.37 g/g creatinine (p=0.0271) in patients who had high urinary protein levels prior to changeover without significant decreases in BP (p=0.0184). According to multiple regression analysis, higher UPE (p<0.0001) and a lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p=0.0011) prior to changeover were independently correlated with reduction in UPE. Our results suggest that the maximum dose of valsartan is more effective than the maximum dose of candesartan for reducing BP and proteinuria.
 ...
PMID:Renal protective effect in hypertensive patients: the high doses of angiotensin II receptor blocker (HARB) study. 1834 23

Antihypertensive therapy has been well established to reduce hypertension related morbidity and mortality, but the optimal therapy for Japanese patients remains unknown. The Valsartan Amlodipine Randomized Trial (VART), a prospective randomized open-label trial, was designed to determine whether treatment with an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (valsartan) or a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) lowers cardiovascular disease events in essential hypertensives in Japan. Registration, randomization and data entry were performed over the Internet. The minimization method (to control for age, gender, blood pressure level and history) was used at random assignment to ensure that the background factors were equivalent between the groups at baseline. After the registration, patients were followed-up for cardiovascular events (primary endpoints), echocardiography, (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging, laboratory tests and blood pressure for 3 years. Currently, 797 patients have been enrolled and assigned to two groups: a valsartan (n=399) and an amlodipine (n=398) group. At baseline, controlled factors (age, gender, blood pressure level, and left ventricular hypertrophy) and the proportions of patients with diabetes and hyperlipidemia were equally allocated. At 12 months, both drugs evenly and significantly lowered blood pressure to the target level (valsartan: 133/79 mmHg; amlodipine: 132/79 mmHg). In conclusion, by combining the data on cardiovascular events with the results of echocardiographic, radionuclide imaging, and blood/urine studies, the VART study will provide mechanistic insights into the clinical outcomes and treatment effects of the trial.
 ...
PMID:Valsartan Amlodipine Randomized Trial (VART): design, methods, and preliminary results. 1836 14

Increased arterial stiffness, as estimated from aortic pulse wave velocity (Ao-PWV), and albuminuria are independent predictors for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Whether angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), drugs with cardio-renal protective effects, improve Ao-PWV to a greater extent than other equipotent antihypertensive medications remains unclear. After a 4-week washout phase, we compared the effects of valsartan (n=66), an ARB, with that of amlodipine (n=65), a calcium channel blocker on Ao-PWV in 131 T2DM patients with pulse pressure (PP) >or=60 mm Hg and raised albumin excretion rate (AER) in a 24-week randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg/d was added to valsartan 160 mg and amlodipine 5 mg/od uptitrated to 10 mg/od after 4 weeks to ensure equivalent BP control. After 24 weeks brachial and central aortic PP had fallen to a similar extent with attained mean (SD) brachial and central PP of 61.6 (13.6) and 47.3 (14.1) mm Hg in the valsartan/HCTZ group and 61.5 (12.2) and 47.3 (9.9) mm Hg in the amlodipine group, respectively. Ao-PWV showed a significantly greater reduction, mean (95% CI), -0.9 m/s (-1.4 to -0.3) for valsartan/HCTZ compared to amlodipine (P=0.002). AER fell significantly only with Val/HCTZ from 30.8(20.4, 46.5) to 18.2(12.5, 26.3) mcg/min, (P=0.01) with between treatment difference in favor of Val/HCTZ of -15.3mcg/min (P<0.001). Changes in AER and Ao-PWV were not correlated. Valsartan/HCTZ improves arterial stiffness and AER to a significantly greater extent than amlodipine despite similar central and brachial BP control. These 2 effects, which appear independent of each other, may explain the specific cardio-renal protective properties of ARBs.
Hypertension 2008 Jun
PMID:Valsartan improves arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes independently of blood pressure lowering. 1842 91

Renal collecting duct (CD)-specific knockout of endothelin-1 (ET-1) causes hypertension and impaired Na excretion. A previous study noted failure to suppress the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis in these knockout (KO) mice, hence the current investigation was undertaken to examine the role of this system in CD ET-1 KO. Renal renin content was similar in kidneys from CD ET-1 KO and control mice during normal Na intake; high-Na intake suppressed renal renin content to a similar degree in KO and control. Plasma renin concentrations paralleled changes in renal renin content. Valsartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), abolished the hypertension in CD ET-1 KO mice during normal Na intake. High-Na intake + ARB treatment increased blood pressure in CD ET-1 KO, but not in controls. High-Na intake was associated with reduced Na excretion in CD ET-1 KO animals, but no changes in water excretion or creatinine clearance were noted. Spironolactone, an aldosterone antagonist, also normalized blood pressure in CD ET-1 KO mice during normal Na intake, whereas high-Na intake + spironolactone raised blood pressure only in CD ET-1 KO animals. In summary, hypertension in CD ET-1 KO is partly due to angiotensin II and aldosterone. We speculate that CD-derived ET-1 may regulate, via a novel pathway, renal renin production.
 ...
PMID:Role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in collecting duct-derived endothelin-1 regulation of blood pressure. 1851 95

The efficacy and safety of valsartan were studied in 90 children (mean age: 3.2 years; 60% male; 30% black) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) > or =95th percentile. Nineteen percent received valsartan in addition to previous antihypertensive therapy. Subjects were randomly assigned to low-, medium-, or high-dose valsartan for 2 weeks (phase 1) and then reassigned randomly to placebo or to remain on the same valsartan dose for 2 additional weeks (phase 2). After this, subjects were enrolled into a 52-week, open-label phase during which valsartan was dosed to achieve SBP <95th percentile. Statistically significant reductions in SBP and diastolic blood pressure of approximately 8.5 mm Hg and 5.7 mm Hg, respectively, were observed at the end of phase 1 in all of the valsartan dose groups. SBP and diastolic blood pressure were also significantly lower during phase 2 in valsartan recipients compared with placebo recipients. SBP <95th percentile was achieved in 77.3% of subjects during the open-label phase. Adverse events were minor and occurred at similar frequencies in each of the 3 dose groups in phase 1 and at equal frequencies in the valsartan and placebo arms in phase 2. Serious adverse events and drug-related adverse events occurred infrequently during both the double-blind (2.2% and 5.6%, respectively) and open-label (14.8% and 6.8%, respectively) portions of the study. Valsartan treatment had no demonstrable negative effects on growth and development. In this study, the first trial of an antihypertensive agent conducted in children <6 years of age, valsartan effectively lowered SBP and diastolic blood pressure compared with placebo.
Hypertension 2008 Aug
PMID:Efficacy and safety of the Angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan in children with hypertension aged 1 to 5 years. 1859 56

This study was conducted to assess the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in European paediatric patients experiencing essential hypertension. This was a retrospective analysis of the IMS MIDAS Prescribing Insight Medical Database. Five major important European markets, including France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK were studied for the usage of ARBs as either a monotherapy or fixed-dose combination (FDC) therapy . Paediatric patients with essential hypertension were identified using ICD-10 codes, and anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification was used to identify major classes of antihypertensives. Projected prescription data for paediatric patients (<18 years) in the time period of October 2005 to September 2006 were analysed. Special emphasis was placed on the category of 6-17 years of age, as many ARBs were recommended in children above 6 years of age. Out of 242,405 estimated paediatric patients with hypertension, 222,033 (91.6%) were diagnosed with essential hypertension. Out of 230,220 projected prescriptions dispensed in these essential hypertensives, approximately 76.2% were for patients in the category of 6-17 years of. In the age group of 6-17 years, ARBs constituted 25.5% of the projected prescriptions, with 10.6% in the form of FDC of ARBs with hydrochlorothiazides (HCTz). Projected ARB prescription usage, either as a monotherapy or as an FDC with HCTz, was higher in Italy (35.7%), France (30.9%) and Spain (28.1%), but was lower in Germany (5.3%), and non-existent in the United Kingdom. Valsartan-based and losartan-based FDCs were commonly used in the age range of 6-17 years, and accounted for 39. and 13.9% of the projected prescription volume in the ARB-FDC category, respectively. In a majority of the important European markets, paediatric hypertensive patients in the age range of 6-17 years are often treated with ARB monotherapy or FDC therapy. Some ARBs lack necessary clinical studies to support its use in treating essential hypertension in paediatric patients.
 ...
PMID:Assessment of the use of angiotensin receptor blockers in major European markets among paediatric population for treating essential hypertension. 1905 66

An open-label, single-dose study is conducted in 26 children with hypertension to characterize the pharmacokinetics of valsartan. Valsartan is administered as an oral suspension (dose of 2 mg/kg), with the maximum single dose being 80 mg. Subjects are stratified into 4 age categories: group 1, 1 to less than 4 years; group 2, 4 to less than 6 years; group 3, 6 to less than 12 years; group 4, 12 to 16 years. Blood samples are collected before and for 24 hours after dosing to quantitate valsartan. Because the body weight of most children in groups 3 and 4 exceeds 40 kg and they received a dose of less than 2 mg/kg, major pharmacokinetic parameters are dose normalized for comparison across the age groups. Dose-normalized maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma-concentration curve and body weight-normalized apparent oral clearance are comparable for the 4 groups (P > or = .1011). Body weight-normalized apparent oral clearance ranges from 0.061 to 0.089 L/h/kg.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics of valsartan in pediatric and adolescent subjects with hypertension. 1917 99

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension is effective in preventing cardiovascular and renal complications. Calcium antagonists and blockers of the renin-angiotensin system are widely used today to initiate antihypertensive therapy but, when given as monotherapy, do not suffice in most patients to normalize blood pressure. Combining the two types of agents considerably increases the antihypertensive efficacy, but not at the expense of a deterioration of tolerability. This is exemplified by the experience accumulated with the recently developed fixed dose combination containing the AT(1)-receptor blocker valsartan (160 mg) and the dihydropyridine amlodipine (5 or 10 mg). In a randomized trial, an 8-week treatment normalized blood pressure (<140/90 mmHg) within 8 weeks in a large fraction of hypertensive patients (78.4% and 85.2% using the 5/160 [n = 371] and 10/160 mg [n = 377] dosage, respectively). Like all AT(1)-receptor blockers valsartan has a placebo-like tolerability. Valsartan prevents to a large extent the occurrence amlodipine-induced peripheral edema. Both amlodipine and valsartan have beneficial effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as well as protective effects on renal function. The co-administration of these two agents is therefore very attractive, as it enables a rapid and sustained blood pressure control in hypertensive patients. The availability of a fixed-dose combination based on amlodipine and valsartan is expected therefore to facilitate the management of hypertension, to improve long-term adherence with antihypertensive therapy and, ultimately, to have a positive impact on cardiovascular and renal outcomes.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine and valsartan as components of a rational and effective fixed-dose combination. 1943 61

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. One of the effects of the activated RAS is target-organ damage, in part due to their effects on causing hypertension. Blocking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) with inhibitors has been shown to attenuate the pathological effects of the RAS. Clinical trials have shown that ACE inhibition improves outcomes in the prevention of acute myocardial infarction, lowering the morbidity and mortality in congestive heart failure, and attenuates renal dysfunction. There is recent evidence to show that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have similar efficacy to ACE inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular outcomes. The wealth of information obtained regarding the beneficial effects of RAS inhibition on clinical outcome has been focused on monotherapy with either ARB or ACE inhibition. Evidence from some trials suggests that better overall inhibition of RAS by dual therapy may improve clinical outcomes. Combination therapy has been shown to be beneficial in patients with congestive heart failure or renal disease. The Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (VALIANT) trial showed equal benefit of either ARB or ACE inhibition with reduction in primary end points in postmyocardial infarction patients, but there was no further benefit from dual therapy in reducing outcomes. In the recent ONTARGET study, there was further evidence that ARBs are equal to ACE inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular events. In Ongoing Telmisartan, Ramipril, or Both in Patients at High Risk for Vascular Events (ONTARGET), combined RAS blockade did not have any added benefit but resulted in increased risk of adverse outcomes. In the Candesartan in Heart Failure (CHARM) and the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) trials of patients with severe heart failure, the addition of an ARB to an ACE inhibitor reduced cardiac mortality and lowered hospital admissions. Whether or not dual therapy is beneficial in patients with diabetic renal failure should be clarified by future studies. Overall, patients receiving dual therapy, if clinically justified, should be monitored closely for potential adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:Blocking the renin-angiotensin system: dual- versus mono-therapy. 1950 82


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>